OFFICIAL YOUTUBE Thread MUST HAVE DESCRIPTIVE TITLES-Vol 5

[tjl]

Love it. I think number 5's bike must be possessed.

[Laurel Green]

ChocolateFrog said:

Laurel Green said:

From one of the sailing vlogs I subscribe to (starts about the three minute mark):

Sailing in the Northern Sea of Cortez, we stumble across an incredible sight… A sardine bait ball that had attracted hundreds of feeding sharks, tuna, dorado, and even a sea lion and lots birds! We douse the sails and drift into the center of the feeding frenzy, watching the food chain in actionction.

Good footage but I couldn't listen to her voice any longer.

This one's for you, ChocolateFrog.

[Halb]

Just saw this on the news

Car crashes into building in California

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/av/world-us-canada-42693...

[boobles]

Boomerang presenter cant stop laughing during interview because of the way the guy is talking after an operation.
This is old but really funny.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hSFWgKl-O-A

[JustinF]

boobles said:

Boomerang presenter cant stop laughing during interview because of the way the guy is talking after an operation.
This is old but really funny.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hSFWgKl-O-A

Spoof show but still v. funny

[LaurasOtherHalf]

boobles said:

Boomerang presenter cant stop laughing during interview because of the way the guy is talking after an operation.
This is old but really funny.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hSFWgKl-O-A

It's as old as YouTube itself Isn't it from a dutch TV comedy sketch show?

[Funk]

Jordan Peterson debate on the gender pay gap, campus protests and postmodernism:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aMcjxSThD54

It's a pleasure to watch this guy - he refuses to allow the interviewer to put words in his mouth or de-rail the point he's trying to make by taking bits of what he's saying and trying to twist it to her own viewpoint. I'm actually going to get his book off the back of this I think.

[RDMcG]

Funk said:

Jordan Peterson debate on the gender pay gap, campus protests and postmodernism:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aMcjxSThD54

It's a pleasure to watch this guy - he refuses to allow the interviewer to put words in his mouth or de-rail the point he's trying to make by taking bits of what he's saying and trying to twist it to her own viewpoint. I'm actually going to get his book off the back of this I think.

Very prominent here in Canada..driving academia nuts!

[ThunderSpook]

Funk said:

Jordan Peterson debate on the gender pay gap, campus protests and postmodernism:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aMcjxSThD54

It's a pleasure to watch this guy - he refuses to allow the interviewer to put words in his mouth or de-rail the point he's trying to make by taking bits of what he's saying and trying to twist it to her own viewpoint. I'm actually going to get his book off the back of this I think.

I can’t believe I just watched a half hour interview with some random psychologist I’ve never heard of and yet couldn’t stop watching for a second! He sounds like a brilliantly clever man.

[Funk]

ThunderSpook said:

Funk said:

Jordan Peterson debate on the gender pay gap, campus protests and postmodernism:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aMcjxSThD54

It's a pleasure to watch this guy - he refuses to allow the interviewer to put words in his mouth or de-rail the point he's trying to make by taking bits of what he's saying and trying to twist it to her own viewpoint. I'm actually going to get his book off the back of this I think.

I can’t believe I just watched a half hour interview with some random psychologist I’ve never heard of and yet couldn’t stop watching for a second! He sounds like a brilliantly clever man.

He appears to have a valid set of observations based on facts and decades of working in psychology. He also seems to want to make people better (regardless of gender) and all she could do was try to paint him into a corner or mark him as some anti-feminist/misogynist when he appears to be nothing of the sort. What's frustrating is that the interviewer couldn't get the simple observations.

Edited by Funk on Thursday 18th January 23:56

[SystemParanoia]

the above led me to re-discover this gem

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jjC3ycS_2js

Richard Ayoade interview

[percymk4]

Best Car Sounds of 2017 - Classic Car Edition
30 minutes of goodness.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jH06h-F8ft8&li...

SPRINT ABM - Zero to Mach 10 in 5 Seconds.
Designed to intercept incoming reentry vehicles.

"One second after first stage ignition, the missile's nose was red hot from aerodynamic friction. The first stage disintegrated from aerodynamic forces as soon as it was explosively separated from the second stage. The second stage was entirely covered by an ablative heat shield that due to aerodynamic friction became hotter than the interior of its rocket motor and glowed incandescently in daylight."

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=msXtgTVMcuA&in...

HUD view of shuttle landing from 80,000ft.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WA_N-K21xmw&in...

What's the Most Difficult Place to Get to In the World?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ap4eVlcYLww&in...

Compilation of Kilroys introductions to his chat show.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yF6cBf133rA&in...

[GrumpyTwig]

Funk said:

ThunderSpook said:

Funk said:

Jordan Peterson debate on the gender pay gap, campus protests and postmodernism:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aMcjxSThD54

It's a pleasure to watch this guy - he refuses to allow the interviewer to put words in his mouth or de-rail the point he's trying to make by taking bits of what he's saying and trying to twist it to her own viewpoint. I'm actually going to get his book off the back of this I think.

I can’t believe I just watched a half hour interview with some random psychologist I’ve never heard of and yet couldn’t stop watching for a second! He sounds like a brilliantly clever man.

He appears to have a valid set of observations based on facts and decades of working in psychology. He also seems to want to make people better (regardless of gender) and all she could do was try to paint him into a corner or mark him as some anti-feminist/misogynist when he appears to be nothing of the sort. What's frustrating is that the interviewer couldn't get the simple observations.

Edited by Funk on Thursday 18th January 23:56

Annoyingly she could have lead a very interesting interview with someone who clearly has a lot professional and academic experience on a subject and has a refreshingly pragmatic viewpoint but instead she pushes for a controversial slant.

Very interesting guy to listen to despite her trying to run him in circles.

[RumbleOfThunder]

Yep Peterson is huge at the moment. He's a fantastic speaker and there's a wealth of content out there on Youtube, including his own channel. He's good with anecdotes as well.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2KfVXV2IjYQ&t=...

[Funk]

GrumpyTwig said:

Annoyingly she could have lead a very interesting interview with someone who clearly has a lot professional and academic experience on a subject and has a refreshingly pragmatic viewpoint but instead she pushes for a controversial slant.

Very interesting guy to listen to despite her trying to run him in circles.

Agreed. He would make an observation and she would immediately try and twist that into something and he kept correcting her by saying, "I don't agree or disagree with it, it's just an observation of how things are." We can't discuss things if we haven't taken stock of the current situation. I particularly loved his position on 'equality' for men and women (we're different, we'll never be the same but we should have the same opportunities) and that what happens when men and women are left to their own devices, they tend to sort themselves into different job roles which results in very different remuneration - the only way to 'fix' that would be by effectively forcing people into fields they don't want to work in. He's also right to point out that just as there are fields dominated by men, there are fields dominated by (highly skilled, well-paid and capable) women such as medicine.

I love the moments where the interviewer asks something she thinks will tie him up and he almost welcomes it as it plays straight into a point he wants to make. A great interview in spite of a poor interviewer.

[Halb]

Here's another great lil chat on stems

Joe Rogan & Mel Gibson on Stem Cell Therapy

https://youtu.be/dmd7-KjE62o

[Janluke]

Funk said:

Agreed. He would make an observation and she would immediately try and twist that into something and he kept correcting her by saying, "I don't agree or disagree with it, it's just an observation of how things are." We can't discuss things if we haven't taken stock of the current situation. I particularly loved his position on 'equality' for men and women (we're different, we'll never be the same but we should have the same opportunities) and that what happens when men and women are left to their own devices, they tend to sort themselves into different job roles which results in very different remuneration - the only way to 'fix' that would be by effectively forcing people into fields they don't want to work in. He's also right to point out that just as there are fields dominated by men, there are fields dominated by (highly skilled, well-paid and capable) women such as medicine.

I love the moments where the interviewer asks something she thinks will tie him up and he almost welcomes it as it plays straight into a point he wants to make. A great interview in spite of a poor interviewer.

It was great I enjoyed both his manner and the content, I'm away to buy his book

[Eddie Strohacker]

This is great. Determined and/or starving Arctic fox.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ufbsz9Zt_-I

[SystemParanoia]

Janluke said:

Funk said:

Agreed. He would make an observation and she would immediately try and twist that into something and he kept correcting her by saying, "I don't agree or disagree with it, it's just an observation of how things are." We can't discuss things if we haven't taken stock of the current situation. I particularly loved his position on 'equality' for men and women (we're different, we'll never be the same but we should have the same opportunities) and that what happens when men and women are left to their own devices, they tend to sort themselves into different job roles which results in very different remuneration - the only way to 'fix' that would be by effectively forcing people into fields they don't want to work in. He's also right to point out that just as there are fields dominated by men, there are fields dominated by (highly skilled, well-paid and capable) women such as medicine.

I love the moments where the interviewer asks something she thinks will tie him up and he almost welcomes it as it plays straight into a point he wants to make. A great interview in spite of a poor interviewer.

It was great I enjoyed both his manner and the content, I'm away to buy his book

Same.. he is awesome!!

I want to keep him in my backpack for next time im forced to confront a foaming at the mouth feminist!

[funkyrobot]

GrumpyTwig said:

Funk said:

ThunderSpook said:

Funk said:

Jordan Peterson debate on the gender pay gap, campus protests and postmodernism:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aMcjxSThD54

It's a pleasure to watch this guy - he refuses to allow the interviewer to put words in his mouth or de-rail the point he's trying to make by taking bits of what he's saying and trying to twist it to her own viewpoint. I'm actually going to get his book off the back of this I think.

I can’t believe I just watched a half hour interview with some random psychologist I’ve never heard of and yet couldn’t stop watching for a second! He sounds like a brilliantly clever man.

He appears to have a valid set of observations based on facts and decades of working in psychology. He also seems to want to make people better (regardless of gender) and all she could do was try to paint him into a corner or mark him as some anti-feminist/misogynist when he appears to be nothing of the sort. What's frustrating is that the interviewer couldn't get the simple observations.

Edited by Funk on Thursday 18th January 23:56

Annoyingly she could have lead a very interesting interview with someone who clearly has a lot professional and academic experience on a subject and has a refreshingly pragmatic viewpoint but instead she pushes for a controversial slant.

Very interesting guy to listen to despite her trying to run him in circles.

I enjoyed that. Very interesting chap.