Nico Rosberg

Author
Discussion

rubystone

11,254 posts

259 months

Tuesday 20th June 2017
quotequote all
entropy said:
There must be some weight to the story otherwise why would Toto come and admit his thoughts on Nico?

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/formulaone/articl...

http://en.f1i.com/news/271068-rosberg-dismisses-wo...
One doesn't really know the context of these types of puff piece. And does it really matter? Psychological games are a big part of F1 and they always have been really.

Derek Smith

45,655 posts

248 months

Tuesday 20th June 2017
quotequote all
rubystone said:
One doesn't really know the context of these types of puff piece. And does it really matter? Psychological games are a big part of F1 and they always have been really.
What would be the point of calling Rosberg vicious? He's nothing to them, at least at the moment, and from what Wolff says it would appear in the future as well. It could be punishment for jumping ship in the way he did, but It's over, why bother?. If it was a revellation that NR bit the heads of little children then I'd see the point, but he's said nothing that we don't all know.

I'm surprised at the dig though, not to mention the admission in all but words, that Rosberg cheated at Monaco. I would have thought Wolff would have moved on. Rosberg still indulges in criticisms and digs but that reduces him. He's nothing to do with the team now.

If I was Wolff and wanted to have a go back, I'd just talk about how good Bottas is for the team, build the bloke up and allow others to make the comparison.

Ot is it, perhaps, to negate pressure to take on another German(ish) driver?


HustleRussell

24,690 posts

160 months

Tuesday 20th June 2017
quotequote all
It's Hamilton psychological management. Rosberg is gone and Hamilton remains so Toto will clearly side with the current driver. To admit that Hamilton gave at least as good as he got could be construed as a criticism of Hamilton which journos would latch onto and wouldn't be constructive within the team either.

Mercedes are playing happy families at the moment with Hamilton and Bottas so publically the management are contrasting that positivity against the Hamilton Rosberg rivalry which has filled so many column inches over the past few years.

Rosberg has already come out and said that he doesn't believe that those are Toto's true feelings and I can't imagine he'd be motivated to lie about that.

deadslow

7,999 posts

223 months

Tuesday 20th June 2017
quotequote all
HustleRussell said:
It's Hamilton psychological management. Rosberg is gone and Hamilton remains so Toto will clearly side with the current driver. To admit that Hamilton gave at least as good as he got could be construed as a criticism of Hamilton which journos would latch onto and wouldn't be constructive within the team either.

Mercedes are playing happy families at the moment with Hamilton and Bottas so publically the management are contrasting that positivity against the Hamilton Rosberg rivalry which has filled so many column inches over the past few years.

Rosberg has already come out and said that he doesn't believe that those are Toto's true feelings and I can't imagine he'd be motivated to lie about that.
this, one million per cent

37chevy

3,280 posts

156 months

Tuesday 20th June 2017
quotequote all
deadslow said:
HustleRussell said:
It's Hamilton psychological management. Rosberg is gone and Hamilton remains so Toto will clearly side with the current driver. To admit that Hamilton gave at least as good as he got could be construed as a criticism of Hamilton which journos would latch onto and wouldn't be constructive within the team either.

Mercedes are playing happy families at the moment with Hamilton and Bottas so publically the management are contrasting that positivity against the Hamilton Rosberg rivalry which has filled so many column inches over the past few years.

Rosberg has already come out and said that he doesn't believe that those are Toto's true feelings and I can't imagine he'd be motivated to lie about that.
this, one million per cent
Wow, your hatred of Hamilton knows no bounds does it? Doesn't even open his mouth and you're saying Hamilton has toto under his thumb so that he can massage his ego.

If toto really wanted to keep his driver focused and have a competitive advantage this year, there would be no point in looking back at past rivalries with Nico and stirring the media into a frenzy again

Hungrymc

6,662 posts

137 months

Wednesday 21st June 2017
quotequote all
I didn't see anything too controversial in there? Nico won WDC last year with a monumental effort. He was ruthless and focused and tried to squeeze every advantage he could. Did anyone actually watch the season and not see that? I think you could see the intense pressure he had put himself under, it was one final, massive and completely committed push - do everything necessary to win which included playing in the grey areas (he wasn't the first and wont be the last). Also why I think he retired, that intensity was unsustainable.

Qualifying at Monaco 2014. Well we all have an opinion on what we think happened, and its all well and good Toto making his comments now - maybe an impartial team principle should have acted when it happened (Toto not doing himself any favours there in my eyes). I just think Nico was flirting with the edges of the rules (if being way outside the spirit of them). Its not unusual in professional sport is it, maybe a unique aspect of F1 and motorsport in general is how rarely a foul or penalty is called, its certainly far more prevalent in most other sports.

I didn't particularly enjoy Nico's driving. But, he committed himself 100% to win the WDC last year which I respect.

HustleRussell

24,690 posts

160 months

Wednesday 21st June 2017
quotequote all
Also, while Toto's English is better than most English people's, it is still his second language. 'Vicious' is an interesting choice of word, perhaps he got it a bit wrong. As above, 'ruthless' might've been more fitting. Then what world champion isn't?

deadslow

7,999 posts

223 months

Wednesday 21st June 2017
quotequote all
HustleRussell said:
As above, 'ruthless' might've been more fitting. Then what world champion isn't?
This is surely correct. I think Rosberg dedicated himself to better/batter Hamilton in every way possible last year (and Lewis is no shrinking violet) in one last ditch attempt to win the WDC. I am sure he was ruthless.

He was possibly fortunate that Lewis became a little distracted at times.

Rosberg won, and knowing that he could never/would never wish to sustain that level of intensity, retired. Fairy nuff.

paua

5,718 posts

143 months

Wednesday 21st June 2017
quotequote all
Whole thing may just be the press getting bit carried away - not like it would be the first time.

cuprabob

14,612 posts

214 months

Wednesday 21st June 2017
quotequote all
paua said:
Whole thing may just be the press getting bit carried away - not like it would be the first time.
That doesn't happen does it?smile

Sa Calobra

37,122 posts

211 months

Wednesday 21st June 2017
quotequote all
HustleRussell said:
It's Hamilton psychological management. Rosberg is gone and Hamilton remains so Toto will clearly side with the current driver. To admit that Hamilton gave at least as good as he got could be construed as a criticism of Hamilton which journos would latch onto and wouldn't be constructive within the team either.

Mercedes are playing happy families at the moment with Hamilton and Bottas so publically the management are contrasting that positivity against the Hamilton Rosberg rivalry which has filled so many column inches over the past few years.

Rosberg has already come out and said that he doesn't believe that those are Toto's true feelings and I can't imagine he'd be motivated to lie about that.
Rosberg is allowed an opinion and to say what he thinks others might say or said.

Rosberg did really well. It must have been literally killing him to lift his game above his talent level. As Damon once said he had to squeeze every ounce out when lifting his game.

So I say chapeau to Rosberg. However Lewis is on another level compared to Rosberg. It just comes more natural to him.

On this topic - it's all mind games.

spunkytherabbit

442 posts

180 months

Wednesday 21st June 2017
quotequote all
HustleRussell said:
Rosberg has already come out and said that he doesn't believe that those are Toto's true feelings and I can't imagine he'd be motivated to lie about that.
Oh come now! Rosberg proved himself manipulative, canny and both able and prepared to twist the words of others and situations when he saw the opportunity to rub the tarnish off his image. Just like every other race driver competing like he did and at the level he did. They'd all lie if they felt the need to, or at least say the absolute minimum so as they could back track later and 'oh this is really what I meant. It was taken out of context'.

Rosberg is as capable and willing as the next F1/ ex-F1 driver and has also proved he will play mis-direction and misinterpretation with words.

HustleRussell

24,690 posts

160 months

Wednesday 21st June 2017
quotequote all
spunkytherabbit said:
HustleRussell said:
Rosberg has already come out and said that he doesn't believe that those are Toto's true feelings and I can't imagine he'd be motivated to lie about that.
Oh come now! Rosberg proved himself manipulative, canny and both able and prepared to twist the words of others and situations when he saw the opportunity to rub the tarnish off his image. Just like every other race driver competing like he did and at the level he did. They'd all lie if they felt the need to, or at least say the absolute minimum so as they could back track later and 'oh this is really what I meant. It was taken out of context'.

Rosberg is as capable and willing as the next F1/ ex-F1 driver and has also proved he will play mis-direction and misinterpretation with words.
'Vicious' though? I've just looked up the definition. It does not mean 'deliberately outbraking oneself at Mirabeau' or 'giving your teammate a puncture at Les Combes' or 'being slightly passive agressive in post race interviews'.

Rosberg' 2016 victory is pretty inspirational. It proves that if you work really hard, practice like hell, and meet every challenge with the same fervour you would your last, you might just be able to beat somebody who is more talented than you.

Rude-boy

22,227 posts

233 months

Wednesday 21st June 2017
quotequote all
HustleRussell said:
Also, while Toto's English is better than most English people's, it is still his second language. 'Vicious' is an interesting choice of word, perhaps he got it a bit wrong. As above, 'ruthless' might've been more fitting. Then what world champion isn't?
Sorry, don't buy that.

Toto knew exactly what the words he was using meant.

To be honest though ruthless is what Hamilton is. Vicious is far more in keeping with Rosberg's MO. Remember Hamilton would play his games out in public, Rosberg in private where you can be a lot more Machiavellian and get away with it without it coming to the attention of the wider world. I am sure that there are people on here who know exactly what it was like, i have had many 2nd and third hand reports - some wild, some from people who have no reason to tell me, privately, off the record lies about events that occurred that I would otherwise have had no idea had happened!

One of the things that Toto is keen to do is to make the very most of Hamilton as a driver and as a brand to promote Merc. Hamilton has a bit of a Diva reputation and some feel that he was very unfair towards Rosberg - bits like this in the press do no harm to Merc and make people realise that Nico was not exactly an angle, Monaco, Spa and Spain are just the three clearest examples of how Rosberg is the type that smiles to your face as they slide the knife in between your ribs - Hamilton charges at you like an ancient warrior...


Sa Calobra

37,122 posts

211 months

Wednesday 21st June 2017
quotequote all
spunkytherabbit said:
Oh come now! Rosberg proved himself manipulative, canny and both able and prepared to twist the words of others and situations when he saw the opportunity to rub the tarnish off his image. Just like every other race driver competing like he did and at the level he did. They'd all lie if they felt the need to, or at least say the absolute minimum so as they could back track later and 'oh this is really what I meant. It was taken out of context'.

Rosberg is as capable and willing as the next F1/ ex-F1 driver and has also proved he will play mis-direction and misinterpretation with words.
Yet for all his intelligence the other drivers used to wind him up/play jokes at his expense!

spunkytherabbit

442 posts

180 months

Thursday 22nd June 2017
quotequote all
Sa Calobra said:
spunkytherabbit said:
Oh come now! Rosberg proved himself manipulative, canny and both able and prepared to twist the words of others and situations when he saw the opportunity to rub the tarnish off his image. Just like every other race driver competing like he did and at the level he did. They'd all lie if they felt the need to, or at least say the absolute minimum so as they could back track later and 'oh this is really what I meant. It was taken out of context'.

Rosberg is as capable and willing as the next F1/ ex-F1 driver and has also proved he will play mis-direction and misinterpretation with words.
Yet for all his intelligence the other drivers used to wind him up/play jokes at his expense!
My honest opinion, as a 42 year old with kids, friends, general life experience... I honestly think it's only child syndrome. Couple it to a high profile father who achieved, having exposed he wasn't QUITE good enough out the box, not wanting to disappoint Daddy.... that's got to be a massive mind fk to handle every race weekend. You can understand why he appeared so fragile in 14 and 15. I just think it's naive to ignore his blatant manipulation and capacity to twist truths like all other drivers do.

But like a previous post said, look at what he achieved with hard work, sacrifice and sheer determination. It might be grudging on my behalf, but yes, you have to admire it.

Sa Calobra

37,122 posts

211 months

Thursday 22nd June 2017
quotequote all
I do admire him. I admired his decision. Damon Hill should have quit whilst he was ahead and I really admire Damon. Schumacher didn't need to come back
Many carry on. Rosberg quit firmly whilst he was ahead. He's in charge.

KevinCamaroSS

11,629 posts

280 months

Thursday 22nd June 2017
quotequote all
HustleRussell said:
Rosberg' 2016 victory is pretty inspirational. It proves that if you work really hard, practice like hell, and meet every challenge with the same fervour you would your last, you might just be able to beat somebody who is more talented than you.
Don't forget the enormous amount of luck he also needed.

oyster

12,594 posts

248 months

Thursday 22nd June 2017
quotequote all
HustleRussell said:
Rosberg' 2016 victory is pretty inspirational. It proves that if you work really hard, practice like hell, and meet every challenge with the same fervour you would your last, you might just be able to beat somebody who is more talented than you.
Very well written.

It's funny how in most walks of life and work situations we admire those who get to where they are through hard work and determination, yet in sport the naturally talented seem to garner more respect.

Of course some combine both (Ronaldo in football comes to mind, perhaps Schumy in F1).

TheLimla

1,828 posts

194 months

Thursday 22nd June 2017
quotequote all
deadslow said:
HustleRussell said:
It's Hamilton psychological management. Rosberg is gone and Hamilton remains so Toto will clearly side with the current driver. To admit that Hamilton gave at least as good as he got could be construed as a criticism of Hamilton which journos would latch onto and wouldn't be constructive within the team either.

Mercedes are playing happy families at the moment with Hamilton and Bottas so publically the management are contrasting that positivity against the Hamilton Rosberg rivalry which has filled so many column inches over the past few years.

Rosberg has already come out and said that he doesn't believe that those are Toto's true feelings and I can't imagine he'd be motivated to lie about that.
this, one million per cent
I think the stars alligned for Rosberg in 2016. In 2014 it was close, 2015 Rosberg didnt get near at all but 2016 seem to come together what with Lewis not liking the new clutch system and his mechanical problems. It really was Rosberg's only good shot to get a title and fair play he managed it, although i agree with others that the turning point was Malaysia. Without that i think Hamilton would have closed the season on top, by that point it was too late for mistakes and unreliability and Lewis had squandered that cushion earlier in the year with clutch issues.