Discussion
b
hstewie said:
hstewie said: I'm taking the piss out of some of the attitudes on this thread.
We've literally had people saying we need to understand what motivated the rioters and we've had people saying all those people did was set fire to a building and we've had people saying all those people on Twitter did was post hurty words and we can't prove any of it influenced the people with the matches.
Didn't notice you picking them up.
Let's not mention your contribution to that big long love-in thread about poor hard done by Lucy Connolly inciting a bit of racial hatred eh.
Its always interesting when people use the word 'literally' before going on to present a twisted, exageratedly paraphrased and broadly misleading version of events.We've literally had people saying we need to understand what motivated the rioters and we've had people saying all those people did was set fire to a building and we've had people saying all those people on Twitter did was post hurty words and we can't prove any of it influenced the people with the matches.
Didn't notice you picking them up.
Let's not mention your contribution to that big long love-in thread about poor hard done by Lucy Connolly inciting a bit of racial hatred eh.
We have not 'literally' had people saying those things at all.
bhstewie said:
hstewie said: Six years after pleading guilty to violent disorder and arson being reckless as to whether life was endangered.
'Racist' hotel rioter jailed for six years
My longest sentence in 30 years in the job was for arson with intent to endanger life. 35 years. Six seems mild to me.'Racist' hotel rioter jailed for six years
Derek Smith said:
bhstewie said:
hstewie said: Six years after pleading guilty to violent disorder and arson being reckless as to whether life was endangered.
'Racist' hotel rioter jailed for six years
My longest sentence in 30 years in the job was for arson with intent to endanger life. 35 years. Six seems mild to me.'Racist' hotel rioter jailed for six years
...and Thomas Burley's was 2 years for arson with intent which sounds worse and IIRC despite a massive list of previous offences. It's a bloody disgrace.
Edited by BikeBikeBIke on Saturday 30th November 11:23
Derek Smith said:
bhstewie said:
hstewie said: Six years after pleading guilty to violent disorder and arson being reckless as to whether life was endangered.
'Racist' hotel rioter jailed for six years
My longest sentence in 30 years in the job was for arson with intent to endanger life. 35 years. Six seems mild to me.'Racist' hotel rioter jailed for six years
Did they fire you in the end?
Rufus Stone said:
BikeBikeBIke said:
Being outraged at arson with intent is not unreasonable or oversensitive.
It's notKAgantua said:
Derek Smith said:
bhstewie said:
hstewie said: Six years after pleading guilty to violent disorder and arson being reckless as to whether life was endangered.
'Racist' hotel rioter jailed for six years
My longest sentence in 30 years in the job was for arson with intent to endanger life. 35 years. Six seems mild to me.'Racist' hotel rioter jailed for six years
Did they fire you in the end?
Rufus Stone said:
BikeBikeBIke said:
Good. It shouldn't be up for debate. Any sane person should agree arson is a despicable crime and with intent to endanger life during a riot woth a long list of previous should attract a sentence near the top end, not the bottom.
Nobody has suggested otherwise.And you were talking about enjoying the outrage at arson and again you changed what you meant by outrage after you were picked up on it, not before.
BikeBikeBIke said:
Rufus Stone said:
BikeBikeBIke said:
Good. It shouldn't be up for debate. Any sane person should agree arson is a despicable crime and with intent to endanger life during a riot woth a long list of previous should attract a sentence near the top end, not the bottom.
Nobody has suggested otherwise.And you were talking about enjoying the outrage at arson and again you changed what you meant by outrage after you were picked up on it, not before.
valiant said:
Think you’re hanging onto the wrong end of the stick there matey as far as BS is concerned.
He loves the underdog. So when scrotes do something wrong he instinctively regards them as the underdog. If an accountant had done it he'd be baying for their blood, when an unemployed knuckle dragger does it he's all for a light sentence and playing it down. That my take on it anyway. It can't be a coincidence that the only two riot related offences he's trivialised were people with a criminal background.BikeBikeBIke said:
Stevie and his mates are applauding light sentences for these vile offences and Stewie has just justified it. He's claiming (after the event) that it was parody by he can't produce a single pro arson post that he's parodying.
And you were talking about enjoying the outrage at arson and again you changed what you meant by outrage after you were picked up on it, not before.
And you were talking about enjoying the outrage at arson and again you changed what you meant by outrage after you were picked up on it, not before.
BikeBikeBIke said:
valiant said:
Think you’re hanging onto the wrong end of the stick there matey as far as BS is concerned.
He loves the underdog. So when scrotes do something wrong he instinctively regards them as the underdog. If an accountant had done it he'd be baying for their blood, when an unemployed knuckle dragger does it he's all for a light sentence and playing it down. That my take on it anyway. It can't be a coincidence that the only two riot related offences he's trivialised were people with a criminal background.Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff