Honda - another disaster ?

Honda - another disaster ?

Author
Discussion

RumbleOfThunder

3,551 posts

203 months

Friday 30th June 2017
quotequote all
Ross played an absolute blinder there. Have to say I'm much happier with him taking a leadership role in F1, I couldn't think of anyone better.

Vaud

50,391 posts

155 months

Friday 30th June 2017
quotequote all
RumbleOfThunder said:
Ross played an absolute blinder there. Have to say I'm much happier with him taking a leadership role in F1, I couldn't think of anyone better.
I agree. Big brain, small ego, surrounds himself with smart people.

AndStilliRise

2,295 posts

116 months

Friday 30th June 2017
quotequote all
Vaud said:
RumbleOfThunder said:
Ross played an absolute blinder there. Have to say I'm much happier with him taking a leadership role in F1, I couldn't think of anyone better.
I agree. Big brain, small ego.
Sounds like me, just the other way round. smile

Paul578

69 posts

107 months

Friday 30th June 2017
quotequote all
Vaud said:
It probably would not have won with the Honda engine according to Ross B and Nick F - it was still not competitive, despite Hondas protestations.
I think there is a slice of discrection in that statement from RB / NF, the then RA109 had a long pre-development cycle since the RA108 turned out early to be such a lemon, it employed new flywheel and gearbox designs and discarded a novel flywheel based KERS system, but alas no-one will really know what could have happened if this design had been realised, and it is one best left for armchair pundits to ponder.


CraigyMc

16,381 posts

236 months

Friday 30th June 2017
quotequote all
Paul578 said:
... alas no-one will really know what could have happened if this design had been realised, and it is one best left for armchair pundits to ponder.
Most oddly, Honda did actually continue to develop the RA109 even after the Brawn sale.

Have a read of http://www.racecar-engineering.com/articles/f1/hon...

Vaud

50,391 posts

155 months

Friday 30th June 2017
quotequote all
Paul578 said:
I think there is a slice of discrection in that statement from RB / NF, the then RA109 had a long pre-development cycle since the RA108 turned out early to be such a lemon, it employed new flywheel and gearbox designs and discarded a novel flywheel based KERS system, but alas no-one will really know what could have happened if this design had been realised, and it is one best left for armchair pundits to ponder.
True, my only reference was Ross' comparison of the RA108 performance figures to what he knew from other engines.

garylythgoe

806 posts

222 months

Friday 30th June 2017
quotequote all
CraigyMc said:
Most oddly, Honda did actually continue to develop the RA109 even after the Brawn sale.

Have a read of http://www.racecar-engineering.com/articles/f1/hon...
Thanks for sharing that. I really enjoyed that!

FourWheelDrift

88,476 posts

284 months

Wednesday 5th July 2017
quotequote all
It's not all bad news, they're not as bad as Red Bull - http://www.crash.net/f1/feature/267956/1/which-tea...

[enter stiffupperlip.smiley]

Crafty_

13,269 posts

200 months

Saturday 8th July 2017
quotequote all
Boullier "McLaren-Honda now on the right path"

http://www.racer.com/f1/item/142081-boullier-mclar...

Smollet

10,522 posts

190 months

Wednesday 12th July 2017
quotequote all
Rumours that the Sauber deal is now off following Kaltenburg's departure
http://www.autosport.com/news/report.php/id/130672

CraigyMc

16,381 posts

236 months

Wednesday 12th July 2017
quotequote all
Smollet said:
Rumours that the Sauber deal is now off following Kaltenburg's departure
http://www.autosport.com/news/report.php/id/130672
Joe Saward is also reporting trouble (or at least, some sort of shanaigans) in the Sauber-Honda deal, along with news that Fred Vasseur is their new head honcho.

Jinba Ittai

562 posts

91 months

Wednesday 12th July 2017
quotequote all
CraigyMc said:
Smollet said:
Rumours that the Sauber deal is now off following Kaltenburg's departure
http://www.autosport.com/news/report.php/id/130672
Joe Saward is also reporting trouble (or at least, some sort of shanaigans) in the Sauber-Honda deal, along with news that Fred Vasseur is their new head honcho.
Could it be Honda are pulling the plug on F1 altogether? McLaren have got a Merc deal already signed and are waiting for Honda to go public before confirming?


carl_w

9,171 posts

258 months

Wednesday 12th July 2017
quotequote all
Jinba Ittai said:
Could it be Honda are pulling the plug on F1 altogether? McLaren have got a Merc deal already signed and are waiting for Honda to go public before confirming?
Latest rumours are a McLaren-Ferrari deal, possibly badged as an Alfa-Romeo engine.

LordGrover

33,535 posts

212 months

Wednesday 12th July 2017
quotequote all
Vaud said:
It's generally easier to add reliability than to add speed. (Massive armchair enthusiast sweeping statement)
Cheap, fast, reliable - you can choose only two.

Vaud

50,391 posts

155 months

Wednesday 12th July 2017
quotequote all
LordGrover said:
Cheap, fast, reliable - you can choose only two.
Though arguably Force India do a good job on a low budget - high reliability, fast and they don't have the largest budget...

MissChief

7,098 posts

168 months

Wednesday 12th July 2017
quotequote all
I really cannot see any chance of Ferrari agreeing to supply a potential rival. If McLaren do change supplier, and rumours have died down a little and even McLaren themselves have softened their stance since the Spec 3 engine debuted, it will be to Mercedes.

Jinba Ittai

562 posts

91 months

Wednesday 12th July 2017
quotequote all
carl_w said:
Jinba Ittai said:
Could it be Honda are pulling the plug on F1 altogether? McLaren have got a Merc deal already signed and are waiting for Honda to go public before confirming?
Latest rumours are a McLaren-Ferrari deal, possibly badged as an Alfa-Romeo engine.
If that were to happen, surely an interim for a few years until McLaren get another manufacturer deal lined up? Possibly Porsche/Audi?

Bristol spark

4,382 posts

183 months

Wednesday 12th July 2017
quotequote all
I can't see Mclaren using anything other than Honda next Year smile Complete with Alonso.

They would be crazy to change now things are looking good.




Frimley111R

15,611 posts

234 months

Wednesday 12th July 2017
quotequote all
Bristol spark said:
I can't see Mclaren using anything other than Honda next Year smile Complete with Alonso.

They would be crazy to change now things are looking good.
I am not sure what you think 'looking good' looks like but its not the view from the midfield. However, they do seem to be making progress and I wonder if they jumped now to another engine supplier, Honda would have a leading engine in 2-3 more years.

Jinba Ittai

562 posts

91 months

Wednesday 12th July 2017
quotequote all
Frimley111R said:
Bristol spark said:
I can't see Mclaren using anything other than Honda next Year smile Complete with Alonso.

They would be crazy to change now things are looking good.
I am not sure what you think 'looking good' looks like but its not the view from the midfield. However, they do seem to be making progress and I wonder if they jumped now to another engine supplier, Honda would have a leading engine in 2-3 more years.
I would much prefer McLaren to stay with Honda, and for it all to come good, but I think McLaren's patience ran out for good a couple of month ago. They have had to make a decision about future engine supply as work on next year's car has started. I just get an uneasy feeling McLaren have signed another engine deal with an at this time unknown supplier, Honda have made the decision to pull out and have notified Sauber so they can make other arrangements.