RE: Ford Focus RS: Review

RE: Ford Focus RS: Review

Author
Discussion

JordanTurbo

937 posts

141 months

Tuesday 19th January 2016
quotequote all
macky17 said:
clap I wonder who will be first to mention soft plastics.
Erm, the artical?

Dan Trent said:
.....Others will have softer plastics in the cabin.....

framerateuk

2,732 posts

184 months

Tuesday 19th January 2016
quotequote all
Sounds like it would be a fantastic road car, but I had a feeling it would struggle to knock the likes of the Megane from top place as far as more track orientated cars go.

I was very tempted to get one on order, but ended up ordering a Clio 220 Trophy. I might fall in love with it but I see it as more of a stop-gap between my current Megane 250 and possibly the all new Megane in a couple of years time (or something different entirely, lets see how things go).

I'm sure Ford will sell these out very quickly though!

Axionknight

8,505 posts

135 months

Tuesday 19th January 2016
quotequote all
Terror Factor said:
Good stuff, very interesting car imo, and I'm not much for new stuff generally speaking smile

As for the 4wd, how does an EVO do it? they also have a transverse engine, and don't seem to have much problems doing impressive drifts!
http://www.lancerregister.com/faq/G04/g04.html

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Active_Yaw_Control

Like so.

MDMA .

8,893 posts

101 months

Tuesday 19th January 2016
quotequote all
TameRacingDriver said:
That overpriced FWD car that was slower than a remapped ST ?

(I jest, but the point stands).
The same mk11 a friend had and spent a fortune on when put up against " the skip " as he called my old rs2, disappeard in my rear view mirror. He got rid not long after.

Jam12321

164 posts

110 months

Tuesday 19th January 2016
quotequote all
Do like the look of it, not quite as hardcore as i was hoping for if im honest. Fake noise? seriously ford, i thought you guys were better than that crap.

samoht

5,703 posts

146 months

Tuesday 19th January 2016
quotequote all
[quote]

As for the 4wd, how does an EVO do it? they also have a transverse engine, and don't seem to have much problems doing impressive drifts!
[/quote]

They install a trained monkey in the rear seat. When the monkey sees you turning into a corner, he gives a quick yank on the handbrake, tipping the car into the apex. Simples.

(Well, its an ECU rather than a monkey)

loose cannon

6,030 posts

241 months

Tuesday 19th January 2016
quotequote all
back to back reviews will be of more interest tbh rather than what we have had so far,
As for homologation specials lol that boat sailed years ago no

anonymous-user

54 months

Tuesday 19th January 2016
quotequote all
anonymous said:
[redacted]
Because when it boils down to it, it's just a blown four cylinder so in all likelihood sounds like a Henry hoover without. I laughed when I saw that the new Clio RS comes with a "sound generator". That is so so sad. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XpZ42A-R_34 Probably the lamest thing I have ever seen. It reminded me of one of those wolf bikes people used to have as kids with a siren and motorbike noises on them.

framerateuk

2,732 posts

184 months

Tuesday 19th January 2016
quotequote all
bulldong said:
Because when it boils down to it, it's just a blown four cylinder so in all likelihood sounds like a Henry hoover without. I laughed when I saw that the new Clio RS comes with a "sound generator". That is so so sad. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XpZ42A-R_34 Probably the lamest thing I have ever seen. It reminded me of one of those wolf bikes people used to have as kids with a siren and motorbike noises on them.
Is there no way to disable it in the Focus RS I wonder? I know M3 owners have been trying to get theirs turned off. At least with the Clio it's off by default and only on if you want to play around with it (though I agree it's totally ridiculous to begin with).

griffsomething

235 posts

161 months

Tuesday 19th January 2016
quotequote all
If being bought purely as a toy, would anyone have one of these over a V8 Mustang? RS + options is circa £34k of the V8 surely?

TNH

559 posts

147 months

Tuesday 19th January 2016
quotequote all
This is probably the least glowing review out of most of the big magazines (Autocar, Top Gear).

I didn't realise this had the stupid noise synthesiser thing. Why oh why?

Other than that I'm very tempted. Fancy an M2 next but this is at least £15k cheaper...

havoc

30,052 posts

235 months

Tuesday 19th January 2016
quotequote all
Axionknight said:
Terror Factor said:
Good stuff, very interesting car imo, and I'm not much for new stuff generally speaking smile

As for the 4wd, how does an EVO do it? they also have a transverse engine, and don't seem to have much problems doing impressive drifts!
http://www.lancerregister.com/faq/G04/g04.html

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Active_Yaw_Control

Like so.
To be fair, I don't think the Focus system is THAT different. And a lot of (admittedly rather talented) pro and semi-pro drivers prefer the Mitsi Evo-RS versions (i.e. stripped out, no AYC) to the standard (AYC equipped) cars.

anonymous-user

54 months

Tuesday 19th January 2016
quotequote all
framerateuk said:
bulldong said:
Because when it boils down to it, it's just a blown four cylinder so in all likelihood sounds like a Henry hoover without. I laughed when I saw that the new Clio RS comes with a "sound generator". That is so so sad. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XpZ42A-R_34 Probably the lamest thing I have ever seen. It reminded me of one of those wolf bikes people used to have as kids with a siren and motorbike noises on them.
Is there no way to disable it in the Focus RS I wonder? I know M3 owners have been trying to get theirs turned off. At least with the Clio it's off by default and only on if you want to play around with it (though I agree it's totally ridiculous to begin with).
There must be a fuse associated with it? Or some kind of wire plugged into the amp.

leglessAlex

5,443 posts

141 months

Tuesday 19th January 2016
quotequote all
I know it's a 300bhp, 4WD car that has to conform to all the safety regs, but still, 1600kg! That's a fair amount.

TameRacingDriver

18,078 posts

272 months

Tuesday 19th January 2016
quotequote all
bulldong said:
Because when it boils down to it, it's just a blown four cylinder so in all likelihood sounds like a Henry hoover without. I laughed when I saw that the new Clio RS comes with a "sound generator". That is so so sad. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XpZ42A-R_34 Probably the lamest thing I have ever seen. It reminded me of one of those wolf bikes people used to have as kids with a siren and motorbike noises on them.
That is hilarious(ly bad) rofl

kambites

67,554 posts

221 months

Tuesday 19th January 2016
quotequote all
leglessAlex said:
I know it's a 300bhp, 4WD car that has to conform to all the safety regs, but still, 1600kg! That's a fair amount.
To be fair that's including a driver. It's just over 1500kg wet with no driver which is still an awful lot, but not quite so bad.

anonymous-user

54 months

Tuesday 19th January 2016
quotequote all
I was wondering when the 1.8% figure would be released. Now technically, a 1.8% increase in rear wheel speed over front wheel speed IS "overspeeding" but it's also only just the sort of difference between a worn tyre and a new one.

Take a look at a typical "slip vs grip" graph for a modern tyre, then move just 1.8% sideways on the slip axis. Er, we are not talking Tokyo Drift here chaps!

If you've got a rwd car, try drifting that with just 1.8% overspeed and see how you get on.......... ;-)

leglessAlex

5,443 posts

141 months

Tuesday 19th January 2016
quotequote all
kambites said:
leglessAlex said:
I know it's a 300bhp, 4WD car that has to conform to all the safety regs, but still, 1600kg! That's a fair amount.
To be fair that's including a driver. It's just over 1500kg wet with no driver which is still an awful lot, but not quite so bad.
Ah, I hadn't spotted that! Thanks.

In this day and age I'd say that's actually pretty good, a sad reflection of the times maybe but oh well.

anonymous-user

54 months

Tuesday 19th January 2016
quotequote all
Baryonyx said:
MajorMantra said:
This might be a very silly question, but with so much trickery required to produce oversteer, wouldn't it have been easier (and not necessarily heavier) just to make this pure RWD? Or does the market just not want that?
I expect the need to make a new longitudinal engine, or find one somewhere else in the GM range and get it to Focus RS spec, would have been an issue. At least by keeping it in the current format, they can keep everything cheap and transverse, and modify the car lightly to drive the back wheels when needed.
Not to mention the fact that a rwd car with a large frontal mass bias and a transverse engine is not a great recipe for handling and you're never going to be able to package a longitudinal engine under the same bonnet (and maintain crash worthyness etc)...



J4CKO

41,526 posts

200 months

Tuesday 19th January 2016
quotequote all
leglessAlex said:
kambites said:
leglessAlex said:
I know it's a 300bhp, 4WD car that has to conform to all the safety regs, but still, 1600kg! That's a fair amount.
To be fair that's including a driver. It's just over 1500kg wet with no driver which is still an awful lot, but not quite so bad.
Ah, I hadn't spotted that! Thanks.

In this day and age I'd say that's actually pretty good, a sad reflection of the times maybe but oh well.
Also, its 347 bhp, but how many will end up with way more than that ?

Focus is actually a fairly sizeable car nowadays, its great grandad the Escort Cosworth was 1300 ish kilos back in 1991, the Focus has more airbags, massively stronger body, bigger brakes, bigger wheels, more gadgets, 2 extra doors, another 125 bhp, fancy torque thingys etc, 200 kilos doesnt seem that bad