RE: Honda NSX: Review

Author
Discussion

Derek Chevalier

3,942 posts

173 months

Thursday 14th July 2016
quotequote all
Twoshoe said:
Derek Chevalier said:
Read his Autocar road test in 2002 of NSX vs 996 - after beating the GT-R he said NSX came very close to beating NSX.
(You may want to edit your comment!)
Good spot, thanks

toppstuff

13,698 posts

247 months

Thursday 14th July 2016
quotequote all
I am genuinely disappointed by this "Its just a Honda" position.

I thought this place was populated by intelligent people with an appreciation of engineering, design and creativity?

The only person who would care about the "brand" and dismiss the NSX because it " isn't a Ferrari" frankly should not be here.

Artey

757 posts

106 months

Thursday 14th July 2016
quotequote all
Terminator X said:
Artey said:
Terminator X said:
CH loved it, nuff said. Junior 918.

TX.
Oh no you're one if them aren't you.
He's my hero, do you want some shoot

TX.
Love your sense of humour. 10/10

stew-S160

8,006 posts

238 months

Friday 15th July 2016
quotequote all
Derek Chevalier said:
Twoshoe said:
Derek Chevalier said:
Read his Autocar road test in 2002 of NSX vs 996 - after beating the GT-R he said NSX came very close to beating NSX.
(You may want to edit your comment!)
Good spot, thanks
NSX was so good it nearly beat itself. laugh


I love just about everything with the new NSX, but the weight. Like the GTR, why does it have to be so heavy?

How much does a 918 weigh, 1650-1700kg? OK, the NSX doesn't seem so bad really, but I do hope these are the early days of this hybrid supercar trend and that the weights will come down when the technology moves on.

Ozzie Osmond

21,189 posts

246 months

Friday 15th July 2016
quotequote all
stew-S160 said:
I do hope these are the early days of this hybrid supercar trend and that the weights will come down when the technology moves on.
I'm not a physicist but I imagine that in order to store a sufficient amount of electrical energy you will always need a certain amount of "mass" to keep it in. Similarly charging times are limited by just how much electricity you can get down a piece of wire. Then there's the safety aspect of keeping large amounts of electricity under control in an accident - which means yet more mass.

Derek Chevalier

3,942 posts

173 months

Saturday 16th July 2016
quotequote all
Terminator X said:
CH loved it, nuff said. Junior 918.

TX.
I'd really love them to do a junior LFA.

pardonmyenglish

107 posts

111 months

Saturday 16th July 2016
quotequote all
Derek Chevalier said:
I'd really love them to do a junior LFA.
they did:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XpMAfsSk7jM


Derek Chevalier

3,942 posts

173 months

Saturday 16th July 2016
quotequote all
pardonmyenglish said:
Derek Chevalier said:
I'd really love them to do a junior LFA.
they did:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XpMAfsSk7jM
I saw that one as a GT-R (heavy) with a V10. For me the Honda is all about the engine, so what would've appealed to me would've been a revised NSX. No more gentlemen's agreement (which pegged the original back to ~90bhp/litre), so give it a ~3.8 litre V6 screamer with ~130 bhp/l that revved to >9000rpm, weight savings (no heavy Bose stereo etc) to target 1350kg, modern brakes, not too big wheels and tyres, and bring it in for around £90-100. Maybe their marketing department (which is shockingly bad in the UK) deemed that there wouldn't be any demand.....

Hubris

156 posts

137 months

Sunday 17th July 2016
quotequote all
Looks great, I'd certainly have one.

Hopefully it's not hewn from the same balsa as the Civic.

nickfrog

21,143 posts

217 months

Sunday 17th July 2016
quotequote all
KimJongHealthy said:
Hybrid technology is there just for the sake of it as it does no significant range on the EV alone. It's a gimmick to lower CO2 figures for Californian authorities.

Looks like a squashed R8 with some extra vents, certainly nothing special there.

Just like the previous generation people who want it can't afford it and those who have enough spare money would rather get a Porsche or McLaren not to be seen in a Honda. Or spend this much on a heavy like hell track toy. Brake steering means it will go through pads like crazy when raced.

Will it become a cult classic like the previous NSX? Unlikely, 20 years from now all those EV gimmick will fall apart while the first gen is a simple car you just have to service and enjoy. Good luck finding a fully working new NSX in 2040.

And it's not even much faster than a GTR for third of the price, while the old NSX was cheaper and beat many supercars. Just like the classic Impreza was a huge seller, beating Porsches for a fraction of the cost while new one is a heavy cow getting kicked by a Golf, so sales are nowhere close to those in the 1990s.


Here, Honda, have a smiley sticker for trying.
What a positive chap you seem to be!

DegsyE39

576 posts

127 months

Monday 18th July 2016
quotequote all
KimJongHealthy said:
Hybrid technology is there just for the sake of it as it does no significant range on the EV alone. It's a gimmick to lower CO2 figures for Californian authorities.

Looks like a squashed R8 with some extra vents, certainly nothing special there.

Just like the previous generation people who want it can't afford it and those who have enough spare money would rather get a Porsche or McLaren not to be seen in a Honda. Or spend this much on a heavy like hell track toy. Brake steering means it will go through pads like crazy when raced.

Will it become a cult classic like the previous NSX? Unlikely, 20 years from now all those EV gimmick will fall apart while the first gen is a simple car you just have to service and enjoy. Good luck finding a fully working new NSX in 2040.

And it's not even much faster than a GTR for third of the price, while the old NSX was cheaper and beat many supercars. Just like the classic Impreza was a huge seller, beating Porsches for a fraction of the cost while new one is a heavy cow getting kicked by a Golf, so sales are nowhere close to those in the 1990s.


Here, Honda, have a smiley sticker for trying.


Edited by KimJongHealthy on Sunday 17th July 09:09
+1

AW111

9,674 posts

133 months

Monday 18th July 2016
quotequote all
KimJongHealthy said:
Hybrid technology is there just for the sake of it as it does no significant range on the EV alone. It's a gimmick to lower CO2 figures for Californian authorities.

Looks like a squashed R8 with some extra vents, certainly nothing special there.

Just like the previous generation people who want it can't afford it and those who have enough spare money would rather get a Porsche or McLaren not to be seen in a Honda. Or spend this much on a heavy like hell track toy. Brake steering means it will go through pads like crazy when raced.

Will it become a cult classic like the previous NSX? Unlikely, 20 years from now all those EV gimmick will fall apart while the first gen is a simple car you just have to service and enjoy. Good luck finding a fully working new NSX in 2040.

And it's not even much faster than a GTR for third of the price, while the old NSX was cheaper and beat many supercars. Just like the classic Impreza was a huge seller, beating Porsches for a fraction of the cost while new one is a heavy cow getting kicked by a Golf, so sales are nowhere close to those in the 1990s.


Here, Honda, have a smiley sticker for trying.


Edited by KimJongHealthy on Sunday 17th July 09:09
Did you read the article before posting that?

The hybrid tech gives it 4wd with torque vectoring and instant torque to fill in any turbo lag.
There is no mention of the brake steering you claim will eat pads on track.
And if you want to rubbish it for not beating a GTR that's cheaper, you can add most Porsches to your "rubbish car" list too.

BlackLabel

13,251 posts

123 months

Saturday 14th July 2018
quotequote all
Is it just me or are these things as rare as hens' teeth? Regularly see McLarens, Italian supercars etc on the roads but still haven't seen a new NSX. Perhaps I'm just living in the wrong place.

HokumPokum

2,051 posts

205 months

Saturday 14th July 2018
quotequote all
they just aren't dramatic enough.. and might lose money hence no one wants to touch them....hence rare as hens teeth.

BlackLabel

13,251 posts

123 months

Sunday 20th October 2019
quotequote all
Lightly used examples of these are now available for ~£90k.

That's some depreciation.

https://www.pistonheads.com/classifieds/used-cars/...

https://www.pistonheads.com/classifieds/used-cars/...

jjr1

3,023 posts

260 months

Sunday 20th October 2019
quotequote all
I have been watching these prices to and am sure they still have further to drop. I really want one though and in that fantastic blue.

cayman-black

12,643 posts

216 months

Sunday 20th October 2019
quotequote all
Bloody hell is the interior that bad?

thelostboy

4,569 posts

225 months

Sunday 20th October 2019
quotequote all
Bad? It's not incredible, but hardly bad.

Also been watching these. Now seem like very good value at £90k, and agree, in that blue in looks great. Saw one on the road about a month ago and they look great in real life - really hunkered down and wide.

havoc

30,062 posts

235 months

Sunday 20th October 2019
quotequote all
Not yet been out in one, but the driving position is very good and the seat, despite looking very different, feels very similar to the original NSX (this is a good thing). Interior may be a little 'safe' vs some competitiors, but the quality is high.

Those that I know own one rate it very highly indeed...I suspect the market is doing what it did 30 years ago, and responding badly to a supercar with a shopping-car badge on the nose. What's worse this time around is that the market is crowded with genuinely good competition...so those buyers just wanting to flash-the-cash have plenty of choice as to how they go all Loadsamoney at those around them.

sunnym3

146 posts

232 months

Sunday 20th October 2019
quotequote all
The price spread on these cars are huge, the cheapest being £91k and the most expensive £152k. The only difference being the cheapest are 17 plates and most expensive being 67. Was there an update between this period to cause a spread of £61k?