The Official ENGLAND Thread - The Team We ALL Support

The Official ENGLAND Thread - The Team We ALL Support

TOPIC CLOSED
TOPIC CLOSED
Author
Discussion

Fittster

20,120 posts

213 months

Tuesday 25th May 2010
quotequote all
anonymous said:
[redacted]
If Heskey fails and England aren't considered to have performed well during the World Cup Capello will find his job security in serious doubt.

Would you put your pay packet on the line for Heskey? No club manager in England will.

curlie467

7,650 posts

201 months

Tuesday 25th May 2010
quotequote all
I am a liverpool fan too and the reason i didnt put him in the starting line up is because i think you need a strong subs bench and i would rather see Gerrard coming on to influence or change things than Lampard or Barry.
I would swap Joe Cole for Adam Johnson though in muy original selection.

Gun

13,431 posts

218 months

Tuesday 25th May 2010
quotequote all
My starting 11 would be:

James

Johnson Terry Ferdinand A.Cole

Lennon Gerrard Milner

Lampard J.Cole

Rooney

Castrol Craig

18,073 posts

206 months

Tuesday 25th May 2010
quotequote all
Hart.
Johnson, Terry, King, A.Cole
Lennon, Lampard, Gerrard, J.Cole
Rooney, Crouch

dmitsi

3,583 posts

220 months

Tuesday 25th May 2010
quotequote all
Hart
Johnson Terry Ferdinand A Cole
Walcott Gerrard Rooney Lennon (or Johnson)
Crouch and Defoe (or lose Defoe and include J Cole in the mid letting Rooney push up more)

I think England need to lose Lampard and barry, Lampard is not someone I think works well in this situation (I know his goal tally this year was good, but arguably it should've been a lot more playing in that Chelsea team), and well barry shouldn't even be in the squad. It's time to let a younger, faster more attacking team build.

Hold Rooney back off two stikers and have gerrard hold the back of the midfield, linking up with the pace around them could prove deadly, especially sticking that lump Crouch up to hassle the defenders. An attacking side would mean the defenders would have to perform, my only doubt is Ferdinand, but he's got to be a better choice than King for now, King is good but needs to get more confidence and awareness of his surroundings.

Milner did not impress last night, he'd get a place if he was consistently involved, but for me he just disappears for large periods of games.

My team would probably lose games, but I reckon they'd be good to watch and score some great goals.

North West Tom

11,514 posts

177 months

Tuesday 25th May 2010
quotequote all
Fittster said:
curlie467 said:
I think Lennon should get the nod before Walcott, especially if you are basing it on pace and final product, he is quicker than Walcott and more precise(just).
I was always under the impression that in a straight sprint Walcott has the beating of Lennon and pretty much anyone else. The problem is the way he uses the ball.

THEO WALCOTT is the Premier League’s answer to sprint superstar Usain Bolt.
Manchester United fan Bolt hit a top speed of 24.04mph as he won two golds at the World Championships in Berlin.
Arsenal’s Walcott clocked 22.72mph and Sol Campbell took a shock second place in the top-flight race with a 22.50mph top speed.
The top speeds have been calculated by Castrol using data captured over two seasons.
Didier Drogba and Fernando Torres would be in a photo finish for third with their joint top speed of 22.27mph.
Football’s fliers hit incredible speeds and Walcott’s bursts mean he would run 9.9secs for 100m – if he could sustain his top speed of 10.1m per second.
WALCOTT 22.72 mph
CAMPBELL 22.50 mph
DROGBA 22.27 mph
TORRES 22.27 mph
ANELKA 22.05 mph
FABREGAS 22.05 mph
A COLE 22.05 mph
CLICHY 21.82 mph
ROONEY 21.82 mph
GERRARD 21.60 mph (The Sun)

source

Looking a Kings performance last night, I'm starting to think it's a shame Sol didn't make the 30.
But that's the thing, Walcott has only got pace. Poor touch, poor vision...

dmitsi

3,583 posts

220 months

Tuesday 25th May 2010
quotequote all
anonymous said:
[redacted]
Yeah it's beautiful, I don't think we'll see it though so we'll never know if I'm right or not hehe

mickk

28,827 posts

242 months

Tuesday 25th May 2010
quotequote all
dmitsi said:
My team would probably lose games, but I reckon they'd be good to watch and score some great goals.
Well why would we play that team then?

Fittster

20,120 posts

213 months

Tuesday 25th May 2010
quotequote all
mickk said:
dmitsi said:
My team would probably lose games, but I reckon they'd be good to watch and score some great goals.
Well why would we play that team then?
Thought you were a Spurs fan!

dmitsi

3,583 posts

220 months

Tuesday 25th May 2010
quotequote all
mickk said:
dmitsi said:
My team would probably lose games, but I reckon they'd be good to watch and score some great goals.
Well why would we play that team then?
Because maybe they don't lose. I don't think it's a realistic team, but with such an attacking team the full backs don't need to push up so much and can conentrate on defending, let the midfield switch around and confuse the opposition. With that pace it could prove interesting.

I just think the team that gets selected will probably lack the extra dynamic needed to scare teams like Spain and Argentina at the moment, England have to look at something different if they want to succeed. So far I've not seen a convincing team that will be able to pass around a top class opposition.


mickk

28,827 posts

242 months

Tuesday 25th May 2010
quotequote all
Fittster said:
mickk said:
dmitsi said:
My team would probably lose games, but I reckon they'd be good to watch and score some great goals.
Well why would we play that team then?
Thought you were a Spurs fan!
I was asking the question why dmitsi chose a team he thought would lose games. I would not be playing Defoe.

Fittster

20,120 posts

213 months

Tuesday 25th May 2010
quotequote all
anonymous said:
[redacted]
Who else but Cole can realistically be picked at LB? Bridge is no better at defending and Baines failed to shine last night.

Solid defensive players at RB, LB and central midfield are horribly missing but without Hargreaves it's hard to see what else can be done about that. After the World Cup is over and a few people announce their retirements it's probably time to call up Jack Rodwell.

130R

6,810 posts

206 months

Tuesday 25th May 2010
quotequote all
Gun said:
My starting 11 would be:

James
...
Nooooo!

Get Karter

1,934 posts

201 months

Tuesday 25th May 2010
quotequote all
Keeper is going to be a tough choice.

Both Green and James can be excellent, but you always feel their next involvement could very well be an almighty cock-up.

Midfield is where World Cups are won though, and it is a concern that Capello doesn't look any further forward in finding the right solution.

As a result, I think it could be an early exit.

VXRuss

1,547 posts

190 months

Tuesday 25th May 2010
quotequote all
130R said:
Gun said:
My starting 11 would be:

James
...
Nooooo!
hehe


curlie467

7,650 posts

201 months

Tuesday 25th May 2010
quotequote all
Get Karter said:
As a result, I think it could be an early exit.
Me too sadly, we just keep taking the same old players everywhere, as individuals they are all good but collectively we just seem to fail when the going gets tough and never have a plan be.

ArtVandelay

6,689 posts

184 months

Tuesday 25th May 2010
quotequote all
Hope Bent is fit again to play against Japan, just to see how he plays as it's his last chance to prove himself for the WC.

Nom de ploom

4,890 posts

174 months

Tuesday 25th May 2010
quotequote all
as i said on another thread - i have to believe we will the world cup. it HAS to happen in my lifetime.

we have goals all over the squad and we cannot underestimate th eeffect the manager has.

COME ON ENGLAND!!

mickk

28,827 posts

242 months

Sunday 30th May 2010
quotequote all
Is anyone else watching this? I could be decorating or something.

mickk

28,827 posts

242 months

Sunday 30th May 2010
quotequote all
'Who's done it for you this half'

'Nobody' was the reply.

Sums it up really.
TOPIC CLOSED
TOPIC CLOSED