What are your unpopular opinions?

What are your unpopular opinions?

TOPIC CLOSED
TOPIC CLOSED
Author
Discussion

TwigtheWonderkid

43,246 posts

149 months

Saturday 24th February 2018
quotequote all
E34-3.2 said:
Front bottom said:
I believe in things beyond known science.
Well, science (evolution) has been proved wrong for a while so good on you.
rofl

TwigtheWonderkid

43,246 posts

149 months

Saturday 24th February 2018
quotequote all
Front bottom said:
I believe in things beyond known science.
Does this mean you believe that there are questions science can't answer? Which is quite right.

Or does it mean that you believe in a whole load of utter fking made up bks that flies in the face of what science does know, using the pathetic mantra of "Well science doesn't know everything" which is fking obvious otherwise we wouldn't still be doing it.

E34-3.2

1,003 posts

78 months

Sunday 25th February 2018
quotequote all
TwigtheWonderkid said:
rofl
You might want to do a bit of research on the subject.

Darwin's theory is not applicable at all according to modern atheist scientists. science is a wonderful thing as it can prove that something written in mid 1800 is actually not working when simulated.

SystemParanoia

14,343 posts

197 months

Sunday 25th February 2018
quotequote all
E34-3.2 said:
TwigtheWonderkid said:
rofl
You might want to do a bit of research on the subject.

Darwin's theory is not applicable at all according to modern atheist scientists. science is a wonderful thing as it can prove that something written in mid 1800 is actually not working when simulated.
So whats the name of the replacement peer reviewed theory ?

And which respected journal / university published it ?

E34-3.2

1,003 posts

78 months

Sunday 25th February 2018
quotequote all
SystemParanoia said:
So whats the name of the replacement peer reviewed theory ?

And which respected journal / university published it ?
I am sure that you know how to do some research on Google, no?

If not, read articles from Berlinsky and many others.

On top of that they discovered soft tissues on the bones of a T-rex, which completely throw away the theory of the age of the dinosaurs. soft tissues could not exist on bones as old as what they thought they dated them originaly. i find it interesting as all that lot are a total bunch of atheist, so it's not about christians v atheist but about old unproven science v modern science with proven research. enjoy.


Edited by E34-3.2 on Sunday 25th February 00:36

gothatway

5,783 posts

169 months

Sunday 25th February 2018
quotequote all
E34-3.2 said:
If not, read articles from Berlinsky and many others.
You do your credibility no good whatsoever when you cannot even spell your hero's name correctly.
So Berlinski doesn't like Evolution, but doesn't subscribe to Intelligent Design either. Does he have any other explanation for life as we know it?
(Edit : sorry, am I feeding a troll?)

E34-3.2

1,003 posts

78 months

Sunday 25th February 2018
quotequote all
gothatway said:
You do your credibility no good whatsoever when you cannot even spell your hero's name correctly.
So Berlinski doesn't like Evolution, but doesn't subscribe to Intelligent Design either. Does he have any other explanation for life as we know it?
(Edit : sorry, am I feeding a troll?)
Hero? I don't have a hero.
It's not like he doesn't like it but he has proven with many other scientists that Darwin's theory is completely wrong.
Troll?

paulguitar

23,104 posts

112 months

Sunday 25th February 2018
quotequote all
E34-3.2 said:
Well, science (evolution) has been proved wrong for a while so good on you.
I am really looking forward to your explanation of how 'evolution has been proved wrong'.


Waiting with genuine interest, checking in tomorrow.





E34-3.2

1,003 posts

78 months

Sunday 25th February 2018
quotequote all
paulguitar said:
I am really looking forward to your explanation of how 'evolution has been proved wrong'.


Waiting with genuine interest, checking in tomorrow.
Check the conversation above. Read or listen scientific explanations from some specialists and make your own mind. smile

paulguitar

23,104 posts

112 months

Sunday 25th February 2018
quotequote all
E34-3.2 said:
paulguitar said:
I am really looking forward to your explanation of how 'evolution has been proved wrong'.


Waiting with genuine interest, checking in tomorrow.
Check the conversation above. Read or listen scientific explanations from some specialists and make your own mind. smile
Yes indeed, I actually did a bit of reading since my post.


I will be back tomorrow to read your debunking of both gravity and the Earth orbiting the sun.






Chestrockwell

2,624 posts

156 months

Sunday 25th February 2018
quotequote all
I don’t like harry Kane

E34-3.2

1,003 posts

78 months

Sunday 25th February 2018
quotequote all
paulguitar said:
Yes indeed, I actually did a bit of reading since my post.


I will be back tomorrow to read your debunking of both gravity and the Earth orbiting the sun.
So instead of starting some smart insults, what did you make of what you read? I am genuinely interested on your scientifical knowledge on the matter.

Dr Jekyll

23,820 posts

260 months

Sunday 25th February 2018
quotequote all
The 95% of drivers who reportedly think they are above average may actually be correct. It's certainly perfectly possible that 5% of drivers are total nutters and 95% are doing their best with varying degrees of competence, in which case the mean average is between the 2 and only 5% of drivers are below average.

MiniMan64

16,860 posts

189 months

Sunday 25th February 2018
quotequote all
paulguitar said:
E34-3.2 said:
Well, science (evolution) has been proved wrong for a while so good on you.
I am really looking forward to your explanation of how 'evolution has been proved wrong'.



Waiting with genuine interest, checking in tomorrow.
Me too. Your explanation, not just some vague comments about go and see for yourself.

The mechanisms of evolution are not fully understood but the fact it happens is not debated in the scientific community.

MiniMan64

16,860 posts

189 months

Sunday 25th February 2018
quotequote all
E34-3.2 said:
I am sure that you know how to do some research on Google, no?

If not, read articles from Berlinsky and many others.

On top of that they discovered soft tissues on the bones of a T-rex, which completely throw away the theory of the age of the dinosaurs. soft tissues could not exist on bones as old as what they thought they dated them originaly. i find it interesting as all that lot are a total bunch of atheist, so it's not about christians v atheist but about old unproven science v modern science with proven research. enjoy.


Edited by E34-3.2 on Sunday 25th February 00:36
The irony is strong in this post.

Have you done any googling?

Yes the soft tissue find was impressive but in no way did it fall into question the age of the dinosaur. It has raised some interesting ideas about chemical preservation but disproving evolution? rofl

travel is dangerous

1,853 posts

83 months

Sunday 25th February 2018
quotequote all
If evolution is not operating, how have bacteria been able to become resistant to synthetic antibiotics which didn't exist naturally until within the last 60-70 years or so?

oldbanger

4,316 posts

237 months

Sunday 25th February 2018
quotequote all
It don’t matter at all what flavours of adults you like knobbing and how you dress - you should be judged by your achievements and overall contribution to society.

Difference is intersting and beautiful. We are all humans, that’s more than enough common ground for me

E34-3.2

1,003 posts

78 months

Sunday 25th February 2018
quotequote all
MiniMan64 said:
Me too. Your explanation, not just some vague comments about go and see for yourself.

The mechanisms of evolution are not fully understood but the fact it happens is not debated in the scientific community.
It did not happen the way Darwin made most of the people believe. Evolution as we learned at school is completely wrong as proven by these guys. As you mentioned evolution happen but not at all the way we all believed for years.

E34-3.2

1,003 posts

78 months

Sunday 25th February 2018
quotequote all
MiniMan64 said:
The irony is strong in this post.

Have you done any googling?

Yes the soft tissue find was impressive but in no way did it fall into question the age of the dinosaur. It has raised some interesting ideas about chemical preservation but disproving evolution? rofl
Yes, impressive and yes it question the age of dinosaurs. Does it disprove evolution? No, but it disprove Darwin's theory and how long it took for us to be humans. It doesn't mean evolution did not happen, it means it happen very differently than what we were thinking.

E34-3.2

1,003 posts

78 months

Sunday 25th February 2018
quotequote all
travel is dangerous said:
If evolution is not operating, how have bacteria been able to become resistant to synthetic antibiotics which didn't exist naturally until within the last 60-70 years or so?
Evolution happened differently. That is what they proved.

TOPIC CLOSED
TOPIC CLOSED