Volvo S60 T5 | Shed of the Week

Volvo S60 T5 | Shed of the Week

Friday 17th January 2020

Volvo S60 T5 | Shed of the Week

Most of the fast five-pot Volvos of yore are now well out of Shed's reach - not all of them, though...



They say you should never judge a book by its cover, and this week's sub-£1,500 Shed tempter is a perfect case in point. Skimming through the pics on the PH Classifieds, you could very easily miss the grey Volvo S60, many already have. It's been on sale here for a fortnight at least, and was only bumped out last week by the very rare appearance of an MOT'd BMW E30 Touring (which is also still for sale, incidentally).

Only when we delve a little deeper into this week's ad do we see that our S60 is actually a low-mileage T5. Interesting. If, back in the early 2000s, you were bored with the usual 3 Series/C-Class choices, the S60 T5 delivered BMW 330 and Merc 320 levels of performance with a unique and not-unattractive style of its own, an equally solid build, and a lot more comfort. Dig deeper still and we find that ours is the manual-gearboxed T5, complete with cool spaceball shifter. And then, tucked away in the text, we discover that it has been remapped.

This is now getting very interesting indeed, because even in standard trim these gen-one (2000-2008) T5s were dishing up 247hp from their B5234T3 2.3-litre straight-five intercooled turbo motors. That went up to 256hp in the gen-two cars, but our shed's Rica remap - which we're assuming is a stage 1 - leapfrogs it up to a claimed 310hp, with a 100Nm torque lift to 430Nm (317lb ft) at 2,900rpm. With under 1,500kg to shift, the standard 2003 T5 knocked off the 0-62mph in 6.8sec, so it's not difficult to imagine that time coming down to something beginning with a five.


What about running costs? Well, you're looking at £325 a year tax, but even with 300+ horsepower you'd be perfectly within your rights to expect low-30s fuel consumption in moderate use, although with the boot in hard that would quickly decrease to the teens.

If the low-tread tyres and knackered wiper blades that were mentioned as advisories on the last test in November have been replaced by now, the only MOT note left to be addressed would be a worn bush on the offside front suspension arm. You'd want to give the suspension a good look over anyway, as S60s are quite hard on their up-and-downy parts. The wishbone bushes are famously soft and the front top mounts are known to fail. Once again, however, there is good news in this department as our shed has already had replacement dampers and Eibach springs fitted, albeit at an unknown point in history.

What is known is that the belt and pump were both done 30,000 miles ago. Depending on how much you trust serpentine belts, or maybe more accurately the pulleys that keep them taut, there should be at least another 30k in the current componentry before you need to think about doing this work again. Volvo quotes much longer intervals, as you'd expect, but it would be a shame to risk spoiling the ship for a ha'porth of tar. If the tensioner fails and the belt flies off this particular vessel, it's goodnight Vienna and hello Davy Jones's locker. The belt change isn't a hard job once you've moved two or three other bits out of the way.


If there are no nasty skeletons in the cupboard ­- ETM (Electronic Throttle Modules) and MAF sensors can both get coked up, oil can leak from the engine at either the rear main oil seal or the turbo drain tube, and Volvo engine mounts are not the most durable - it looks like this is being somewhat undersold. It just boils down to whether you like the look of it, and how it's going to go on the road.

Style is a matter of taste but Shed rather likes the S60's 'sucked-in-S80' wheel-at-each-corner look. There's not a lot of room in the back, but the boot is huge and the seats are fabulous. This car doesn't have a light-coloured interior, which is definitely a plus because the cars that do have them suffer terribly from screen reflections. How does it go? Well, surely it's all about the five-pot warble with these, and nothing else much matters, so why not have a gange at this vid of a T5 with a "brutal dual side exhaust." If you are of a more conservative nature here's a video of a standard car that you could show to your mum and that will tell you a lot about the T5's good points - of which there are many.

With just four previous owners and very minor advisories on last November's MOT, it's hard to see this low-mile Volvo as anything other than a super-comfy Q-car bargain at £1,195. Hell, refurbed Nebula BBS alloys go for well over £200 a pop on eBay, and the remap would cost you another £400 or so if you had to do it yourself - which you don't. Lovely jubbly.


See the full ad here




 

Author
Discussion

Cambs_Stuart

Original Poster:

2,868 posts

84 months

Friday 17th January 2020
quotequote all
That's a great shed.
Fast, comfortable and cheap. Looks good too.
My personal favourite shed for some time, at least since the saab and the MG ZS of a couple of month ago.

Sparky137

869 posts

181 months

Friday 17th January 2020
quotequote all
A friend of mine has had a couple of these, crackingly good cars even in standard tune.

A (very) worthy shed of the week.

GTiWILL

780 posts

78 months

Friday 17th January 2020
quotequote all
A brilliant find. The very definition of Shed of the Week.

pti

1,698 posts

144 months

Friday 17th January 2020
quotequote all
Always liked the look of the p1 S60, looks even better slightly lowered with a sets of Nebulas on it.

I'll trade my D5 for a T5 as soon as my commute reduces.

Halo in reverse

147 posts

107 months

Friday 17th January 2020
quotequote all
Shedtastic !

KPB1973

918 posts

99 months

Friday 17th January 2020
quotequote all
I had practically the same car (colour and spec) bar different alloys and went for a RICA remap too. It was ballistic afterwards, bar the clutch and DMF being unable to cope with the torque, turbo and sensor relates issues galore. The former was an expensive job at around the grand mark.

But the midrange on it was phenomenal compared to standard.

Fabulous stereo and seats too.

Having owned a later 2.4 T5 to (a much better engine in terms of low down grunt) I have to say they had a certain character but were both riddled with gremlins and mechanical issues.

But for the price, if it is running ok, someone will get a very fast bargain.

blearyeyedboy

6,289 posts

179 months

Friday 17th January 2020
quotequote all
I'll stake a claim on this as a contender for Shed Of The Year.

Jimmy Recard

17,540 posts

179 months

Friday 17th January 2020
quotequote all
Ace. I love the wheels and gear lever

hammo19

4,986 posts

196 months

Friday 17th January 2020
quotequote all
Hit the shed nail on the head. Perfect shedding and wafty barging. Respect.

richinlondon

593 posts

122 months

Friday 17th January 2020
quotequote all
had the S60R version of these - fantastic car and always surprised people with the performance. four wheel drive was superb on that too.

dunnoreally

963 posts

108 months

Friday 17th January 2020
quotequote all
Tested one of these a while back and absolutely loved how it drove. Great mix of comfort and performance for very little money. Didn't get it because of a couple of worries about the state of it, but I doi sometimes wonder if that was a mistake.

Turbobanana

6,265 posts

201 months

Friday 17th January 2020
quotequote all
Excellent shed, if a little dull-looking.

You have to wonder what clothes the original owner wore: grey, no doubt. Probably lived in a house with magnolia wallpaper too.

greenarrow

3,589 posts

117 months

Friday 17th January 2020
quotequote all
This is more like it!

My favourite shed for ages.

Hellbound

2,500 posts

176 months

Friday 17th January 2020
quotequote all
Turbobanana said:
Excellent shed, if a little dull-looking.

You have to wonder what clothes the original owner wore: grey, no doubt. Probably lived in a house with magnolia wallpaper too.
I feel the same. I just can't personally relate to older Volvo's. Actually the only old Volvo I like and would own is the first Bertone coupe. As for new Volvo's I'd happily own the upcoming XC40 EV with the new Google/Android operating system that comes with fully integrated 'Ok Google, open sunroof' type voice commands, ditching the software they have now.

Oh and I wouldn't mind the Polestar 1 and 2.

can't remember

1,078 posts

128 months

Friday 17th January 2020
quotequote all
Love Volvos, but this one's got a boot so it's a no from me.

Macron

9,873 posts

166 months

Friday 17th January 2020
quotequote all
Feels a bit mean calling this one a shed tbh!

CarlosSainz100

495 posts

120 months

Friday 17th January 2020
quotequote all
I've had an S60 D5 and whilst it was supremely comfortable, what lets the S60 down by far is the atrocious steering circle. It became a liability in car parks to the point where I avoided multi storeys.

And the boot may be big but the aperture is really narrow which knackers what you can fit in there.

That said, for the money this is a great shed. Just avoid multi storeys and you'll be fine.

pSyCoSiS

3,594 posts

205 months

Friday 17th January 2020
quotequote all
Lovely SOTW, as mentioned, a SOTY contender.

Solidly built, great engines, the most comfortable seats, excellent heaters and a decent stereo.

I went through a recent spell where I went Volvo mad - two V70 Estates, a 940 Turbo Estate, 2006 S80 D5 and a nice turquoise S70 T5 - now that was some car and it pulled like a train and just kept going.

Newer Volvos, as with most manufacturers, feel very plastic inside. Old ones had a much more reassuring feel about them. Simple mechanicals keep them reliable daily drivers.

Get this for a grand or less, and it's a great all-rounder that will scare a lot of newer, more expensive machinery. And you can't beat that 5 cylinder burble!

Bladedancer

1,269 posts

196 months

Friday 17th January 2020
quotequote all
This is a great find.
100k is nothing for these cars, if they're serviced correctly.

benharris

118 posts

159 months

Friday 17th January 2020
quotequote all
CarlosSainz100 said:
I've had an S60 D5 and whilst it was supremely comfortable, what lets the S60 down by far is the atrocious steering circle. It became a liability in car parks to the point where I avoided multi storeys.
I was considering an S60 D5 a year ago, to use as my daily shed, but the turning circle was the thing that put me off as the access to my driveway is very tight. I think the turning radius is a rediculous 13 meters. My dad has an earlier, phase 1 V70 and the turning circle on that is only 10 meters for a bigger car!

Aparently there is something you can do with the steering rack to reduce the turning circle. Volvo fitted a different bushing/spacer component, depending on the size of the wheels specified at the factory, so changing this can make it better, although you'd probably also need to run smaller wheels to prevent them rubbing.

Even still - it gets a 10 vote from me - great shed!

Edited by benharris on Friday 17th January 08:42