SpaceX (Vol. 2)
Discussion
They plan to build at least two towers at pad 37, possibly four with two for launches and two for catching! They already have a built tower at 39A and are in the process of building the flame trench, launch mount and tank farm. They've also started work on another giga bay at the Cape with the ground cleared and the footings in already.
I had thought SpaceX was fairly well protected from Musk these days but could Starship be SpaceX's Cybertruck, in that they had to compromise the engineering because the boss demanded certain things?
I know they blew up a lot of rockets before they nailed Falcon 9, but it always felt like they were moving forwards.
I know they blew up a lot of rockets before they nailed Falcon 9, but it always felt like they were moving forwards.
Time for a serious, serious rethink about this whole programme.
And NASA really has to reassess their manned lunar programme.
I hope no one was hurt in that explosion.
I’ve just watched it and it just blew during tanking.
I’m sure the test facility has been badly damaged - if not totally destroyed.
And NASA really has to reassess their manned lunar programme.
I hope no one was hurt in that explosion.
I’ve just watched it and it just blew during tanking.
I’m sure the test facility has been badly damaged - if not totally destroyed.
Eric Mc said:
Time for a serious, serious rethink about this whole programme.
And NASA really has to reassess their manned lunar programme.
I hope no one was hurt in that explosion.
I ve just watched it and it just blew during tanking.
I m sure the test facility has been badly damaged - if not totally destroyed.
Has the favoured new head for NASA been announced? The guy that got de-announced the other week seemed to have had his head screwed on. Less community outreach and more actual spaceflight.And NASA really has to reassess their manned lunar programme.
I hope no one was hurt in that explosion.
I ve just watched it and it just blew during tanking.
I m sure the test facility has been badly damaged - if not totally destroyed.
Connected?
I doubt it.
The consistent failures of Starship are entirely due to the way the rocket is designed.
I really cannot see how they are going to get this thing to work.
This is a serious set back- probably more than the ones that occurred in flight.
I am sure the test facility has been badly damaged.
The consistent failures of Starship are entirely due to the way the rocket is designed.
I really cannot see how they are going to get this thing to work.
This is a serious set back- probably more than the ones that occurred in flight.
I am sure the test facility has been badly damaged.
Just watching some replays on NSF and they seem to have detected that the forward flaps had just been tested a split second before it went bang. There were two explosions - the upper tank went first followed a split second later by the lower tank.
Whether the movement of the forward flaps had a bearing on what then happened is obviously unknown at the moment.
Whether the movement of the forward flaps had a bearing on what then happened is obviously unknown at the moment.
Edited by Eric Mc on Thursday 19th June 09:30
Edited by Eric Mc on Thursday 19th June 09:31
I wonder of with all the new Starship pads being developed whether they are at the stage at looking at parallel development of integrating existing expendable upper stages, or at least the engine and fuel gubbins, as they must be sitting on loads of bigger version Starlink satellites ready to launch.
Gassing Station | Science! | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff