Best estate car?

Author
Discussion

43034

2,963 posts

168 months

Sunday 15th July 2012
quotequote all


lick


astroarcadia

1,710 posts

200 months

ALawson

7,815 posts

251 months

Sunday 15th July 2012
quotequote all
Any comments on these? http://www.autotrader.co.uk/classified/advert/2012...

I think they are the best petrol estate under 160g/km? Other option is a 320M Sport, however these are a little small in the back.


HeatonNorris

1,649 posts

148 months

Sunday 15th July 2012
quotequote all
Great engine - lacking in character, but diesel-like levels of torque from low down.

Don't believe the official consumption figures - I'm seeing around mid-30s with that lump in a Passat.

aberdeeneuan

1,344 posts

178 months

Sunday 15th July 2012
quotequote all
white_goodman said:
Fair enough. Probably not as economical as the Audi then but still a big improvement on the low to mid 20s that I get from my WRX!
I actually really liked it, it felt like it would just do whatever you asked of it. It was not by any stretch fast though. One of those cars that would be rewarding to own just by being understated and good at what it does.

Spec b though, that would be fun but ruinous on petrol!

FarleyRusk

1,036 posts

211 months

Sunday 15th July 2012
quotequote all
I have a 2.0T Passat Estate which is well-made, comfortable and surprisingly quick in a straight line. It corners like a boat though which is why my next car will likely be a 335i Touring. It's a lot smaller I know, but with the Passat we take the kitchen sink with us on holiday every time :-o

HeatonNorris

1,649 posts

148 months

Sunday 15th July 2012
quotequote all
43034 said:


lick
Great cars, but useless as an estate. The boot, with load cover in place, is smaller than the saloon's boot.

sutts

897 posts

148 months

Sunday 15th July 2012
quotequote all


V8Wagon

1,707 posts

160 months

Sunday 15th July 2012
quotequote all
sutts said:
What's going on with the exhaust tips? They can't decide what they wanna be....twin slash or oval.


I miss my old bus......totally slipped under everyones radar until I booted it! Then heads would swivel wondering how that dull Audi bus could make such a noise!!



Edited by V8Wagon on Sunday 15th July 22:38

nick heppinstall

8,074 posts

280 months

Sunday 15th July 2012
quotequote all
I'm happy with my Ocavia Scout 1.8tsi. It's pretty nippy with 0-60 in just over 8 seconds.

The 4th gen Haldex 4x4 was great in the snow over he last couple of years.

It has loads of space with he seats up. Drop them down and it must be one of he biggest in its class.

Cost 17.5k brand new with :

Adaptive xenons, curtain airbags, heated seats plus a decent standard spec including cruise, duel zone climate and a half decent touch screen stereo with built in 6 cd changer and mp3.

Ok I know it's a Skoda but get over the badge and it's a decent car.

In fact the only thing that lets Skoda down and this is he 4th I've owned is the carpets.

The quality is crap which is a shame because all the switch gear and panels are of good quality.

hidetheelephants

24,289 posts

193 months

Sunday 15th July 2012
quotequote all
Seeing everyone else is posting pics of their preferred barges, here's mine; it worked out at just over £5/bhp.


V8Wagon

1,707 posts

160 months

Sunday 15th July 2012
quotequote all
hidetheelephants said:
Seeing everyone else is posting pics of their preferred barges, here's mine; it worked out at just over £5/bhp.

Very nice indeed.....have you still got it?

What engine was in that?

hidetheelephants

24,289 posts

193 months

Sunday 15th July 2012
quotequote all
V8Wagon said:
Very nice indeed.....have you still got it?

What engine was in that?
Yeh; needs an MoT, new rear discs and a bunch of other stuff done though and my motivation is low at the moment. It's an RB25DET.

Edited by hidetheelephants on Monday 16th July 17:00

dema

367 posts

175 months

Sunday 15th July 2012
quotequote all
hidetheelephants said:
Seeing everyone else is posting pics of their preferred barges, here's mine; it worked out at just over £5/bhp.

Would love one of those but it would need LPG for me frown

GravelBen

15,684 posts

230 months

Monday 16th July 2012
quotequote all
hidetheelephants said:
Yeh; needs an MoT, new rear discs and a bunch of other stuff done though and my motivation is low at the moment. It's an RB25DETT.
[pedant]

Either its rather non-standard or you hit T twice.

[/pedant]

wink

Nice cars but very big/heavy/thirsty, the old man's 2.5NA Stagea drank an awful lot more than my Legacy GTB.

phil1979

3,548 posts

215 months

Monday 16th July 2012
quotequote all
/biased:



With the 3.2 V6, and the 4x4 running gear, it would be lovely!

rob.e

2,861 posts

278 months

Monday 16th July 2012
quotequote all
I'm baised too:

My kiddie carrier: vRS with the 2.0 TSI petrol engine (same as a mk6 golf gti). 600 litre boot, stage 1 re-map to 245bhp 420 Nm torque. Still does 33-ish mpg overall.

Quick, big boot, cheap.


Twincam16

27,646 posts

258 months

Monday 16th July 2012
quotequote all
UnderTheRadar said:
IMO I'd go for a large MPV if what you need is a child-carrier. Huge internal space designed for the job, not expensive to buy or run (as long as you steer clear of the Voyagers) The handling is better than you'd expect but the image is less good - depending on what type of person you want to impress.
Ford, thankfully, seems to be in the process of chopping the unnecessary headroom on its MPVs to lower the centre of gravity, make them look more like hatches/estates and enable them to handle better, which is good news for people who feel they have to own one.

The S-Max looks more like a kind of post-milennial Granada estate, and IMO the C-Max (not the Grand version with the suicide doors, just the regular new C-Max) is a stunning-looking car, as they've managed to hide the extra bulk by giving it rally-style haunches but without resorting to off-roader-sized wheels, which almost give it the look of a previous-generation rally-specced Focus.

It's probably the first nicely-proportioned car with sliding rear seats:


Twincam16

27,646 posts

258 months

Monday 16th July 2012
quotequote all
rob.e said:
I'm baised too:

My kiddie carrier: vRS with the 2.0 TSI petrol engine (same as a mk6 golf gti). 600 litre boot, stage 1 re-map to 245bhp 420 Nm torque. Still does 33-ish mpg overall.

Quick, big boot, cheap.

Who stuck football stickers to the passenger door?

rob.e

2,861 posts

278 months

Monday 16th July 2012
quotequote all
C-max is not a fast car. Top spec petrol only has 150ps.