The Alpine implosion
The Alpine implosion
Author
Discussion

TheDeuce

34,341 posts

96 months

Thursday 7th August 2025
quotequote all
thegreenhell said:
Does he have "a habit of bringing the company into disrepute"? Or was it just one incident that got dragged out in public? I'm not defending the guy, just wondering if I've missed some other incidents he caused.

As for "mentoring junior drivers", that was never really a strong suit at Red Bull. More like throwing a bunch of them in the deep end to see if any of them could swim, and not worrying too much about the ones who drowned.
The old 'throw enough st at the wall and hope some of it sticks' approach to driver mentoring smile

WilsonWilson

877 posts

179 months

Thursday 7th August 2025
quotequote all
Can Colapinto turn his career around? The standard of rookies has been so high in the last 20 years that drivers who get a reputation as crashers eventually get dropped, then no one else wants to touch them irrespective of money (Latifi, Maldonado, Mick).

I can only think of Massa and Grosjean who were given the chance to get past those early smashes.

Leithen

14,037 posts

297 months

Thursday 7th August 2025
quotequote all
DanielSan said:
Leithen said:
I mentioned that earlier. Wolff might have a say about Horner being involved…
He's got no share in the team, they're a customer whose paying full price for the engines. He'd have 0 say in anything to do with Horner going into the Enstone team, even come 2030 and supply contract renewal time, turning down a source of revenue for purely personal reasons wouldn't be particularly professional, especially given there's been no issue with Flavio running the team.

It's business, you don't have to like the person you're doing a deal with
Not sure where you got the idea that anyone thought Wolff has a share in Alpine.

Instead he controls the engine supply. They currently supply four teams including their own. Aston Martin will be with Honda next year, so it was down to three (Mercedes, McLaren & Williams). On the face of it, it made sense to allow Alpine to take up the fourth supply position.

However, these are new engines, and whilst they like the idea of volume supply to improve development/reliability, supplying more than they need to might be a big logistical headache. More importantly, as per the rules, they are under no obligation to supply a fourth team - https://www.autosport.com/f1/news/what-f1s-rules-s....

With contracts signed, then it depends what is in them. I'd be very surprised if there weren't exit clauses for both parties.

Even if there aren't exit clauses, Wolff can make it very clear that with Horner as a part owner, the supply will last the length of the contract and no more. He can also have a lot of fun at Horner's expense. Given how much he apparently loathes Horner, this might be something of an issue for Alpine.

Mercedes may well also want to scale back its engine supply to the minimum required. It is being humiliated by a customer at the moment, in a marvellous reverse ferret situation that mirrors 2009. It obviously needs to abide by the rules, but it could chose to supply those teams in the future that pose less of a WC rivalry. If Alpine continues to be st, no problem. But Horner might well kick the team into shape.

So, Wolff might well have a say, if indirectly, as to whether other shareholders would want Horner as part of their operation. Never pays to burn bridges, especially over piranha infested waters. And you can guarantee he's not going to put up with any of the st that Cyril Abiteboul put up with from Horner.

TheDeuce

34,341 posts

96 months

Thursday 7th August 2025
quotequote all
WilsonWilson said:
Can Colapinto turn his career around? The standard of rookies has been so high in the last 20 years that drivers who get a reputation as crashers eventually get dropped, then no one else wants to touch them irrespective of money (Latifi, Maldonado, Mick).

I can only think of Massa and Grosjean who were given the chance to get past those early smashes.
Both of whom proved everyone wrong and enjoyed a continued F1 career with hardly any crashing smile

thegreenhell

24,063 posts

249 months

Thursday 7th August 2025
quotequote all
Wolff doesn't control the engine supply. AMG HPP is a separate company controlled 100% by Mercedes-Benz. Wolff isn't even a director of that company.

SJfW

535 posts

113 months

Thursday 7th August 2025
quotequote all
thegreenhell said:
Sandpit Steve said:
Not unless he’s completely exonerated by the forthcoming employment tribunal, that many have said is a factor in his sacking from Red Bull.

Yes the tide might be turning on the extreme wokery of the past few years, but who’s putting serious money behind someone who has a habit of bringing the company into disrepute?

Now would a team hire Horny to manage the operation in the future, possibly yes. But very much as a sackable employee, as he’s always been.

I still think Horny should go back to Arden, and spend at least a couple of years running and mentoring junior drivers.
Does he have "a habit of bringing the company into disrepute"? Or was it just one incident that got dragged out in public? I'm not defending the guy, just wondering if I've missed some other incidents he caused.

As for "mentoring junior drivers", that was never really a strong suit at Red Bull. More like throwing a bunch of them in the deep end to see if any of them could swim, and not worrying too much about the ones who drowned.
How much control did Horner have over the young driver program vs Helmut Marko?

Leithen

14,037 posts

297 months

Thursday 7th August 2025
quotequote all
thegreenhell said:
Wolff doesn't control the engine supply. AMG HPP is a separate company controlled 100% by Mercedes-Benz. Wolff isn't even a director of that company.
Would Mercedes supply an engine to anyone against his wishes? Why does he front the discussions on supply?

Had Horner been ejected from RB earlier and become involved in Alpine before Mercedes agreed to supply them, would they have gone ahead and done so?

It’s a delicious scenario which will be very disappointing if Horner doesn’t end up at Alpine.

hehe

bergclimber34

4,164 posts

23 months

Thursday 7th August 2025
quotequote all
Have always thought the fact Briatore is allowed or anywhere near F1 after what he has done shows the true state of this sport.

Jinba Ittai

695 posts

121 months

Thursday 7th August 2025
quotequote all
Blib said:
Jinba Ittai said:
Well Flávio Briatore and Pat Symonds, just to name two off the top of my head, were welcomed back to the sport with open arms, and they did far far worse than Horner has done. Horner will only go somewhere where he can have equity as part of the deal. Perhaps he brings Arden into F1 anfter taking over Alpine. Regardless of what you think of him personally, and I think he is a loathsome individual, what he achieved with RB won’t be conveniently forgotten. He will always be in demand as long as he wants to be in the sport.
Personally, I dont believe that a bent attempt to win a motor car race is far worse than being accused of sexual harassment and coercive, controlling behaviour of an employee.

Still, each to their own, I suppose.

hehe
Exactly. And in the F1 world, I've got a pretty good idea which is considered worse.

Blib

48,123 posts

227 months

Thursday 7th August 2025
quotequote all
Jinba Ittai said:
Exactly. And in the F1 world, I've got a pretty good idea which is considered worse.
Really?

You sure about that?

This ain't the 1970s any more. There's huge corporations involved nowadays.


MustangGT

13,838 posts

310 months

Thursday 7th August 2025
quotequote all
Blib said:
Jinba Ittai said:
Exactly. And in the F1 world, I've got a pretty good idea which is considered worse.
Really?

You sure about that?

This ain't the 1970s any more. There's huge corporations involved nowadays.
Meanwhile CH has been 'accused' which is not the same as 'guilty of'. Currently CH is 'innocent' until proven guilty.

Briatore was found guilty, therefore proven.

So yes, Briatore's offence is far greater at this point in time.

DanielSan

20,015 posts

197 months

Thursday 7th August 2025
quotequote all
Blib said:
Jinba Ittai said:
Exactly. And in the F1 world, I've got a pretty good idea which is considered worse.
Really?

You sure about that?

This ain't the 1970s any more. There's huge corporations involved nowadays.
And huge corporations are always well known foe being squeaky clean and never ignoring issues if it suits their agenda.

ralphrj

4,090 posts

221 months

Thursday 7th August 2025
quotequote all
Leithen said:
thegreenhell said:
Wolff doesn't control the engine supply. AMG HPP is a separate company controlled 100% by Mercedes-Benz. Wolff isn't even a director of that company.
Would Mercedes supply an engine to anyone against his wishes? Why does he front the discussions on supply?

Had Horner been ejected from RB earlier and become involved in Alpine before Mercedes agreed to supply them, would they have gone ahead and done so?

It’s a delicious scenario which will be very disappointing if Horner doesn’t end up at Alpine.

hehe
Mercedes AMG High Performance Powertrains Limited provides the PUs to Mercedes-Benz AG who then provide them to the teams. Toto is acting on behalf of Mercedes-Benz AG when he is discussing supply to other teams.

I would be surprised if a contract to supply PUs to another team would have a 'Horner clause' as the provision of the PU is so critical to the customer team being able to function.

thegreenhell

24,063 posts

249 months

Thursday 7th August 2025
quotequote all
They've already signed a contract to supply them to Flavio the proven cheat and criminal, so I don't think they'll bat an eyelid at Horner if he goes there.