Are cars over-tyred today?

Are cars over-tyred today?

Author
Discussion

stu harris

469 posts

241 months

Thursday 15th October 2009
quotequote all
I think you'll find that the weight (both Kerbweight and GVW) has had a bearing on the increase in tyre width.

Stu

CampDavid

9,145 posts

198 months

Thursday 15th October 2009
quotequote all
Are you sure your Teg had 16 inch wheels? They all had 195/55/15s I thought (which are the perfect tyre size for a hot hatch IMO

Chris_w666

22,655 posts

199 months

Thursday 15th October 2009
quotequote all
Lots from the showroom are over tyred, my fiesta has 195/45/16's and the 1.8 focus I had came with 215/40/17's from the factory. Neither car ever needs the grip that the STD tyres offer. But lots of 2nd hand cars end up with bargain basement ditchfinders on to save the £100-£200 per corner cost of replacing the OE tyres, I saw a woman getting some horrendously cheap tyres fitted to her 57 plate mondeo yesterday that while they save money wouldn't have been what I had wanted responsible for gripping the road in the vehicle I ferried my kids about in.

Whitean3

2,184 posts

198 months

Thursday 15th October 2009
quotequote all
Let's go back a few years to when the first Lotus Elise came out. I remember reading in Performance car a review of the car with an interview with the chief engineer blokey at Lotus at that time. He was saying that from their calculations, the front tyres for the car only needed to be the width of a front motorbike tyre from e.g. a Harley. So about 145 cm. THe marketing department dictated that it needed wider tyres to look more butch and sporty, so it wore 185s. Which is still fairly narrow compared to todays offerings.

Both our cars are massively overtyred in my opinion, for design/marketing and safety reasons, in that order. There's a lot to be said for the fun of being able to do controllable, 4 wheel drifts at slow speeds in classic like the Austin A30 or Morris Minor!

jon-

16,509 posts

216 months

Thursday 15th October 2009
quotequote all
One of the reasons i don't mind driving my OH Ford KA is the £30 165/65 13 tyres mean you can slide it around a little, even with 70bhp.

The main reason we're all over tyred is because it looks cool, and marketing like that. Imagine what a 165/35 19 would look like...

HellDiver

5,708 posts

182 months

Thursday 15th October 2009
quotequote all
My first Mk4 Astra running on 175/70-14 tyres on steelies was the best handling Astra I ever had. The ones with the 16" and 17" rims were never anywhere as good, even with aftermarket suspension. I put that firmly down to the lower unsprung weight of those steels and tyres.

ewenm

28,506 posts

245 months

Thursday 15th October 2009
quotequote all
13" for track on the Caterham - nice cheap tyres (ex-race semi-slicks if you can find them) make excellent track day rubber.

15" on the road for that extra inch or so of ground clearance. Some people use 16" for road use. I don't get the obsession with big wheels myself - why does a wide tyre have to be on big diameter rims? Small and light please!

pbirkett

18,079 posts

272 months

Thursday 15th October 2009
quotequote all
CampDavid said:
Are you sure your Teg had 16 inch wheels? They all had 195/55/15s I thought (which are the perfect tyre size for a hot hatch IMO
Mine was a 98 spec JDM so came with 16s as standard.

CampDavid

9,145 posts

198 months

Thursday 15th October 2009
quotequote all
pbirkett said:
CampDavid said:
Are you sure your Teg had 16 inch wheels? They all had 195/55/15s I thought (which are the perfect tyre size for a hot hatch IMO
Mine was a 98 spec JDM so came with 16s as standard.
I never realised they had different wheels. Everydays a school day!

pbirkett

18,079 posts

272 months

Thursday 15th October 2009
quotequote all
CampDavid said:
pbirkett said:
CampDavid said:
Are you sure your Teg had 16 inch wheels? They all had 195/55/15s I thought (which are the perfect tyre size for a hot hatch IMO
Mine was a 98 spec JDM so came with 16s as standard.
I never realised they had different wheels. Everydays a school day!
Yep, and the 98-spec was actually meant to take 215/45/R16, but I opted for 205s as they were at the time much cheaper!

Zod

35,295 posts

258 months

Thursday 15th October 2009
quotequote all
I have a car with 275s on the back and another with 285s. Both will come unstuck easily with a bit of pressure from the right foot.

rhinochopig

17,932 posts

198 months

Thursday 15th October 2009
quotequote all
Most fun I ever had in my westy was on a private airfield using junk yard XR2 pepperpots fitted with whatever tyres the wheels came with. No grip whatsoever and the ability to drift like you were in a go-kart. Contrast that with the normal 205 32r or 48r tyres, which required a high level of concentration due to the more snappy nature and much higher corner speeds.

Cactussed

5,292 posts

213 months

Thursday 15th October 2009
quotequote all
Zod said:
I have a car with 275s on the back and another with 285s. Both will come unstuck easily with a bit of pressure from the right foot.
Which one is the Polo? hehe

Mr Will

13,719 posts

206 months

Thursday 15th October 2009
quotequote all
Cactussed said:
Zod said:
I have a car with 275s on the back and another with 285s. Both will come unstuck easily with a bit of pressure from the right foot.
Which one is the Polo? hehe
The Polo has the 275s on the back. However it has space-savers on the front, hence spinning up it's wheels so easily.

900T-R

20,404 posts

257 months

Thursday 15th October 2009
quotequote all
Zod said:
I have a car with 275s on the back and another with 285s. Both will come unstuck easily with a bit of pressure from the right foot.
Or hitting standing water whilst going in a straight line on the motorway. wink

Crusoe

4,068 posts

231 months

Thursday 15th October 2009
quotequote all
Crusoe said:
my 245s on 3lr z4 were sliding around a lot this morning, italian tune up before it's MOT smile very slippery in the cold and damp spinning up in third in a straight line even with plenty of tread left. In the dry you would struggle to get wheel spin unless you were really trying though, probably a good safe compromise for most conditions on the road, though 165 section rears on a 1.8 sport mx5 was some of the most fun track time I've had.
Turns out I have broken rear springs and my car is un-roadworthy till it's fixed oops. MOT fail but should be covered under warranty.

Chris71

21,536 posts

242 months

Thursday 15th October 2009
quotequote all
Herman Toothrot said:
On a daily driver I think you want it to stick to the road well so other than the daft costs involved wide tyres are a good thing. On fun cars a bit less tyre is good, my MX5 has 260bhp going through 195's smile
yes

My thoughts exactly. I never understand this idea of making sports cars corner at the sort of speeds you can only really exploit on a track. Likewise, the fact that the average numptie's hatchback can go round corners a lot quicker than they think is probably no bad thing.

LukeBird

17,170 posts

209 months

Thursday 15th October 2009
quotequote all
Definitely!!

otolith

56,080 posts

204 months

Thursday 15th October 2009
quotequote all
Interesting topic - seems a lot of people feel they have too much grip. So who has actually changed their wheels and tyres for narrower versions? Or are you all running really cheap LingLongDarkHorse teflon specials?

Zod

35,295 posts

258 months

Thursday 15th October 2009
quotequote all
Cactussed said:
Zod said:
I have a car with 275s on the back and another with 285s. Both will come unstuck easily with a bit of pressure from the right foot.
Which one is the Polo? hehe
I'm not sure the Polo could break the grip sufficiently to move off from standstill!