The Official 2018 Singapore Grand Prix Thread **SPOILERS**

The Official 2018 Singapore Grand Prix Thread **SPOILERS**

Author
Discussion

rev-erend

21,413 posts

284 months

Tuesday 18th September 2018
quotequote all
Did anyone enjoy this race.

I found much of it a snoozy fest .. just car after car following without being able to get close or overtake.

It did get a bit better towards the end and during the pit stops but it was dull.


wibble cb

3,605 posts

207 months

Tuesday 18th September 2018
quotequote all
Hamilton can now afford to not fight say Verstappen for wins, so long as he finishes ahead of Vettel...Just a thought.

Steamer

13,857 posts

213 months

Tuesday 18th September 2018
quotequote all
wibble cb said:
Hamilton can now afford to not fight say Verstappen for wins, so long as he finishes ahead of Vettel...Just a thought.
That is true and Hamilton is certainly getting wiser.. but you know he'd never give up a fight or a podium place 'just because he could afford to'.

I think this season is showing more than ever that when Lewis needs 'it' (that little bit extra that maybe isnt in the car / didnt think was in the car) - He can do it, and obviously loves doing it.

Being a Ferrari fan isn't easy.

37chevy

3,280 posts

156 months

Tuesday 18th September 2018
quotequote all
wibble cb said:
Hamilton can now afford to not fight say Verstappen for wins, so long as he finishes ahead of Vettel...Just a thought.
Not that comfortable yet. 1 retirement for Hamilton and losing a few points here and there and he could give Vettel the championship. Just carry on driving like he has been doing methinks

Deesee

Original Poster:

8,420 posts

83 months

Tuesday 18th September 2018
quotequote all
Looks like Seb/Ferrari have doubled down on the hyper soft tyre strategy for Sochi


HTP99

22,546 posts

140 months

Tuesday 18th September 2018
quotequote all
37chevy said:
wibble cb said:
Hamilton can now afford to not fight say Verstappen for wins, so long as he finishes ahead of Vettel...Just a thought.
Not that comfortable yet. 1 retirement for Hamilton and losing a few points here and there and he could give Vettel the championship. Just carry on driving like he has been doing methinks
Yep, change your approach and this is when mistakes happen.

anonymous-user

54 months

Tuesday 18th September 2018
quotequote all
HTP99 said:
37chevy said:
wibble cb said:
Hamilton can now afford to not fight say Verstappen for wins, so long as he finishes ahead of Vettel...Just a thought.
Not that comfortable yet. 1 retirement for Hamilton and losing a few points here and there and he could give Vettel the championship. Just carry on driving like he has been doing methinks
Yep, change your approach and this is when mistakes happen.
Hard to think of where he’d need to fight too hard to keep ahead of a RedBull, the rest of this year, with his power advantage.

wibble cb

3,605 posts

207 months

Tuesday 18th September 2018
quotequote all
REALIST123 said:
HTP99 said:
37chevy said:
wibble cb said:
Hamilton can now afford to not fight say Verstappen for wins, so long as he finishes ahead of Vettel...Just a thought.
Not that comfortable yet. 1 retirement for Hamilton and losing a few points here and there and he could give Vettel the championship. Just carry on driving like he has been doing methinks
Yep, change your approach and this is when mistakes happen.
Hard to think of where he’d need to fight too hard to keep ahead of a RedBull, the rest of this year, with his power advantage.
Another way to look at it that maybe Mercedes have turned up Hamilton’s engine mode to 11 to build this cushion, surely at some point reliability might come into it, has Hamilton got any penalty free components left in his allocation? Just playing devils advocate, he may need to be more circumspect in future races, and to a degree now has that luxury.

Deesee

Original Poster:

8,420 posts

83 months

Wednesday 19th September 2018
quotequote all
wibble cb said:
REALIST123 said:
HTP99 said:
37chevy said:
wibble cb said:
Hamilton can now afford to not fight say Verstappen for wins, so long as he finishes ahead of Vettel...Just a thought.
Not that comfortable yet. 1 retirement for Hamilton and losing a few points here and there and he could give Vettel the championship. Just carry on driving like he has been doing methinks
Yep, change your approach and this is when mistakes happen.
Hard to think of where he’d need to fight too hard to keep ahead of a RedBull, the rest of this year, with his power advantage.
Another way to look at it that maybe Mercedes have turned up Hamilton’s engine mode to 11 to build this cushion, surely at some point reliability might come into it, has Hamilton got any penalty free components left in his allocation? Just playing devils advocate, he may need to be more circumspect in future races, and to a degree now has that luxury.
The rumour was infact that Hamilton was using an older spec engine in Singapore, as the race pace was known to be slower (so less stress on the PU) so they would not need all the bells and whistles, the latest engine (3rd if the allocation) was already one race fresher than Sebastian’s 3rd allocated, so could actually be 2 races fresher now.

Flooble

5,565 posts

100 months

Wednesday 19th September 2018
quotequote all
Deesee said:
The rumour was infact that Hamilton was using an older spec engine in Singapore, as the race pace was known to be slower (so less stress on the PU) so they would not need all the bells and whistles, the latest engine (3rd if the allocation) was already one race fresher than Sebastian’s 3rd allocated, so could actually be 2 races fresher now.
Are you sure about that? I thought they both took new "Spec 3" engines for Spa and hence both "Spec 3" engines are two races old (Spa and Monza)?

Hamilton does/did have one "spare" race on his "Spec 2" engine, as Mercedes messed up their quality control and weren't able to introduce it in Canada when Ferrari brought their "Spec 2", Mercedes therefore having to run seven races in a row on their "Spec 1".

So that "spare" race may come in to play if the "Spec 3" units can't cover Spa-Monza-Russia-Japan-USA-Mexico-Brazil-Abu Dhabi (8 races). However, it was always going to the be the case that to manage 21 races on 3 engines equally, you'd need the engines to do seven races each, but Ferrari swapped from "Spec 1" to "Spec 2" after only six races and again "Spec 2" to "Spec 3" after another six.

I was under the impression most teams tend to use an "old" spec for Monaco and Singapore since neither race pushes the engine hard. Monaco will have been "Spec 1" for both of them, so it's possible some of Mercedes sudden advantage was using their "Spec 2" in Singapore while Ferrari reverted to the "Spec 1" to even out the wear on their engine allocation; since Ferrari only had six races on their "Spec 1" it would be logical to use it in Singapore, while Mercedes only had five races on their "Spec 2" but seven on their "Spec 1", thus logical to use the "Spec 2".

It also suggests that in order to avoid pushing the "Spec 3" to eight races, both teams are going to be using "Spec 2" again somewhere. If Mercedes were using their "Spec 2" then Hamilton being able to cruise around turned down to the minimum could be very useful (Ferrari's Spec 2 having been pushed much harder in Canada, when Mercedes were still on Spec 1; and Mercedes Spec 2 having also failed to complete the race distance in Austria while Ferrari's went all the way).


Derek Smith

45,655 posts

248 months

Wednesday 19th September 2018
quotequote all
Flooble said:
Are you sure about that? I thought they both took new "Spec 3" engines for Spa and hence both "Spec 3" engines are two races old (Spa and Monza)?

Hamilton does/did have one "spare" race on his "Spec 2" engine, as Mercedes messed up their quality control and weren't able to introduce it in Canada when Ferrari brought their "Spec 2", Mercedes therefore having to run seven races in a row on their "Spec 1".

So that "spare" race may come in to play if the "Spec 3" units can't cover Spa-Monza-Russia-Japan-USA-Mexico-Brazil-Abu Dhabi (8 races). However, it was always going to the be the case that to manage 21 races on 3 engines equally, you'd need the engines to do seven races each, but Ferrari swapped from "Spec 1" to "Spec 2" after only six races and again "Spec 2" to "Spec 3" after another six.

I was under the impression most teams tend to use an "old" spec for Monaco and Singapore since neither race pushes the engine hard. Monaco will have been "Spec 1" for both of them, so it's possible some of Mercedes sudden advantage was using their "Spec 2" in Singapore while Ferrari reverted to the "Spec 1" to even out the wear on their engine allocation; since Ferrari only had six races on their "Spec 1" it would be logical to use it in Singapore, while Mercedes only had five races on their "Spec 2" but seven on their "Spec 1", thus logical to use the "Spec 2".

It also suggests that in order to avoid pushing the "Spec 3" to eight races, both teams are going to be using "Spec 2" again somewhere. If Mercedes were using their "Spec 2" then Hamilton being able to cruise around turned down to the minimum could be very useful (Ferrari's Spec 2 having been pushed much harder in Canada, when Mercedes were still on Spec 1; and Mercedes Spec 2 having also failed to complete the race distance in Austria while Ferrari's went all the way).
This formula is a bit too complex for my tired, old brain.


Mr Dendrite

2,315 posts

210 months

Wednesday 19th September 2018
quotequote all
Derek Smith said:
This formula is a bit too complex for my tired, old brain.
Need new Specs Derek?

Deesee

Original Poster:

8,420 posts

83 months

Wednesday 19th September 2018
quotequote all
Flooble said:
Deesee said:
The rumour was infact that Hamilton was using an older spec engine in Singapore, as the race pace was known to be slower (so less stress on the PU) so they would not need all the bells and whistles, the latest engine (3rd if the allocation) was already one race fresher than Sebastian’s 3rd allocated, so could actually be 2 races fresher now.
Are you sure about that? I thought they both took new "Spec 3" engines for Spa and hence both "Spec 3" engines are two races old (Spa and Monza)?

Hamilton does/did have one "spare" race on his "Spec 2" engine, as Mercedes messed up their quality control and weren't able to introduce it in Canada when Ferrari brought their "Spec 2", Mercedes therefore having to run seven races in a row on their "Spec 1".

So that "spare" race may come in to play if the "Spec 3" units can't cover Spa-Monza-Russia-Japan-USA-Mexico-Brazil-Abu Dhabi (8 races). However, it was always going to the be the case that to manage 21 races on 3 engines equally, you'd need the engines to do seven races each, but Ferrari swapped from "Spec 1" to "Spec 2" after only six races and again "Spec 2" to "Spec 3" after another six.

I was under the impression most teams tend to use an "old" spec for Monaco and Singapore since neither race pushes the engine hard. Monaco will have been "Spec 1" for both of them, so it's possible some of Mercedes sudden advantage was using their "Spec 2" in Singapore while Ferrari reverted to the "Spec 1" to even out the wear on their engine allocation; since Ferrari only had six races on their "Spec 1" it would be logical to use it in Singapore, while Mercedes only had five races on their "Spec 2" but seven on their "Spec 1", thus logical to use the "Spec 2".

It also suggests that in order to avoid pushing the "Spec 3" to eight races, both teams are going to be using "Spec 2" again somewhere. If Mercedes were using their "Spec 2" then Hamilton being able to cruise around turned down to the minimum could be very useful (Ferrari's Spec 2 having been pushed much harder in Canada, when Mercedes were still on Spec 1; and Mercedes Spec 2 having also failed to complete the race distance in Austria while Ferrari's went all the way).
Not now I've rechecked!

Yes both drivers introduced the 3rd pu at Belgium, Im thinking PU no 2 and getting the races in a muddle, and had totally forgotten that the 3rd pu's were in place at Belgium. Apologies to everyone & anyone if any wires crossed on my post.

Derek Smith

45,655 posts

248 months

Wednesday 19th September 2018
quotequote all
Mr Dendrite said:
Derek Smith said:
This formula is a bit too complex for my tired, old brain.
Need new Specs Derek?
New brain. I've followed Hamilton's example over the years and turned it down, but it doesn't seem to help.


oyster

12,595 posts

248 months

Wednesday 19th September 2018
quotequote all
I forgot to mention this on the thread earlier, but a couple of lap time anomalies really seem to affect the race.

Vettel's first lap out of the pits (and I think he was in clear air) was 4 seconds slower than Verstappen. This terrible lap gave Max the chance to even be near Seb after his pit stop.

And the pace difference between Hamilton and rest of the field after Lewis had cleared the traffic on lap 38. Verstappen got within half a second at one point and Vettel got within 3 seconds. Just a couple of laps later, Max was 4 seconds behind and Seb 8 seconds behind.

kambites

67,556 posts

221 months

Wednesday 19th September 2018
quotequote all
How did Vettel's out lap compare to everyone else's? I think it was just very hard to turn the tyres on, especially on the Ferrari.

DanielSan

18,786 posts

167 months

Wednesday 19th September 2018
quotequote all
kambites said:
How did Vettel's out lap compare to everyone else's? I think it was just very hard to turn the tyres on, especially on the Ferrari.
I’m sure his first sector or two were some of the quickest in the race, but then he caught Perez whose times were falling off a cliff and got stuck behind him in sector 3

Deesee

Original Poster:

8,420 posts

83 months

Wednesday 19th September 2018
quotequote all
The Merc F1 debrief, pure pit wall..

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=6snQ5R-0GaI


Deesee

Original Poster:

8,420 posts

83 months

Wednesday 19th September 2018
quotequote all
DanielSan said:
kambites said:
How did Vettel's out lap compare to everyone else's? I think it was just very hard to turn the tyres on, especially on the Ferrari.
I’m sure his first sector or two were some of the quickest in the race, but then he caught Perez whose times were falling off a cliff and got stuck behind him in sector 3
Lewis 44 Seb 5 Max 33 Kimi 7 Valtteri 77 in and out times, with gaps





Mr Dendrite

2,315 posts

210 months

Thursday 20th September 2018
quotequote all
Derek Smith said:
New brain. I've followed Hamilton's example over the years and turned it down, but it doesn't seem to help.
Thought the ECU was FIA standard, didn’t You get the upgrade smile