2021 F1 cars thread
Discussion
First full Merc photo, the video launch starts at 11
More https://twitter.com/MercedesAMGF1/status/136669735...
More https://twitter.com/MercedesAMGF1/status/136669735...
resolve10 said:
Livery looks really smart. I like how they always manage to freshen it up a little without losing the identity of previous designs.
Anyone know what the two bulges are in the engine shroud? Looks unusual.
Changes made to the PU require it, i suspect it's to give clearance to a change in exhaust routing and turbine design.Anyone know what the two bulges are in the engine shroud? Looks unusual.
jsf said:
Changes made to the PU require it, i suspect it's to give clearance to a change in exhaust routing and turbine design.
Thanks. It's not a very elegant solution by usual F1 standards. I guess it's a result of having limited scope to change this years' cars?I'm sure someone much smarter than me has done the analysis to ensure it has minimal affect on the cars performance, but they are pretty large bumps and must be less efficient than a smooth surface in terms of airflow.
resolve10 said:
Thanks. It's not a very elegant solution by usual F1 standards. I guess it's a result of having limited scope to change this years' cars?
I'm sure someone much smarter than me has done the analysis to ensure it has minimal affect on the cars performance, but they are pretty large bumps and must be less efficient than a smooth surface in terms of airflow.
It's possible the design change is targeting proving out the 2022 spec, which could well need a higher exhaust header design to increase the size of the new underfloor tunnels. Get a season of testing in the bag as it's a fixed engine from the end of the season for 3 years.I'm sure someone much smarter than me has done the analysis to ensure it has minimal affect on the cars performance, but they are pretty large bumps and must be less efficient than a smooth surface in terms of airflow.
It's what was done back in the old ground effect days, the exhausts had to go from low down at the side of the engine with a conventional setup to up high above the tunnel floors.
jsf said:
resolve10 said:
Thanks. It's not a very elegant solution by usual F1 standards. I guess it's a result of having limited scope to change this years' cars?
I'm sure someone much smarter than me has done the analysis to ensure it has minimal affect on the cars performance, but they are pretty large bumps and must be less efficient than a smooth surface in terms of airflow.
It's possible the design change is targeting proving out the 2022 spec, which could well need a higher exhaust header design to increase the size of the new underfloor tunnels. Get a season of testing in the bag as it's a fixed engine from the end of the season for 3 years.I'm sure someone much smarter than me has done the analysis to ensure it has minimal affect on the cars performance, but they are pretty large bumps and must be less efficient than a smooth surface in terms of airflow.
It's what was done back in the old ground effect days, the exhausts had to go from low down at the side of the engine with a conventional setup to up high above the tunnel floors.
andburg said:
Also possible that the bodywork around has been shrunk in slightly which would make the hump necessary to accommodate something they didnt change
It's a bigger surface area than before. James even made specific mention of it as being required for a change in the PU.We are all guessing what that change is, i'm just trying to apply some logic to it, but i could be completely wrong and its something else they are accommodating.
Gassing Station | Formula 1 | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff