Andrew Benson - F1 expert????

Andrew Benson - F1 expert????

Author
Discussion

oyster

Original Poster:

12,594 posts

248 months

Friday 11th April 2014
quotequote all
I'm getting increasingly frustrated reading anything this guy writes. He's a BBC reporter, not a commentator or pundit, yet he seems to feel he has some divine right to defend the current F1 regs, in particular the fuel saving element to them.

This isn't a rant about the new F1 regs at all, but more a concern that Andrew Benson is playing up to his environmentalist BBC bosses for showing such disdain to F1 before 2014 and such admiration for it now.

It's as if it's more about politics to him than racing.

DuckAvenger

324 posts

133 months

Friday 11th April 2014
quotequote all
oyster said:
This isn't a rant about the new F1 regs at all, but
Yes it is

S0 What

3,358 posts

172 months

Friday 11th April 2014
quotequote all
Maybe, just maybe, he agrees with the new regs ?
i do so i dont see it as strange that he does?

Ponk

1,380 posts

192 months

Friday 11th April 2014
quotequote all
He certainly knows how to operate ctrl + c and ctrl + v. I don't think he's ever printed an article which hasn't been at least in partially borrowed.

deadslow

7,994 posts

223 months

Friday 11th April 2014
quotequote all
I avoid anything with this guy's name on.

oyster

Original Poster:

12,594 posts

248 months

Friday 11th April 2014
quotequote all
DuckAvenger said:
oyster said:
This isn't a rant about the new F1 regs at all, but
Yes it is
It's plainly not. I made that quite clear in my post. If you want to read other things into it then it's a pity as it demeans your debating capability somewhat.

Schermerhorn

4,342 posts

189 months

Friday 11th April 2014
quotequote all
He seemed to have a major axe to grind against Michael Schumacher when Schumi made his return in 2010.

NRS

22,143 posts

201 months

Sunday 13th April 2014
quotequote all
Ponk said:
He certainly knows how to operate ctrl + c and ctrl + v. I don't think he's ever printed an article which hasn't been at least in partially borrowed.
Have to agree with this. Most of his stories are a slightly modified version of his previous one. And then the rest is reworded from the other commentators. I have to say I was wondering how much he would struggle when Anderson left since he liked to copy him! biggrin

S0 What

3,358 posts

172 months

Sunday 13th April 2014
quotequote all
oyster said:
DuckAvenger said:
oyster said:
This isn't a rant about the new F1 regs at all, but
Yes it is
It's plainly not. I made that quite clear in my post. If you want to read other things into it then it's a pity as it demeans your debating capability somewhat.
Oh it plainly is, you assume the regs are wrong and that he is wrong for agreeing with them, which to me demeans your debating ability somewhat, you can't debate about which you already beleive to be wrong, whats the point, you've made up your mind.

Edited by S0 What on Sunday 13th April 17:15

Some Gump

12,688 posts

186 months

Sunday 13th April 2014
quotequote all
I quite like the current regs, and really don't think there is any more fuel saving now than there has been in the past - i think ow it's just more visible and people make a big song and dance about it.

Does that nake me a hand wringing leftie puppet on the strings of the director general?

RichB

51,565 posts

284 months

Sunday 13th April 2014
quotequote all
S0 What said:
...wronge <clip> ...wronge <clip> wronge...
Struggling to figure out what word your predictive speller is trying to make you use there hehe

anonymous-user

54 months

Tuesday 15th April 2014
quotequote all
"The biggest set of rule changes for a generation"

"The biggest set of rule changes for a generation"

"The biggest set of rule changes for a generation"

"The biggest set of rule changes for a generation"

This sentence was in every one of his articles from testing until the first race. Generation doesn't even describe a defined period of time! Chief F1 writer he is not; he's the only F1 writer on the BBC.

Derek Smith

45,654 posts

248 months

Tuesday 15th April 2014
quotequote all
I support the new regulations.

Well, perhaps not entirely.

I thought they would be a disaster, and that with all the other pressures on the sport, it would be severely damaged and maybe something else would take up the mantel of premier motor sport formula.

I think, however, the jury is still out on that and there seems to be a certain support building. The major source of complaint seems to be the noise and that from the armchair fans who could, one assumes, turn the sounds of their TVs up.

Whether they should have opted to go for the biggest changes in the regulations in a generation at a time of stretched budgets and scarce sponsors is a different argument.

Mercedes team is in the ascendant and the Merc engine is the one to have. So the days of one team dominating are not over. That is a major shame.

Merc have allowed their two drivers to compete but one wonders if they will continue to do so. My betting is that they will not, even if neither suffers damage after a collision. But I can't believe that, a/ they won't collide, and b/ that Merc won't then enforce team orders.

Let's enjoy the competition whilst it is happening.

entropy

5,433 posts

203 months

Tuesday 15th April 2014
quotequote all
RenOHH said:
"The biggest set of rule changes for a generation"

"The biggest set of rule changes for a generation"

"The biggest set of rule changes for a generation"

"The biggest set of rule changes for a generation"

This sentence was in every one of his articles from testing until the first race. Generation doesn't even describe a defined period of time! Chief F1 writer he is not; he's the only F1 writer on the BBC.
Yes its annoying but its the BBC and he's aware of th audience aren't all anoraks and not necessarily care about the intricacies.

Fire99

9,844 posts

229 months

Tuesday 15th April 2014
quotequote all
I cannot deny, I find him flippin' annoying and I avoid his articles if I can.