The Official Manchester United Thread [vol 7]

The Official Manchester United Thread [vol 7]

TOPIC CLOSED
TOPIC CLOSED
Author
Discussion

Challo

10,132 posts

155 months

Saturday 24th February 2018
quotequote all
DeltonaS said:
Challo said:
The whole money thing becomes a non issues these days when players are going for over £100 million. Pogba was £90m on his own, and is that JM’s fault?

LvG brought some dross, and played some shocking football. Glad we have moved on to JM.
as interesting as the back of a refrigerator.....

DiMaria's GF seems to know more about football than Sir park a bus alot.
What are you talking about? Di María gf knows more about football then JM?

You mean because she wanted to move after they never settled in Manchester and there House got broken into? What’s that got to do with JM?

anonymous-user

54 months

Saturday 24th February 2018
quotequote all
jammy-git said:
Yes, it says that Utd have had a game in the last week and Liverpool haven't.
You play in like 4 hours!

m3sye

26,231 posts

201 months

Saturday 24th February 2018
quotequote all
Alpinestars said:
See, if you were really on the ball, you'd have pointed out that lukaku has not had a single shot on target against the top 6 teams this season.
:Laugh: damn will try harder next time wink

jammy-git

29,778 posts

212 months

Saturday 24th February 2018
quotequote all
anonymous said:
[redacted]
You were asking about the past week. I can't talk much about a game that hasn't happened yet!!

anniesdad

14,589 posts

238 months

Saturday 24th February 2018
quotequote all
Alpinestars said:
See, if you were really on the ball, you'd have pointed out that lukaku has not had a single shot on target against the top 6 teams this season.
If true. That says more about the team than the striker to be honest.

Gavia

7,627 posts

91 months

Saturday 24th February 2018
quotequote all
FFS. We finally get rid of the Spuds and their pathetic WUMing and now we’re infested with Dippers. Guess it’s time to wreck their thread soon.

franki68

10,391 posts

221 months

Saturday 24th February 2018
quotequote all
anniesdad said:
Alpinestars said:
See, if you were really on the ball, you'd have pointed out that lukaku has not had a single shot on target against the top 6 teams this season.
If true. That says more about the team than the striker to be honest.
Not sure how you work that out,he has had some brilliant chances in games that he has fluffed.
He is not clinical ,but for all the complaints he has performed better than the other major centre forward signings .Outside of Kane and Aguero who is there in the premier league is world class?

anonymous-user

54 months

Saturday 24th February 2018
quotequote all
Gavia said:
FFS. We finally get rid of the Spuds and their pathetic WUMing and now we’re infested with Dippers. Guess it’s time to wreck their thread soon.
Ructions is already doing that so you can stand down.


anniesdad

14,589 posts

238 months

Saturday 24th February 2018
quotequote all
franki68 said:
anniesdad said:
Alpinestars said:
See, if you were really on the ball, you'd have pointed out that lukaku has not had a single shot on target against the top 6 teams this season.
If true. That says more about the team than the striker to be honest.
Not sure how you work that out,he has had some brilliant chances in games that he has fluffed.
He is not clinical ,but for all the complaints he has performed better than the other major centre forward signings .Outside of Kane and Aguero who is there in the premier league is world class?
I think because in my mind the team is there to supply the striker to win matches. A simplistic view I guess but generally it's how games are won. If he is not being given chances to shoot on target and hence to score goals I would ask the question as to why?

My feeling is that he's actually more clinical than he appears. If I'm honest I can't recall all the chances he may have missed in those games, I've slept since then, but I do think that we could do more as a team to help Lukaku get more chances and hence score more.

I expect by the end of the season he will have scored 30 goals for us, which is a great return generally and easily justifies his purchase.

franki68

10,391 posts

221 months

Saturday 24th February 2018
quotequote all
anniesdad said:
I think because in my mind the team is there to supply the striker to win matches. A simplistic view I guess but generally it's how games are won. If he is not being given chances to shoot on target and hence to score goals I would ask the question as to why?

My feeling is that he's actually more clinical than he appears. If I'm honest I can't recall all the chances he may have missed in those games, I've slept since then, but I do think that we could do more as a team to help Lukaku get more chances and hence score more.

I expect by the end of the season he will have scored 30 goals for us, which is a great return generally and easily justifies his purchase.
his misses the other night against seville are a prime example of how he is not clinical.If you play counter attack which seems to be jm's way at the moment you only get a couple of chances a game,he has missed big chances in several games this season,he is currently not a big game player.On the plus side..he is still pretty young and can improve this.
yes overall if he finishes 25-30 goals he has to be considered a success ,but he is along way from where we need him to be.

gadgetmac

14,984 posts

108 months

Saturday 24th February 2018
quotequote all
Gavia said:
FFS. We finally get rid of the Spuds and their pathetic WUMing and now we’re infested with Dippers. Guess it’s time to wreck their thread soon.
Thats a pretty potent sword-of-damocles you’re wielding lately hehe

m3sye

26,231 posts

201 months

Saturday 24th February 2018
quotequote all
I thought living abroad was suppose to chill you out... Gavia is one angry man....
Since when have Liverpool and utd fans not had a bit of friendly craic ?

NRS

22,154 posts

201 months

Saturday 24th February 2018
quotequote all
Plus it's not just us saying it either - some of the people here have done so too.

I'm abroad if that helps on statistic calculations that could be done btw.

mickk

28,859 posts

242 months

Saturday 24th February 2018
quotequote all
Gavia said:
FFS. We finally get rid of the Spuds and their pathetic WUMing and now we’re infested with Dippers. Guess it’s time to wreck their thread soon.
It's a forum Gavia you can't get rid of posters unless you're a mod. I'm sure the Liverpool boys will welcome you though.

Alpinestars

13,954 posts

244 months

Saturday 24th February 2018
quotequote all
franki68 said:
anniesdad said:
I think because in my mind the team is there to supply the striker to win matches. A simplistic view I guess but generally it's how games are won. If he is not being given chances to shoot on target and hence to score goals I would ask the question as to why?

My feeling is that he's actually more clinical than he appears. If I'm honest I can't recall all the chances he may have missed in those games, I've slept since then, but I do think that we could do more as a team to help Lukaku get more chances and hence score more.

I expect by the end of the season he will have scored 30 goals for us, which is a great return generally and easily justifies his purchase.
his misses the other night against seville are a prime example of how he is not clinical.If you play counter attack which seems to be jm's way at the moment you only get a couple of chances a game,he has missed big chances in several games this season,he is currently not a big game player.On the plus side..he is still pretty young and can improve this.
yes overall if he finishes 25-30 goals he has to be considered a success ,but he is along way from where we need him to be.
He's st.

ORD

18,120 posts

127 months

Saturday 24th February 2018
quotequote all
Not sure I would go that far. He has potential but he’s not there yet.

Alpinestars

13,954 posts

244 months

Saturday 24th February 2018
quotequote all
ORD said:
Not sure I would go that far. He has potential but he’s not there yet.
Sorry, but he's awful. Terrible movement, terrible control, and for someone so big, he wins nothing in the air. Waste of space. We'd be a much better side without him, and with Sanchez, martial or rashford up front.

jammy-git

29,778 posts

212 months

Saturday 24th February 2018
quotequote all
He looks worse than he did at Everton. I'd say he's a Benteke or Andy Carrol, can play well when there's no pressure, but put him in a big club and confidence suffers and can't handle the responsibility.

Sparkyhd

1,792 posts

95 months

Saturday 24th February 2018
quotequote all
Gavia said:
FFS. We finally get rid of the Spuds and their pathetic WUMing and now we’re infested with Dippers. Guess it’s time to wreck their thread soon.
If it's peace and quiet you're after you need to be on the West Brom thread.

jammy-git

29,778 posts

212 months

Saturday 24th February 2018
quotequote all
Sparkyhd said:
Gavia said:
FFS. We finally get rid of the Spuds and their pathetic WUMing and now we’re infested with Dippers. Guess it’s time to wreck their thread soon.
If it's peace and quiet you're after you need to be on the West Brom thread.
Odd that the arguments seem to follow Gavia around. It's a mystery that we may never solve.
TOPIC CLOSED
TOPIC CLOSED