The worst book you have ever read.

The worst book you have ever read.

Author
Discussion

rowley birkin

487 posts

100 months

Wednesday 14th June 2017
quotequote all
The Magus by John Fowles; what a load of psychological nonsense that was (coudn't finish reading it).

qube_TA

8,402 posts

245 months

Wednesday 14th June 2017
quotequote all
Goaty Bill 2 said:
qube_TA said:
in return I bought him 'God is not great' by Christopher Hitchens.
Not the right thread for it, but Peter Hitchens 'The Rage Against God' might interest you.
As I am sure you are well aware, the brothers held opposing views.
(It will likely not make a convert of you either, but it's an enjoyable read, and less likely to make 'the worst' list smile )

Which reminds me, I must put down Russian classics and Solzhenitsyn for a bit and read 'God is not great'.
Having watched quite a few hours of his debates and talks, I expect I am quite familiar with the content already.
The Qu'ran will remain lower on the 'must read list', but for the benefit of intellectual discussions with my few Muslim friends, it's probably worth making the effort.
Thanks, I've not read any of Peter's books was a little put off by his aggressive authoritarian style when he's ever interviewed. Also he seems to suggest that there's no evidence for evolution, I start to struggle when someone says that. smile



XM5ER

5,091 posts

248 months

Wednesday 28th June 2017
quotequote all
Another vote for Digital Fortresses - Dan Brown here. The only book I have ever thrown across the room. It pained me to have to touch it again in order to throw it in the bin.

The Davinci Code was awful as well, it's as if he'd read Focaults Pendulum by Umberto Eco and just didn't get it.

matchmaker

8,489 posts

200 months

Monday 10th July 2017
quotequote all
Bourne trilogy by Robert Ludlum. Longwinded, complicated & confusing.

havoc

30,052 posts

235 months

Monday 10th July 2017
quotequote all
matchmaker said:
Bourne trilogy by Robert Ludlum. Longwinded, complicated & confusing.
I can't agree with that. Re-read them a few years ago following the films, and I thought they read quite well vs some of the more modern equivalents (e.g. Dan Brown).

They're not high literature, but they're entertaining enough...

Alfa numeric

3,025 posts

179 months

Monday 10th July 2017
quotequote all
I'm an avid reader and I'll always finish a book I've started, not matter how bad it is.

Two have defeated me however- Rancid Aluminiumby James Hawes and Filth by Irvine Welsh. I gave up on the former when I realised that I was actively looking for excuses not to pick it up even though I was a fair way though it. The latter I gave up on about half way through when I realised that there was absolutely not plot, just the rantings of a man with multiple personalities.

XM5ER

5,091 posts

248 months

Monday 10th July 2017
quotequote all
Alfa numeric said:
I'm an avid reader and I'll always finish a book I've started, not matter how bad it is.

Two have defeated me however- Rancid Aluminiumby James Hawes and Filth by Irvine Welsh. I gave up on the former when I realised that I was actively looking for excuses not to pick it up even though I was a fair way though it. The latter I gave up on about half way through when I realised that there was absolutely not plot, just the rantings of a man with multiple personalities.
I dumped the book (Filth) and only got halfway through the movie before thinking "this is just st".

BigBen

11,639 posts

230 months

Monday 10th July 2017
quotequote all
havoc said:
matchmaker said:
Bourne trilogy by Robert Ludlum. Longwinded, complicated & confusing.
I can't agree with that. Re-read them a few years ago following the films, and I thought they read quite well vs some of the more modern equivalents (e.g. Dan Brown).

They're not high literature, but they're entertaining enough...
Agree, I really enjoyed the books.

Adam B

27,222 posts

254 months

Tuesday 11th July 2017
quotequote all
matchmaker said:
Bourne trilogy by Robert Ludlum. Longwinded, complicated & confusing.
eh? the Bourne Identity was one of my favourite books, didn't find it complicated or confusing, I was 12

Adam B

27,222 posts

254 months

Tuesday 11th July 2017
quotequote all
Alfa numeric said:
I'm an avid reader and I'll always finish a book I've started, not matter how bad it is.

Two have defeated me however- Rancid Aluminium by James Hawes and Filth by Irvine Welsh. I gave up on the former when I realised that I was actively looking for excuses not to pick it up even though I was a fair way though it. The latter I gave up on about half way through when I realised that there was absolutely not plot, just the rantings of a man with multiple personalities.
I remember reading Rancid Aluminium many years ago, and thinking it was a real disappointment, after his debut novel which I loved - White Merc With Fins

g3org3y

20,627 posts

191 months

Sunday 16th July 2017
quotequote all
The Crack Fox said:
otherman said:
I think it's time we lowered the tone a bit, because there are some classics in this thread so far. Check this out;

Don't Tell Mum I Work on the Rigs: (She Thinks I'm a Piano Player in a wehouse) by Paul Carter

Widely well reviewed by reading age 4 amazon reviewers, but check the one star reviews to get the real situation. As one person put it; one star is too many.
I found it most entertaining, actually! smile
It was ok, not as funny as it thinks it is though.

XM5ER said:
Alfa numeric said:
I'm an avid reader and I'll always finish a book I've started, not matter how bad it is.

Two have defeated me however- Rancid Aluminiumby James Hawes and Filth by Irvine Welsh. I gave up on the former when I realised that I was actively looking for excuses not to pick it up even though I was a fair way though it. The latter I gave up on about half way through when I realised that there was absolutely not plot, just the rantings of a man with multiple personalities.
I dumped the book (Filth) and only got halfway through the movie before thinking "this is just st".
I know Filth is popular with many IW fans, though after reading Trainspotting and Porno (as well as a couple others) I felt it weaker and less enjoyable. The underlying concept and writing for Filth is much more marmite imo.

Edited by g3org3y on Sunday 16th July 09:57

Eddie Strohacker

3,879 posts

86 months

Sunday 16th July 2017
quotequote all
Never rated IW much. Twenty years since I read Trainspotting but I remember thinking at the time it was a collection of bar room tales pulled into a narrative but written in Jockistani & never went back for more.

g3org3y

20,627 posts

191 months

Sunday 16th July 2017
quotequote all
Eddie Strohacker said:
Never rated IW much. Twenty years since I read Trainspotting but I remember thinking at the time it was a collection of bar room tales pulled into a narrative but written in Jockistani & never went back for more.
I think he does his 'bread and butter' well. The others are hit and mix. There's a lot of chat about California in most recent books (I think he lives there now) but I don't find that especially interesting.

For me, Trainspotting, Porno and Skagboys are probably the standout books though I really enjoyed Glue and Ecstasy (the books rather than the substances!).

TooLateForAName

4,746 posts

184 months

Wednesday 26th July 2017
quotequote all
Trexthedinosaur said:
Clive Cussler isn't so bad, enjoyable easy reading.
Is that meant to be a joke? They are ste.

Alias218

1,495 posts

162 months

Saturday 12th August 2017
quotequote all
paulguitar said:
Inspired by another thread, ‘giving up on a book’ I would like to know what you would consider the worst book you have ever read?

Mine, as posted in that thread, are:


1: 'When the Wind Blows' by James Patterson. This is about, and I am not kidding, ‘secret flying children’.

2: ‘One Day’ by David Nicholls... Astonishingly awful.


So, everyone, your nominations?
When I saw this thread I immediately thought 'When the Wind Blows' and it's even more terrible sequel 'The Lake House'. Then I saw your no.1 choice and felt my decision was entirely vindicated!

They both had a terrible premise (although the idea of 'shucking' was vaguely interesting) and I couldn't stand James Patterson's writing style. I had to will myself to finish the second book as I hate to leave a book unfinished.

Ted Mackerel

29 posts

80 months

Sunday 13th August 2017
quotequote all
Frank macavennies autobiography. Trust me, its garbage.

Ted Mackerel

29 posts

80 months

Sunday 13th August 2017
quotequote all
Ulysses was boring too.

paulguitar

Original Poster:

23,390 posts

113 months

Sunday 13th August 2017
quotequote all
Alias218 said:
paulguitar said:
Inspired by another thread, ‘giving up on a book’ I would like to know what you would consider the worst book you have ever read?

Mine, as posted in that thread, are:


1: 'When the Wind Blows' by James Patterson. This is about, and I am not kidding, ‘secret flying children’.

2: ‘One Day’ by David Nicholls... Astonishingly awful.


So, everyone, your nominations?
When I saw this thread I immediately thought 'When the Wind Blows' and it's even more terrible sequel 'The Lake House'. Then I saw your no.1 choice and felt my decision was entirely vindicated!

They both had a terrible premise (although the idea of 'shucking' was vaguely interesting) and I couldn't stand James Patterson's writing style. I had to will myself to finish the second book as I hate to leave a book unfinished.
It is great to read that someone else understands!

Mr Gearchange

5,892 posts

206 months

Sunday 13th August 2017
quotequote all
paulguitar said:
Alias218 said:
paulguitar said:
Inspired by another thread, ‘giving up on a book’ I would like to know what you would consider the worst book you have ever read?

Mine, as posted in that thread, are:


1: 'When the Wind Blows' by James Patterson. This is about, and I am not kidding, ‘secret flying children’.

2: ‘One Day’ by David Nicholls... Astonishingly awful.


So, everyone, your nominations?
When I saw this thread I immediately thought 'When the Wind Blows' and it's even more terrible sequel 'The Lake House'. Then I saw your no.1 choice and felt my decision was entirely vindicated!

They both had a terrible premise (although the idea of 'shucking' was vaguely interesting) and I couldn't stand James Patterson's writing style. I had to will myself to finish the second book as I hate to leave a book unfinished.
It is great to read that someone else understands!
As I may have said previously, Patterson is thriller writing for the thickest kid in the remedial class. Utterly dire.

Goaty Bill 2

3,407 posts

119 months

Sunday 13th August 2017
quotequote all
Ted Mackerel said:
Ulysses was boring too.
You are referring to the James Joyce novel (I admit, I've not read it) not to Homer's Odysseus I presume?