Ban Elephant Racing

Author
Discussion

Chainsaw Rebuild

2,006 posts

102 months

Tuesday 6th February 2018
quotequote all
InitialDave said:
Someone made a music video using movie car chases: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oZk_i6fWn94&
That was a great video! it has car chases, pretty girls, cool cars and even a topless lady riding a motorbike; all set to a classic rock sound track. thumbup

R0G

4,986 posts

155 months

Tuesday 6th February 2018
quotequote all
One easy solution - leave the EU and scrap the speed restrictors

jmorgan

36,010 posts

284 months

Tuesday 6th February 2018
quotequote all
Roads are congested. Ban overtaking then what will you do when the problem is still there.

markymarkthree

2,267 posts

171 months

Tuesday 6th February 2018
quotequote all
revvingit said:
SVTRick said:
You fking retard
Thanks for your thoughtful and consider response.
Perfect response to the retarded suggestion by the o/p that waggons should stay in lane one.
Perhaps the o/p will come back and tell us how his or her suggestion will work when we are backed up behind cranes, granny or granddad chugging along ect ect.

cossy400

3,161 posts

184 months

Tuesday 6th February 2018
quotequote all
OP also doesn't state how long this epic hold up that caused him to rage on here, was for.


30 seconds a WHOLE minute maybe?

jmorgan

36,010 posts

284 months

Tuesday 6th February 2018
quotequote all
It will be for 20 miles and added four years to the journey.

cossy400

3,161 posts

184 months

Tuesday 6th February 2018
quotequote all
jmorgan said:
It will be for 20 miles and added four years to the journey.
laugh

hehe

driving

Of course it will, OP is now retired too.

mikeveal

4,571 posts

250 months

Tuesday 6th February 2018
quotequote all
markymarkthree said:
revvingit said:
SVTRick said:
You fking retard
Thanks for your thoughtful and consider response.
Perfect response to the retarded suggestion by the o/p that waggons should stay in lane one.
Perhaps the o/p will come back and tell us how his or her suggestion will work when we are backed up behind cranes, granny or granddad chugging along ect ect.
I don't think that's what the OP was suggesting.

An LGV with a drawbar has a maximum length of 18.75m. Lets say one LGV overtakes another LGV. It's easier to imagine the slower vehicle to be stationary.
The moving LGV starts 5m behind, pulls out, passes and pulls in with another 5m gap. It must travel 5m + 18.75m (the length of the overtaken vehicle) + 5m +18.75m (it's own length), so a total distance of 47.5m in the outside lane.

If the speed differential is a perfectly reasonable 3mph (1.34 meters per second), then the overtaking LGV will take 35 seconds to complete the manoeuvre.

Now if one LGV is travelling at 56mph and one at 53mph, it still takes 35 seconds to complete the manoeuvre, 35 seconds at 56mph equates to 866m, about half a mile.

All of that is very reasonable and I don't think anyone would call it elephant racing.



A little while ago, southbound on the A34 I sat behind two HGVs (not LGVs) sat side by side at ~56mph for 15 miles. They were not held up by traffic in front. That is elephant racing, that is deliberately holding up traffic, that is why drivers don't let HGVs out to overtake, that is the behaviour of retarded knuckledraggers and that's what gives HGV drivers a bad name.

Perhaps the "professional" drivers here would like to explain why it should ever take longer than 35 seconds for any HGV to overtake (one) other?
It is as much the responsibility of the driver being overtaken to back off a little as it is the driver overtaking to do so reasonably. If our pro drivers can't explain, then perhaps they'd be so good as to condemn elephant racing?


N.B.
I deliberately put the word "professional" in quotes. That's not a dig at HGV drivers, I just wanted to point out that a professional driver is just someone who's profession is driving, it doesn't necessarily mean they are any good. The same should be said for most professions! evil


Edited by mikeveal on Tuesday 6th February 08:36

markymarkthree

2,267 posts

171 months

Tuesday 6th February 2018
quotequote all
mikeveal said:
I don't think that's what the OP was suggesting.

An LGV with a drawbar has a maximum length of 18.75m. Lets say one LGV overtakes another LGV. It's easier to imagine the slower vehicle to be stationary.
The moving LGV starts 5m behind, pulls out, passes and pulls in with another 5m gap. It must travel 5m + 18.75m (the length of the overtaken vehicle) + 5m +18.75m (it's own length), so a total distance of 47.5m in the outside lane.

If the speed differential is a perfectly reasonable 3mph (1.34 meters per second), then the overtaking LGV will take 35 seconds to complete the manoeuvre.

Now if one LGV is travelling at 56mph and one at 53mph, it still takes 35 seconds to complete the manoeuvre, 35 seconds at 56mph equates to 866m, about half a mile.

All of that is very reasonable and I don't think anyone would call it elephant racing.



A little while ago, southbound on the A34 I sat behind two HGVs (not LGVs) sat side by side at ~56mph for 15 miles. They were not held up by traffic in front. That is elephant racing, that is deliberately holding up traffic, that is why drivers don't let HGVs out to overtake, that is the behaviour of retarded knuckledraggers and that's what gives HGV drivers a bad name.

Perhaps the "professional" drivers here would like to explain why it should ever take longer than 35 seconds for any HGV to overtake (one) other?
It is as much the responsibility of the driver being overtaken to back off a little as it is the driver overtaking to do so reasonably. If our pro drivers can't explain, then perhaps they'd be so good as to condemn elephant racing?


N.B.
I deliberately put the word "professional" in quotes. That's not a dig at HGV drivers, I just wanted to point out that a professional driver is just someone who's profession is driving, it doesn't necessarily mean they are any good. The same should be said for most professions! evil


Edited by mikeveal on Tuesday 6th February 08:36
It takes me more than 35 secs as I wont be 5 meters behind when I start my manoeuvre and when I pull in it wont be 5 meters in front of overtaken vehicle.
As for the use of the word "professional", some are only pro's because they get paid.

Meanwhile looking forward to the o/p replying.

cossy400

3,161 posts

184 months

Tuesday 6th February 2018
quotequote all
mikeveal said:
I don't think that's what the OP was suggesting.

An LGV with a drawbar has a maximum length of 18.75m. Lets say one LGV overtakes another LGV. It's easier to imagine the slower vehicle to be stationary.
The moving LGV starts 5m behind, pulls out, passes and pulls in with another 5m gap. It must travel 5m + 18.75m (the length of the overtaken vehicle) + 5m +18.75m (it's own length), so a total distance of 47.5m in the outside lane.

If the speed differential is a perfectly reasonable 3mph (1.34 meters per second), then the overtaking LGV will take 35 seconds to complete the manoeuvre.

Now if one LGV is travelling at 56mph and one at 53mph, it still takes 35 seconds to complete the manoeuvre, 35 seconds at 56mph equates to 866m, about half a mile.

All of that is very reasonable and I don't think anyone would call it elephant racing.



A little while ago, southbound on the A34 I sat behind two HGVs (not LGVs) sat side by side at ~56mph for 15 miles. They were not held up by traffic in front. That is elephant racing, that is deliberately holding up traffic, that is why drivers don't let HGVs out to overtake, that is the behaviour of retarded knuckledraggers and that's what gives HGV drivers a bad name.

Perhaps the "professional" drivers here would like to explain why it should ever take longer than 35 seconds for any HGV to overtake (one) other?
It is as much the responsibility of the driver being overtaken to back off a little as it is the driver overtaking to do so reasonably. If our pro drivers can't explain, then perhaps they'd be so good as to condemn elephant racing?


N.B.
I deliberately put the word "professional" in quotes. That's not a dig at HGV drivers, I just wanted to point out that a professional driver is just someone who's profession is driving, it doesn't necessarily mean they are any good. The same should be said for most professions! evil


Edited by mikeveal on Tuesday 6th February 08:36
I drive one, and the thing is now days its all about getting there on time or in an amount of time.

Good friend of mine has to start from point A drive for 3 and half hrs do a delivery and then drive for 2 and half hours to a collection then get as far back towards his yard as possibly so they can sort his work the next day.

Now if he is held up that s not his fault and he ll not rush to bend the rules to make up the time hes lost.

How ever not everyone is like my mate, and they believe that that extra 0.5 mph they ve got is going to earn them the cash.

There is no excuses to be given from any "professional" as you put it, as its just pure ignorance on both parts. As the reality is 36 seconds going by your figures, which means if I was at 56 and dropped to 53 they d be gone and life would carry on.

Which is what I do.

Bit like car drivers running down the outside of a que for a slip road off the motorway and jumping in at the last minute really.

Oh and professional as you put it, we are only ever classed as that in front of the DVSA/POLICE and a JUDGE, every one else just thinks we are a hold up and a pain in the ass.

You could stop buying stuff i suppose.....

Problem is everything comes on a truck at some point and that's not going to change anytime soon.







mikeveal

4,571 posts

250 months

Tuesday 6th February 2018
quotequote all
markymarkthree said:
It takes me more than 35 secs as I wont be 5 meters behind when I start my manoeuvre and when I pull in it wont be 5 meters in front of overtaken vehicle.
As for the use of the word "professional", some are only pro's because they get paid.

Meanwhile looking forward to the o/p replying.
Yeah, that is true, most seem to leave a smaller gap than that. biggrin How much gap would you like and I'll redo the sums?
Double the gap... A 10 meter gap before and after increases the overtake distance from 47.5m to 57.5m. At 3mph differential, that takes 43 seconds. 43 seconds at 56mph is 1075m or 0.67miles.

I still think that's reasonable. And I'm still looking forward to the professional drivers here explaining why it should take multiple miles to overtake a single HGV, or failing that to hearing them condemn the behaviour.

Elephant racing isn't defensible.

markymarkthree

2,267 posts

171 months

Tuesday 6th February 2018
quotequote all
mikeveal said:
markymarkthree said:
It takes me more than 35 secs as I wont be 5 meters behind when I start my manoeuvre and when I pull in it wont be 5 meters in front of overtaken vehicle.
As for the use of the word "professional", some are only pro's because they get paid.

Meanwhile looking forward to the o/p replying.
Yeah, that is true, most seem to leave a smaller gap than that. biggrin How much gap would you like and I'll redo the sums?
Double the gap... A 10 meter gap before and after increases the overtake distance from 47.5m to 57.5m. At 3mph differential, that takes 43 seconds. 43 seconds at 56mph is 1075m or 0.67miles.

I still think that's reasonable. And I'm still looking forward to the professional drivers here explaining why it should take multiple miles to overtake a single HGV, or failing that to hearing them condemn the behaviour.

Elephant racing isn't defensible.
Sorry but I cant do the maths but I try to do the 3 sec rule thingy when in the waggon.

p1esk

4,914 posts

196 months

Tuesday 6th February 2018
quotequote all
Six Figs said:
Black_S3 said:
One of the few sensible traffic laws we have is HGVs 58 while cars can do 70 imo.
it's 60mph
Has it changed? I thought it was 56 mph (90 kph).

mikeveal

4,571 posts

250 months

Tuesday 6th February 2018
quotequote all
markymarkthree said:
Sorry but I cant do the maths but I try to do the 3 sec rule thingy when in the waggon.
You must be one in a million !

56mph is 25 meters per second (type "56mph in m/s" into Google, it does the maths for you.)
So 3 seconds at 56mph is 75meters. A standard HGV is 16.5 meters long, so you're leaving a gap of 4.5 truck lengths. I've never seen a driver on the A34 doing that, and I do 100 miles a day five days a week.

cossy400

3,161 posts

184 months

Tuesday 6th February 2018
quotequote all
mikeveal said:
markymarkthree said:
Sorry but I cant do the maths but I try to do the 3 sec rule thingy when in the waggon.
You must be one in a million !

56mph is 25 meters per second (type "56mph in m/s" into Google, it does the maths for you.)
So 3 seconds at 56mph is 75meters. A standard HGV is 16.5 meters long, so you're leaving a gap of 4.5 truck lengths. I've never seen a driver on the A34 doing that, and I do 100 miles a day five days a week.
3 seconds from a point the truck in front passes is never 75 meters thou is it.


markymarkthree

2,267 posts

171 months

Tuesday 6th February 2018
quotequote all
p1esk said:
Six Figs said:
Black_S3 said:
One of the few sensible traffic laws we have is HGVs 58 while cars can do 70 imo.
it's 60mph
Has it changed? I thought it was 56 mph (90 kph).
When was it 56 ?
For as long as I can remember on motorways for over 7.5t it has always been 60mph in the UK.

https://www.gov.uk/speed-limits

markymarkthree

2,267 posts

171 months

Tuesday 6th February 2018
quotequote all
mikeveal said:
markymarkthree said:
Sorry but I cant do the maths but I try to do the 3 sec rule thingy when in the waggon.
You must be one in a million !

56mph is 25 meters per second (type "56mph in m/s" into Google, it does the maths for you.)
So 3 seconds at 56mph is 75meters. A standard HGV is 16.5 meters long, so you're leaving a gap of 4.5 truck lengths. I've never seen a driver on the A34 doing that, and I do 100 miles a day five days a week.
Possibly, but it is what I have done for many years now and has served me well.

Been up and down the A34 many times and still do, best keep an eye out for a brown waggon carrying plant.

mikeveal

4,571 posts

250 months

Tuesday 6th February 2018
quotequote all
cossy400 said:
3 seconds from a point the truck in front passes is never 75 meters thou is it.
Call it 60mph to make the maths easy.
That's a mile a minute.
1 mile is 1609 meters.
So if you're doing 60mph, you're covering 1609meters in 60 seconds. That's 1609/60=26.8 meters every second.

At 56 mph, it's 25m/s, so yes, in 3 seconds you cover 75 meters.

p1esk

4,914 posts

196 months

Tuesday 6th February 2018
quotequote all
markymarkthree said:
p1esk said:
Six Figs said:
Black_S3 said:
One of the few sensible traffic laws we have is HGVs 58 while cars can do 70 imo.
it's 60mph
Has it changed? I thought it was 56 mph (90 kph).
When was it 56 ?
For as long as I can remember on motorways for over 7.5t it has always been 60mph in the UK.

https://www.gov.uk/speed-limits
I was referring to HGVs, i.e. 44 tonne vehicles. I don't know about the limits for smaller commercial vehicles.

markymarkthree

2,267 posts

171 months

Tuesday 6th February 2018
quotequote all
p1esk said:
markymarkthree said:
p1esk said:
Six Figs said:
Black_S3 said:
One of the few sensible traffic laws we have is HGVs 58 while cars can do 70 imo.
it's 60mph
Has it changed? I thought it was 56 mph (90 kph).
When was it 56 ?
For as long as I can remember on motorways for over 7.5t it has always been 60mph in the UK.

https://www.gov.uk/speed-limits
I was referring to HGVs, i.e. 44 tonne vehicles. I don't know about the limits for smaller commercial vehicles.
So was I where I said "over 7.5t" which makes it an HGV be it 10t or 44t = 60mph.