Climate Cat out of the Bag? Potentially dynamite revelations

Climate Cat out of the Bag? Potentially dynamite revelations

Author
Discussion

TankRizzo

7,269 posts

193 months

Thursday 26th November 2009
quotequote all
Oh God, now Sturgeon is talking about people "denying" the problem and again linking Cumbrian flooding to climate change.

Do these people have half a brain?

srebbe64

13,021 posts

237 months

Thursday 26th November 2009
quotequote all
The questioner has got his head screwed on!

JohnnyPanic

1,282 posts

209 months

Thursday 26th November 2009
quotequote all
Well said man in the stripey shirt!

TankRizzo

7,269 posts

193 months

Thursday 26th November 2009
quotequote all
And he got zero response. Such is the level of brainwashing nowadays.

turbobloke

Original Poster:

103,950 posts

260 months

Thursday 26th November 2009
quotequote all
It's the BBC, outcome inevitable.

anonymous-user

54 months

Thursday 26th November 2009
quotequote all
TankRizzo said:
YOU IDIOT WOMAN, THE FLOODING IS NOTHING TO DO WITH GLOBAL WARMING

JESUS
No not Jesus you mean Noah laugh


JohnnyPanic

1,282 posts

209 months

Thursday 26th November 2009
quotequote all
*sigh* I'm off for a whisky

VxDuncan

2,850 posts

234 months

Thursday 26th November 2009
quotequote all
JohnnyPanic said:
Well said man in the stripey shirt!
TB cleans up well doesn't he!*

  • any evidence to link TB to that bloke is statistically insignificant
Quite scary the shock to the audience of the suggestion that AGW was unproven. That whole room appears to have swallowed the story hook,line and sinker.

sstw

1,046 posts

187 months

Thursday 26th November 2009
quotequote all
Arrrgh no I've missed it! Can anyone give a summary?

Guy Torf Myland

853 posts

190 months

Thursday 26th November 2009
quotequote all
Dimbleby made a real effort to keep that one on topic. None of them bar the Mail bag (hmm) mentioned the CRU, as per the question.

Wonder how Marcus Brigstocke got halfway across the world to empathise with the Innuit. Fly, did you Marcus, you fat-arsed bellend?

Westy Pre-Lit

5,087 posts

203 months

Thursday 26th November 2009
quotequote all
The amount of time spent on that issue and washed over as if they meant nothing, they weren't even explained FFS. This just shows the utter contempt they have for the general public.

That was outrageous.

Muncher

12,219 posts

249 months

Thursday 26th November 2009
quotequote all
Does anyone else think that the brainwashing has gone too far and that regardless of the science disproving it for our generation at least war is "lost" as the bandwagon has gained too much momentum?

Plotloss

67,280 posts

270 months

Thursday 26th November 2009
quotequote all
Muncher said:
Does anyone else think that the brainwashing has gone too far and that regardless of the science disproving it for our generation at least war is "lost" as the bandwagon has gained too much momentum?
At least one person per page for the last 135 pages or so hehe

jgmadkit

548 posts

249 months

Thursday 26th November 2009
quotequote all
She patronised the audience, from that point on it was game over.

dangerousB

1,697 posts

190 months

Thursday 26th November 2009
quotequote all
I'll try.
I had no idea who Marcus Brigstock was before the programme started and I no longer care.
Nicola Sturgeon was as nauseating as she always is, David Davis was insipid and hinted, but didn't speak what he felt he should enunciate.
Charlie Faulkner . . . well, words could only just touch on the vitriol I feel for that . . .
The bird from The Daily Mail was spot on, but unfortunately the hand picked audience (as it would appear from the derision that ensued) didn't agree.
What did you expect from the BBC?

JohnnyPanic

1,282 posts

209 months

Thursday 26th November 2009
quotequote all
I'm guessing the audience is made up of BBC loving Grauniad readers anyhow, so would have thus far had no exposure to the CRU hack, let only any freedom of thought.

dangerousB

1,697 posts

190 months

Thursday 26th November 2009
quotequote all
JohnnyPanic said:
I'm guessing the audience is made up of BBC loving Grauniad readers anyhow, so would have thus far had no exposure to the CRU hack, let only any freedom of thought.
fking spot on biglaugh

whoami

13,151 posts

240 months

Thursday 26th November 2009
quotequote all
dangerousB said:
I'll try.
I had no idea who Marcus Brigstock was before the programme started and I no longer care.
Nicola Sturgeon was as nauseating as she always is, David Davis was insipid and hinted, but didn't speak what he felt he should enunciate.
Charlie Faulkner . . . well, words could only just touch on the vitriol I feel for that . . .
The bird from The Daily Mail was spot on, but unfortunately the hand picked audience (as it would appear from the derision that ensued) didn't agree.
What did you expect from the BBC?
How do you know?

JohnnyPanic

1,282 posts

209 months

Thursday 26th November 2009
quotequote all
whoami said:
dangerousB said:
I'll try.
I had no idea who Marcus Brigstock was before the programme started and I no longer care.
Nicola Sturgeon was as nauseating as she always is, David Davis was insipid and hinted, but didn't speak what he felt he should enunciate.
Charlie Faulkner . . . well, words could only just touch on the vitriol I feel for that . . .
The bird from The Daily Mail was spot on, but unfortunately the hand picked audience (as it would appear from the derision that ensued) didn't agree.
What did you expect from the BBC?
How do you know?
He looked very much like he was holding back

TankRizzo

7,269 posts

193 months

Thursday 26th November 2009
quotequote all
I got the feeling when Melanie Phillips was talking about the CRU leaks, that the audience did not have a scooby-doo what she was talking about.