Supercars spotted, some rarities (Vol 5)

[Garlick]

GFWilliams said:

Garlick said:

In fairness the logo of your new site was bigger than the fraction of the car on show.

Considering it's not a money making site (we don't even have a website) I don't see it as a problem?

ps. don't go on the photography forum, there probably won't be any content left by the time you're done with removing anything with a watermark!

I'm not arguing with you GF, just saying that while we welcome spots of cars on here we prefer not to have images showing small portions of air intakes from cars on pro-shoots.

The photo forum is different, as you know, so post away over there but posts on here should be of proper 'spots' showing the whole car and ideally without overly large watermarks. Nowt to do with being profit making, just not the thing we want on this particular thread.

[andrew]

"Supercars spotted, some rarities, no images showing small portions of air intakes from cars on pro-shoots. (Vol 5)"

hth

[AllNines]

And no photos where the dashboard of your own car takes up more of the shot than the car being spotted?

[Actus Reus]

AllNines said:

And no photos where the dashboard of your own car takes up more of the shot than the car being spotted?

Yep. Worst 'I have a V10 R8' post evah.

[Petrolhead95]

Actus Reus said:

AllNines said:

And no photos where the dashboard of your own car takes up more of the shot than the car being spotted?

Yep. Worst 'I have a V10 R8' post evah.

Surely if you had one you'd like to show it off?

[fatboy69]

I saw a rare beast in Cheltenham yesterday.

An MG6!

So shocked I didn't take a photo!!!

[Penfolds]

Well it's good to see the endless arguing has been brought into the new volume... Guess it just wouldn't be the same without it.

Here's an actual spot from last week to break the text.

[AllNines]

Some more cheery souls would call it banter...

[carguy88]

GFWilliams said:

ps. don't go on the photography forum, there probably won't be any content left by the time you're done with removing anything with a watermark!

lol

[Penfolds]

AllNines said:

Some more cheery souls would call it banter...

Wasn't aimed at you.

[Shmee]

Actus Reus said:

AllNines said:

And no photos where the dashboard of your own car takes up more of the shot than the car being spotted?

Yep. Worst 'I have a V10 R8' post evah.

I guess I can't do 'combos' either then

[balders118]

Penfolds said:

Well it's good to see the endless arguing has been brought into the new volume... Guess it just wouldn't be the same without it.

Here's an actual spot from last week to break the text.

I do think this new vanquish is a lovely looking thing. However, that rear spolier ruins the clean lines of the back end - it really does look like an after thought.

Despite this being a prettier car than the old vanquish, I still think the old one is better looking. More to my taste I think.

[Beefmeister]

Found some more photos on my iPhone from Miami:

Lovely lovely lovely...




Big pimpin'



These always look ace IMO




I was drawn to this in a car park, then some further looking made me realise it's a bloody fake GT3, probably based on a boggo Carrera.




This was a curio I'd never heard of. Looked like a typical awful US Chrysler from the 80s.



Then when i got to the back I noticed the badge! Apparently a joint venture in the 80's. A dark time for Maserati..



Nice to see this in a mall, though it's just a replica shell



Nice looking Cali



Absolute taste bypass



Nice lineup outside a mall



Colourful ponies!

[r6blacky]

It may not be ultra rare but it's the first of it's kind I've seen

[Tuscan Rat]

Shmee said:

Your passenger must have been leaning over big time to get those shots, cos you would not post pictures showing you clearly driving whilst using a mobile phone.. Or if it was a camera, driving whilst not in proper control ?

[Shmee]

Tuscan Rat said:

Your passenger must have been leaning over big time to get those shots, cos you would not post pictures showing you clearly driving whilst using a mobile phone.. Or if it was a camera, driving whilst not in proper control ?

My passenger was instructed to get the dials in shot.

[Tuscan Rat]

Shmee said:

My passenger was instructed to get the dials in shot.

I knew that would be the case..

[Monty Zoomer]

Garlick said:

we prefer not to have images showing small portions of air intakes from cars on pro-shoots.

Good.

Photographers take the worst photographs

[darkcat]

Just a few from the phone

Dont see many of these at all:



bad photo i know, but my only choice, why would you spend that much on a toyota IQ??


And this is just epicly horrid:

[Petrolhead95]

darkcat said:

Just a few from the phone
And this is just epicly horrid:

Why, just why?