Match.com (Vol. 7)
Discussion
Alan320i said:
Why oh why did a lot of the woman on these sites get pregnant so young. They are all so irresponsible and it’s a complete turn off for any guy on the hunt.
Because they are serial bad decision makers, they love the cock and wanted to date bad boys when they were younger. They get to their 30's 2 children from different fathers, crappy rented/council accommodation, children sharing a bedroom, low paid job etc. Essentially they are looking for a man to be baby daddy to their children and give them the lifestyle they have created in their Pinterest account.They go onto POF but they are the lowest hanging of all fruit so 100 other men will have been there before you. They will also think they are a bit of a Cougar as they will have hooked up with guys in their 20s who also realise they are much easier than girls their own age.
These women are just pump and dump to these men, they are smart enough to realise they want nothing to do with them other than easy sex. Yes it is easy sex, but personally I don't think the juice is worth the squeeze.
If you insist on seeing these women multiple times before you know it she will be making hints about you meeting her children and they will refer to you as "Mummy's boyfriend". Her (also single obviously) mother who lives in a council house around the corner will then start getting excited that her daughter is dating someone decent with a job compared to all the other losers.
Just don't go there.
hyphen said:
And are very fertile, so don't take any risks
Yes, most of these women won't actually expect you to wear a condom, first of all just think about what I said earlier and how many other men have been there. Secondly think just how much these women would love to trap a guy with a good job for 18 years of baby jail.Don't believe "I am on the pill" or "No, better than that I can't actually get pregnant"
Edited by anonymous-user on Monday 8th March 09:07
Joey Deacon said:
Yes, most of these women won't actually expect you to wear a condom, first of all just think about what I said earlier and how many other men have been there. Secondly think just how much these women would love to trap a guy with a good job for 18 years of baby jail.
Don't believe "I am on the pill" or "No, better than that I can't actually get pregnant"
Yup. The one I mentioned in the previous page that I had one date with fell into that category. The 'date' felt more like an interview for the role of her future ex-husband #2. As mentioned, I ran. I'm quite sure she'd have been up for getting knocked-up asap just for the $$$s. Don't believe "I am on the pill" or "No, better than that I can't actually get pregnant"
Edited by Joey Deacon on Monday 8th March 09:07
George Shagger Smiley said:
Dating a single mother can be fiscally astute.
If her ex is of the $$ variety then you can play the long time lover without ever moving in so she doesn't get those purse strings cut. Getting her ex to fund the family life style is the way to play these things.
If ex had a st ton of money she wouldn't have left him in the first place. If her ex is of the $$ variety then you can play the long time lover without ever moving in so she doesn't get those purse strings cut. Getting her ex to fund the family life style is the way to play these things.
In all seriousness I know that sounds terrible but statistically money makes a guy much more desirable.
Edited to add in a logical conclusion.
If he had loads of cash and they arn't together maybe she was the problem and now you are stuck with her.
If he had a load of cash and he was the problem then your theory works out. (take all that with a pinch of salt)
Edited by vulture1 on Monday 8th March 12:33
Magnum 475 said:
Joey Deacon said:
Yes, most of these women won't actually expect you to wear a condom, first of all just think about what I said earlier and how many other men have been there. Secondly think just how much these women would love to trap a guy with a good job for 18 years of baby jail.
Don't believe "I am on the pill" or "No, better than that I can't actually get pregnant"
Yup. The one I mentioned in the previous page that I had one date with fell into that category. The 'date' felt more like an interview for the role of her future ex-husband #2. As mentioned, I ran. I'm quite sure she'd have been up for getting knocked-up asap just for the $$$s. Don't believe "I am on the pill" or "No, better than that I can't actually get pregnant"
Edited by Joey Deacon on Monday 8th March 09:07
vulture1 said:
Magnum 475 said:
Joey Deacon said:
Yes, most of these women won't actually expect you to wear a condom, first of all just think about what I said earlier and how many other men have been there. Secondly think just how much these women would love to trap a guy with a good job for 18 years of baby jail.
Don't believe "I am on the pill" or "No, better than that I can't actually get pregnant"
Yup. The one I mentioned in the previous page that I had one date with fell into that category. The 'date' felt more like an interview for the role of her future ex-husband #2. As mentioned, I ran. I'm quite sure she'd have been up for getting knocked-up asap just for the $$$s. Don't believe "I am on the pill" or "No, better than that I can't actually get pregnant"
Edited by Joey Deacon on Monday 8th March 09:07
Then kids. How soon might I want to have kids with her. Remember, this was the first date(!)
A lot of her questions were 'money focused' without explicitly asking about money. As it went on it seemed she was trying to work out the size of the meal ticket.
She was also open, almost proud, of the speed with which she'd met, married, had a baby, and got divorced from husband number one. I could see very clearly what was in store for me if I was daft enough to become husband number 2.
Never knew I could run quite that fast.
vulture1 said:
George Shagger Smiley said:
Dating a single mother can be fiscally astute.
If her ex is of the $$ variety then you can play the long time lover without ever moving in so she doesn't get those purse strings cut. Getting her ex to fund the family life style is the way to play these things.
If ex had a st ton of money she wouldn't have left him in the first place. If her ex is of the $$ variety then you can play the long time lover without ever moving in so she doesn't get those purse strings cut. Getting her ex to fund the family life style is the way to play these things.
In all seriousness I know that sounds terrible but statistically money makes a guy much more desirable.
Edited to add in a logical conclusion.
If he had loads of cash and they arn't together maybe she was the problem and now you are stuck with her.
If he had a load of cash and he was the problem then your theory works out. (take all that with a pinch of salt)
Edited by vulture1 on Monday 8th March 12:33
When I was on POF, all of the women without a pot to piss in had clearly had children with men who had no money. By the time the women had reached their 30s these baby daddies were actually more of an inconvenience. They would be happier if these men had nothing to do with their children's life and they were certainly not contributing much money towards them.
I did meet a couple of women who had clearly married well and had ended up with £million+ houses out of it. These women had not instigated the divorce, in both cases the men had run off with other women.
Once a woman hits her 30's that line of exciting men is rapidly diminishing and the reality hits that their life is going to be crappy house and no money from now on. Literally the only way out of this is to date one of the betas who she would not have looked twice at in her 20s, but usually they have a house and a decent job.
This is why whenever a women moans "Where have all the decent men gone?" the answer is "In your 20s where you left them"
These men men who end up with these women do they honestly believe that she dated all those men for 15+ years to finally realise what she actually wanted was a 4/5 out of 10 man?
George Shagger Smiley said:
Dating a single mother can be fiscally astute.
If her ex is of the $$ variety then you can play the long time lover without ever moving in so she doesn't get those purse strings cut. Getting her ex to fund the family life style is the way to play these things.
Yes, sounds a good idea to date a woman like that...If her ex is of the $$ variety then you can play the long time lover without ever moving in so she doesn't get those purse strings cut. Getting her ex to fund the family life style is the way to play these things.
Joey Deacon said:
I think when a woman is under 30 money isn't so much of an issue as they think they have plenty of time. During this time they are mostly interested in the top 20% of men looks wise, the exciting bad boys. During this phase I don't think a woman is going to look twice at a beta unless he is seriously wealthy.
When I was on POF, all of the women without a pot to piss in had clearly had children with men who had no money. By the time the women had reached their 30s these baby daddies were actually more of an inconvenience. They would be happier if these men had nothing to do with their children's life and they were certainly not contributing much money towards them.
I did meet a couple of women who had clearly married well and had ended up with £million+ houses out of it. These women had not instigated the divorce, in both cases the men had run off with other women.
Once a woman hits her 30's that line of exciting men is rapidly diminishing and the reality hits that their life is going to be crappy house and no money from now on. Literally the only way out of this is to date one of the betas who she would not have looked twice at in her 20s, but usually they have a house and a decent job.
This is why whenever a women moans "Where have all the decent men gone?" the answer is "In your 20s where you left them"
These men men who end up with these women do they honestly believe that she dated all those men for 15+ years to finally realise what she actually wanted was a 4/5 out of 10 man?
i can't work out if you are a mysogonist or a bottom feeder, which is it?When I was on POF, all of the women without a pot to piss in had clearly had children with men who had no money. By the time the women had reached their 30s these baby daddies were actually more of an inconvenience. They would be happier if these men had nothing to do with their children's life and they were certainly not contributing much money towards them.
I did meet a couple of women who had clearly married well and had ended up with £million+ houses out of it. These women had not instigated the divorce, in both cases the men had run off with other women.
Once a woman hits her 30's that line of exciting men is rapidly diminishing and the reality hits that their life is going to be crappy house and no money from now on. Literally the only way out of this is to date one of the betas who she would not have looked twice at in her 20s, but usually they have a house and a decent job.
This is why whenever a women moans "Where have all the decent men gone?" the answer is "In your 20s where you left them"
These men men who end up with these women do they honestly believe that she dated all those men for 15+ years to finally realise what she actually wanted was a 4/5 out of 10 man?
shirt said:
Joey Deacon said:
I think when a woman is under 30 money isn't so much of an issue as they think they have plenty of time. During this time they are mostly interested in the top 20% of men looks wise, the exciting bad boys. During this phase I don't think a woman is going to look twice at a beta unless he is seriously wealthy.
When I was on POF, all of the women without a pot to piss in had clearly had children with men who had no money. By the time the women had reached their 30s these baby daddies were actually more of an inconvenience. They would be happier if these men had nothing to do with their children's life and they were certainly not contributing much money towards them.
I did meet a couple of women who had clearly married well and had ended up with £million+ houses out of it. These women had not instigated the divorce, in both cases the men had run off with other women.
Once a woman hits her 30's that line of exciting men is rapidly diminishing and the reality hits that their life is going to be crappy house and no money from now on. Literally the only way out of this is to date one of the betas who she would not have looked twice at in her 20s, but usually they have a house and a decent job.
This is why whenever a women moans "Where have all the decent men gone?" the answer is "In your 20s where you left them"
These men men who end up with these women do they honestly believe that she dated all those men for 15+ years to finally realise what she actually wanted was a 4/5 out of 10 man?
i can't work out if you are a mysogonist or a bottom feeder, which is it?When I was on POF, all of the women without a pot to piss in had clearly had children with men who had no money. By the time the women had reached their 30s these baby daddies were actually more of an inconvenience. They would be happier if these men had nothing to do with their children's life and they were certainly not contributing much money towards them.
I did meet a couple of women who had clearly married well and had ended up with £million+ houses out of it. These women had not instigated the divorce, in both cases the men had run off with other women.
Once a woman hits her 30's that line of exciting men is rapidly diminishing and the reality hits that their life is going to be crappy house and no money from now on. Literally the only way out of this is to date one of the betas who she would not have looked twice at in her 20s, but usually they have a house and a decent job.
This is why whenever a women moans "Where have all the decent men gone?" the answer is "In your 20s where you left them"
These men men who end up with these women do they honestly believe that she dated all those men for 15+ years to finally realise what she actually wanted was a 4/5 out of 10 man?
I just can't figure out what would make you think that
I can't remember which female comedian it was but she said something brilliant - "Women aren't turned on by guys in uniforms, women are turned on by guys who've obviously got a JOB".
What Joey Essex above seems to fail to realise is that for every single mother out there there's probably 5X more guys - guys that can walk away, avoid child maintenance, shack up with some other girl and rinse and repeat. Of course they're going to be careful ffs.
What Joey Essex above seems to fail to realise is that for every single mother out there there's probably 5X more guys - guys that can walk away, avoid child maintenance, shack up with some other girl and rinse and repeat. Of course they're going to be careful ffs.
shirt said:
Joey Deacon said:
I think when a woman is under 30 money isn't so much of an issue as they think they have plenty of time. During this time they are mostly interested in the top 20% of men looks wise, the exciting bad boys. During this phase I don't think a woman is going to look twice at a beta unless he is seriously wealthy.
When I was on POF, all of the women without a pot to piss in had clearly had children with men who had no money. By the time the women had reached their 30s these baby daddies were actually more of an inconvenience. They would be happier if these men had nothing to do with their children's life and they were certainly not contributing much money towards them.
I did meet a couple of women who had clearly married well and had ended up with £million+ houses out of it. These women had not instigated the divorce, in both cases the men had run off with other women.
Once a woman hits her 30's that line of exciting men is rapidly diminishing and the reality hits that their life is going to be crappy house and no money from now on. Literally the only way out of this is to date one of the betas who she would not have looked twice at in her 20s, but usually they have a house and a decent job.
This is why whenever a women moans "Where have all the decent men gone?" the answer is "In your 20s where you left them"
These men men who end up with these women do they honestly believe that she dated all those men for 15+ years to finally realise what she actually wanted was a 4/5 out of 10 man?
i can't work out if you are a mysogonist or a bottom feeder, which is it?When I was on POF, all of the women without a pot to piss in had clearly had children with men who had no money. By the time the women had reached their 30s these baby daddies were actually more of an inconvenience. They would be happier if these men had nothing to do with their children's life and they were certainly not contributing much money towards them.
I did meet a couple of women who had clearly married well and had ended up with £million+ houses out of it. These women had not instigated the divorce, in both cases the men had run off with other women.
Once a woman hits her 30's that line of exciting men is rapidly diminishing and the reality hits that their life is going to be crappy house and no money from now on. Literally the only way out of this is to date one of the betas who she would not have looked twice at in her 20s, but usually they have a house and a decent job.
This is why whenever a women moans "Where have all the decent men gone?" the answer is "In your 20s where you left them"
These men men who end up with these women do they honestly believe that she dated all those men for 15+ years to finally realise what she actually wanted was a 4/5 out of 10 man?
anonymous said:
[redacted]
Sadly true. It is a bit of a double standard at times though. but thats the dating game. you either play it or not. Joey is certainly very cynical in what he says. Albeit a lot of truth in what he says. But then as somebody pointed out, there are men who are just as materialistic and mercenary and happy to ruin a woman just to get an easy cumdump to use and abuse.
It still surprises me so many younger women go with such losers again and again and again. But i guess its the same as the thing where victims of abuse and domestic violence wont leave or go from one dysfunctional relationship to another.
anonymous said:
[redacted]
re: 'Just be yourself' crap and the right women will turn up. That's true though. If they 'change themselves' just to meet a girl, they will inevitably change back to how they were, and lose that girl again.
And and many women won't care if the guy works in a call centre, as the criteria of many women will be "is employed" and the box will be ticked.
People choose people 'at their level' generally.
Gassing Station | The Lounge | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff