RE: Lotus Exige S Roadster: Review

RE: Lotus Exige S Roadster: Review

Author
Discussion

jerrytlr

418 posts

213 months

Friday 5th July 2013
quotequote all
Bencolem said:
intellectually a Boxster S is the more attractive proposition unfortunately.
Why?

I don't get it. Lotus depreciation is relatively low, pricing is similar....



Cheers

Jerry

Ozzie Osmond

21,189 posts

246 months

Friday 5th July 2013
quotequote all
chevronb37 said:
The thing is absolutely batsh*t mental, the way it covers the ground is borderline unhinged.

In fact the primary issue with the V6 Exige is how on earth one might manage to retain one's licence in one. I've never driven anything else which makes it so easy to cover the ground at prison sentence speeds.
^^^^ Absolutely this!! Astounding machine! Sheer speed for the money is beyond any doubt! (Un)fortunately common sense got the better of me....

Twincam16

27,646 posts

258 months

Saturday 6th July 2013
quotequote all
jerrytlr said:
Why?

I don't get it. Lotus depreciation is relatively low, pricing is similar....
Absolutely - in fact Lotuses tend to drop a bit, find their price and stay there, whereas Porsches seem to fall into the wrong hands and deteriorate. Look at the prices of S1 Elises compared to S1 Boxsters, and Excels versus 944s before them. Esprits and 911s seem to keep pace with each other, used-price-wise, and I see the Exige V6 as an Esprit successor of sorts.

chickensoup

Original Poster:

469 posts

255 months

Saturday 6th July 2013
quotequote all
DJRC said:
Lotus have reinvented the ferrari 3x8GTS line. Its that simple.
For £50k it is staggering value and its the Alfa 4C's worst nightmare.

Lotus would have my order already if they werent in deep st and had a prospective future. Now, their future looks a little rosier, but I will still bide my time thankyou. Ive put my hand in my pocket to try and help out one British sportscar company, not doing it again, esp when they arent from Blackpool smile
I bet the 4c will outsell it. As a Lotus enthusiast, my deposit is with Alfa - love the looks of the Exige S, don't think I could live with it

Ozzie Osmond

21,189 posts

246 months

Saturday 6th July 2013
quotequote all
chickensoup said:
As a Lotus enthusiast - love the looks of the Exige S, don't think I could live with it
That hits the £50k nail on the head.

scenario8

6,561 posts

179 months

Saturday 6th July 2013
quotequote all
chickensoup said:
I bet the 4c will outsell it. As a Lotus enthusiast, my deposit is with Alfa - love the looks of the Exige S, don't think I could live with it
What would be the difficulty? Do you imagine it would be intolerable in the sort of everyday bog standard heavily trafficked driving that makes up most peoples' daily commute, you expect it to fal apart quicker than an Alfa, be more troublesome, depreciate faster - or something else about it?

Ryvita

714 posts

210 months

Saturday 6th July 2013
quotequote all
Regarding the roof (I am an S2 Exige owner with the soft-top conversion fitted):

The new one has the same roof fixings as the S2 to the best of my knowledge/experience seeing them at the dealership.
A standard S2 Exige has the hard-top roof. It is bolted in with two bolts at the front, two at the rear and two "cover panel" sections, one front one rear, which bolt on covering the join and further securing it.
The hard-top roof can be removed in about 5-10 minutes single handedly with a bit of practice.
It doesn't fit in the boot obviously!
The soft-top conversion allows you to put the Elise fabric roof in instead.
Conversion consists of drilling/cutting two channels in the rear of the roof mount section, into which fit the two "ribs" which support the fabric roof section. IT can be self done if you're brave about taking a dremel to your car.
The fixings of the fabric roof click into the existing bolt hols front and back to secure it.
Fabric roof can go on/off in 2 minutes with practice and does fit in the boot. smile

Gary C

12,431 posts

179 months

Saturday 6th July 2013
quotequote all
What's the point?

To me the exige was the much more track focused ( and therefore solid roofed ) Elise.

Having an open topped version undermines this.

big_rob_sydney

3,402 posts

194 months

Sunday 7th July 2013
quotequote all
Not really a fan. 53k for 0-60 in sub 4 is good, but this includes compromises for seating multiple people.

A Litchfield subaru will be just as quick, for 40k, and give you 4 doors, and a big boot.

Alternatively, the second hand market has plenty to offer. I've seen some GTR's at 40k that are positively tasty, with a few upgrades.

This?

Pass.

chevronb37

6,471 posts

186 months

Sunday 7th July 2013
quotequote all
Ozzie Osmond said:
chevronb37 said:
The thing is absolutely batsh*t mental, the way it covers the ground is borderline unhinged.

In fact the primary issue with the V6 Exige is how on earth one might manage to retain one's licence in one. I've never driven anything else which makes it so easy to cover the ground at prison sentence speeds.
^^^^ Absolutely this!! Astounding machine! Sheer speed for the money is beyond any doubt! (Un)fortunately common sense got the better of me....
Mercifully I'm poor so will stick with my S1. After 24 hours in the new one I was left in awe of its abilities. For a company so perennially in the sh*t, it's quite extraordinary that Lotus can produce a car so dynamically capable.

Bezza1969

777 posts

148 months

Sunday 7th July 2013
quotequote all
Twincam16 said:
jerrytlr said:
Why?

I don't get it. Lotus depreciation is relatively low, pricing is similar....
Absolutely - in fact Lotuses tend to drop a bit, find their price and stay there, whereas Porsches seem to fall into the wrong hands and deteriorate. Look at the prices of S1 Elises compared to S1 Boxsters, and Excels versus 944s before them. Esprits and 911s seem to keep pace with each other, used-price-wise, and I see the Exige V6 as an Esprit successor of sorts.
Yes, I'm fed up with all this stereotyped nonsense about german cars holding up their prices better. Look at the prioes of early Mk1 Elises compared with 2.5 Boxsters. Price when new was £19K for the Elise, £33K for the Boxster, the Elise still makes a good £7-8K, 2.5 Boxsters are down in the £5K or below region. A 10 year old Mk2 Elise 111S still makes close to 50% of its list price, whereas an early Cayman S is already down to about 35-40% of its list price after 7 years.

peter450

1,650 posts

233 months

Sunday 7th July 2013
quotequote all
Lotus build quality has never really matched there competitors, they have always done best, when selling for a lower price and offering more performance for it

The Esprit Turbo SE was a good example and was one of the higher selling varients of that car.

The Elise, was too when it first came out, (offering decent enough go even in 120hp trim, with a very tuneable engine) till they forgot about everyone else makeing there cars faster, which resulted in almost no progress in the base cars (once a big seller in the range) performance till they finished it off with a 1.6, that barely had the leg's on a 2 litre MX5, sales were dire despite it being the only elise on sale

This is the first car, since then that actually offers a lot more pace than say a similarly priced porsche, the Evora's nice but does not have either a significant price advantage or lots more performance than a typical porshce, having cayman level performance for a cayman level price

I like it, Lotus needs more cars like this IMO

senninha2

132 posts

181 months

Sunday 7th July 2013
quotequote all
http://www.pistonheads.com/classifieds/used-cars/l...

Modern asking price of Lotus models is bonkers ... I was lucky to buy new in 2002 and loved my 135 ... If in the market I'd rather buy something like the attached link and save the ££££

Back to basics please Lotus, it's why we loved you in the first place!

unpc

2,835 posts

213 months

Sunday 7th July 2013
quotequote all
Am I the only one who thinks this is spectacular VFM? OK the ingress egress issue is still a pain but this is GT3 fast and a Boxster/Cayman wouldn't see which way this went. I'd buy one in a heart beat if I could get it past Mrs UNPC .

interloper

2,747 posts

255 months

Sunday 7th July 2013
quotequote all
unpc said:
Am I the only one who thinks this is spectacular VFM? OK the ingress egress issue is still a pain but this is GT3 fast and a Boxster/Cayman wouldn't see which way this went. I'd buy one in a heart beat if I could get it past Mrs UNPC .
That's how I see it too, it may not be a brilliant all rounder, instead they have focused on speed and handling. Its a far better argument for a weekend toy than a Boxster, because it is more of a toy!

Wills2

22,819 posts

175 months

Sunday 7th July 2013
quotequote all
That looks great and at 53k looks VGVFM.

DJRC

23,563 posts

236 months

Monday 8th July 2013
quotequote all
big_rob_sydney said:
Not really a fan. 53k for 0-60 in sub 4 is good, but this includes compromises for seating multiple people.

A Litchfield subaru will be just as quick, for 40k, and give you 4 doors, and a big boot.

Alternatively, the second hand market has plenty to offer. I've seen some GTR's at 40k that are positively tasty, with a few upgrades.

This?

Pass.
It looks better.
Its a roadster.
It handles better.
It rides better.
It DOESNT seat 4 ppl.
People look at you and dont think "there goes a complete "

Nobody ever bought a Lotus because of its 0-60 time ffs.

Ozzie Osmond

21,189 posts

246 months

Monday 8th July 2013
quotequote all
All I would say is "go and drive the cars". Then decide where to spend your £50k.

Hopefully Lotus can find customers willing to part with hard cash to accompany the internet enthusiasm. My local dealer has a number of Exige S in stock. Also low mileage Evoras at only two thirds of new price - so get yer money out!

Rawwr

22,722 posts

234 months

Monday 8th July 2013
quotequote all
big_rob_sydney said:
Not really a fan. 53k for 0-60 in sub 4 is good, but this includes compromises for seating multiple people.

A Litchfield subaru will be just as quick, for 40k, and give you 4 doors, and a big boot.

Alternatively, the second hand market has plenty to offer. I've seen some GTR's at 40k that are positively tasty, with a few upgrades.

This?

Pass.
Is this going to be another thread where you argue that the Impreza is the alpha and the omega of automotive perfection?

toppstuff

13,698 posts

247 months

Monday 8th July 2013
quotequote all
Rawwr said:
big_rob_sydney said:
Not really a fan. 53k for 0-60 in sub 4 is good, but this includes compromises for seating multiple people.

A Litchfield subaru will be just as quick, for 40k, and give you 4 doors, and a big boot.

Alternatively, the second hand market has plenty to offer. I've seen some GTR's at 40k that are positively tasty, with a few upgrades.

This?

Pass.
Is this going to be another thread where you argue that the Impreza is the alpha and the omega of automotive perfection?
Indeed, I cannot think of any sensible, possible reason why anyone looking for a car like the Exige is ever, ever, ever going to even pause to think of an Impreza for even a nano second.

Same for the GTR. Now I am a massive fan of the GTR ( intend to buy one ) but, again, it is plain daft to even mention the GT-R and the Exige in the same sentence. You may as well compare the Exige to a Range Rover, the comparison is just as silly.