The worst book you have ever read.

The worst book you have ever read.

Author
Discussion

captain_cynic

11,972 posts

95 months

Monday 5th February 2018
quotequote all
Roberty said:
RHVW said:
- The Bible.
Amen to that!
I thought it was a quite good work of fiction. Especially when you consider how many different authors were involved.

paulguitar

Original Poster:

23,289 posts

113 months

Monday 5th February 2018
quotequote all
captain_cynic said:
Roberty said:
RHVW said:
- The Bible.
Amen to that!
I thought it was a quite good work of fiction. Especially when you consider how many different authors were involved.
It's a mess in many ways as one might expect, but there are an awful lot of sayings and metaphors in general use today that come directly from the bible.

Einion Yrth

19,575 posts

244 months

Monday 5th February 2018
quotequote all
paulguitar said:
captain_cynic said:
Roberty said:
RHVW said:
- The Bible.
Amen to that!
I thought it was a quite good work of fiction. Especially when you consider how many different authors were involved.
It's a mess in many ways as one might expect, but there are an awful lot of sayings and metaphors in general use today that come directly from the bible.
Can't be bothered to run the numbers, but I have a sneaking suspicion that Shakespeare accounts for more.

cherie171

367 posts

117 months

Monday 5th February 2018
quotequote all
captain_cynic said:
2. Ancillary Justice by Anne Lecke. One of the few books I couldn't finish. I found the entire thing too contrived, the attempt to keep mystery in the novel just ended up annoying me. Put it down when a shipment of Neil Asher novels arrived and I haven't gone back.
I loved the whole trilogy, it felt like reading some 60s era Anne McCaffrey, so was a huge nostalgia trip to my teen years for me.

The book that stands out to me for being over-hyped recently was The Loney by Andrew Michael Hurley. It started off promising enough, some nice atmospheric descriptions, and intriguing characters, but after a while it felt as though Hurley didn't quite know what to do with his creation. Filed under disappointingly underwhelming.

anonymous-user

54 months

Friday 16th February 2018
quotequote all
Lord Iffy Boatrace by Bruce Dickinson. Now I know the man is a genuine polymath and one of the most iconic frontmen of all time, but this is unadulterated pap.

SickAsAParrot

304 posts

112 months

Thursday 22nd February 2018
quotequote all
Ha!, I bought both the Iffy Boatrace books when they came out, because, you know, Bruce, I thought they were OK but nothing special.

I bought a book called The Malice Box from some cheap shop a few years ago, that was truly awful, blatant attempt to cash in on Dan Browny type books.

Derek Smith

45,613 posts

248 months

Thursday 22nd February 2018
quotequote all
Bradgate said:
Pride and prejudice.

I accept that as a bloke, I'm not in the target market, but I just couldn't bring myself to give a toss which sister ended up married to which unsuitable bloke, or why.
I read it as something of a penance. The BBC series of the 1990s was excellent, real quality, but having to walk around a museum in Bath to view some of the frocks made me rather irritated and I said something negative to one of the staff. She asked me If I'd read the book and I had to admit I had not. My wife told her she'd ensure I did read it.

Now I've read it I can see that I was completely right in what I said to the woman. The book is dreadful. It might have been better if she'd ever met a bloke, but I doubt it as her characterisation of women was poor.

Someone mentioned Conrad. I was forced to read him as a kid at school. I thought it was poorly written. When moving house what should I find but my old school books and The Rover was there. I was entranced and since then have read The N****r and the Narcissus, Lord Jim and have started Nostromo.

I thought Catcher in the Rye was magic when I read it as a youth. It, like me, hasn't aged well though.


AstonZagato

12,698 posts

210 months

Thursday 22nd February 2018
quotequote all
Derek Smith said:
Bradgate said:
Pride and prejudice.

I accept that as a bloke, I'm not in the target market, but I just couldn't bring myself to give a toss which sister ended up married to which unsuitable bloke, or why.
I read it as something of a penance. The BBC series of the 1990s was excellent, real quality, but having to walk around a museum in Bath to view some of the frocks made me rather irritated and I said something negative to one of the staff. She asked me If I'd read the book and I had to admit I had not. My wife told her she'd ensure I did read it.

Now I've read it I can see that I was completely right in what I said to the woman. The book is dreadful. It might have been better if she'd ever met a bloke, but I doubt it as her characterisation of women was poor.
Giles Coren agrees
https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/giles-coren-why...

Derek Smith

45,613 posts

248 months

Thursday 22nd February 2018
quotequote all
AstonZagato said:
Great minds and all that.

I've recently sat through Persuasion, the BBC production with Ciaran Hinds. Here we had the captain of a man-of-the-line, who was victorious in the West Indies, fighting the nasty French yet too frightened to speak to the woman he loves. At the end they sent him fight Napoleon. Well best of luck with that, mate. I felt sorry for his crew.

Every girl was empty headed except, of course, the heroine.

Austen is heralded as the first feminist because of her railing against the unfairness of her not inheriting money on the death of her father. Nowhere did Pride and Prejudice mention the lives of the women who served the five daughters who did bugger all for their indolent lives. Stitch a hat and then go for a walk. Wow! How unjust. Men were working in Beer Caves giving themselves horrific skin problems and there she was, life of luxury, and loving it.

Perhaps that is feminism.

Re the BBC film: I thought it well made, well acted, but the story sucked.

Edited to add: the illness suffered by many miners in silica rich seams is potters rot or silicosis. Not nice. One of the biggest killers of miners world wide.

But Austen didn't go down the mines.



Edited by Derek Smith on Thursday 22 February 16:51

TheJimi

24,960 posts

243 months

Thursday 22nd February 2018
quotequote all
tertius said:


and one I did finish but really, what utter tosh:

4. Pillars of the Earth - Ken Follett
Having just finished Pillars of The Earth, I'm genuinely surprised to see it here.

Still, opinions and all that smile

putonghua73

615 posts

128 months

Thursday 12th April 2018
quotequote all
jas xjr said:
yung cheng ? wild swans . it was a big thing back in the eighties. i have never struggled as much with anything else i have ever read. i am a voracious reader and i always see a book to the end. i di manage to read it but god was it depressing and boring.
Jung Chang. An immensely important book, if you have any interest in modern China. I found it a fascinating read, and finally finished reading whilst in Lijiang [China] in 2009.

toasty said:
Norweigan Wood - Murakami - Diary of a boring Japanese kid. Gave up halfway through.


I enjoyed Norweigan Wood', but it pales in comparison to 'The Wind-Up Bird Chronicle' - although a number of people whom when discussing what we were reading, made faces at the mere mention of it ['The Wind-Up Bird Chronicle']. Of all the Murakami-ism's that ring true that aside from May Kasahara, he cannot really write a 3 dimensional female character.

rowley birkin said:
The Magus by John Fowles; what a load of psychological nonsense that was (coudn't finish reading it).
I went through a phase of reading Fowles during my late teenage years and like most novels read during this period, that's where it stays.

My nomination is Stephen Donaldson's 'Thomas Covenant' series. Dense, turgid, and wholly leaden. I recall chucking the book in disgust. This is the only book that I have stopped reading mid-way through because it was so abominably written.

Halmyre

11,185 posts

139 months

Thursday 12th April 2018
quotequote all
putonghua73 said:
I went through a phase of reading Fowles during my late teenage years and like most novels read during this period, that's where it stays.

My nomination is Stephen Donaldson's 'Thomas Covenant' series. Dense, turgid, and wholly leaden. I recall chucking the book in disgust. This is the only book that I have stopped reading mid-way through because it was so abominably written.
I made it through the first two series, many years ago, but gave up on the first book of the third series just last year. In fact it was so terrible that it killed the faint desire to read the first two again.

anonymous-user

54 months

Thursday 12th April 2018
quotequote all
Halmyre said:
putonghua73 said:
I went through a phase of reading Fowles during my late teenage years and like most novels read during this period, that's where it stays.

My nomination is Stephen Donaldson's 'Thomas Covenant' series. Dense, turgid, and wholly leaden. I recall chucking the book in disgust. This is the only book that I have stopped reading mid-way through because it was so abominably written.
I made it through the first two series, many years ago, but gave up on the first book of the third series just last year. In fact it was so terrible that it killed the faint desire to read the first two again.
I got through the first of the last series and bought the second but couldn't face reading it. After 30 years Is finally decided I didn't care what happened to him and he was a tt.

Speaking of bad books, I know he's revered but I've never managed to read a Neil Gaiman other than Good Omens - which I put down to TP filtering the NG stuff.

Also the Booker prize winner ("the real ned kelly gang" or something similar) wow, how turgid was that!

perdu

4,884 posts

199 months

Thursday 12th April 2018
quotequote all
For truly awful, Brake pedal down John Bratby RA

Back in the late sixties, early seventies my wife and I shared similar tastes in fiction, we are older now

We read Breakdown by Bratby, kind of liked it a bit then went on to his next work which might be Breakfast and elevenses which I liked

Then we had Break pedal down, which completely killed any desire to read any more of his stuff for both of us

Lucky really because I never heard of anything from him later, nor wished to

Anyway, my offering to the genre awfullius

coppice

8,599 posts

144 months

Saturday 14th April 2018
quotequote all
I loved Fowles , although I preferred Daniel Martin to The Magus. Worst book I've read recently was Johnny Herbert's effort. If ever a book needed a rigorous sub edit this one did - it's sloppily written , error strewn and repetitive. Sack the ghostwriter....

DeejRC

5,779 posts

82 months

Monday 30th April 2018
quotequote all
Zadie Smith - White Teeth.

Dear Christ Almighty on the cross - congratulations luv, you finally managed to knock James Joyce and Stephen bloody Dedalus off the top spot. And I never thought Id say that!

lauda

3,474 posts

207 months

Wednesday 2nd May 2018
quotequote all
I’ve looked through this thread and agree that some of the books mentioned are boring or cheesy or badly written. However, none of them compare to How Late It Was, How Late by James Kelman.

I read it off the back of having read (and loved) Trainspotting and reading something where Kelman’s book was compared favourably to Welsh’s. Both are by Scottish authors. One is funny, shocking, heartbreaking and a work of genius. The other is an execrable pile of unreadable turd.

I’m pretty sure none of you will have read it and I can only advise that you maintain that situation. Even 20 years later, it stands head and shoulders above anything else I’ve ever read as the worst by a considerable margin. It won the Booker Prize....

Gameface

16,565 posts

77 months

Sunday 9th February 2020
quotequote all
toon10 said:
I'd say the Philip Carlo book on the Iceman is the most fascinating book I've read.
Apart from from the fact it's not true.

Read Murder Machine for the reality of those Kuklinksi pretended to be involved with.

bigandclever

13,775 posts

238 months

Sunday 9th February 2020
quotequote all
Peter Robinson reviewed the klf/JAMS book '2023' saying "a novel which is either impenetrable or terrible or both" and I got this far and think he may have a point.


techguyone

3,137 posts

142 months

Sunday 9th February 2020
quotequote all
Gaffa tape the book and drop it in the sea...

yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes