VW Golf R Does Quarter-Mile in 9.5 Secs
Discussion
nickfrog said:
Straight line performance has stopped impressing me a long time ago.
Clivey said:
some of us have next to no interest in 4-pot hatches above a certain price level, or as a fun car.
And yet you choose you spend your time/energy coming onto a thread about a 4-pot hatch driving in a straight line just to announce this to the world?I'm off to find a thread about lawnmowers, just to tell them how much I hate mowing the lawn.
There are some truly odd people on PH.
M-SportMatt said:
C70R said:
TwistingMyMelon said:
there were novas , astras and escorts being built in sheds in the 80s and 90s that were not too far off this pace
Not in the 80s, there weren't..
Plenty of rallycross cars with BDT's were pumping out WELL over 600 bhp in the 80's, Most of which were Non WORKS efforts and privateer built. Not quite the same type of car but nonetheless, 2.0 4 bangers have been making silly power for 30 plus years, even in production car format ( Ford RS200 EVO )
I'd have said a forged golf r is well within it's comfort zone at 780bhp. Dsg has a big part to pay in that time I think, if the clutch pack has been uprated then the actual gearbox would cope. I'm not a fan of dsg cars but they do seem to take the abuse and power increases a lot better
M-SportMatt said:
C70R said:
TwistingMyMelon said:
there were novas , astras and escorts being built in sheds in the 80s and 90s that were not too far off this pace
Not in the 80s, there weren't..
Plenty of rallycross cars with BDT's were pumping out WELL over 600 bhp in the 80's, Most of which were Non WORKS efforts and privateer built. Not quite the same type of car but nonetheless, 2.0 4 bangers have been making silly power for 30 plus years, even in production car format ( Ford RS200 EVO )
nickfrog said:
C70R said:
Threads like this quickly identify the wally crowd on PH. I'm not particularly in love with the Golf R, but you'd have to be some kind of cynic/retard to be unimpressed with that performance
I don't follow you at all and don't understand the cynic/retard thing. Straight line performance has stopped impressing me a long time ago.Building a 3200+ horsepower Corvette like I am currently, often meets with 'meh' responses because of its lack of ability to corner like a Cayman S. I didn't build it for that though, I built it to go ~240mph in less than 6.0 seconds, but again, if it doesn't corner like a mid engine sports car, it's deemed 'flawed'.
Horses for courses and all that
C70R said:
And yet you choose you spend your time/energy coming onto a thread about a 4-pot hatch driving in a straight line just to announce this to the world?
And yet you choose to spend your time/energy calling people retards because they are impressed by different things than what impresses you ?C70R said:
There are some truly odd people on PH.
Indeedfuelracer496 said:
Building a 3200+ horsepower Corvette like I am currently, often meets with 'meh' responses because of its lack of ability to corner like a Cayman S. I didn't build it for that though, I built it to go ~240mph in less than 6.0 seconds, but again, if it doesn't corner like a mid engine sports car, it's deemed 'flawed'.
Horses for courses and all that
Is there a thread on this car and/or it's build anywhere on the net? Sounds interesting.Horses for courses and all that
fuelracer496 said:
This isn't a rarity on the forum. There's a distinct us & them attitude on both sides. Those who dislike or have no interest in drag racing, rarely acknowledge the engineering and performance capabilities of cars. Much in the same way, the drag racing fraternity rarely has anything positive to say about circuit racing. Those who dabble in a bit of both, see and witness this regularly (speaking from my own experience).
Building a 3200+ horsepower Corvette like I am currently, often meets with 'meh' responses because of its lack of ability to corner like a Cayman S. I didn't build it for that though, I built it to go ~240mph in less than 6.0 seconds, but again, if it doesn't corner like a mid engine sports car, it's deemed 'flawed'.
Horses for courses and all that
I couldn't agree with you more. Hence my surprise at seeing the word "retard" just because different people like different things.Building a 3200+ horsepower Corvette like I am currently, often meets with 'meh' responses because of its lack of ability to corner like a Cayman S. I didn't build it for that though, I built it to go ~240mph in less than 6.0 seconds, but again, if it doesn't corner like a mid engine sports car, it's deemed 'flawed'.
Horses for courses and all that
The engineering must be nothing short of fascinating but one should be allowed to find the outcome unimpressive exactly like someone else may find the idea of repeatedly driving around the same circuit unimpressive. Neither are retards, just different.
SuperchargedVR6 said:
C70R said:
Threads like this quickly identify the wally crowd on PH. I'm not particularly in love with the Golf R, but you'd have to be some kind of cynic/retard to be unimpressed with that performance.
Someone makes a 5-seat hatchback run the quarter faster than the world's quickest hypercars, while being road-legal and looking largely stock on the outside, and we get this:
It's because it's a Golf. If it was a PH darling car, they'd all be beating themselves off under their desks over it.Someone makes a 5-seat hatchback run the quarter faster than the world's quickest hypercars, while being road-legal and looking largely stock on the outside, and we get this:
OzzyR1 said:
Is there a thread on this car and/or it's build anywhere on the net? Sounds interesting.
I started a build thread on another forum a while ago, I decided against it being on PH for the reasons mentioned above. Slight issues with photobucket being sods recently, so am porting photos over to Flickr when time allows as 95% of them are on broken links at present (a complete pain in the backside TBH, might just pay their silly subscription fee to get it working again ).https://www.avforums.com/threads/something-funny.1...
ETA: $400, hell no to that one just to display some piccies. Cheeky sods.
Edited by fuelracer496 on Thursday 27th July 11:28
nickfrog said:
C70R said:
And yet you choose you spend your time/energy coming onto a thread about a 4-pot hatch driving in a straight line just to announce this to the world?
And yet you choose to spend your time/energy calling people retards because they are impressed by different things than what impresses you ?C70R said:
There are some truly odd people on PH.
IndeedYou came to a thread that doesn't interest you, just to tell everyone that it doesn't interest you.
Which of us is the odd one?
How about a 3.58 second, 386mph, 1/4 mile...
https://youtu.be/0lnEjOuQGBc
...and I was there!
Another fair comparison? No petrol burned either, just hydrogen peroxide.
https://youtu.be/0lnEjOuQGBc
...and I was there!
Another fair comparison? No petrol burned either, just hydrogen peroxide.
^^
I think its fairly obvious that too many people seem to think the Golf R is some magical new shiny development the like of which was never been seen before,, when in realty its just a newer technology version of the same tried and tested 4pot AWD family car that the Japs have been punting out for over years.
Its also absolutely true that writing a post comparing a superbike to a 4 seat car and then getting offended when people point out (the obvious) that a bike isn't a car, is enough to make the Pope think 'mincer'.
C70R said:
nickfrog said:
C70R said:
And yet you choose you spend your time/energy coming onto a thread about a 4-pot hatch driving in a straight line just to announce this to the world?
And yet you choose to spend your time/energy calling people retards because they are impressed by different things than what impresses you ?C70R said:
There are some truly odd people on PH.
IndeedYou came to a thread that doesn't interest you, just to tell everyone that it doesn't interest you.
Which of us is the odd one?
I've written out a bunch of posts like yours C70R but can never bring myself to hit the submit button because I know it'd just make me a hypocrite.
Yipper said:
A VW Golf R, with a 2-litre forged engine, uprated clutch and exhaust, delivering ~780bhp, has this week done 0-60 in 2.6secs and the quarter-mile in 9.5secs.
Total cost of roughly £50k (£30k for car + £20k for mods).
Faster than a ~£1m LaFerrari, P1, 918, Veyron and Aventador...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3o4xHr5zxBk&fe...
https://www.instagram.com/p/BW5Sj3XlarN/
Not bad:Total cost of roughly £50k (£30k for car + £20k for mods).
Faster than a ~£1m LaFerrari, P1, 918, Veyron and Aventador...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3o4xHr5zxBk&fe...
https://www.instagram.com/p/BW5Sj3XlarN/
RWD Manual MK1 Escort 2.0 Cossie engine 9.6
https://youtu.be/MgFIareWonQ
Yipper said:
A VW Golf R, with a 2-litre forged engine, uprated clutch and exhaust, delivering ~780bhp, has this week done 0-60 in 2.6secs and the quarter-mile in 9.5secs.
Total cost of roughly £50k (£30k for car + £20k for mods).
Faster than a ~£1m LaFerrari, P1, 918, Veyron and Aventador...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3o4xHr5zxBk&fe...
https://www.instagram.com/p/BW5Sj3XlarN/
Not bad:Total cost of roughly £50k (£30k for car + £20k for mods).
Faster than a ~£1m LaFerrari, P1, 918, Veyron and Aventador...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3o4xHr5zxBk&fe...
https://www.instagram.com/p/BW5Sj3XlarN/
RWD Manual MK1 Escort 2.0T engine 9.6
https://youtu.be/MgFIareWonQ
^^
I think its fairly obvious that too many people seem to think the Golf R is some magical new shiny development the like of which was never been seen before,, when in realty its just a newer technology version of the same tried and tested 4pot AWD family car that the Japs have been punting out for over years.
Its also absolutely true that writing a post comparing a superbike to a 4 seat car and then getting offended when people point out (the obvious) that a bike isn't a car, is enough to make the Pope think 'mincer'.
Gassing Station | General Gassing | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff