RE: New TVR Griffith on the move
Discussion
Thom said:
Not only does the car look like crap, but making an article on top of the PH page sums up how much vacuous hype is being put into this.
We have a miserable video showing two guys swearing for a few seconds - Is this what you call journalism?
Lol someone who obviously doesnt know PH's origins! We have a miserable video showing two guys swearing for a few seconds - Is this what you call journalism?
vz-r_dave said:
Thom said:
Not only does the car look like crap, but making an article on top of the PH page sums up how much vacuous hype is being put into this.
We have a miserable video showing two guys swearing for a few seconds - Is this what you call journalism?
Lol someone who obviously doesnt know PH's origins! We have a miserable video showing two guys swearing for a few seconds - Is this what you call journalism?
Pandering is pandering. And blinkered tolerance of a rather stty looking car just highlights how much people are willing to ignore when they are blinded by loyalty.
It's not a bad thing. I just think some are more blunt about it than others. And lets not forget, one man's meat is another man's poison, so each to their own.
Loving the comments about this being an "analogue" car. Ha ha. Yeah right. I don't recall old TVRs having EPAS, traction control, anti-lock brakes...
Porsche911R said:
IF TVR can do this for £90k what are Lotus playing at where that old Evora is £110k ?
Some thing don't add up in Lotus land. TVR have sold more than Lotus have all year.
IM guessing you have a deposit down now and given up chasing after the latest GT3? You could even chop the GT4 in for a tivSome thing don't add up in Lotus land. TVR have sold more than Lotus have all year.
BigGingerBob said:
fausTVR said:
although the tick over sounded more cement mixer, hopefully dodgy acoustics.
Before Les switched off the engine I thought there was some noisy KTM style bike behind the camera. I really hope it's just bad acoustics, the car sounded great in the Goodwood launch videoPhantomPH said:
vz-r_dave said:
Thom said:
Not only does the car look like crap, but making an article on top of the PH page sums up how much vacuous hype is being put into this.
We have a miserable video showing two guys swearing for a few seconds - Is this what you call journalism?
Lol someone who obviously doesnt know PH's origins! We have a miserable video showing two guys swearing for a few seconds - Is this what you call journalism?
Pandering is pandering. And blinkered tolerance of a rather stty looking car just highlights how much people are willing to ignore when they are blinded by loyalty.
It's not a bad thing. I just think some are more blunt about it than others. And lets not forget, one man's meat is another man's poison, so each to their own.
Loving the comments about this being an "analogue" car. Ha ha. Yeah right. I don't recall old TVRs having EPAS, traction control, anti-lock brakes...
Edited by vz-r_dave on Wednesday 20th September 09:31
Edited by vz-r_dave on Wednesday 20th September 09:32
Porsche911R said:
IF TVR can do this for £90k what are Lotus playing at where that old Evora is £110k ?
Some thing don't add up in Lotus land. TVR have sold more than Lotus have all year.
I presume this is a joke. Some thing don't add up in Lotus land. TVR have sold more than Lotus have all year.
Oh, it's you, so I doubt it is.
We don't know how this car goes yet, but based on exterior and interior the Lotus is miles and miles and miles ahead.
vz-r_dave said:
Have you seen the car in the flesh? I always reserve judgement until I have. A british manufacturer produces its first car for over 10 years, of which was the sole reason PH formed ends up as a lead article..... Yes it does have something to do with it, get over yourself!
It does not have anything to do with how the car looks, it is all about the lack of content.Otherwise, how about posting a vid when they replaced the wheels?
Or when they filled up the tank?
Or when whoever washed their hands after replacing the wheels?
If PH pretend to boast about being a leading TVR community then they better bring proper content... unless TVR have become another bland, dull and hype-driven modern brand?
vz-r_dave said:
PhantomPH said:
vz-r_dave said:
Thom said:
Not only does the car look like crap, but making an article on top of the PH page sums up how much vacuous hype is being put into this.
We have a miserable video showing two guys swearing for a few seconds - Is this what you call journalism?
Lol someone who obviously doesnt know PH's origins! We have a miserable video showing two guys swearing for a few seconds - Is this what you call journalism?
Pandering is pandering. And blinkered tolerance of a rather stty looking car just highlights how much people are willing to ignore when they are blinded by loyalty.
It's not a bad thing. I just think some are more blunt about it than others. And lets not forget, one man's meat is another man's poison, so each to their own.
Loving the comments about this being an "analogue" car. Ha ha. Yeah right. I don't recall old TVRs having EPAS, traction control, anti-lock brakes...
ETA - yes I have. The rear end isn't terrible (and I stand by the Supra in a Veilside kit comments I have made), but the profile is uninspiring and the front end is a clusterfk.
Gassing Station | General Gassing | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff