The BAD PARKING thread [vol4]
The BAD PARKING thread [vol4]
Author
Discussion

MediumBuild

1,404 posts

4 months

Wednesday 29th April
quotequote all
Rusty Old-Banger said:
Even if it was an electric car using that space, odds are it won't be charging. Just using it as a handy, wide "reserved" space. The shops near me swapped a dozen blue-badge spaces for electric spaces, so right by the door, and while they are well observed and left alone by ICE drivers, the EV drivers are always in there and never, ever charging.
As an EV driver that really boils my piss.

tt601

285 posts

201 months

Wednesday 29th April
quotequote all
tt601 said:
Free car park close by-check
Plenty of empty spaces -check
Clearly marked/coloured safe pedestrian walkway -check
Where shall I park -ummmmm.
Idiot-check


That’s fair enough as a view but I this instance the only people he is affecting is pedestrians and all drivers by parking on the corner. Not sure where EVs come into it?

Hol

9,303 posts

226 months

Wednesday 29th April
quotequote all
MediumBuild said:
Rusty Old-Banger said:
Even if it was an electric car using that space, odds are it won't be charging. Just using it as a handy, wide "reserved" space. The shops near me swapped a dozen blue-badge spaces for electric spaces, so right by the door, and while they are well observed and left alone by ICE drivers, the EV drivers are always in there and never, ever charging.
As an EV driver that really boils my piss.
It was always going to happen though.
They find the space empty and convince themselves that they partially qualify by owning the correct car.

Not unlike the people with older teenage kids who park in parent and child spaces. They convince themselves they qualify, because not all such spaces are are labelled parent and toddler.


Also, if nobody ever says anything, then they assume we all agree with them.

Edited by Hol on Wednesday 29th April 10:04

otolith

66,776 posts

230 months

Wednesday 29th April
quotequote all
I do find the parking situation on this road (and the one up over the junction past the Marsden) bizarre - the pavement for pedestrians is seriously narrowed, to the extent that a wheelchair or double buggy wouldn't fit in some places, and it's still blocking the road enough to cause a lot of congestion.

I'd write to them all offering a free dropped kerb and 12 months to sort out parking before double yellowing the lot of it.


5s Alive

2,768 posts

60 months

Wednesday 29th April
quotequote all
Hol said:
MediumBuild said:
Rusty Old-Banger said:
Even if it was an electric car using that space, odds are it won't be charging. Just using it as a handy, wide "reserved" space. The shops near me swapped a dozen blue-badge spaces for electric spaces, so right by the door, and while they are well observed and left alone by ICE drivers, the EV drivers are always in there and never, ever charging.
As an EV driver that really boils my piss.
It was always going to happen though.
They find the space empty and convince themselves that they partially qualify by owning the correct car.

Not unlike the people with older teenage kids who park in parent and child spaces. They convince themselves they qualify, because not all such spaces are are labelled parent and toddler.


Also, if nobody ever says anything, then they assume we all agree with them.

Edited by Hol on Wednesday 29th April 10:04
I 'helpfully' suggested to one such recently that he should really park elsewhere once he'd finished charging. We both knew that he hadn't charged at all. His response? 'The sign says EVs only, it doesn't say they have to be charging'. So either they actually believe that or are taking the piss. Pulling people up on this kind of behavior gets you nowhere.

Ian_SW

976 posts

111 months

Wednesday 29th April
quotequote all
otolith said:
I do find the parking situation on this road (and the one up over the junction past the Marsden) bizarre - the pavement for pedestrians is seriously narrowed, to the extent that a wheelchair or double buggy wouldn't fit in some places, and it's still blocking the road enough to cause a lot of congestion.

I'd write to them all offering a free dropped kerb and 12 months to sort out parking before double yellowing the lot of it.

Marked pavement parking places like this is quite common in Sutton. For some reason, the borough council seems quite keen on it. Presumably the highways people in the council think what's left of the pavement outside the parking bay is wide enough.

When I lived near there nearly 30 years ago, it did mean that two lanes of cars could flow reasonably unimpeded (with the odd lost wing mirror - I wouldn't have wanted to park my car on a road like that!) and you only needed to stop if a bus was coming the other way. However as cars have got so much wider in the last 30 years that's probably no longer possible. They would be better with parking bays fully on the road and enough space left with double yellows after every few bays for passing places.

mac96

6,034 posts

169 months

Wednesday 29th April
quotequote all
Ian_SW said:
otolith said:
I do find the parking situation on this road (and the one up over the junction past the Marsden) bizarre - the pavement for pedestrians is seriously narrowed, to the extent that a wheelchair or double buggy wouldn't fit in some places, and it's still blocking the road enough to cause a lot of congestion.

I'd write to them all offering a free dropped kerb and 12 months to sort out parking before double yellowing the lot of it.

Marked pavement parking places like this is quite common in Sutton. For some reason, the borough council seems quite keen on it. Presumably the highways people in the council think what's left of the pavement outside the parking bay is wide enough.

When I lived near there nearly 30 years ago, it did mean that two lanes of cars could flow reasonably unimpeded (with the odd lost wing mirror - I wouldn't have wanted to park my car on a road like that!) and you only needed to stop if a bus was coming the other way. However as cars have got so much wider in the last 30 years that's probably no longer possible. They would be better with parking bays fully on the road and enough space left with double yellows after every few bays for passing places.
In the photo example it looks as if one solution would be widening the road on the right by a couple of feet to make room for all the users. But I bet that wouldn't be considered even if it is practical.

North West Tom

11,675 posts

203 months

Wednesday 29th April
quotequote all
Funny one - recently the council extended some yellow lines to go a bit futher down from a junction, as (legally) parked cars were causing a bit of a blockage as it's a fairly busy road to turn out into.

When they came to paint the lines, there was a van parked (again, legally) so the painters had to go around him. In fairness, I don't recall seeing any signposts or traffic cones to warn of the incoming painting.

However, that was a few weeks ago, and they haven't been back to fill in the gaps, so now people are treating it as their own private parking space on the road. I would guess it's legal as there are no lines, but I'm not sure I'd risk parking there (and common sense would tell me they could be coming back to paint any time!)

Anyway we are back to square one now with these VIP parked cars causing blockages behind them.




ferret50

2,792 posts

35 months

Wednesday 29th April
quotequote all
North West Tom said:
Funny one - recently the council extended some yellow lines to go a bit futher down from a junction, as (legally) parked cars were causing a bit of a blockage as it's a fairly busy road to turn out into.

When they came to paint the lines, there was a van parked (again, legally) so the painters had to go around him. In fairness, I don't recall seeing any signposts or traffic cones to warn of the incoming painting.

However, that was a few weeks ago, and they haven't been back to fill in the gaps, so now people are treating it as their own private parking space on the road. I would guess it's legal as there are no lines, but I'm not sure I'd risk parking there (and common sense would tell me they could be coming back to paint any time!)

Anyway we are back to square one now with these VIP parked cars causing blockages behind them.



I would be inclined to paint yellow lines over that van, including the front screen!

hehe

Nigel_O

3,732 posts

245 months

Wednesday 29th April
quotequote all
otolith said:
I do find the parking situation on this road (and the one up over the junction past the Marsden) bizarre - the pavement for pedestrians is seriously narrowed, to the extent that a wheelchair or double buggy wouldn't fit in some places, and it's still blocking the road enough to cause a lot of congestion.

I'd write to them all offering a free dropped kerb and 12 months to sort out parking before double yellowing the lot of it.

Where would the dropped kerbs lead to? Looks like very few of the houses have the room for off-street parking.

otolith

66,776 posts

230 months

Wednesday 29th April
quotequote all
Nigel_O said:
otolith said:
I do find the parking situation on this road (and the one up over the junction past the Marsden) bizarre - the pavement for pedestrians is seriously narrowed, to the extent that a wheelchair or double buggy wouldn't fit in some places, and it's still blocking the road enough to cause a lot of congestion.

I'd write to them all offering a free dropped kerb and 12 months to sort out parking before double yellowing the lot of it.

Where would the dropped kerbs lead to? Looks like very few of the houses have the room for off-street parking.
Some of the houses have turned their small front gardens into parking, so it's possible.

Your Dad

2,218 posts

209 months

Wednesday 29th April
quotequote all
otolith said:
I do find the parking situation on this road (and the one up over the junction past the Marsden) bizarre - the pavement for pedestrians is seriously narrowed, to the extent that a wheelchair or double buggy wouldn't fit in some places, and it's still blocking the road enough to cause a lot of congestion.

I'd write to them all offering a free dropped kerb and 12 months to sort out parking before double yellowing the lot of it.

Looks like the single buggy fits through, but the lampost would also hinder a double buggy.

https://www.google.com/maps/place/Downs+Rd,+Sutton...

otolith

66,776 posts

230 months

Wednesday 29th April
quotequote all
Wouldn't lose any sleep about scraping past a lamppost, mind...

donkmeister

12,184 posts

126 months

Wednesday 29th April
quotequote all
Your Dad said:
otolith said:
I do find the parking situation on this road (and the one up over the junction past the Marsden) bizarre - the pavement for pedestrians is seriously narrowed, to the extent that a wheelchair or double buggy wouldn't fit in some places, and it's still blocking the road enough to cause a lot of congestion.

I'd write to them all offering a free dropped kerb and 12 months to sort out parking before double yellowing the lot of it.

Looks like the single buggy fits through, but the lampost would also hinder a double buggy.

https://www.google.com/maps/place/Downs+Rd,+Sutton...
As an aside, if you ever get Google to blur your house (like the one next to the spot on the link), it's impossible to get it unblurred even if the house changes ownership. Which can he quite annoying if you move house, find it blurred on Streetview and don't want the world to think you were caught doing something you shouldn't have been doing.

(I can't be alone in assuming every blurred house image has either someone in a state of undress or someone who was signed off sick but swinging the lead)

donkmeister

12,184 posts

126 months

Wednesday 29th April
quotequote all
otolith said:
Wouldn't lose any sleep about scraping past a lamppost, mind...
How many gallons of piss have been sprayed over the average suburban lamp post in its life time? Plenty of dog pee, plus if you live a few minutes walk from a pub then possibly human pee too.

No thanks, I'll scrape past the car if it's an either/or situation.

otolith

66,776 posts

230 months

Wednesday 29th April
quotequote all
donkmeister said:
How many gallons of piss have been sprayed over the average suburban lamp post in its life time? Plenty of dog pee, plus if you live a few minutes walk from a pub then possibly human pee too.

No thanks, I'll scrape past the car if it's an either/or situation.
Well, there's that, but people tend not to be so precious about not getting their lamppost scratched.

Mr Tidy

30,375 posts

153 months

Thursday 30th April
quotequote all
mac96 said:
Ian_SW said:
otolith said:
I do find the parking situation on this road (and the one up over the junction past the Marsden) bizarre - the pavement for pedestrians is seriously narrowed, to the extent that a wheelchair or double buggy wouldn't fit in some places, and it's still blocking the road enough to cause a lot of congestion.

I'd write to them all offering a free dropped kerb and 12 months to sort out parking before double yellowing the lot of it.

Marked pavement parking places like this is quite common in Sutton. For some reason, the borough council seems quite keen on it. Presumably the highways people in the council think what's left of the pavement outside the parking bay is wide enough.

When I lived near there nearly 30 years ago, it did mean that two lanes of cars could flow reasonably unimpeded (with the odd lost wing mirror - I wouldn't have wanted to park my car on a road like that!) and you only needed to stop if a bus was coming the other way. However as cars have got so much wider in the last 30 years that's probably no longer possible. They would be better with parking bays fully on the road and enough space left with double yellows after every few bays for passing places.
In the photo example it looks as if one solution would be widening the road on the right by a couple of feet to make room for all the users. But I bet that wouldn't be considered even if it is practical.
IME of living in Sutton years ago, taking my Mum to the Marsden for 2 lumpectomy's, a mastectomy and countless follow-up appointments and my sister living in that Borough now they'd never consider widening the road, even though there is only wasteland to the right. After all it wouldn't generate any revenue.

The parking on the pavement on the left is a concession to residents who pay for a permit, but the Council sell more than twice as many permits as there are spaces so they are on a winner.

There is F-All there apart from the Marsden but most residential roads nearby have double yellow lines so the Marsden can rinse patients for £2 an hour even if they have a Blue Badge, unless they get lucky with one of the four free wheelchair accessible spaces that aren't at the bottom of a steep hill.

I got lucky with those a couple of times, but usually had to drop Mum off in the ambulance bay in her wheelchair, park up the hill and then go back to her - and pay to escape.

Charging anyone going there for treatment is a disgrace.

Sorry, rant over.



Groomio

639 posts

6 months

Thursday 30th April
quotequote all
donkmeister said:
Your Dad said:
otolith said:
I do find the parking situation on this road (and the one up over the junction past the Marsden) bizarre - the pavement for pedestrians is seriously narrowed, to the extent that a wheelchair or double buggy wouldn't fit in some places, and it's still blocking the road enough to cause a lot of congestion.

I'd write to them all offering a free dropped kerb and 12 months to sort out parking before double yellowing the lot of it.

Looks like the single buggy fits through, but the lampost would also hinder a double buggy.

https://www.google.com/maps/place/Downs+Rd,+Sutton...
As an aside, if you ever get Google to blur your house (like the one next to the spot on the link), it's impossible to get it unblurred even if the house changes ownership. Which can he quite annoying if you move house, find it blurred on Streetview and don't want the world to think you were caught doing something you shouldn't have been doing.

(I can't be alone in assuming every blurred house image has either someone in a state of undress or someone who was signed off sick but swinging the lead)
Streetview only identifies the year and month, not the day or time



Giantt

919 posts

62 months

Thursday 30th April
quotequote all

Camden council spent million,plus two years, removing the plastic barriers marking the cycle lane, Haverstock Hill,dug up road,traffic chaos,all to make the cycle lane a parking place, opposite side of the road is rammed when something on at the school

donkmeister

12,184 posts

126 months

Thursday 30th April
quotequote all
Groomio said:
donkmeister said:
Your Dad said:
otolith said:
I do find the parking situation on this road (and the one up over the junction past the Marsden) bizarre - the pavement for pedestrians is seriously narrowed, to the extent that a wheelchair or double buggy wouldn't fit in some places, and it's still blocking the road enough to cause a lot of congestion.

I'd write to them all offering a free dropped kerb and 12 months to sort out parking before double yellowing the lot of it.

Looks like the single buggy fits through, but the lampost would also hinder a double buggy.

https://www.google.com/maps/place/Downs+Rd,+Sutton...
As an aside, if you ever get Google to blur your house (like the one next to the spot on the link), it's impossible to get it unblurred even if the house changes ownership. Which can he quite annoying if you move house, find it blurred on Streetview and don't want the world to think you were caught doing something you shouldn't have been doing.

(I can't be alone in assuming every blurred house image has either someone in a state of undress or someone who was signed off sick but swinging the lead)
Streetview only identifies the year and month, not the day or time
I've known people to be signed off for several months (probably legitimately).

Imagine someone signed off for a faked or exaggerated physical malady, who then decided to use that time to landscape their front garden. That sort of thing.