RE: Porsche 911 GT3 (991): Review

RE: Porsche 911 GT3 (991): Review

Author
Discussion

JohnGoodridge

529 posts

195 months

Thursday 13th June 2013
quotequote all
RichardD said:
toppstuff said:
Where is Porsche going with this?
Using every trick possible to get the best laptimes from a naturally aspirated rear mounted straight six engined two wheel drive sportscar smile ?
About the balance between how fast you're going, and how you're going fast. As I think Harris has said before Porsche have been exceptionally good at this in their GT spec cars in the past. I think there's two arguments:

1. Harris: That a manual gearchange is a core driver input, that should be maintained as at least an option in order to reward good technique.

2. Porsche (AP): That a manual gearchange is not a core driver input (racers left them behind ages ago). Thus automating it (well) leaves more bandwidth in the cerebral cortex for getting reward from the other key inputs: steering and acceleration/ braking. Supplemental argument: that with the dizzying capabilities of a modern Porsche GT spec car most drivers will get more pleasure from the car NOT having a manual box.

Who is right? Don't know in an absolute sense, but while I like 3 pedals I can see that in 15 years time the argument will be moot: manual boxes will be for oddities and classics.



SeiW500

247 posts

168 months

Thursday 13th June 2013
quotequote all
Wheres the VIDEO....

Chris's videos are ggggggreat!

Christoffer

472 posts

197 months

Thursday 13th June 2013
quotequote all
What a fantastic car and equally great video review Chris. Amazing driving - more of that please!! And Oh My God I want one!!!

daveknott5

731 posts

219 months

Thursday 13th June 2013
quotequote all
Seconded on the amazing driving. The speed at which Harris sends the back out is crazy!

Benjaminbopper

143 posts

169 months

Thursday 13th June 2013
quotequote all
Great vid, great skill and a sound conclusion.

I don't understand though, Porsche are the king of vehcile spec options - why not just offer a manual gearbox as an option?

I'm sure there's something out there off the shelf from the likes of ZF that can handle it going by todays global new car power figures.

TheRoadWarrior

1,241 posts

178 months

Thursday 13th June 2013
quotequote all
SeiW500 said:
Wheres the VIDEO....

Chris's videos are ggggggreat!
http://www.pistonheads.com/news/default.asp?storyId=27908

2manycars

2,742 posts

178 months

Thursday 13th June 2013
quotequote all
Great write up.

I did think, with the way Chris started it though, it was going to end up like a Top Gear sign off.

"So, if you want a fast manual Porsche, buy an old cashier" biggrin

jonby

5,357 posts

157 months

Thursday 13th June 2013
quotequote all
Surely what's effectively happened is that to those who have historically understood the GT3 to mean a certain type of car, they now have to think somewhat differently using 2013 as a reference I/e the difference between 2013+ GT3s and those that precede 2013

This new car looks like an amazing piece of kit, far more usable as a daily driver and continent crosser than old GT3 as well as being good for occasional trackwork and for Sunday drives

There was always going to be a point at which the 'old school' GT3/RS cars reached a zenith - we got there with the last batch of 997s and those cars will not feel dated from a fun point of view for many years to come

It was inevitable - you can't have the paradox of a performance car where they put stickers instead of badges on to lose weight but keep a much slower shifting box rather than go flappy paddle

And it's too simplistic to say put a manual box in as an option. Too much of everything about the car's design is synced in to which box is being used to make it worth offering - it's not the cost of the box, it's the cost of working out ratios, electronic displays, wiring looms, mounts, weight distribution, etc

Crusoe

4,068 posts

231 months

Thursday 13th June 2013
quotequote all
would the new engine fit in the old 997 manual car or a manual cayman biggrin

hornbaek

3,675 posts

235 months

Thursday 13th June 2013
quotequote all
Exactly - Jonby. I was told that being able to provide a manual option is not about tweaks which could be paid for a healthy fee on the options list but a fundamental different design brief for the engineers.

Hoddy910

92 posts

147 months

Thursday 13th June 2013
quotequote all
Tis a shame there is no option for a manual but still...sex on wheels! Gotta be impressed with that engine, specially when it beats the 458 for specific output; 125hp/ltr vs 124hp/ltr :-)

NGK210

2,923 posts

145 months

Thursday 13th June 2013
quotequote all
hornbaek said:
Exactly - Jonby. I was told that being able to provide a manual option is not about tweaks which could be paid for a healthy fee on the options list but a fundamental different design brief for the engineers.
Rods 'n' cables vs the relative simplicity of fly-by-wire/actuator thingys?

NGK210

2,923 posts

145 months

Thursday 13th June 2013
quotequote all
Crusoe said:
would the new engine fit in the old 997 manual car or a manual cayman biggrin
I'm sure Ruf could oblige... idea

canucklehead

416 posts

146 months

Thursday 13th June 2013
quotequote all
kambites said:
McAndy said:
Purely playing devil's advocate: I'm sure there are other technologies that have evolved, particularly in the automotive sector, that have left people crowing for the old and resenting the new. However, in time most come round to the fact that the new is better and end up lamenting the loss of the old like one would an ex-girlfriend: yep, it was fun, but they're an ex for a reason (possibly even for several!)
I don't think that's true; at least it's certainly isn't for me. There have been a number of cases where I have intensely disliked new developments and I've generally I've eventually come to view them as an evil I can't get away from but I've never come to like them; they just get added to the list of things that make me despair about new cars in general.
to quote barney stinson, 'new is always better'

to quote barney stinson, 'old is always better'

me, i love the satisfaction of knowing i just nailed a gearchange and got it absolutely right. so i guess i'll just buy old cars in future.

MC Bodge

21,628 posts

175 months

Thursday 13th June 2013
quotequote all
I'd probably like a manual gearbox, but I'll never, ever be able to afford to own one, so who cares?


anonymous-user

54 months

Thursday 13th June 2013
quotequote all
MC Bodge said:
I'd probably like a manual gearbox, but I'll never, ever be able to afford to own one, so who cares?
Precisely

Plainview23

316 posts

212 months

Thursday 13th June 2013
quotequote all
Great reviews - pinacle of motoring journalism - so thanks.

Having driven plenty of dual clutches, some bad some excellent --- I'll take a manual GT3 every time. 997 or 996RS. Personally, I just don't drive fast enough, regularly enough, to get the most of the 10/10ths that a PDK allows. Actually found myself doing 140mph recently in my M6 on a motorway and realised that there is such a thing as too much effortless power! Going to move back to something more visceral (and manual!) for my next vehicle!

BRMMA

1,846 posts

172 months

Thursday 13th June 2013
quotequote all
Well that's another one to add to the lottery list

minimalist

1,492 posts

205 months

Thursday 13th June 2013
quotequote all
Watching the video I noticed the car at c.160kph at the top of third gear. My 5 speed 964 could also get close to c.160kph in third. Mind you, mine only revved to 6.5k and took an extra 4(ish) seconds to hit that benchmark. I also had an S2000 which revved to 9k. It was the best thing about it. Seven gears driving a flat six to nine that quickly must feel fantastic. Mental performance from a normally aspirated engine.

It's been said before but I'll say it again...

The GT3 is dead. Long live the GT3.

OlberJ

14,101 posts

233 months

Thursday 13th June 2013
quotequote all
So this is the same engine casing that's in a 981 Cayman?

It'd bolt right in there. Right up to that sweet manual gearbox.

scratchchin