UK asylum seekers expected to be flown to Rwanda

[lucky5trike]

Well, at least the Refugees Minister has (had?) his finger on the pulse;

https://twitter.com/LBC/status/1511418078181171205

Refugees Minister Lord Harrington declares there is 'no possibility' refugees will be sent to Rwanda, despite reports.

[SmoothCriminal]

Good, I wonder if the bleeding hearts on here have actually experienced the "diversity" these boat arrivals bring to the area they're settled in, these are not women and children from a war torn area but male migrants looking for an easy ride.

What's so dangerous in France that they can't stay there? Oh yes I imagine the French don't put them up in hotels and pay for domino's pizza.

[Randy Winkman]

Electro1980 said:

TCX said:

Tonberry said:

Nice little vote winner for this cesspit of hatred.

Luckily, they'll never legally be able to do it.

Interesting point of view, someone walks into your house uninvited ,what would you think/ do?
Someone 'walks' into the country uninvited,you consider this ok?

You know that is a ridiculous comparison. If you genuinely believe they are the same thing then you lack the knowledge and intellect to even be worth discussing this with.

I agree with you - they are nowhere near the same.

[GranpaB]

SmoothCriminal said:

Good, I wonder if the bleeding hearts on here have actually experienced the "diversity" these boat arrivals bring to the area they're settled in, these are not women and children from a war torn area but male migrants looking for an easy ride.

What's so dangerous in France that they can't stay there? Oh yes I imagine the French don't put them up in hotels and pay for domino's pizza.

It is very sad that the UK is seen as an easy target.

[Vanden Saab]

I like it, especially if it has the added advantage of the human rights lawyers who live off our taxes representing them having to live there too. Mind you as they would be paid the Rwanda local rate for the job I doubt there would be many takers...

[Ivan stewart]

Vanden Saab said:

I like it, especially if it has the added advantage of the human rights lawyers who live off our taxes representing them having to live there too. Mind you as they would be paid the Rwanda local rate for the job I doubt there would be many takers...

And don’t forget the people traffickers who give the economic migrants a loan , they won’t be getting that back if their customers are straight on a plane to Rwanda !!

[Electro1980]

GranpaB said:

It is very sad that the UK is seen as an easy target.

It’s not.

[Byker28i]

frisbee said:

Pit Pony said:

I don't know what to say.

Why are we treating people so badly ?

It’s a vote winner!

It’ll be a colossal waste of money.

It's a distraction from partygate...

[Mrr T]

Vanden Saab said:

I like it, especially if it has the added advantage of the human rights lawyers who live off our taxes representing them having to live there too. Mind you as they would be paid the Rwanda local rate for the job I doubt there would be many takers...

It seems quite important to you that asylum seeks should not have access to legal advice why? You also seem to have something against human rights lawyers why?

[poo at Paul's]

I think gas is cheap in Rwanda and you can get diesel no problem too

[biggbn]

What's Rwandan for squirrel?

[JagLover]

Byker28i said:

frisbee said:

Pit Pony said:

I don't know what to say.

Why are we treating people so badly ?

It’s a vote winner!

It’ll be a colossal waste of money.

It's a distraction from partygate...

It is both a distraction and a vote winner (if they ever actually do it rather than talk about it).

Immigration has soared up the list of concerns of Conservative voters since the boat migrations started to get significant and over half had it as their number one issue. Patel is regularly among the least popular ministers amongst polls of members mainly as she is seen as someone who talks a good game but is doing nothing about it.

Edited by JagLover on Thursday 14th April 08:50

[PRTVR]

Electro1980 said:

TCX said:

Tonberry said:

Nice little vote winner for this cesspit of hatred.

Luckily, they'll never legally be able to do it.

Interesting point of view, someone walks into your house uninvited ,what would you think/ do?
Someone 'walks' into the country uninvited,you consider this ok?

You know that is a ridiculous comparison. If you genuinely believe they are the same thing then you lack the knowledge and intellect to even be worth discussing this with.

No it's not, the difference is one you would have to deal with personally, the other something you can ignore, so you can have a view disconnect from the consequences.
You are aware these people have passed through many safe countries prior to crossing the Channel. ?

[GranpaB]

Electro1980 said:

GranpaB said:

It is very sad that the UK is seen as an easy target.

It’s not.

No?

Nice that you support immigrants putting their lives at risk trying to cross the water from France, and the lining of the pockets of people smugglers.

Edited by GranpaB on Thursday 14th April 08:55

[biggbn]

In other news, the government have promised to send illegal immigrants to Mars on one way ships so they can prepare the planet for mass immigration due to the cost of living squeeze and various wars. Boris Johnson will announce this far sighted triumph when parliament reconvenes. Nobody will believe him, instead assuming this wild and highly improbable claim is as improbable as everything else he says.

Back to the studio...

[Electro1980]

GranpaB said:

Electro1980 said:

GranpaB said:

It is very sad that the UK is seen as an easy target.

It’s not.

No?

Nice that you support immigrants putting their lives at risk trying to cross the water from France, and the lining of the pockets of people smugglers.

Edited by GranpaB on Thursday 14th April 08:55

Is that all you can do? Absolutely no room for the possibility that you might be wrong? Do one.

[grumbledoak]

What a ridiculous idea. Creating new not-concentration-camps-really in the third world.

If we are to intercept boat traffic across the Channel, we should put them on the Isle of Wight. I bet that doesn't happen either.

[lucky5trike]

biggbn said:

In other news, the government have promised to send illegal immigrants to Mars on one way ships so they can prepare the planet for mass immigration due to the cost of living squeeze and various wars. Boris Johnson will announce this far sighted triumph when parliament reconvenes. Nobody will believe him, instead assuming this wild and highly improbable claim is as improbable as everything else he says.

Back to the studio...

I'm reading that in the voice of Youtube's Jonathan Pie (Tom Walker) for some reason!

[JagLover]

grumbledoak said:

What a ridiculous idea. Creating new not-concentration-camps-really in the third world.

If we are to intercept boat traffic across the Channel, we should put them on the Isle of Wight. I bet that doesn't happen either.

Not that ridiculous as third country processing is the Australian solution that many have called for the last three years or so, while the government was busy with empty gestures, such as blustering they will send in the navy or the like.

They have at last realised that this is the only solution consistent with remaining within the UNHCR. Interestingly enough if you believe Cummings it was also the solution being discussed at the highest levels nearly two years ago but Bojo was putting a stop to it then.

It has been very successful for Australia in deterring migration by boat.

[Squadrone Rosso]

I checked the date for this one. 14 days too late.

A wave machine midway between Dover & Calais or robot sharks seem more likely!