Cheap tyres VS premium brand tyres

Cheap tyres VS premium brand tyres

Author
Discussion

dommyem

Original Poster:

7 posts

97 months

Sunday 25th February 2018
quotequote all
Hey thanks for all of the reply’s, I feel like this hasn’t gone down too well in this community and I’d like to explain my thoughts a little further.

Ok so I, like most of you, would have replied in a similar way to a post like this had I had bad experiences with cheap tyres. Thing is, that from my recent experience I honestly have to say that I don’t think it was a bad decision.

The differences are very slight, the cost savings aren’t - therefore worthwhile (in my opinion).
Don’t knock it til you’ve tried it. I’m not a racing driver and don’t plan on doing any track days, I’m just trying to save a few fellow petrol heads a couple of quid based on my recent experience of pretty average driving (with a few foot to the floor moments).

One user mentioned having better tyres and just adding tyre pressure to my rears: surely this would Just waste expensive tyres??

Regarding aqua planning: water displacement is always the number 1, so bear in mind tread depth is the most important feature there.

I’d also like to add that maybe I was lucky with my most recent set, and that had black circles chosen a lesser quality tyre, this post may have been swayed in the opposite direction. We will never know.

All being said I know you’re all only trying to watch out for each other and offer sound advice so thanks for the responses.

Jim AK

4,029 posts

124 months

Sunday 25th February 2018
quotequote all
I put Hankook`s on my last E Class.

It was in for service & Merc very kindly priced Conti`s as what were on it & Hankook, what new E`s were coming through with at the time.

I spoke to my local indy tyre place, he priced them considerably less than Merc & then suggested I get the Hankook`s.

£40 less a corner than Conti`s iirc, but were a higher load rating.

They transformed the old boat!

Cornered better due to the higher LR, stiffer walls apparently, were quieter than the Conti`s, wore better (never seen more than about 18k on Conti`s) Hankooks were still above the wear mark when I changed the car after about 20k & I was £160 up too.

My new E has Contis & I can`t wait to wear the fkers out!!

Would never put Ditchfinders on a daily that does big miles, 20k plus pa, although our shed Astra has Lassa 205`s on it, they seem quite fine for something that spends it`s life doing tip runs, station carpark lurking & the occasional 100 mile round trip.

greysquirrel

332 posts

169 months

Sunday 25th February 2018
quotequote all
dommyem said:
Hey thanks for all of the reply’s, I feel like this hasn’t gone down too well in this community and I’d like to explain my thoughts a little further.

Ok so I, like most of you, would have replied in a similar way to a post like this had I had bad experiences with cheap tyres. Thing is, that from my recent experience I honestly have to say that I don’t think it was a bad decision.

The differences are very slight, the cost savings aren’t - therefore worthwhile (in my opinion).
Don’t knock it til you’ve tried it. I’m not a racing driver and don’t plan on doing any track days, I’m just trying to save a few fellow petrol heads a couple of quid based on my recent experience of pretty average driving (with a few foot to the floor moments).

One user mentioned having better tyres and just adding tyre pressure to my rears: surely this would Just waste expensive tyres??

Regarding aqua planning: water displacement is always the number 1, so bear in mind tread depth is the most important feature there.

I’d also like to add that maybe I was lucky with my most recent set, and that had black circles chosen a lesser quality tyre, this post may have been swayed in the opposite direction. We will never know.

All being said I know you’re all only trying to watch out for each other and offer sound advice so thanks for the responses.
But you cost saving is what, £100? on a 25% saving? if you chose to always fill up at the cheapest fuel station over the course of a year you would probably make that back.

jon-

16,509 posts

216 months

Sunday 25th February 2018
quotequote all
dommyem said:
The differences are very slight, the cost savings aren’t - therefore worthwhile (in my opinion).
Don’t knock it til you’ve tried it. I’m not a racing driver and don’t plan on doing any track days, I’m just trying to save a few fellow petrol heads a couple of quid based on my recent experience of pretty average driving (with a few foot to the floor moments).


Regarding aqua planning: water displacement is always the number 1, so bear in mind tread depth is the most important feature there.
Aquaplaning causes less than 1% of overall european accidents. Most accidents happen below 60 mph, with a spread across dry and wet conditions and can be attributed to not stopping in time (rather than falling off a road in a corner).

The "slight differences" you mention can be anywhere between 15% and 30% wet braking, which when braking down from a speed of 60mph (which could be considered "taking it easy" or "driving to the conditions" on certain UK roads) can be the difference of stopping, or a really big crash.

crankedup

25,764 posts

243 months

Sunday 25th February 2018
quotequote all
Recently fitted Avon’s all round to my E92, pleased with the choice in all aspects. However, I do not drive fast therefore consider I do not need the more expensive rubber.

Red 4

10,744 posts

187 months

Sunday 25th February 2018
quotequote all
The savings you've made will probably pale into insignificance if/ when you don't stop in time.

I don't scrimp on tyres.

Tyres are meant to grip - not give you a loose rear end (no pun intended).


2172cc

1,103 posts

97 months

Sunday 25th February 2018
quotequote all
I've always been a premium tyre guy and really would only consider a make I would feel comfortable with knowing I have full confidence in them when called upon in an emergency. When looking at buying a second hand car, the quality of tyres and if their all the same make tells me how well it's been looked after. After all what else have they saved money on? Ok I agree we can't all afford the best tyres but careful shopping around and research can pay in the end.
My Sunbeam Lotus has 13" wheels which is a real struggle to get decent road tyres for in my preferred size without going to the specialist classic tyre suppliers who charge a fortune for them or using track day specials. I've now got another set of 15" wheels so I have a bigger choice.

Xtriple129

1,150 posts

157 months

Sunday 25th February 2018
quotequote all
My car had Nokian (or Nexan maybe) tyres on when I got it. All with loads of tread and it was so easy to behave like a hooligan in it it was unreal. The back end was very playful (which in a 2.5 tonne car was fun!) and I nearly spun it once in the rain accelerating hard(ish) away from some traffic lights.

When it was serviced it was noted that the tyres were cracking quite badly (not old either) so I replaced them with Michelins. I have never been a tyre snob (on cars anyway, on bikes, a totally different story!) but they really have transformed the car. It grips now, all the time, feels much more responsive to the steering and more stable under cornering, doesn't like to 'light up' the rears at the first sign of damp either.

Car-Matt

1,923 posts

138 months

Sunday 25th February 2018
quotequote all
Hopefully nobody’s toddler accidentally runs out into the road in front of a linglongbrownstar99plus shod car.......

It’s all very well saying ‘ I can handle crap tyres because I don’t cane it in the wet’ but that is hugely stupid and arrogant to suggest that nothing else serious could potentially be avoided through better tyres. Things can and do happen that out outside of our control.

Drive safe.


HannsG

3,045 posts

134 months

Sunday 25th February 2018
quotequote all
Having bought cars with cheap tyres on. The difference is night and day when it comes to some mid or high end brands.

The cheap tyres are probably only suitable for a shed to be honest.

Debaser

5,845 posts

261 months

Sunday 25th February 2018
quotequote all
OP, if you don't brake hard why don't you fit the cheapest brakes possible to your car?

Integroo

11,574 posts

85 months

Sunday 25th February 2018
quotequote all
Debaser said:
OP, if you don't brake hard why don't you fit the cheapest brakes possible to your car?
He probably does.

irc

7,299 posts

136 months

Sunday 25th February 2018
quotequote all
TBH when I saw the first post I thought troll. First post on here asking about the advisability of using tyres which give poor grip.

" I actually love my slightly less grippy tyres, it's made the rear of the car so much more fun!"

Not so much fun when doing an emergency stop with less grippy tyres. The saving between ditchfinders and mid range tyres over the life of the tyres is pretty minimal. £2 a week?

I'll give the OP the benefit of the doubt on trolling but the fact the reduced grip is noticeable in normal driving when the tyres are still new says it all.

Integroo

11,574 posts

85 months

Sunday 25th February 2018
quotequote all
irc said:
TBH when I saw the first post I thought troll. First post on here asking about the advisability of using tyres which give poor grip.

" I actually love my slightly less grippy tyres, it's made the rear of the car so much more fun!"

Not so much fun when doing an emergency stop with less grippy tyres. The saving between ditchfinders and mid range tyres over the life of the tyres is pretty minimal. £2 a week?

I'll give the OP the benefit of the doubt on trolling but the fact the reduced grip is noticeable in normal driving when the tyres are still new says it all.
Indeed, just wait to see how bad they are when they have 10k miles on them ...

M4cruiser

3,635 posts

150 months

Sunday 25th February 2018
quotequote all
It really has to be unbelievable stupidity (sorry if that offends you) to save a few quid a year, on a major safety item, on a car that costs maybe £2,000 a year to run. I don't know how much yours costs, but add up Depreciation, Tax, Insurance, Servicing and Fuel and see if it's worth it.

What do you think the manufacturer would say? What brand do they recommend?

If I had a Veyron, though ... well the pukka tyres are £7,000 each, so if I could get some £60 ones for my next 200mph spin then I probably would redface but I'd ask Richard Hammond first ...




dommyem

Original Poster:

7 posts

97 months

Sunday 25th February 2018
quotequote all
Can confirm I am running on Toledo TL1000
http://www.tyrereviews.co.uk/Tyre/Pace/Toledo-TL10...

dommyem

Original Poster:

7 posts

97 months

Sunday 25th February 2018
quotequote all
https://www.mytyres.co.uk/cgi-bin/rtest.pl?rt_rubr...

Nearly every comment on "Would you purchase these again?" is Definitely.

ST_Nuts

1,487 posts

107 months

Sunday 25th February 2018
quotequote all
Had 2 front ditch finders on my last car (MX5) £40 quid each and it was horrid to drive. Steering felt like I had a flat tyre from the vibrations and I was too scared to throw it around corners. Never again. Michelins every time.

HustleRussell

24,699 posts

160 months

Sunday 25th February 2018
quotequote all
dommyem said:
https://www.mytyres.co.uk/cgi-bin/rtest.pl?rt_rubr...

Nearly every comment on "Would you purchase these again?" is Definitely.
dommyem said:
So really I am very pleased with my decision
dommyem said:
I don’t think it was a bad decision.
Confirmation bias is a thing.

I’m sure the tyres are adequate just so long as you believe hard enough.

Riley Blue

20,955 posts

226 months

Sunday 25th February 2018
quotequote all
TheAngryDog said:
Oh Christ. Riley blue will be along in a minute to regale about how fantastic ditch finders are and how we are all blithering idiots for daring to buy decent tyres.
Me? I've never held that view.