Worst car ever made and sold in the UK?

Worst car ever made and sold in the UK?

Author
Discussion

RedWhiteMonkey

6,844 posts

182 months

Tuesday 22nd November 2011
quotequote all
How difficult is it to read and understand the topic subject before posting? The amount of whoosh parrots needed in here is immense.

LuS1fer

41,132 posts

245 months

Tuesday 22nd November 2011
quotequote all
Ah yes but how hard is it to repeat the post question in the first post of the thread though as you tend not to look at the top.

So the question is worst made and sold in the UK. well that would be the Reliant Regal unless you class the AC invacar as a car.


and this abomination:

FisiP1

1,279 posts

153 months

Tuesday 22nd November 2011
quotequote all
Reliant three wheeler, take your pick.

No question.

jas xjr

11,309 posts

239 months

Tuesday 22nd November 2011
quotequote all
+1 for the Talbot avenger. Truly truly awful. Drove a new one and struggled to find neutral

cptsideways

13,545 posts

252 months

Tuesday 22nd November 2011
quotequote all
yonex said:
The Viva takes some beating!
Oy no - My first car was a Viva HL 1.2, it had the best handbrake of all of my mates cars & taught me the art of going sideways. Superb amounts of steering lock too. The comedy horizontal speedo would always keep me amused with it's alleged speed indications.

Fire99

9,844 posts

229 months

Tuesday 22nd November 2011
quotequote all
LuS1fer said:
I have to admit that is pretty damn odd. But just for the audacity of calling it a 'Mini' it must be:



BuzzLightyear

1,426 posts

182 months

Tuesday 22nd November 2011
quotequote all
In fairness, it depends how you read the OPs question. It could either be
A) the worst car that was both made and sold in the UK, or
B) the worst car made (anywhere) that was sold in the UK.
I assume from the OPs later post that he actually meant B.

HTH

BL (no relation!)

12gauge

1,274 posts

174 months

Tuesday 22nd November 2011
quotequote all
The allegro cant be that bad, my grandad had one from about 1980-2000 before finally packing in driving and despite being driven everywhere in 1st or 2nd gear around 9000rpm it worked all that time.

The rust got it in the end, but other than that it survived his driving it.

Steffan

10,362 posts

228 months

Tuesday 22nd November 2011
quotequote all
In which case the Polski, Dacia and TATA cars I have driven over the years have been head and shoulders worse than any UK car.

These East European and Indian cars are in a class of their own in build quality. Dreadful.

The trim falls off, the wheels fall off, the door fall off. Dreadful. Awful.

You could not forecast with any degree of certainty whether any journey would start, continue or finish.

You did know you were NOT in safe hands.

douglasr

1,092 posts

272 months

Tuesday 22nd November 2011
quotequote all
The Talbot Tagora.

Talbot Sunbeam. I had a 1.0 LS when I was a student. Cheap, 4 speed box, no kit, dodgy RWD handling and 0-60 in 18 seconds. It started rusting after 2 years. As usual, it was the UK workforce and lack of investment to blame (at Linwood and Chrysler US). However the Ti and Lotus Sunbeam models were successful in motorsport events including the world rallying championship - I always wanted a Lotus version...






Negative Creep

24,974 posts

227 months

Tuesday 22nd November 2011
quotequote all
Moskvich - the very name shouts it's a UK built car through and through

Sir Bagalot

6,478 posts

181 months

Tuesday 22nd November 2011
quotequote all
Back in the late 80's or early 90's a mates company bought a Tata pickup truck. They used to buy new and run them into the ground.

After six months they were a bit concerned already about the amount of trouble they might have come MOT time 2.5 years away.

Fear not. There was no need to worry about how much it would cost to get the then three year old Tata pickup truck through it's MOT. It didn't get that far. Just past it's second birthday it actually started falling to pieces.


Fetchez la vache

5,572 posts

214 months

Tuesday 22nd November 2011
quotequote all
Ozzie Osmond said:
For instance - the Talbot Horizon.

This from Wikipedia, "The collapse of Chrysler Europe in 1978 and its subsequent sale to Peugeot meant that the car was hurriedly rebadged using the exhumed Talbot brand for the remainder of its life. From 1980 production expanded to the former Chrysler Europe Ryton plant, near Coventry in England.

In 1981, Series II models were introduced, with some minor improvements. By then however, the Horizon was becoming increasingly uncompetitive next to rivals such as the Volkswagen Golf, Opel Kadett/Vauxhall Astra and the third generation Ford Escort. The rattly and unrefined ohv engines which had been carried over from the Simca 1100 were largely to blame, while body corrosion was a serious issue, at least until Series II, giving many cars a short service life.

Due to corrosion problems there are few left, Horizon is now a rare sight with possibly less than 200 surviving examples in the UK.

The end of Horizon production in 1987 also marked the end of the Talbot badge on passenger cars."
lol. My Dad had a new Chrysler Alpine (blue with white bumpers) followed by a gold with black bumpers Talbot Alpine.
Fancy, eh?

It wasn't so much the corrosion but the way the paint and bumpers faded in sunlight after what must have been 2 months.
Shocking tanks.

kiteless

11,707 posts

204 months

Tuesday 22nd November 2011
quotequote all
My nominations? Firms that are remembered for great cars, but have little dollops of shyte in their catalogue.

A British company which enjoyed building butch open-wheeled roadsters - usually powered by massive US V8's. Things like this, for example (Allard J2X):-



Yet it also built this little stbox (Allard Clipper) for, seemingly, no apparent reason whatsoever apart from to demonstrate that it could build an ugly little stbox:-



Another nomination would be this (AC Petite):-



From a British company that also made the AC 289




tali1

5,266 posts

201 months

Tuesday 22nd November 2011
quotequote all
Welshbeef said:
moffspeed said:
Mk 6 Escort RS2000 - probably just an averagely bad car until you add the RS prefix - an unforgiveable defamation of everything that had borne the title beforehand...
Agree with you there.

I remember the RS1600 with fondness and then of course the RS1800 (farmers special)
Not owned any to compare, but the Press seemed happy with Mk 6 Escort RS2000 - not top of the class but there were no negative reviews

Fire99

9,844 posts

229 months

Tuesday 22nd November 2011
quotequote all
douglasr said:
Talbot Sunbeam.
Yep, The regular Talbot Sunbeam was a bit of a shocker. However, the Talbot Sunbeam Lotus was a different matter!! Impressive figures for 1979. Not bad figures for 2011!!

http://www.performance-car-guide.co.uk/sunbeam-lot...

lankybob

1,701 posts

190 months

Tuesday 22nd November 2011
quotequote all
Welshbeef said:
For me a nomination is the Austin Allegro.

Can anyone better that?
OI! Sod off!

hehe

Mr Dave

3,233 posts

195 months

Wednesday 23rd November 2011
quotequote all
tali1 said:
Welshbeef said:
moffspeed said:
Mk 6 Escort RS2000 - probably just an averagely bad car until you add the RS prefix - an unforgiveable defamation of everything that had borne the title beforehand...
Agree with you there.

I remember the RS1600 with fondness and then of course the RS1800 (farmers special)
Not owned any to compare, but the Press seemed happy with Mk 6 Escort RS2000 - not top of the class but there were no negative reviews
The Mark 6 RS2000 is pretty good to drive actually, and surprisingly good on track. My friend took his round a local track faster than a mark 2 Escort RS2000 with some go faster bits bolted on which annoyed a lot of the old ford boys around here.

I nominate either the Mark 1 Escort 1.3 Automatic. I drove one that another friend bought for a project and it was so awful it was definately the worst car I have ever driven.

I imagine the 1.3 Capris would be worse.



aw51 121565

4,771 posts

233 months

Wednesday 23rd November 2011
quotequote all
Steffan said:
Welshbeef said:
S1_RS said:
The Allegro was a better car than the Maestro, that was a crap car.
Well I had a Maestro 1.6L in like a skin colour with brown interior.... It was a carb not injection.

Rust was diabolical
Dash fell apart which I Vosges back together with wedges and glue...
Seat foam collapsed
Radio speakers stopped working.

I rebuilt that car mechanically totally stripped engine braking and cooling system and the engine was a gem never once broke down I simply stripped it as a learning exercise with my old man.
You are quite right in your praise for the A series engine.

It was without a doubt one of the most durable long lived designs ever produced in the UK. Or indeed anywhere else. 5,500,000 built.

Nearest engine to a Meccano set I have ever rebuilt.

Utterly understressed, magnificently forgiving: I ran one in a Mini once from Aberystwyth to Nottingham with a leaking radiator stopping every ten miles to top up.

Boiled time and gain. Never blew the gasket never caused any problem

Except when I switched it off it overran for a minute because the carbon in the combustion chamber was glowing.

Imagine that in a K series. Bang.

Or a Duratech. Bang. Or a Vauxhall Red Top Bang!

But sadly as cars the inadequate build quality and poor design ruined BMH etc

The Marina was an unsafe indeed a dangerous car on release.

The handling was appalling before urgent suspension changes were made post test driving by journalists. That car should never have been made.

The worst I think.

Strongly agree, the A-Series is a good 'un - punches well above its weight. The 1.6 in a Maestro was either an R-Series or an S-Series though wink . S-Series was good - "the thinking man's engine" the blurb called it, and it just went on and on with oil leaks - but the R-Series inherited fragility from the E-Series in the Allegro and Maxi (head gasket failure, for example).

For reasons I cannot fathom (the seed was sown in 1984 rolleyes ) I have an MG Mestro 1600 with R-Series engine in my fleet - it pressurises its coolant system and isn't particularly refined, but the damn thing sounds great (two twin choke webers) and just keeps on going! 400 miles a week is quite feasible, and the bodywork - despite recent muchos welding after it was abandoned in long grass for quite a few years - just doesn't fall apart smile .

When the Montego was new, contemporary Road Tests put it above both the Cavalier and the Sierra. Poor/lack of Quality Control was mentioned in the long term tests - to be honest, it probably 'did' for the brand frown as the same problem (letting the buyers act as unpaid development engineers) had been blatantly obvious with the Allegro & Marina (Steffan refers to Journalists also helping out with the Marina) 10 years before (and the Maxi 5 years before that, the 1100/1300 & 1800 five years years before that, and the Mini a few years before that...).

Meanwhile, CAR Magazine did a Long Term Test of the new Nissan Primera 2.0 eGT (published in 1992), and they slated the build quality (electric windows sticking and failing, fifth gear failing, other irritating odds'n'sods). Sadly the car was built in the North East frown .

BL/Austin Rover never had these problems with Japanese Implants - the Acclaim produced their lowest warranty costs ever, and Austin Rover built Hondas that passed all the Japanese Quality Control checks...

But it's good, as usual, to see the usual BL-bashing thread smile .


martin84

5,366 posts

153 months

Wednesday 23rd November 2011
quotequote all
Has the Montego been mentioned? Drove one of those once, what an utter stbox.