RE: We Want To Build A Car Says BMW M Boss

RE: We Want To Build A Car Says BMW M Boss

Author
Discussion

Dagnut

3,515 posts

193 months

Monday 24th October 2011
quotequote all
RodMod said:
I think that they should do a M car for the purist, trouble now is anyone (funds providing) can go and buy a 3 series M car with 4 doors and its just not what M is about imho.

Rod.
Where are these romantic notions of M cars coming from? you could buy an E36 Saloon?

treetops

1,177 posts

158 months

Monday 24th October 2011
quotequote all
People will buy any old super car nowadays.

Its simple:

Work out how much it costs to make.

Limit production to 740 (if say it has 740bhp or something silly)

Build a prototype.

Tell everyone it costs xyz

Before you know it Jay Kay, Jay Lenno, Chris Evans and the odd Saudi prince all pre-order.

Before you know it all 740 examples are accounted for - money banked and off you go.

They are then up at premium at the usual suspect dealers.

Sit back, relax and count the coin.

Mermaid

21,492 posts

171 months

Monday 24th October 2011
quotequote all
jontysafe said:
..
I think the new twin-turbo V8, with the wick turned up slightly, in a lightweight mid engine application based on a mixture of existing and new mechanicals would sell very well and again give BMW a halo model. I know I`d consider buying one. Anyone else?
Target the MP4-12C.

FWDRacer

3,564 posts

224 months

Monday 24th October 2011
quotequote all
TheRoadWarrior said:
The good old days?

Sounds like the man speaks a lot of sense to me.
Absolutely right.

No business case for a complete car. There not in business to make cars. They are in it to make money.

RLK500

917 posts

252 months

Monday 24th October 2011
quotequote all
...and that's were the issue lies.

The M division are more than likely car guys, the BMW Management are money guys.....

Aused

293 posts

169 months

Monday 24th October 2011
quotequote all
Did M ever stand for Motorsport? (genuine question)

Because looking at the cars of the early years they seemed more geared towards transferring motorsport tech directly to road cars (or homologation) than selling "emotion" and "fun", otherwise it would be the EF3 or EF5 not M3 or M5. And what the fuuck does that mean anyway, it is entirely subjective, I don't find an M3 convertible to be worthy of an M badge, I don't find it fun and the only emotions it conjures in me are negative, but the marketing hacks at BMW who seem to run M division now probably think it is a great idea to leach a bit of road cred of a previously (and in the large part still) highly respected division. marketing waankers

kambites

67,543 posts

221 months

Monday 24th October 2011
quotequote all
Aused said:
Did M ever stand for Motorsport? (genuine question)
Yes.

Aused

293 posts

169 months

Monday 24th October 2011
quotequote all
Aused said:
Did M ever stand for Motorsport? (genuine question)

Because looking at the cars of the early years they seemed more geared towards transferring motorsport tech directly to road cars (or homologation) than selling "emotion" and "fun", otherwise it would be the EF3 or EF5 not M3 or M5. And what the fuuck does that mean anyway, it is entirely subjective, I don't find an M3 convertible to be worthy of an M badge, I don't find it fun and the only emotions it conjures in me are negative, but the marketing hacks at BMW who seem to run M division now probably think it is a great idea to leach a bit of road cred of a previously (and in the large part still) highly respected division. marketing waankers
... shame it works on joe public frown, i'm going to go and buy another Renaultsport product now getmecoat (for now anyway)

Stew2000

2,776 posts

178 months

Monday 24th October 2011
quotequote all
I vote this:


Beardy10

23,213 posts

175 months

Monday 24th October 2011
quotequote all
Sadly this is where BMW being a stand alone maker really suffer...they've undoubetedly got the know how but can't make it pay.

They've also never been able to sell cars at the top of the price bracket....they must look at all the AMG S Class and SL's etc with great envy.

Audi could never have done the R8 if they didn't own Lambo.

Mermaid

21,492 posts

171 months

Monday 24th October 2011
quotequote all
kambites said:
Aused said:
Did M ever stand for Motorsport? (genuine question)
Yes.
More so in the 70's & 80's - then volumes went up, compromises made, weight increase, more toys

Gary C

12,408 posts

179 months

Monday 24th October 2011
quotequote all
TheForceV4 said:
"We cannot just keep adding power. M is not selling horsepower; that's not what we're about."

I dont see why not. Sad times if this is how it pans out.
Not sad at all if it still has driver enjoyment.

Gary C

12,408 posts

179 months

Monday 24th October 2011
quotequote all
Stew2000 said:
I vote this:

To be shot a dawn along with its stylist.

fwaggie

1,644 posts

200 months

Monday 24th October 2011
quotequote all
This is a very "soundbite-ey" article, not enough info to deduce what is actually being said.

"Our job is to sell emotion and fun, using the technology that's socially acceptable at the time. Whether that's a combustion engine or an electric motor, we don't care."

True. If you transfer most of the characteristics of a racing car to a road going car, you're going to be thinking "Waaaaa... F**k!" and enjoying yourself. A good emotion and fun.

"We cannot just keep adding power. M is not selling horsepower; that's not what we're about."

He hasn't said what they ARE about, he hasn't said if they've changed direction from where they were 10/20 years ago, this is a very vague statement.

M's were / are about the power, the way the powers made and delivered, the sound, the handling.

The marketing twonks are really diluting the M brand though, leeching off it's reputation to just stick a few trinkets onto ordinary cars and sell them for more. This bit is very sad and I think the marketing dept will be kicking themselves when a BMW 'M' car means as much as GTi (or even TDi).

Dagnut

3,515 posts

193 months

Monday 24th October 2011
quotequote all
kambites said:
Yes.
When exactly? They have made one focused car in the last 15 years( M3 GTS excluded)the E46 CSl and that wasn't exactly a sales sucess

marcosgt

11,018 posts

176 months

Monday 24th October 2011
quotequote all
Dagnut said:
When exactly? They have made one focused car in the last 15 years( M3 GTS excluded)the E46 CSl and that wasn't exactly a sales sucess
A bloke at work has a 320Si (I think) that isn't a M car by name, but, judging from the fact that every part has to be hand hewn from Unobtainium from the mountains of Mordor by elves and uses the blood of unicorns instead of oil for lubrication, most certainly isn't a bog standard BMW 320!

M.

Dagnut

3,515 posts

193 months

Monday 24th October 2011
quotequote all
marcosgt said:
A bloke at work has a 320Si (I think) that isn't a M car by name, but, judging from the fact that every part has to be hand hewn from Unobtainium from the mountains of Mordor by elves and uses the blood of unicorns instead of oil for lubrication, most certainly isn't a bog standard BMW 320!

M.
its an E30 but yeah? so about 20 years ago?

Munich

1,071 posts

196 months

Monday 24th October 2011
quotequote all
When calculating the business case, does BMW include brand awareness and the potential positive "halo" effect such a car would bring to BMW as a brand? I mean, this in itself should contribute millions of "EURs" to the project....

Only looking at the numbers (for these sorts of cars) isn't always the correct solution.

marcosgt

11,018 posts

176 months

Monday 24th October 2011
quotequote all
Dagnut said:
its an E30 but yeah? so about 20 years ago?
No, it's the current model.

M.

Dagnut

3,515 posts

193 months

Monday 24th October 2011
quotequote all
marcosgt said:
No, it's the current model.

M.
Not exactly a focused car but