The BAD PARKING thread [vol4]
Discussion
jamei303 said:
Shermanator said:
CoolHands said:
I genuinely don't see anything wrong with that
They are taking up one space, like they would if they parked nornally
They have not inconvenienced anyone (you cant even argue about the hatching at the end of the row, as the back of the car isn't in them), like they would if they parked normally.
If I saw that on my way inside I would crack a smile about it, I think CoolHands needs to loosen up a little.
Isn’t siupposed to is rarely clever in the real world.
In this example they have to reverse into a lane that is only expecting people to exit fromtwaya from the assigned lanes.
But.. if you boys think that everyone else should compensate for their radical decisions
I guess that explains it.
Mandalore said:
Trying to be special and parking where someone
Isn’t siupposed to is rarely clever in the real world.
In this example they have to reverse into a lane that is only expecting people to exit fromtwaya from the assigned lanes.
But.. if you boys think that everyone else should compensate for their radical decisions
I guess that explains it.
I don’t want to argue one way or the other on the driver’s attitude about parking how he did, but I used to often see one or two Smart cars parked, nose on, or reversed on to the pavement, opposite Brompton Oratory Church, either in Brompton Road, or Cromwell Gardens, SW7.Isn’t siupposed to is rarely clever in the real world.
In this example they have to reverse into a lane that is only expecting people to exit fromtwaya from the assigned lanes.
But.. if you boys think that everyone else should compensate for their radical decisions
I guess that explains it.
They didn’t constitute a hazard, they were about a long as a large car was wide.
Gassing Station | General Gassing | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff