Engine manufacturer championship

[slipstream 1985]

Whilst not completely even in that some manufacturers only have 2 teams to draw points from and others have 3 it could still be interesting.
Assuming that the best 4 positions of your engine count towards the points Ferrari could be the winners of this.
So far
Mercedes 46
Ferrari 34
Honda 16
Renault 6

[slipstream 1985]

Mercedes 46 + 44 = 90
Ferrari 34 + 32 = 66
Honda 16 + 18 =36
Renault 6 + 8 = 14

[TheDeuce]

So... It's Mercedes then

I would have been a little interested to see a honda Vs Renault battle this year, but Renault already lost that.

[slipstream 1985]

slipstream 1985 said:

Mercedes 46 + 44 + 47= 137
Ferrari 34 + 32 + 27= 93
Honda 16 + 18 + 22= 56
Renault 6 + 8 + 6 = 20

[rdjohn]

So far, it sort of vindicates everything that Horner and Marko said about Renault and their decision to switch to Honda power.

McLaren - Oops!

[slipstream 1985]

Yes looks that way. Honda are missing some easy points if Gasly was up to speed as well.

[DanielSan]

There's a good interview with Adrian Newey on Natalie Pinkham's In the Pink podcast and he explains why Horner/Marko went on the offensive when it came to the Renault situation and that it didn't work.

The name of her podcast is also pointed out by Ricciardo in the first one she put out

[slipstream 1985]

engine	aus	bhr	chn	total
Merc	46	44	47	137
Ferr	34	32	27	93
Hond	16	18	22	56
Rena	6	8	6	20

[slipstream 1985]

slipstream 1985 said:

engine	aus	bhr	chn	aze	total
Merc	46	44	47	53	190
Ferr	34	32	27	27	120
Hond	16	18	22	12	68
Rena	6	8	6	10	30

[slipstream 1985]

engine	aus	bhr	chn	aze	esp	total
Merc	46	44	47	53	44	234
Ferr	34	32	27	27	29	149
Hond	16	18	22	12	25	93
Rena	6	8	6	10	4	34

Renault really floundering and relying on mclaren for most of their points.
Mercedes don't even need a 3rd and 4th driver to get them extra points.

[slipstream 1985]

engine	aus	bhr	chn	aze	esp	mon	total
Merc	46	44	47	53	44	40	274
Ferr	34	32	27	27	29	19	168
Hond	16	18	22	12	25	33	126
Rena	6	8	6	10	4	10	44

Honda's biggest haul of points. All cars picking up a solid result. Ferrari really dropping the ball with only 2 points finishers. Renaults = best points haul and could have been so much better.

[anonymous-user]

I loved Renault claiming this week they're level on engine power with Mercedes. Course you are, luv. Bet you've got great reliability too, eh?

I'd imagine Mercedes have enough PU oomph to run a stting great amount of downforce and still run down the straights faster than the French donkeys.

[slipstream 1985]

engine	aus	bhr	chn	aze	esp	mon	can	total
Merc	46	44	47	53	44	40	40	314
Ferr	34	32	27	27	29	19	33	201
Hond	16	18	22	12	25	33	15	141
Rena	6	8	6	10	4	10	14	58

Renault were close to beating Honda on points but Sainz getting mugged at the end swung it against them.

[Car-Matt]

janesmith1950 said:

I loved Renault claiming this week they're level on engine power with Mercedes. Course you are, luv. Bet you've got great reliability too, eh?

I'd imagine Mercedes have enough PU oomph to run a stting great amount of downforce and still run down the straights faster than the French donkeys.

So leaving aside the Merc works team ( who's oil burners were making noticeable puffs of dark smoke all weekend), where are Williams and Racing point then if their PU is SSSSOOOOOOO much better then the Renault PU? There were good signs for Renault PU's on a power circuit this weekend. They are all definitely converging bar the way Ferarri and Merc works teams are running them.

[kambites]

The reason Renault are so far behind in that table is that their engine isn't in a decent chassis, not that their engine is particularly poor. I don't think they've caught up with Ferrari or Mercedes in terms of power yet but I don't think they (or Honda) are far behind; especially in race trim.

That table is basically Mercedes vs Ferrari vs Redbull vs nobody, with a few extra odd points thrown in from the second division.

Edited by kambites on Monday 10th June 12:33

[slipstream 1985]

engine	aus	bhr	chn	aze	esp	mon	can	fra	total
Merc	46	44	47	53	44	40	40	43	357
Ferr	34	32	27	27	29	19	33	30	231
Hond	16	18	22	12	25	33	15	12	153
Rena	6	8	6	10	4	10	14	17	75

[thegreenhell]

kambites said:

The reason Renault are so far behind in that table is that their engine isn't in a decent chassis, not that their engine is particularly poor. I don't think they've caught up with Ferrari or Mercedes in terms of power yet but I don't think they (or Honda) are far behind; especially in race trim.

That table is basically Mercedes vs Ferrari vs Redbull vs nobody, with a few extra odd points thrown in from the second division.

It is pretty meaningless.

If you remove the four works teams from the table, it looks like this:

Renault	40
Ferrari	35
Mercedes	19
Honda	17

Edited for post-race penalty effects.

Edited by thegreenhell on Sunday 23 June 19:19

[Car-Matt]

slipstream 1985 said:

=engine=||=aus=||=bhr=||=chn=||=aze=||=esp=||=mon=||=can=||=fra=||=total=||

Merc	46	44	47	53	44	40	40	43	357
Ferr	34	32	27	27	29	19	33	30	231
Hond	16	18	22	12	25	33	15	12	153
Rena	6	8	6	10	4	10	14	17	75

You need to recalculate your bullst table as penalties have been applied lol

[slipstream 1985]

Car-Matt said:

slipstream 1985 said:

=engine=||=aus=||=bhr=||=chn=||=aze=||=esp=||=mon=||=can=||=fra=||=total=||

Merc	46	44	47	53	44	40	40	43	357
Ferr	34	32	27	27	29	19	33	30	231
Hond	16	18	22	12	25	33	15	12	153
Rena	6	8	6	10	4	10	14	17	75

You need to recalculate your bullst table as penalties have been applied lol

My championship rules

engine	aus	bhr	chn	aze	esp	mon	can	fra	total
Merc	46	44	47	53	44	40	40	43	357
Ferr	34	32	27	27	29	19	33	32	233
Hond	16	18	22	12	25	33	15	13	154
Rena	6	8	6	10	4	10	14	14	72

[The Moose]

Wouldn’t it be easier to go vertical?!