Worst design mis-steps
Discussion
Dapster said:
Crisp and clean
Modern and classy
Bloated and fish faced
Mercedes fell into the trap of circular design late and made a horrendous mish-mash of shapes. Not only is the W210 the ugliest E-Class ever, it was the worst built with accountants taking stage and the infamous rust issues. Mercedes have crossed from conservative to market led designs but the current glizty designs are way better than the W210.Modern and classy
Bloated and fish faced
swisstoni said:
You should have seen the bhing on here when the Sagaris came out.
When it came out it looked like a Halfords special Considering how different the Tuscan looked next to anything else at the time, I remember back in 2005 when my dad parked the one he was selling next to the Sag he was buying. It made the Tuscan look pretty ordinary.
T5SOR said:
swisstoni said:
You should have seen the bhing on here when the Sagaris came out.
When it came out it looked like a Halfords special Considering how different the Tuscan looked next to anything else at the time, I remember back in 2005 when my dad parked the one he was selling next to the Sag he was buying. It made the Tuscan look pretty ordinary.
bluemason said:
0a said:
The new bmw x2 looks just as bad.And I am waiting for mercedes to come up with their own version of an entry level ugly crossover.harry henderson said:
Problem is you are comparing one of the most dramatically styled TVR's with the new one. TVRs were mostly clean, simple designs, they didn't have all the louvres and wings although I did prefer them that way. This is why the new looks cleaner and simpler in looks.Can't see the issue with the new Polo, looks just as good as the earlier one.
If we're talking all new models rather than just bodged facelifts, then I'd say that Ford still hold the crown for the retrograde step from MK1 Focus to MK2, then they did it again with the MK3 which was at least distinctive but very disjointed...
It's particularly strange as when Ford do a facelift they do at least tend to improve things-
Ground breaking-
(especially ground breaking when you look at what else was on offer in 1998)
Neat tidy up-
Boring blob-
Marginally better but still not as good as the MK1-
If we're talking all new models rather than just bodged facelifts, then I'd say that Ford still hold the crown for the retrograde step from MK1 Focus to MK2, then they did it again with the MK3 which was at least distinctive but very disjointed...
It's particularly strange as when Ford do a facelift they do at least tend to improve things-
Ground breaking-
(especially ground breaking when you look at what else was on offer in 1998)
Neat tidy up-
Boring blob-
Marginally better but still not as good as the MK1-
Frimley111R said:
Problem is you are comparing one of the most dramatically styled TVR's with the new one. TVRs were mostly clean, simple designs, they didn't have all the louvres and wings although I did prefer them that way. This is why the new looks cleaner and simpler in looks.
Is this clean enough:This makes the new one look 10 years old already.
harry henderson said:
Frimley111R said:
Problem is you are comparing one of the most dramatically styled TVR's with the new one. TVRs were mostly clean, simple designs, they didn't have all the louvres and wings although I did prefer them that way. This is why the new looks cleaner and simpler in looks.
Is this clean enough:This makes the new one look 10 years old already.
deltashad said:
Granada' s were king for a long time. When BMW launched the stunning and capable e34, Ford were killing the Granada. What were they thinking of...
I think that distinct drop off the cliff of Granada design coincided with Ford HQ's decision to make World Cars. All that Ford Europe could then do was to try to polish whatever turd fell out of the back of Ford US (got carried away with that metaphor ) Never been the same IMHO.
Gassing Station | General Gassing | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff