RE: Volkswagen Up GTI - official

RE: Volkswagen Up GTI - official

Author
Discussion

anonymous-user

54 months

Monday 22nd May 2017
quotequote all
MarshPhantom said:
Max_Torque said:
GTIMAN2 said:
So...this or a mint MK1 GTI ? How far have have we come in 40 years? my 1980 GTI is quicker,110BHP with less weight,a hoot to drive with manual steering,probably as well made,has a K jet never goes wrong injection system and nudges 35MPG daily,the same as this in the real world.No silly sat nav,bluetooth thingy either. On the other hand,I applaud the safety standards,ABS and much better grip.But 40 years ago I was looking forward to getting into my self flying car by now............................
Somewhat rose tinted.... ;-)

How far have we come?

Tell you what, i'll drive the new UP, you can drive your old Mk1, and we'll drive into each other doing just 30mph. One of us would be leaving in an ambulance at best, the other, except for some mild bruising and an airbag burn or two would walkaway.

That's how far we've come in 40 years!

(and that's before you get to the fact you need to service your Mk1 4x more often, the fact what comes out the tailpipe is something like 1000x less polluting, the fact you have to shout at your passenger at 70mph, the fact that after 10 years in the rain a MK1 is a rust bucket. Then add in modern HVAC, ICE, Lighting,Comfort,NVH, etc etc etc.)
As I haven't had any kind of accident since I was 19 I don't tend to be paranoid about car safety.

HTH.
When i was working at Jag in Whitley on the 10.5MY platforms, there was an engine tester who ran my test bed. Nice chap, mid 20's, really into his cars, super enthusiastic, he'd been saving up to get a Pug 205 GTi, which he then bought. One Monday he didn't come into work. Turns out he'd been out driving his 205, got hit in the drivers door by a mondeo. Bang, lights out.......... Made me think about the value of modern crash safety.


ukaskew

10,642 posts

221 months

Monday 22nd May 2017
quotequote all
Played PH bingo before opening the comments, I had 'should have more power' within 5 posts and 'should be 4 cylinder' within 20.

I won.

VGTICE

1,003 posts

87 months

Monday 22nd May 2017
quotequote all
ukaskew said:
Played PH bingo before opening the comments, I had 'should have more power' within 5 posts and 'should be 4 cylinder' within 20.

I won.
Let's be honest, it should be 8 cylinder.

ajprice

27,442 posts

196 months

Monday 22nd May 2017
quotequote all
VGTICE said:
Let's be honest, it should be 8 cylinder.
Been done with a Lupo hehe

TomScrut

2,546 posts

88 months

Monday 22nd May 2017
quotequote all
ukaskew said:
Played PH bingo before opening the comments, I had 'should have more power' within 5 posts and 'should be 4 cylinder' within 20.

I won.
And do you agree with aforementioned comments?

AgentZ

272 posts

128 months

Monday 22nd May 2017
quotequote all
I feel a lot of replies are being a bit harsh on the UP and/or have rose tinted glasses on re previous cars.

Sure it would have been nice for the UP to have had more power and be more of a GTI and for it to have come out 3 years sooner but so long as it comes in at/below the quoted £15,000 then I think it will do OK.

As for saying it is too heavy in comparison to both the Mk1 Golf GTI and Lupo GTI is just wrong/unfair. The Golf's weight is surely unladen/DIN versus the UP's 997kg EU weight (though curiously it is 5kg lower than the High UP) and the last 2006 MY Lupo's weighed 1038kg without a driver so over 1100kg EU.

Even if VW are playing weight games here with the UP/Golf comparison it still has AC/climate, 6 speed vs 4 speed, 17" wheels/tyres vs 13", bigger brakes?, more sound deadening, all the airbags/safety and electric everything. To only be ~110kg heavier isn't bad. The Lupo is quite chubby given the near identical size and alu panels.

As a current Mii "Sport" owner I'm interested in how this drives/feels. No chance of a SEAT/Skoda version I assume?


ukaskew

10,642 posts

221 months

Tuesday 23rd May 2017
quotequote all
TomScrut said:
And do you agree with aforementioned comments?
As a Citigo owner, nope. The 100ish hp fun car sector is severely lacking in choice at the moment, it used to be a really interesting little area with the likes of the Panda 100hp, Ignis Sport, Sportka etc.

The comparisons with the Abarth seem way out of touch too, the Up platform is super practical. We essentially use ours as a small family car, the packaging is pretty incredible (large off-road buggy in boot, surprisingly roomy in cabin even with large car seat etc). That + fun (which the standard car already hints at, and the 3 pot sounds great) ticks a lot of boxes.

At the weekend we were two up with two road bikes in the back (wheels on) and weekend luggage, just by dropping the rear seats. I've admittedly not tried that with the Abarth but I'm pretty confident that's not going to happen. The Abarth is a fun car but it's nowhere near as flexible.


Edited by ukaskew on Tuesday 23 May 04:40

3yardy3

270 posts

114 months

Tuesday 23rd May 2017
quotequote all
"In a world where hot hatches now pack 300hp-plus, electronically controlled differentials, variable dampers and even ceramic brakes this could be considered a refreshing breath of fresh air and a return to the core values of simplicity, light weight and back to basics fun. Let's hope so."

Isn't this what Toyota did with the gt-86? They get slated all the time for being underpowered... (I really like the GT-86 btw)

An Tiomanai

17 posts

84 months

Tuesday 23rd May 2017
quotequote all
MadDog1962 said:
Potentially quite a lot of back to basics fun. I think that it's a bit too heavy though.

About 100kg more than an old Mk 1 Golf GTI.

Maybe VW could offer a stripped down version? (Wind up windows, less trim, etc etc)
VW Up! GT3 RS?

anonymous-user

54 months

Tuesday 23rd May 2017
quotequote all
the early gtis mk1 mk 2 were fun cars, that is the forefront. my mk2 gti 8v had tiny power in comparison to today's cars, but i never once thought i want more. i just loved the whole set up, it made you feel like a kid. it didn't need hundreds of bhp, or fancy electrics or 4 exhausts it just needed your hands and a sense of fun.

if this can distill this into the car then great, but i think it will be a marketing exercise. a car designed by true car people for the public is what a gti is about, not a badge to sell more, which VW have done in the past.

the ingredients sound good, light engine, light chassis, back end out potential , but i just feel it wont be a fun car, it will be too safe and too over worked by accountants.

AgentZ

272 posts

128 months

Tuesday 23rd May 2017
quotequote all
Interesting that Autocar have edited their article to say it will start from £14,000 now. VW had a word with them?

shoestring7

6,138 posts

246 months

Friday 14th July 2017
quotequote all
The Spruce goose said:
the early gtis mk1 mk 2 were fun cars, .
I drove a mk1 a couple if years ago, my overwhelming impression was of the throttle response. It was as if it had a race flywheel; instant in the way it responded and fizzed up to the red line, which in turn made snappy gear changes easy, and made the whole car come alive. Even if it felt like all panels and dash were missing a lot of fixings, the brakes were spongy & weak and the driving position was odd, it was a hoot to drive. I tried a MINI the same day, it was like a bank vault in comparison, but the throttle pedal felt like the Golf's brake, and someone had bolted on a steam train's flywheel to the engine.

Lets hope VW's engineers can make their little turbo'd, emissions friendly 3 banger feel like 1980's tech.

SS7