Elise, VX220 or S2000?

Author
Discussion

havoc

30,052 posts

235 months

Thursday 5th January 2006
quotequote all
Rawwr said:
Hmm, I reckon an Elise would have the edge over an S2000 up to about 90mph.

/voe

You have to be kidding - I have been all over the tail of S1's in my old 'teg, on-road from 40 upwards, and on-track along every straight...and the S2k is marginally more accelerative than the 'teg.

Up to 30, yeah - I'll give you that. Beyond 30 - forget it...just look at the bhp/tonne comparison.

Seriously - out of these three the Elise will walk into the pub about halfway through the second pint of the other two...I'd say VX220 edges it up to at least 60 and definitely for in-gear performance, S2000 quickest at silly-speeds and once on-the-boil.

Depends what you're after - S2000 will give you the biggest accelerative 'hit', VX will be the one to carry pace in cross-country.

shnozz

27,472 posts

271 months

Thursday 5th January 2006
quotequote all
angrys3owner said:
I've just had an idea... (doesn't happen very often)

why not walk to work as others have suggested, and then get a TVR for weekend fun? makes sense to me...


why would you need to walk to work if you bought a TVR? (aside from the obvious pun...)

The Chimaera was far more practical than the Elise. But if Rawr and Mucher mention servicing costs of a Lotus being that much more than the VX220, the TVR is on another planet. After my last 2 TVRs I am finding the Elise almost amusing at how cheap it is to service and run generally. If the Vauxhall is less, then its almost pocket money running costs.

smartie

2,604 posts

273 months

Thursday 5th January 2006
quotequote all
Just been through a similar process and bought a 2004 S2000. One deciding point was that my wife has to go to work in it and didn't really think she'd get on with the Elise.

Elise (S2 111S) was actually more expensive to insure than S2000.

My only view is the Honda is the better car 95% of the time and not that much worse for the other 5%! It is cheap as chips to service (though I am coming from an M3!) and other than tyres I can't see any particularly large bills on the horizon.

You seem to get an awful lot more car for your money than with an Elise/VX!

shnozz

27,472 posts

271 months

Thursday 5th January 2006
quotequote all
oh, and for what its worth, my S1 is a lot quicker on 90% of roads to the 4 litre Chimaera.

shnozz

27,472 posts

271 months

Thursday 5th January 2006
quotequote all
smartie said:

My only view is the Honda is the better car 95% of the time and not that much worse for the other 5%!


exactly my view. only a mirror image.

Sums it up though, its whats right for you. Hence the thread is pretty pointless to me. If I had wanted one car to do the daily grind and give me my thrills I would have bought a Honda S2000. Actually, thats a lie, I would have bought a Boxster, but the S2000 would have come a close second.

For a weekend toy, I wouldnt have wanted an S2000 as it didnt excite me. Plus I didnt fancy tracking one on a regular basis.

It really is this simple - go and drive all 4. Everyone else's opinion is irrelevant.

blindswelledrat

Original Poster:

25,257 posts

232 months

Thursday 5th January 2006
quotequote all
shnozz said:
smartie said:

My only view is the Honda is the better car 95% of the time and not that much worse for the other 5%!


exactly my view. only a mirror image.

Sums it up though, its whats right for you. Hence the thread is pretty pointless to me. If I had wanted one car to do the daily grind and give me my thrills I would have bought a Honda S2000. Actually, thats a lie, I would have bought a Boxster, but the S2000 would have come a close second.

For a weekend toy, I wouldnt have wanted an S2000 as it didnt excite me. Plus I didnt fancy tracking one on a regular basis.

It really is this simple - go and drive all 4. Everyone else's opinion is irrelevant.


Lots of good advice- thanks for it.
Re TVR: Would love one (I actually convinced myself I'd buy an Integrale) but I can't justify the ownership expense and I find owning unreliable cars has become stressfull.
I probably won't drive all four because a) I would hate to feel like a 'test pilot' and b) as soon as the money clears I will be far too impatient!!

Practicality isn't too much an issue as we are buying a family toyota for the wife/kids type situation so it sounds like its between VX and elise!!

shnozz

27,472 posts

271 months

Thursday 5th January 2006
quotequote all
You aren't a test pilot when you will subsequently be parting with your hard earned in exchange for 1 of the 4.

As things stand, there has been support from PHers for each one of the 4 cars. You know why. Because they are all fecking top notch and you have excluded a whole heap of cars that are frankly turd in comparison. When you get to that level, its few and far between. Any of those cars would make you very happy IMO.

klassiekerrally

2,543 posts

255 months

Thursday 5th January 2006
quotequote all
Harry Flashman said:
Why would anyone want an S1 Elise over a VX220?

Because it isn't badged 'Opel' in the Netherlands.
And because the VX220 isn't as pleasing to the eye.
Haven't driven a VX220, but did drive a couple of Elises (all series 1, from 120 to 179 bhp) and I love them...
I'm not the kind of person for high-revving cars like the S2000, and I don't like the looks of it very much.

Muncher

12,219 posts

249 months

Thursday 5th January 2006
quotequote all
Schnozz - The VX costs me £20 in servicing every 10k based on the service schedule. (£3 filter, £17 Castrol oil on offer)

However, as I do it myself it gets serviced at least every 6k in excess of the service schedule including new plugs, tie rod ends, ball joints, brake fluid etc.

Rawwr

22,722 posts

234 months

Thursday 5th January 2006
quotequote all
havoc said:
Rawwr said:
Hmm, I reckon an Elise would have the edge over an S2000 up to about 90mph.

/voe

You have to be kidding - I have been all over the tail of S1's in my old 'teg, on-road from 40 upwards, and on-track along every straight...and the S2k is marginally more accelerative than the 'teg.

Up to 30, yeah - I'll give you that. Beyond 30 - forget it...just look at the bhp/tonne comparison.

Seriously - out of these three the Elise will walk into the pub about halfway through the second pint of the other two...I'd say VX220 edges it up to at least 60 and definitely for in-gear performance, S2000 quickest at silly-speeds and once on-the-boil.

Depends what you're after - S2000 will give you the biggest accelerative 'hit', VX will be the one to carry pace in cross-country.


Guess you learn something new everyday:
http://homepage.ntlworld.com/martin.leach1/elises200

>> Edited by Rawwr on Thursday 5th January 18:07

angrys3owner

15,855 posts

229 months

Thursday 5th January 2006
quotequote all
shnozz said:


why would you need to walk to work if you bought a TVR? (aside from the obvious pun...)



I wouldn't fancy a TVR being much fun if used for constant 2 mile journeys during the week that's all, and it'd be more special at weekend that either and elise or vx220 in my opinion. I'd be looking at super nutty cars if I only worked 2 miles from home!

ninjaboy

2,525 posts

250 months

Thursday 5th January 2006
quotequote all
Why is it i here about the K series being such a load of shite when most kit cars makers sware by it, yet nobody ever mentions vauxhalls 2l engine that loved to mix its water and oil by being abit porous? rover had their faults but no more than anyone else back on topic i would say get the Honda they sound so nice Lotus is a great car too depends how much comfort you want also the honda would propably be faster after you got over 80mph

Rawwr

22,722 posts

234 months

Thursday 5th January 2006
quotequote all
ninjaboy said:
Why is it i here about the K series being such a load of shite when most kit cars makers sware by it, yet nobody ever mentions vauxhalls 2l engine that loved to mix its water and oil by being abit porous? rover had their faults but no more than anyone else back on topic i would say get the Honda they sound so nice Lotus is a great car too depends how much comfort you want also the honda would propably be faster after you got over 80mph


Don't get me wrong, I *prefer* the K Series Elise over the Toyota.

Harry Flashman

19,345 posts

242 months

Thursday 5th January 2006
quotequote all
shnozz said:
You aren't a test pilot when you will subsequently be parting with your hard earned in exchange for 1 of the 4.

As things stand, there has been support from PHers for each one of the 4 cars. You know why. Because they are all fecking top notch and you have excluded a whole heap of cars that are frankly turd in comparison. When you get to that level, its few and far between. Any of those cars would make you very happy IMO.


That heap big man shnozz. He talk sense.

chris watton

22,477 posts

260 months

Thursday 5th January 2006
quotequote all
Have used my TVR to get me to and from work for the past 2 years, never let me down yet!
Back to the subject, I think a VX220T is a complete bargain for its pace and handling, as fast as a TVR (in the real world), and cheaper than an equivalent Elise. I have heard (so not gospel) that the S2000’s power comes in only at lunatic revs, making the full 240bhp redundant most of the time, plus I couldn’t get insurance for less than £700 (clean licence, full NC etc) for the S2000, when we were looking late last year for another car for the wife!

shnozz

27,472 posts

271 months

Thursday 5th January 2006
quotequote all
chris watton said:
Have used my TVR to get me to and from work for the past 2 years, never let me down yet!
Back to the subject, I think a VX220T is a complete bargain for its pace and handling, as fast as a TVR (in the real world)


Unless you increase the budget, an £11k Elise will be faster than an £11k TVR in the real world as well. Not only is mine faster point to point, it was faster down the 1/4 mile strip this year, hardly the right environment to see the Elise excel.

However, going back to the point about running TVRs over 2 mile distance....I'd be happier running my Chimaera on a 2 mile run to work and back than the Elise. Not only was it more comfortable, better sound proofed, bigger boot and generally more refined, it was also so torquey that if you kept it under 3k revs you would still be going a good pace and not stressing the engine when cold. Under 3k the Elise is lethargic at best. Remember that the old RV8 4 litres are 240bhp from 4000cc, hardly a stressed engine so for lazy commuting, probably far better than a K series. It may be designed for a metro, but not a metro with the engine in the back...

shnozz

27,472 posts

271 months

Thursday 5th January 2006
quotequote all
Harry Flashman said:
shnozz said:
You aren't a test pilot when you will subsequently be parting with your hard earned in exchange for 1 of the 4.

As things stand, there has been support from PHers for each one of the 4 cars. You know why. Because they are all fecking top notch and you have excluded a whole heap of cars that are frankly turd in comparison. When you get to that level, its few and far between. Any of those cars would make you very happy IMO.


That heap big man shnozz. He talk sense.


so ditch the cushions then big lad.

chris watton

22,477 posts

260 months

Thursday 5th January 2006
quotequote all
shnozz said:
Valid points...


I agree, but I was talking about straight line speed (I didn’t make that clear, my fault)
Because they are so light and perfectly set up, both the VX and Elise are as fast as most other cars on the twisties – I just feel that with the VX220T, you have the best of both worlds, riotously fast both on the B-roads and equally ballistic on the straights (the turbo gives it more torque, I have been told)
I tried to talk Chan into getting either one of those cars, but she didn’t like the ‘fiddly’ roof, so she had an MGF Trophy instead!

shnozz

27,472 posts

271 months

Thursday 5th January 2006
quotequote all
chris watton said:
shnozz said:
Valid points...


I agree, but I was talking about straight line speed (I didn’t make that clear, my fault)
Because they are so light and perfectly set up, both the VX and Elise are as fast as most other cars on the twisties – I just feel that with the VX220T, you have the best of both worlds, riotously fast both on the B-roads and equally ballistic on the straights (the turbo gives it more torque, I have been told)
I tried to talk Chan into getting either one of those cars, but she didn’t like the ‘fiddly’ roof, so she had an MGF Trophy instead!


see my comment re the 1/4 mile though mate

But I do agree, the VX220T seems to be the best of both worlds, as do the more specialised converted Honda/Audi/duratec Elises. Whilst the Elise is a revelation after the TVRs, there are times on those long straights that you do feel underpowered. To be fair, I would expect the S2000 to bridge that gap, but then you get on the circuit and....

combover

3,009 posts

227 months

Thursday 5th January 2006
quotequote all
What would a VXT with stiffer, aftermarket suspension be like then? Or would it be massively expensive in relation to this budget?

Combover