Can my sister get her deposit back? Car returned

Can my sister get her deposit back? Car returned

Author
Discussion

northwest monkey

6,370 posts

189 months

Sunday 23rd July 2017
quotequote all
So she knew the power steering wasn't covered?

Putting aside the legality of the document for a minute, owning a car does come with some responsibility.

Also, despite what people here will tell you, filling in a Small Claims form does not automatically get you your money back. Having a hearing in a Small Claims court does not automatically get you your money back. Winning in a Small Claims court does not automatically get you your money back. Getting the bailiffs round does not automatically get you your money back.

If your sister wants to spend the next 12/18 months without a car and a lot of expense and time going to court, then go ahead. If it was me, and it was my sister, I'd lend her the money to get the car fixed - then worry about what to do.

dwight666

Original Poster:

14 posts

81 months

Sunday 23rd July 2017
quotequote all
The car has been returned, RAC recovered the car and brought it to a garage.
Mechanic called up RAC and they've said it's not covered so my sister has been in touch with the company she got the car from.
They have said because your hiring the car it's up to you to fix it. She's then told them to collect the car themselves as she's not paying out for it.

The way they've sold it to her when she was getting it was that she's borrowing the money from them and she's just paying it back. But obviously there is actually no finance regulated company involved.

When we spoke to RAC they said the warranty they offer is the basic only covers small things such a tyres horns ect

Jim AK

4,029 posts

124 months

Sunday 23rd July 2017
quotequote all
Going off on a different tack here but there is more to worry about than the car`s reliability.

If she has no V5, who is the car registered to?

Who insures it? Any `Hire car` I`ve ever had it was all included. Avis, Hertz etc are like that!

If your sister is insuring it has she declared she is not the Registered Keeper?Legal owner?

Who is making sure its taxed & MOT`d?

This all sounds like the biggest Barrel of Monkeys that is also full of several opened cans of worms ever!!

anonymous-user

54 months

Sunday 23rd July 2017
quotequote all
is this some sort of bailee agreement, then the law is different to normal finance.

dwight666

Original Poster:

14 posts

81 months

Sunday 23rd July 2017
quotequote all
Right! It doesn't make sense one bit

She insures it tax's and mot's but on the V5 they are the registered keeper.

We will see what FCA have to say anyway doesn't sound legit to me at all.

northwest monkey

6,370 posts

189 months

Sunday 23rd July 2017
quotequote all
So what is your sister going to do about a car?

confused_buyer

6,615 posts

181 months

Sunday 23rd July 2017
quotequote all
The whole thing looks a complete mess but I think northwest monkey's advice above is very good.

She probably has got a very good case and one way or another, morally, she may well win something and the supplier get into all sorts of trouble for dodgy financial agreements. However, equally, I think the likely outcome will be no money and no car. By the time anything happens the supplier will be long gone and there will be a new company called OldName(2017) Ltd in it's place.

Also, living in the real world, no warranty is ever going to cover anything on £1500 car. No such thing exists. Cars at this price range always have been, always are and always will be a gamble which is why they are cheap in the first place. No matter how you buy one when it goes wrong you will be paying to fix it.

What has gone wrong with it? Does it really need £500 spent on it? Could a £50 secondhand pump or something sort it?

Personally, I'd probably find a cheap way to fix it and agree something with the seller to call it a day with a lump sum pay off (can anyone lend her some money) and call it a day.

HustleRussell

24,690 posts

160 months

Sunday 23rd July 2017
quotequote all
dwight666 said:
She did want the car but didn't want to spend £500 fixing it when she only got it in march the warranty they offer is very basic only covers minor things
It's a 15 year old, £1,700 car- how obliging do you expect the dodgy bomb site dealer's warranty to be?

confused_buyer

6,615 posts

181 months

Sunday 23rd July 2017
quotequote all
HustleRussell said:
It's a 15 year old, £1,700 car- how obliging do you expect the dodgy bomb site dealer's warranty to be?
You could buy it from a £700m showroom on Park Lane and there will still be no warranty because just how expensive a warranty is ever going to be included in a £1700 car? Even if it is £200 who here would willingly cover anything and everything which might go wrong on a 15 year old car for a year for that? Answer: no one. And no warranty company ever will either. They don't exist because the cost v risk will never work.

dwight666

Original Poster:

14 posts

81 months

Sunday 23rd July 2017
quotequote all
she's sorted a new car now anyway but obviously she's peeved of and lost hundreds.
I just wanted people's opinion on whether she has a good case or not if it has to go to court.
Which sounds like we do

em177

3,131 posts

164 months

Sunday 23rd July 2017
quotequote all
dwight666 said:
she's sorted a new car now anyway but obviously she's peeved of and lost hundreds.
I just wanted people's opinion on whether she has a good case or not if it has to go to court.
Which sounds like we do
You dont.

confused_buyer

6,615 posts

181 months

Sunday 23rd July 2017
quotequote all
dwight666 said:
she's sorted a new car now anyway but obviously she's peeved of and lost hundreds.
I just wanted people's opinion on whether she has a good case or not if it has to go to court.
Which sounds like we do
My gut feeling is that you'll spend £100s in court fees and getting some proper legal advice (which you will need to bring a proper case working out that agreement and ownership of the car) and by the time you get there the entity you are trying to take to court will either no longer exist or have no assets anyway.

Be careful you are not just throwing good money after bad. Small Claims Court isn't actually that cheap - it is cheap to start a case but costs can mount and you'll need to pay these upfront - takes a long time and even if you win you getting the money can be a nightmare.


confused_buyer

6,615 posts

181 months

Sunday 23rd July 2017
quotequote all
Incidentally, she hasn't really lost all that much. She's paid £780 for 4 and a bit months of car use. OK, so not cheap really but there is no way she will be getting all of her money back even in the best case scenario and if she doesn't get costs awarded and then actually get the money you'll spend more in court costs then you could ever get back anyway.

saaby93

32,038 posts

178 months

Sunday 23rd July 2017
quotequote all
dwight666 said:
she's sorted a new car now anyway but obviously she's peeved of and lost hundreds.
learn by experience - move on

cuprabob

14,606 posts

214 months

Sunday 23rd July 2017
quotequote all
What was the cash price of the car?

I would expect a "dodgy" contract like this to charge a really high interest rate to borrow the money for the 12 months.

Based on the Brighthouse financial model, I would expect half of that £1700 total to be interest making it really a sub £1k car.

As said, put it down to experience and move on.

Where possible, if paying a deposit L, pay it by credit card but not always if you have a poor credit rating and don't have one.

Hope your sister has better luck with her next car...


Edited by cuprabob on Sunday 23 July 11:40

The Moose

22,846 posts

209 months

Sunday 23rd July 2017
quotequote all
I'm surprised there's no mention of maintenance in the agreement. Comparing it to Hertz/Avis is pretty stupid - talk about not comparing apples with apples.

There's likely to have been no finance as such on the car, however the value of the car may have been inflated

I'm afraid I have little sympathy for your sister. She is a sub prime risk, not able to raise "traditional" finance for a car that's worth somewhere between £1,000 and £2,000. Because of this she has elected to go down an atypical route and either not understood the consequences of what she's doing or now trying to weasel her way out of the agreement. The dude she bought from is offering something to allow her to be independently mobile regardless of the fact she can afford to buy a car. The alternative is that she doesn't have a car...however the bus isn't an attractive option!!!

I have a friend over here who is a part time car dealer. He occasionally operates this type of agreement on a handshake for people who can't afford to pay in full immediately.

Mexman

2,442 posts

84 months

Sunday 23rd July 2017
quotequote all
Typical sub prime customer, can't afford it in the first place, when it goes wrong, doesn't want to pay for it, wants numerous months 'free' motoring, wants her deposit back, SOGA, blah, blah,blah...and it's everyone else's fault but their own.
Why has she got stty credit rating in the first place?
Let me guess, dosn't pay her rent, can't afford electric bill, gas bill, council tax, probably has thousands coming in, in benefits, bet she has the latest i phone three million and seven though, as well as numerous tatoos she has paid hundreds for.
1700 quid car has a fault several months later.....Fix it.

Andy-6ufnp

133 posts

97 months

Sunday 23rd July 2017
quotequote all
Mexman said:
Typical sub prime customer, can't afford it in the first place, when it goes wrong, doesn't want to pay for it, wants numerous months 'free' motoring, wants her deposit back, SOGA, blah, blah,blah...and it's everyone else's fault but their own.
Why has she got stty credit rating in the first place?
Let me guess, dosn't pay her rent, can't afford electric bill, gas bill, council tax, probably has thousands coming in, in benefits, bet she has the latest i phone three million and seven though, as well as numerous tatoos she has paid hundreds for.
1700 quid car has a fault several months later.....Fix it.
Just a bit presumptuous don't you think.

Mr Teddy Bear

186 posts

191 months

Sunday 23rd July 2017
quotequote all
Mexman said:
Typical sub prime customer, can't afford it in the first place, when it goes wrong, doesn't want to pay for it, wants numerous months 'free' motoring, wants her deposit back, SOGA, blah, blah,blah...and it's everyone else's fault but their own.
Why has she got stty credit rating in the first place?
Let me guess, dosn't pay her rent, can't afford electric bill, gas bill, council tax, probably has thousands coming in, in benefits, bet she has the latest i phone three million and seven though, as well as numerous tatoos she has paid hundreds for.
1700 quid car has a fault several months later.....Fix it.
Presumptuous and out of order Mr Mexman.

anonymous-user

54 months

Sunday 23rd July 2017
quotequote all
Mr Teddy Bear said:
Presumptuous and out of order Mr Mexman.
you get it a lot on ph, people make massive assumptions about things that have little or no knowledge of. Probably said on here before and they lap it up or the Dailymail said it.

21% of the uk population live in relative poverty, not benefits people poverty but the bulk of these are hard working people just not had the luck others in life have. Sometimes these people can't tie there boot laces up and work harder (the standard ph response).

The problem is sitting behind a pc screen ranting at the unfortunate doesn't; really give you an objective point of view on these matters to hand.