Halo...

Author
Discussion

waynecyclist

8,764 posts

114 months

Monday 26th March 2018
quotequote all
It looks like someone has bolted a toilet seat to the car.

I am all for safety but this has to be one of the worst ideas ever.

unpc

2,835 posts

213 months

Monday 26th March 2018
quotequote all
I'm not a fan but some teams seem to have tried sticking aerodynamic addenda on them making them uglier still.

PhantomPH

4,043 posts

225 months

Monday 26th March 2018
quotequote all
ash73 said:
I think it's a bit over-spec'd, but let's wait and see how it performs in a crash.
You'll be waiting a long time. Based on the weekend's evidence, the cars won't be near each other in order to cause a crash. wink

All joking aside - when was the last time you saw a crash that would have 'tested' such a device? In this modern era, I cannot remember a time when (with notable exceptions included that have already been established the halo would not have helped) there was encroachment into the drivers' head area enough to have justified such a device.

Even Botas blasting into the barrier and obliterating his car, didn't result in wheels etc flying around.

F1 contains risks. It's optional - if you don't accept those risks, then don't drive. I remember Mansell back in the day saying that drivers knew that every time they set foot in a car, it my be their last. Things have moved on soooo much since then, it's great - but the toilet seat is a step too far. it is very much 'safety' for safety's sake.

Anyway...grumpy old man ramble ramble ramble.

Blaster72

10,835 posts

197 months

Monday 26th March 2018
quotequote all
PhantomPH said:
You'll be waiting a long time. Based on the weekend's evidence, the cars won't be near each other in order to cause a crash. wink

All joking aside - when was the last time you saw a crash that would have 'tested' such a device? In this modern era, I cannot remember a time when (with notable exceptions included that have already been established the halo would not have helped) there was encroachment into the drivers' head area enough to have justified such a device.

Even Botas blasting into the barrier and obliterating his car, didn't result in wheels etc flying around.

F1 contains risks. It's optional - if you don't accept those risks, then don't drive. I remember Mansell back in the day saying that drivers knew that every time they set foot in a car, it my be their last. Things have moved on soooo much since then, it's great - but the toilet seat is a step too far. it is very much 'safety' for safety's sake.

Anyway...grumpy old man ramble ramble ramble.
Jules Bianchi may have survived if such a device was installed.

budgie smuggler

5,378 posts

159 months

Monday 26th March 2018
quotequote all
Blaster72 said:
Jules Bianchi may have survived if such a device was installed.
no chance, impact was over 250 G

PhantomPH

4,043 posts

225 months

Monday 26th March 2018
quotequote all
Blaster72 said:
PhantomPH said:
You'll be waiting a long time. Based on the weekend's evidence, the cars won't be near each other in order to cause a crash. wink

All joking aside - when was the last time you saw a crash that would have 'tested' such a device? In this modern era, I cannot remember a time when (with notable exceptions included that have already been established the halo would not have helped) there was encroachment into the drivers' head area enough to have justified such a device.

Even Botas blasting into the barrier and obliterating his car, didn't result in wheels etc flying around.

F1 contains risks. It's optional - if you don't accept those risks, then don't drive. I remember Mansell back in the day saying that drivers knew that every time they set foot in a car, it my be their last. Things have moved on soooo much since then, it's great - but the toilet seat is a step too far. it is very much 'safety' for safety's sake.

Anyway...grumpy old man ramble ramble ramble.
Jules Bianchi may have survived if such a device was installed.
Nope. No he wouldn't. And there is a school of thought that the only difference might have been that he was killed instantly by the halo being pushed into his face, rather than being on life support.

I never, ever want to see any racer hurt, let alone killed - but this halo seems to be the solution to a problem that's not really there.

The sad thing is, I think without it the cars would look really good this year. Low and wide and less overall fuss (details excluded). Nice looking machines.

sgtBerbatov

2,597 posts

81 months

Monday 26th March 2018
quotequote all
Blaster72 said:
PhantomPH said:
You'll be waiting a long time. Based on the weekend's evidence, the cars won't be near each other in order to cause a crash. wink

All joking aside - when was the last time you saw a crash that would have 'tested' such a device? In this modern era, I cannot remember a time when (with notable exceptions included that have already been established the halo would not have helped) there was encroachment into the drivers' head area enough to have justified such a device.

Even Botas blasting into the barrier and obliterating his car, didn't result in wheels etc flying around.

F1 contains risks. It's optional - if you don't accept those risks, then don't drive. I remember Mansell back in the day saying that drivers knew that every time they set foot in a car, it my be their last. Things have moved on soooo much since then, it's great - but the toilet seat is a step too far. it is very much 'safety' for safety's sake.

Anyway...grumpy old man ramble ramble ramble.
Jules Bianchi may have survived if such a device was installed.
Jules Bianchi was a completely freak accident. You can say that having the halo would've saved him, but if he had actually slowed down in the double yellow flag waved sector he could also be alive. So shall we reduce the speeds of the car as well? Plus the only accident like that you could compare it to would be Tom Pryce's fatal accident in the 70's. So are two freak accidents worth the flip flop on the car?

Also, for the safety device, I think it'd be 1998/1999 when they introduce wheel teathers after the poor mashall got killed by one flying from a car. The initial version didn't work. Now, however, it's very rare that a wheel flies off a car completely.

The Moose

Original Poster:

22,845 posts

209 months

Monday 26th March 2018
quotequote all
sgtBerbatov said:
Blaster72 said:
PhantomPH said:
You'll be waiting a long time. Based on the weekend's evidence, the cars won't be near each other in order to cause a crash. wink

All joking aside - when was the last time you saw a crash that would have 'tested' such a device? In this modern era, I cannot remember a time when (with notable exceptions included that have already been established the halo would not have helped) there was encroachment into the drivers' head area enough to have justified such a device.

Even Botas blasting into the barrier and obliterating his car, didn't result in wheels etc flying around.

F1 contains risks. It's optional - if you don't accept those risks, then don't drive. I remember Mansell back in the day saying that drivers knew that every time they set foot in a car, it my be their last. Things have moved on soooo much since then, it's great - but the toilet seat is a step too far. it is very much 'safety' for safety's sake.

Anyway...grumpy old man ramble ramble ramble.
Jules Bianchi may have survived if such a device was installed.
Jules Bianchi was a completely freak accident. You can say that having the halo would've saved him, but if he had actually slowed down in the double yellow flag waved sector he could also be alive. So shall we reduce the speeds of the car as well? Plus the only accident like that you could compare it to would be Tom Pryce's fatal accident in the 70's. So are two freak accidents worth the flip flop on the car?

Also, for the safety device, I think it'd be 1998/1999 when they introduce wheel teathers after the poor mashall got killed by one flying from a car. The initial version didn't work. Now, however, it's very rare that a wheel flies off a car completely.
In my opinion, his accident was not a freak accident at all! He cocked up and he paid the (very heavy) price for it.

sgtBerbatov

2,597 posts

81 months

Monday 26th March 2018
quotequote all
The Moose said:
sgtBerbatov said:
Blaster72 said:
PhantomPH said:
You'll be waiting a long time. Based on the weekend's evidence, the cars won't be near each other in order to cause a crash. wink

All joking aside - when was the last time you saw a crash that would have 'tested' such a device? In this modern era, I cannot remember a time when (with notable exceptions included that have already been established the halo would not have helped) there was encroachment into the drivers' head area enough to have justified such a device.

Even Botas blasting into the barrier and obliterating his car, didn't result in wheels etc flying around.

F1 contains risks. It's optional - if you don't accept those risks, then don't drive. I remember Mansell back in the day saying that drivers knew that every time they set foot in a car, it my be their last. Things have moved on soooo much since then, it's great - but the toilet seat is a step too far. it is very much 'safety' for safety's sake.

Anyway...grumpy old man ramble ramble ramble.
Jules Bianchi may have survived if such a device was installed.
Jules Bianchi was a completely freak accident. You can say that having the halo would've saved him, but if he had actually slowed down in the double yellow flag waved sector he could also be alive. So shall we reduce the speeds of the car as well? Plus the only accident like that you could compare it to would be Tom Pryce's fatal accident in the 70's. So are two freak accidents worth the flip flop on the car?

Also, for the safety device, I think it'd be 1998/1999 when they introduce wheel teathers after the poor mashall got killed by one flying from a car. The initial version didn't work. Now, however, it's very rare that a wheel flies off a car completely.
In my opinion, his accident was not a freak accident at all! He cocked up and he paid the (very heavy) price for it.
He cocked up more than once in his career, as every other driver has and will do. The fact a big digger/crane was near the track and the car decides to go straight on in that particular place aimed directly at that particular object? That has never happened, to my knowledge, on the race track before. So in reality it is a freak accident. If the crane wasn't there or if he was a foot either side of it, it'd be a completely different story.

I'm not one for superstition or anything, but I can't help but feel that team were cursed. Maria de Villota crashed in semi-similar way, again completely freak accident with no past accident to compare it to.

Blaster72

10,835 posts

197 months

Monday 26th March 2018
quotequote all
budgie smuggler said:
Blaster72 said:
Jules Bianchi may have survived if such a device was installed.
no chance, impact was over 250 G
Thanks, my post should have had a ? on the end and been a question rather than looking like a fact.

colin79666

1,816 posts

113 months

Monday 26th March 2018
quotequote all
I think they look awful and think they might actually make things more dangerous in certain scenarios. Take the Massa incident, the spring could have hit the halo and gone down, straight into his chest, instead of glancing the helmet and carrying on past.

No one wants drivers to be injured or worse but if safety is really paramount they may as well just remove the driver and have the cars drive themselves. F1 has got so technology driven these days anyway.

Not that my opinion counts for much. I gave up watching F1 years ago!

angrymoby

2,613 posts

178 months

Monday 26th March 2018
quotequote all
colin79666 said:
I think they look awful and think they might actually make things more dangerous in certain scenarios. Take the Massa incident, the spring could have hit the halo and gone down, straight into his chest, instead of glancing the helmet and carrying on past.
think i'd take my chances with a deflected & dissipated body shot, than a direct one to the face or head tbh



RedAlfa

476 posts

184 months

Monday 26th March 2018
quotequote all
angrymoby said:
think i'd take my chances with a deflected & dissipated body shot, than a direct one to the face or head tbh
Helmets and visors are now able to withstand the type of accident Felipe had ...... the visor has been reinforced.

angrymoby

2,613 posts

178 months

Monday 26th March 2018
quotequote all
RedAlfa said:
Helmets and visors are now able to withstand the type of accident Felipe had ...... the visor has been reinforced.
you fancy testing that? ...be my guest

NickofName

108 posts

131 months

Tuesday 27th March 2018
quotequote all
I was genuinely hoping that all the 'you barely notice them after half an hour' stuff was true.

Sorry, after a whole race weekend I'm still noticing them and still noticing how utterly gopping they look.

The most frustrating thing is that out of all the minor technical changes that have been suggested to improve the racing or the aesthetics, they went ahead with one that makes the cars look markedly worse and solves a problem that no one ever seems to have had, or seems likely to have.

Just put a damn cockpit canopy on them FFS, it'll look so much better and if the Halo is the only way to preserve the open-cockpit heritage of the sport then unfortunately I think it's time to let that heritage go.

budgie smuggler

5,378 posts

159 months

Tuesday 27th March 2018
quotequote all
NickofName said:
I was genuinely hoping that all the 'you barely notice them after half an hour' stuff was true.

Sorry, after a whole race weekend I'm still noticing them and still noticing how utterly gopping they look.

The most frustrating thing is that out of all the minor technical changes that have been suggested to improve the racing or the aesthetics, they went ahead with one that makes the cars look markedly worse and solves a problem that no one ever seems to have had, or seems likely to have.

Just put a damn cockpit canopy on them FFS, it'll look so much better and if the Halo is the only way to preserve the open-cockpit heritage of the sport then unfortunately I think it's time to let that heritage go.
I just don't understand why they seemed to st-can the windscreen idea after Vettel does one lap and says he's 'dizzy'. Yet Jenson complained of feeling 'cross eyed' various other drivers don't like it, the fans don't like it, yet here we are with it on the cars.
Smacks of them having already decided they wanted this solution rather than the windscreen for some reason.

crankedup

25,764 posts

243 months

Tuesday 27th March 2018
quotequote all
I watched the race, no longer take anything like the interest that I once had for the sport though. I’m in the camp that calls the halo pig ugly, the televised overhead view makes the car look almost comical, something akin to a fairground ride imo.
They need another solution, enclosed cockpit worth a second look.
Oh the race itself was, to me, achingly boring.

HustleRussell

24,687 posts

160 months

Tuesday 15th May 2018
quotequote all
Halo vindicated?

Edited by HustleRussell on Tuesday 15th May 16:47

Gameface

16,565 posts

77 months

Tuesday 15th May 2018
quotequote all
Apparently not...

budgie smuggler

5,378 posts

159 months

Tuesday 15th May 2018
quotequote all
HustleRussell said:
FTFY