RE: Porsche 911 GT3 (991.2) : Review

RE: Porsche 911 GT3 (991.2) : Review

Author
Discussion

Rob_R

2,428 posts

245 months

Thursday 27th April 2017
quotequote all
SirSquidalot said:
Manual in speed yellow for me please! Really good article that.
clapclapclap

This man has the right idea!

WCZ

10,525 posts

194 months

Thursday 27th April 2017
quotequote all
alexrogers92 said:
More upset Porsche owners complaining because they haven't been chosen to buy one, but refuse to pay over list for one.

Cake and eat it comes to mind.
what? that doesn't even make sense

Rob_R

2,428 posts

245 months

Thursday 27th April 2017
quotequote all
Auson said:
Is it just me whos a bit shocked by 1.5 tons ?

Very nice though and that engine note, oh yes doctor !
Bearing in mind that's wet weight with driver.

breadvan

1,999 posts

168 months

Thursday 27th April 2017
quotequote all
Autocar's printed review quoted its rivals as the F488 and 675LT.

praise indeed.

alexrogers92

71 posts

94 months

Thursday 27th April 2017
quotequote all
WCZ said:
what? that doesn't even make sense
What doesn't make sense about it? What I'm saying is they will be available to buy, but average Joe wants to pay list price for one. You won't get one for list price unless you're chosen by Porsche.

So you have the chance to buy one, but you can't have your cake and eat it. Simple.

boxsey

3,574 posts

210 months

Thursday 27th April 2017
quotequote all
Helicopter123 said:
I have no issue with Porsche releasing investment assets onto the market on an annual basis.

Lots of companies do it.

Cannot understand though why they don't set the initial price 'at market' though?
I don't think they do. They're making more of them then the previous generations. The original 996GT3 was not an investment asset when launched e.g. anyone could order a new 996RS because there was so little interest in them. It's the people/market that have turned the Porsche GT cars into investment assets rather than Porsche themselves. Especially in the UK (it's no where near as bad in mainland Europe I believe). The situation got worse over here with the arrival of the GT4 because it was a 'cheap' GT car that attracted another level of speculator. The GT4 investment experiment went so well (for those that got one) that they alone have doubled the interest in the latest GT3. Demand is now so out of control that Porsche don't have a hope in satisfying the majority that are interested in buying one.

p.s. Really enjoyed the review regardless of me not being in the running for one, ever!

mechagran

124 posts

158 months

Thursday 27th April 2017
quotequote all
The single best introduction to a car article I have ever read. My thoughts exactly. "I want I want" doesn't get you anywhere. Time to accept you either arent rich enough or important enough - suck it up and stop crying.

Oh and, guess what you have the internet, food and central heating. These are not real problems so grow the fk up.

Onehp

1,617 posts

283 months

Thursday 27th April 2017
quotequote all
Auson said:
Is it just me whos a bit shocked by 1.5 tons ?
Glad you noticed, pleased that PH finally takes care to specify how the weight is defined. In this case fuelled and with a driver, so not too bad. But not so favourable as the supercar manufacturers utterly pointless dry weights will have led you to believe. Like the autocar rivals for this one, the 675LT and the 488. How much are these on the road with a driver? 1300kg you said? It's 1475kg and 1625kg respectively. Weighed by Sport Auto with pricy extra carbon bits. If it is any consolation, the F40, alledgedly very lightweight, puts more than 1400kg on the scales by the same standards, so actually it isn't that bad after all.

Digga

40,317 posts

283 months

Thursday 27th April 2017
quotequote all
Onehp said:
Auson said:
Is it just me whos a bit shocked by 1.5 tons ?
Glad you noticed, pleased that PH finally takes care to specify how the weight is defined. In this case fuelled and with a driver, so not too bad. But not so favourable as the supercar manufacturers utterly pointless dry weights will have led you to believe. Like the autocar rivals for this one, the 675LT and the 488. How much are these on the road with a driver? 1300kg you said? It's 1475kg and 1625kg respectively. Weighed by Sport Auto with pricy extra carbon bits. If it is any consolation, the F40, alledgedly very lightweight, puts more than 1400kg on the scales by the same standards, so actually it isn't that bad after all.
And why a TVR Tuscan race car with 'only' 450hp still feels blisteringly quick on track - it weighs less than 900kgs.

Onehp

1,617 posts

283 months

Thursday 27th April 2017
quotequote all
Digga said:
And why a TVR Tuscan race car with 'only' 450hp still feels blisteringly quick on track - it weighs less than 900kgs.
Without a driver. And an all out race car vs road. But even so, that's light indeed and fast for it!

AndrewD

7,537 posts

284 months

Thursday 27th April 2017
quotequote all
Dave Hedgehog said:
why

porsche have engineered them into a commodities market for dealers and flippers to make huge profits on

normal buyers have sod all chance of getting one


utterly pointless
You see this is just myopic. We are a small RHD island and availability is different on the continent. I read a post a day or two ago about somebody going into their local European dealer and ordering one. You can't extrapolate just because we are relatively less able to get the cars because we compete with other affluent RHD markets for the smaller RHD production.

Of course, they won't make unlimited quantities as this is a 2-seat relatively impractical halo model and their capacity goes towards the more mainstream stuff. Would you run your business any differently?

It is great they make such a range of cars and this car in particular, along with RS, R, GT2RS etc. It must be a thankless task trying to work out who gets one but at the end of the day this is no different to what has been going on with Ferrari etc for years. My experience of Porsche is they are less up themselves by a huge margin than Ferrari when it comes to allocation.

I get what Dan is saying. I want my cars to drive and enjoy them, not flip them. Last year I was fortunate enough to buy new a 991RS, GT4 and Boxster Spyder. All driven when I get a chance and none flipped. It pisses me off when you read uninformed internet debate calling these cars investment vehicles. There always has been flipping, Porsche didn't invent it. There always will be.

Now, can we get back to the car.

Dan, I would love to read a review of the manual - particularly as it has a mechanical diff and I understand the RWS is recalibrated vs PDK.


Edited by AndrewD on Thursday 27th April 13:52

epom

11,515 posts

161 months

Thursday 27th April 2017
quotequote all
It'll never sell, a normally aspirated engine revving to 9000 rpm think of the CO2 ? Everyone knows turbo charging is where it's at. So surprised with Porsche of all people dropping the ball so badly on this one.

PRMan3

2 posts

84 months

Thursday 27th April 2017
quotequote all
I'm new to PistonHeads and just read this review. I write web content for a living and it's not often that an article makes me laugh out loud - nicely written, Dan. Oh, and the car's none too shabby either. Now, who do I have to bribe round here to put one on my driveway........???

V8 FOU

2,974 posts

147 months

Thursday 27th April 2017
quotequote all
mechagran said:
The single best introduction to a car article I have ever read. My thoughts exactly. "I want I want" doesn't get you anywhere. Time to accept you either arent rich enough or important enough - suck it up and stop crying.

Oh and, guess what you have the internet, food and central heating. These are not real problems so grow the fk up.
Well said, Sir!

BTW, just love the car.....

s m

23,223 posts

203 months

Thursday 27th April 2017
quotequote all
epom said:
It'll never sell, a normally aspirated engine revving to 9000 rpm think of the CO2 ? Everyone knows turbo charging is where it's at. So surprised with Porsche of all people dropping the ball so badly on this one.
Don't worry, they're bringing out a GT2 soon for the 'non-purists' ( as someone on another thread put it )

Dagnut

3,515 posts

193 months

Thursday 27th April 2017
quotequote all
AndrewD said:
Dave Hedgehog said:
why

porsche have engineered them into a commodities market for dealers and flippers to make huge profits on

normal buyers have sod all chance of getting one


utterly pointless
You see this is just myopic. We are a small RHD island and availability is different on the continent. I read a post a day or two ago about somebody going into their local European dealer and ordering one. You can't extrapolate just because we are relatively less able to get the cars because we compete with other affluent RHD markets for the smaller RHD production.

Of course, they won't make unlimited quantities as this is a 2-seat relatively impractical halo model and their capacity goes towards the more mainstream stuff. Would you run your business any differently?

It is great they make such a range of cars and this car in particular, along with RS, R, GT2RS etc. It must be a thankless task trying to work out who gets one but at the end of the day this is no different to what has been going on with Ferrari etc for years. My experience of Porsche is they are less up themselves by a huge margin than Ferrari when it comes to allocation.

I get what Dan is saying. I want my cars to drive and enjoy them, not flip them. Last year I was fortunate enough to buy new a 991RS, GT4 and Boxster Spyder. All driven when I get a chance and none flipped. It pisses me off when you read uninformed internet debate calling these cars investment vehicles. There always has been flipping, Porsche didn't invent it. There always will be.

Now, can we get back to the car.

Dan, I would love to read a review of the manual - particularly as it has a mechanical diff and I understand the RWS is recalibrated vs PDK.


Edited by AndrewD on Thursday 27th April 13:52
Just out of interest how do values compare in Japan or India?

Dale487

1,334 posts

123 months

Thursday 27th April 2017
quotequote all
Helicopter123 said:
I have no issue with Porsche releasing investment assets onto the market on an annual basis.

Lots of companies do it.

Cannot understand though why they don't set the initial price 'at market' though?
I was thinking the same about the price set at the market, instead of a list price which had everyone fight over 'em - How about sealed bids (fully binding) & say if Porsche make 1500 the highest 1500 bids get the car. Drive out the speculators, flippers etc but it would put them out of even the richest of normal people.

big_rob_sydney

3,402 posts

194 months

Thursday 27th April 2017
quotequote all
I guess for me its pretty simple. What would the dialogue be like if Porsche made several thousand extra cars? This entire discussion about availability would be pretty much gone.

I dont think you can objectively sit back and separate what Porsche are doing. Supply and demand are equal parts of a market. They do the supply, and customers provide the demand.

As long as Porsche are intent on maximising profitability, is it any wonder we get the results we do?

I'm sure its a good car (I wont go so far as to say great, because the pendulum effect will catch people out, given that not everyone is a driving god - PH readership excluded of course *cough, cough*), and who doesnt like the idea of having a toy like this, whether in reality or in their dreams?

But in reality though, to stick your head in the sand over the OPC behaviour is refusing to accept that a good many people who DO genuinely want one and can afford them through outright funds or finance, just will be excluded from the opportunity.

I fear that will breed ill will.


Roma101

838 posts

147 months

Thursday 27th April 2017
quotequote all
alexrogers92 said:
WCZ said:
what? that doesn't even make sense
What doesn't make sense about it? What I'm saying is they will be available to buy, but average Joe wants to pay list price for one. You won't get one for list price unless you're chosen by Porsche.

So you have the chance to buy one, but you can't have your cake and eat it. Simple.
Nope. Still doesn't make sense.

People would prefer to buy a new car to their spec. at the list price. They don't want to buy a second hand car not to their spec. for 50% more than what the car cost originally.

Roma101

838 posts

147 months

Thursday 27th April 2017
quotequote all
mechagran said:
The single best introduction to a car article I have ever read. My thoughts exactly. "I want I want" doesn't get you anywhere. Time to accept you either arent rich enough or important enough - suck it up and stop crying.

Oh and, guess what you have the internet, food and central heating. These are not real problems so grow the fk up.
You sound like a charming person. No doubt it has got you far in life though.