Fuel economy - anyone beating the official figures?

Fuel economy - anyone beating the official figures?

Author
Discussion

cheddar

Original Poster:

4,637 posts

174 months

Wednesday 28th June 2017
quotequote all
My father reckons that overall he's 4mpg up on the manufacturers claimed mpg in his Skoda Octavia, no mean feat given that most of us struggle to get within 20% of the 'official' figures.

He's a real 'neutral downhill' and 'into 6th before he's out of the driveway' type so it's possible.

Anyone else manage this?

Rick101

6,967 posts

150 months

Wednesday 28th June 2017
quotequote all
I had an 2008 vRS diesel. It was pretty efficient, especially if you used AD and hypermiling techniques.

I saw 61.2 on the OBC on a particularly careful run. Not sure how that equated to the official figures

Edited by Rick101 on Wednesday 28th June 19:20

Strudul

1,585 posts

85 months

Wednesday 28th June 2017
quotequote all
Neutral coasting is actually worse for mpg. Better to stay in gear.

According to my average mpg readout I achieve significantly higher than the quoted figures.

Rick101

6,967 posts

150 months

Wednesday 28th June 2017
quotequote all
Why is that? I thought most modern cars cut overfuel when off the throttle regardless.

spookly

4,018 posts

95 months

Wednesday 28th June 2017
quotequote all
VW claim 39mpg. I get 22.5mpg.

loose cannon

6,029 posts

241 months

Wednesday 28th June 2017
quotequote all
Just managed 417 miles in my megane rs 250 and the light has just come on saying 45 miles left
And 36.5 mpg average speed 34.5 mph

Edited by loose cannon on Wednesday 28th June 19:35

wiliferus

4,060 posts

198 months

Wednesday 28th June 2017
quotequote all
Volvo V70 D5 163 manual... I can't be arsed to check the figures, but if I go by the OBC I beat the claimed combined figure day in day out.
Brim to brim however reveals I'm about 10% below...

anonymous-user

54 months

Wednesday 28th June 2017
quotequote all
wiliferus said:
Volvo V70 D5 163 manual... I can't be arsed to check the figures, but if I go by the OBC I beat the claimed combined figure day in day out.
Brim to brim however reveals I'm about 10% below...
The OBC on my V70 T5 said I could get mid to high 30s on a long run if I was gentle. I believe it went on to seek a career in politics once we parted company.

A900ss

3,248 posts

152 months

Wednesday 28th June 2017
quotequote all
2015 Mercedes C 220d that I think has an official 70 ish combined

Drove Gloucestershire to Milton Keynes and then to Folkestone today. Certainly not economy driving, just going with flow and mostly 80 ish on M1/25/20.

OBC claimed 65mpg and its normally fairly accurate

So not exceeding the official but certainly
OK for 80ish.

I am amazed at this car. It averages similar mpg to my wife's Seat Ibiza Ecomotion (same as Polo Blue motion)

PS-average over last 20k is 60mpg


caelite

4,274 posts

112 months

Wednesday 28th June 2017
quotequote all
Used to be able to beat my Shogun's paper MPG. It was a '00 mk3 SWB with the old 2.5td. On paper it should achieve 28mpg, I could get a solid 30 out of mine, ~32 on a long run. Even managed up to 35 on a properly good run (whole tank spent at 60mph on the motorway)That is from calculating the average based on a tank of fuel, didn't have anything as fancy as an inaccurate trip computer on that old rig.

It wasn't as if I was pussy footing them about either, the old brute had a total 114bhp when it left the factory, and was the best part of 2 ton, 160k miles and 15 years later no doubt had some effect on that figure. So you had no option other than drive it flat out to get up to road speed. Although I did keep it at 56-60mph on dual carriageways/motorways. It would do 80 but made some very interesting smells when you ran it at that pace for more than 20 minutes or so biggrin.

Mound Dawg

1,915 posts

174 months

Wednesday 28th June 2017
quotequote all
Got 55.5 mpg on the computer in the 124 Spider on my 45 mile commute yesterday morning. It's averaged 43.5 over 15,500 miles.

Adverts say 43-44 combined so I'm right there.

louiechevy

645 posts

193 months

Wednesday 28th June 2017
quotequote all
2010 seat ibiza 1.4 ecomotive, seat say the combined consumption is 76mpg the trip computer is giving me an average of 85ish it's miles out! I fill it to the brim and work it out on the miles last tank was 74mpg current one is going to better worst in the winter is 68mpg last summer managed 78mpg on one tank. Basically I drive like a nun it's a bad habit I've gotten into smile

alec.e

2,149 posts

124 months

Wednesday 28th June 2017
quotequote all
Jaguar S-Type 3.0 V6 Petrol:

Average speed 63mph

Jaguar Supercarged V8:

Average speed 53mph

Otispunkmeyer

12,580 posts

155 months

Wednesday 28th June 2017
quotequote all
Strudul said:
Neutral coasting is actually worse for mpg. Better to stay in gear.

According to my average mpg readout I achieve significantly higher than the quoted figures.
Depends what you're doing I'd say. Certainly VW have a freewheel mode on some of their cars (likely DSG equipped only) as its better to glide a further distance using a little fuel than a shorter distance using no fuel. Though it is not clear in this case if it cuts the engine, it just says it disengages the clutch and re-engages when braking. It does mention rengaging to use the pumping of the engine to slow the car, so I guess the fuel isn't cut when coasting.

http://en.volkswagen.com/en/innovation-and-technol...

Certainly in an EV it can be better to free wheel as you'll cover more distance than the extra range you might generate travelling a shorter distance with regen and then having to use extra energy to meet the same distance. But it is different in an EV as there isn't an engine to keep idle.

Hoofy

76,341 posts

282 months

Wednesday 28th June 2017
quotequote all
35mpg in a CLK 55 AMG. It was the most boring 20 miles ever, I can tell you!

Tempest_5

603 posts

197 months

Wednesday 28th June 2017
quotequote all
When I changed jobs at the beginning of the year I doubled my commuting distance. Before this I was getting 32 mpg from my old Mondeo estate. The official figure is 36 for my petrol 1.8. The extra distance ment that I had a massive fuel bill for the first month that almost negated my pay rise.

I modified my driving style, gentle acceleration, anticipate stopping at junctions, use highest gear possible etc. I can now get about 42 mpg on a good day. Admittedly the route is hillier which means that you can lift off on the downhill sections. It is also cross country through small towns which drops the average speed. I find it is more economic than my old a dual carriage way flat route. It is harder work though and you have to be gentle/slow. If you get a day where there is lots of quick stuff behind you the mpg drops as dawdling along at 45 would be a bit anti social.

Anyway going slow for a bit means quick feels even quicker when you have a blat.

So, yes you can beat the official MPG, but it's not always possible, suitable or convenient.

gizlaroc

17,251 posts

224 months

Wednesday 28th June 2017
quotequote all
Official combined for mine, E350 Estate, is 32mpg, I often get 35mpg plus from it, which is roughly 3mpg less than the E350d estate I had before got on the same run.



It has averaged 29.2mpg calculated over the last 21,000 miles since I kept track. Which for a 306hp 3.5 litre V6 petrol large estate I think is great. The E350d said 36mpg on the OBC but was just under 33 calculated.


Noesph

1,151 posts

149 months

Wednesday 28th June 2017
quotequote all
Renault claim 57.6 mpg, I get 30 mpg. 48% out isn't too bad........

cptsideways

13,544 posts

252 months

Wednesday 28th June 2017
quotequote all
Otispunkmeyer said:
Strudul said:
Neutral coasting is actually worse for mpg. Better to stay in gear.

According to my average mpg readout I achieve significantly higher than the quoted figures.
Depends what you're doing I'd say. Certainly VW have a freewheel mode on some of their cars (likely DSG equipped only) as its better to glide a further distance using a little fuel than a shorter distance using no fuel. Though it is not clear in this case if it cuts the engine, it just says it disengages the clutch and re-engages when braking. It does mention rengaging to use the pumping of the engine to slow the car, so I guess the fuel isn't cut when coasting.

http://en.volkswagen.com/en/innovation-and-technol...

Certainly in an EV it can be better to free wheel as you'll cover more distance than the extra range you might generate travelling a shorter distance with regen and then having to use extra energy to meet the same distance. But it is different in an EV as there isn't an engine to keep idle.
In gear you use no fuel but use your kinetic energy operating a giant air pump & slow down sooner.

Coasting you use a little fuel but all your kinetic energy can be put to use


The Lupo 3L had a coasting function back in 2000, some of the current VAG DSG's have the same function, in the US they do shut off the engine but not in Europe, many EV's have a coasting function too.

Erudite geezer

576 posts

121 months

Wednesday 28th June 2017
quotequote all


45.3 mpg from a 62-plate BMW 520d Touring M-Sport. Averaging just 22mph.

Absolutely love this car.