Man city vs spurs offside?

Man city vs spurs offside?

Author
Discussion

48k

13,077 posts

148 months

Thursday 18th April 2019
quotequote all
This is the angle that shows two contacts by the ball on Llorente the first is on his forearm near his elbow. the second is on his thigh.

https://twitter.com/i/status/1118615467424227329


TaylotS2K

1,964 posts

207 months

Thursday 18th April 2019
quotequote all
48k said:
This is the angle that shows two contacts by the ball on Llorente the first is on his forearm near his elbow. the second is on his thigh.

https://twitter.com/i/status/1118615467424227329
Yep. The referee did not have that angle.

Pothole

34,367 posts

282 months

Thursday 18th April 2019
quotequote all
Big GT said:
B

I agree VAR reverses clear ref errors. But does it really resolve a problem in football? No. Otherwise it would be rolled out in the Championship down to Nationwide league.

For me VAR is the thin end of the wedge.
It'll be used universally in due course.

ChocolateFrog

25,222 posts

173 months

Thursday 18th April 2019
quotequote all
TaylotS2K said:
48k said:
This is the angle that shows two contacts by the ball on Llorente the first is on his forearm near his elbow. the second is on his thigh.

https://twitter.com/i/status/1118615467424227329
Yep. The referee did not have that angle.
Still looks like a goal from that angle.

It wouldn't be a pen at the other end.

Integroo

11,574 posts

85 months

Thursday 18th April 2019
quotequote all
48k said:
This is the angle that shows two contacts by the ball on Llorente the first is on his forearm near his elbow. the second is on his thigh.

https://twitter.com/i/status/1118615467424227329
Still a goal.

popeyewhite

19,845 posts

120 months

Thursday 18th April 2019
quotequote all
It was accidental and the player clearly makes an attempt to move his arm away from the ball. Correct decision by ref IMO. I understand the rules will be changed for next year meaning even clearly accidental handballs will result in a no goal if the act leads to a goal. So no goal allowed for MC against Schalke then! (Was it Schalke?)

franki68

10,390 posts

221 months

Thursday 18th April 2019
quotequote all
of course it is a goal,what was he supposed to do..surgically remove his arm as he went up for the ball ?

DocJock

8,356 posts

240 months

Thursday 18th April 2019
quotequote all
Puggit said:
No offside or the old offside. The current offside laws are an abomination of the game.
100% this ^^

Wasn't it Bill Shankly who was credited with saying "If you aren't interfering with play, what are doing on the pitch?"?

Cheib

23,235 posts

175 months

Thursday 18th April 2019
quotequote all
Puggit said:
As a Watford fan who suffered the most ridiculous offside goal to City recently, and with a Swansea supporting BiL, afraid I laughed at the total justice of that offside goal being chalked off.

Wasn't sure about VAR before - bring it on...
I agree. And I also think it will change the importance of playing at home statistically. WIthout doubt part of that advantage is referees responding to crowd pressure (in my opinion!)...that kind of refereeing bias will presumably happen less. Could actually impact the big clubs more as the perception is that they get the rub of the green than smaller clubs.

TwigtheWonderkid

43,342 posts

150 months

Thursday 18th April 2019
quotequote all
If we assume, for sake of argument, VAR got both decisions right, I still think it's crap. The Llorente goal he would have given anyway, as he didn't see anything amiss with it. The offside goal would have stood without VAR, but so what. That's football, wrong calls happen, deal with it.

I tell you what isn't football......a team thinking they'd scored the winning goal in a CL QF and celebrating for 40 seconds, only to have it disallowed. It's utter st. You score a goal, look at the linesman, flag is down, you go mental. That's it.

VAR is being sold to us on a lie, the lie being the game will be better when all the big decisions are right. It won't be better, it'll be worse.

ChocolateFrog

25,222 posts

173 months

Thursday 18th April 2019
quotequote all
TwigtheWonderkid said:
If we assume, for sake of argument, VAR got both decisions right, I still think it's crap. The Llorente goal he would have given anyway, as he didn't see anything amiss with it. The offside goal would have stood without VAR, but so what. That's football, wrong calls happen, deal with it.

I tell you what isn't football......a team thinking they'd scored the winning goal in a CL QF and celebrating for 40 seconds, only to have it disallowed. It's utter st. You score a goal, look at the linesman, flag is down, you go mental. That's it.

VAR is being sold to us on a lie, the lie being the game will be better when all the big decisions are right. It won't be better, it'll be worse.
It's funny for the rest of us though.

LoonyTunes

3,362 posts

75 months

Thursday 18th April 2019
quotequote all
TwigtheWonderkid said:
If we assume, for sake of argument, VAR got both decisions right, I still think it's crap. The Llorente goal he would have given anyway, as he didn't see anything amiss with it. The offside goal would have stood without VAR, but so what. That's football, wrong calls happen, deal with it.
"so what?" ...well as a Spurs fan I don't want to suffer the injustice of another unwarranted defeat where we deserved to win or at least get something from the game but were once again robbed by some inept decision making...sorry.


TwigtheWonderkid said:
I tell you what isn't football......a team thinking they'd scored the winning goal in a CL QF and celebrating for 40 seconds, only to have it disallowed. It's utter st. You score a goal, look at the linesman, flag is down, you go mental. That's it.

VAR is being sold to us on a lie, the lie being the game will be better when all the big decisions are right. It won't be better, it'll be worse.
...worse? The jury is out.

Fairer? Undoubtedly.

I don't want emotions deciding the result. That's the emotions of the biggest crowds with home advantage. I want fair play to win out and VAR at least nibbles at that outstanding bug bear.

Zoon

6,694 posts

121 months

Thursday 18th April 2019
quotequote all
TwigtheWonderkid said:
If we assume, for sake of argument, VAR got both decisions right, I still think it's crap. The Llorente goal he would have given anyway, as he didn't see anything amiss with it. The offside goal would have stood without VAR, but so what. That's football, wrong calls happen, deal with it.

I tell you what isn't football......a team thinking they'd scored the winning goal in a CL QF and celebrating for 40 seconds, only to have it disallowed. It's utter st. You score a goal, look at the linesman, flag is down, you go mental. That's it.

VAR is being sold to us on a lie, the lie being the game will be better when all the big decisions are right. It won't be better, it'll be worse.
Well not worse if the team that wins should have won given the rules of the game?
A bit like the non-VAR game that City profited from handsomely in the FA Cup.

TwigtheWonderkid

43,342 posts

150 months

Thursday 18th April 2019
quotequote all
LoonyTunes said:
TwigtheWonderkid said:
If we assume, for sake of argument, VAR got both decisions right, I still think it's crap. The Llorente goal he would have given anyway, as he didn't see anything amiss with it. The offside goal would have stood without VAR, but so what. That's football, wrong calls happen, deal with it.
"so what?" ...well as a Spurs fan I don't want to suffer the injustice of another unwarranted defeat where we deserved to win or at least get something from the game but were once again robbed by some inept decision making...sorry.
It wasn't inept decision making. If the offside goal had been allowed to stand, it wouldn't have been inept decision making. If was a tight call, and it looked to me, before I saw the slo mo, as if the ball had gone directly from Eriksson to Aguero, so a back pass. Not all wrong decisions are inept, just human error. Which should be part of the game.

Wrong decisions go for and against you. VAR went for you last night, but against you some other time. You'll be no better off in the long run. With VAR next season, the same top 6 will still be battling for the top 6 places, and the 3 to go down will probably be 2 of the newly promoted teams, and one other.

franki68

10,390 posts

221 months

Thursday 18th April 2019
quotequote all
TwigtheWonderkid said:
If we assume, for sake of argument, VAR got both decisions right, I still think it's crap. The Llorente goal he would have given anyway, as he didn't see anything amiss with it. The offside goal would have stood without VAR, but so what. That's football, wrong calls happen, deal with it.

I tell you what isn't football......a team thinking they'd scored the winning goal in a CL QF and celebrating for 40 seconds, only to have it disallowed. It's utter st. You score a goal, look at the linesman, flag is down, you go mental. That's it.

VAR is being sold to us on a lie, the lie being the game will be better when all the big decisions are right. It won't be better, it'll be worse.
I don’t like it,but I’m not sure what you can say is wrong about the correct decisions being reached .
If it wasn’t there City would have gone through ,and that would have been an injustice to spurs.
I think it removes something from the game ,especially if you are actually at the game ,but overall if it leads to more correct decisions being made then it is hard to argue against it.

TwigtheWonderkid

43,342 posts

150 months

Thursday 18th April 2019
quotequote all
Zoon said:
TwigtheWonderkid said:
If we assume, for sake of argument, VAR got both decisions right, I still think it's crap. The Llorente goal he would have given anyway, as he didn't see anything amiss with it. The offside goal would have stood without VAR, but so what. That's football, wrong calls happen, deal with it.

I tell you what isn't football......a team thinking they'd scored the winning goal in a CL QF and celebrating for 40 seconds, only to have it disallowed. It's utter st. You score a goal, look at the linesman, flag is down, you go mental. That's it.

VAR is being sold to us on a lie, the lie being the game will be better when all the big decisions are right. It won't be better, it'll be worse.
Well not worse if the team that wins should have won given the rules of the game?
Well firstly, it's the laws of the game. And secondly, you're talking rot. Some of my happiest memories at football have been when awful decisions have gone my way, and I've been furious when they've gone against my team. And at football, I want to be ecstatic or livid. I don't want to come away thinking "oh well, that was fair." I've got chess for that.

LoonyTunes

3,362 posts

75 months

Thursday 18th April 2019
quotequote all
TwigtheWonderkid said:
LoonyTunes said:
TwigtheWonderkid said:
If we assume, for sake of argument, VAR got both decisions right, I still think it's crap. The Llorente goal he would have given anyway, as he didn't see anything amiss with it. The offside goal would have stood without VAR, but so what. That's football, wrong calls happen, deal with it.
"so what?" ...well as a Spurs fan I don't want to suffer the injustice of another unwarranted defeat where we deserved to win or at least get something from the game but were once again robbed by some inept decision making...sorry.
It wasn't inept decision making. If the offside goal had been allowed to stand, it wouldn't have been inept decision making. If was a tight call, and it looked to me, before I saw the slo mo, as if the ball had gone directly from Eriksson to Aguero, so a back pass. Not all wrong decisions are inept, just human error. Which should be part of the game.

Wrong decisions go for and against you. VAR went for you last night, but against you some other time. You'll be no better off in the long run. With VAR next season, the same top 6 will still be battling for the top 6 places, and the 3 to go down will probably be 2 of the newly promoted teams, and one other.
The inept decision making was in pre-VAR games.

I also don't think it will equal itself out, I feel it will address the current unbalanced equilibrium a little.

48k

13,077 posts

148 months

Thursday 18th April 2019
quotequote all
TwigtheWonderkid said:
VAR went for you last night, but against you some other time.
It already did, in the first leg.

TwigtheWonderkid

43,342 posts

150 months

Thursday 18th April 2019
quotequote all
LoonyTunes said:
TwigtheWonderkid said:
LoonyTunes said:
TwigtheWonderkid said:
If we assume, for sake of argument, VAR got both decisions right, I still think it's crap. The Llorente goal he would have given anyway, as he didn't see anything amiss with it. The offside goal would have stood without VAR, but so what. That's football, wrong calls happen, deal with it.
"so what?" ...well as a Spurs fan I don't want to suffer the injustice of another unwarranted defeat where we deserved to win or at least get something from the game but were once again robbed by some inept decision making...sorry.
It wasn't inept decision making. If the offside goal had been allowed to stand, it wouldn't have been inept decision making. If was a tight call, and it looked to me, before I saw the slo mo, as if the ball had gone directly from Eriksson to Aguero, so a back pass. Not all wrong decisions are inept, just human error. Which should be part of the game.

Wrong decisions go for and against you. VAR went for you last night, but against you some other time. You'll be no better off in the long run. With VAR next season, the same top 6 will still be battling for the top 6 places, and the 3 to go down will probably be 2 of the newly promoted teams, and one other.
The inept decision making was in pre-VAR games.

I also don't think it will equal itself out, I feel it will address the current unbalanced equilibrium a little.
It really won't. Liverpool will still get more pens than Cardiff. Because they spend more time in the opposition penalty area. That's why the big teams get more decisions go their way, because they create more opportunities for decisions to go their way. Because they have better footballers.

PHuzzy

2,747 posts

172 months

Thursday 18th April 2019
quotequote all
TwigtheWonderkid said:
Well firstly, it's the laws of the game. And secondly, you're talking rot. Some of my happiest memories at football have been when awful decisions have gone my way, and I've been furious when they've gone against my team. And at football, I want to be ecstatic or livid. I don't want to come away thinking "oh well, that was fair." I've got chess for that.
I'm pretty sure the Man City fans would have been livid last night and the Spurs fans ecstatic all whilst being the correct decision.

Same with Liverpool, everyone thought Mane was offside (including Mane), they were ecstatic when they found out he wasn't.