Slowest "Performance" Brand Car ?

Slowest "Performance" Brand Car ?

Author
Discussion

ExPat2B

Original Poster:

2,157 posts

200 months

Friday 16th March 2018
quotequote all
I witnessed a little traffic light race on my commute this morning. A very red faced gentleman in a Mercedes-benz A180 CDI AMG sport was beaten off the lights to a merge by a Transit Connect quite convincingly, and was quite cross about it and proceeded to weave all over the back of him for the next mile.

The AMG certainly looked very sporting, but I was surprised when I looked it up to discover it did 0-62mph in 11.3sec.

Is this the slowest "proper" performance branded car made by a manufacturer ? BMW seem just as determined to prostitute the M badge.

Integroo

11,574 posts

85 months

Friday 16th March 2018
quotequote all
AMG-Line is a trim level - it isn't a proper AMG car.

Howard-

4,952 posts

202 months

Friday 16th March 2018
quotequote all
Mk4 Golf GTI

Nickbrapp

5,277 posts

130 months

Friday 16th March 2018
quotequote all
Doesn’t the a180 have the Diesel engine out of a Renault with 107bhp or something? Not surprised the connect beat it.

Bmw put a 101bhp in the 1 Series m sport which will be just as slow.


It’s all about the badge for the least money for these people, or lowest co2 for a company car, so it’s not surprising there’s so many slow fast looking cars around

kambites

67,556 posts

221 months

Friday 16th March 2018
quotequote all
The current model Smart ForFour Brabus is pretty slow.

culpz

4,882 posts

112 months

Friday 16th March 2018
quotequote all
Integroo said:
AMG-Line is a trim level - it isn't a proper AMG car.
Correct. The car in question is not a "performance" brand car.

Better examples would be something like the Fiesta ST150 or the Focus ST170. Not really new examples though, but they still did not live up to their proper ST performance badges today or even at the time of their release.

Buzypea

225 posts

139 months

Friday 16th March 2018
quotequote all
I never understood cars like this, all show and no go. Horses for courses though.

I much prefer it the other way around, no sporting pretensions but with plenty of poke under the bonnet.

Fancy being beaten off the line by a Transit connect in an AMG Line Merc. Ha Ha.


Efbe

9,251 posts

166 months

Friday 16th March 2018
quotequote all
fabia vrs from 2003-7

130bhp from a 1.9tdi

ExPat2B

Original Poster:

2,157 posts

200 months

Friday 16th March 2018
quotequote all
culpz said:
Correct. The car in question is not a "performance" brand car.

Better examples would be something like the Fiesta ST150 or the Focus ST170. Not really new examples though, but they still did not live up to their proper ST performance badges today or even at the time of their release.
I agree, its not a proper AMG. I think what is most confusing is that it actually looks "sportier" than the A45 which has about 3 times the power, do you not think trim leveling a car in this will result in major brand dilution ?

Shiv_P

2,746 posts

105 months

Friday 16th March 2018
quotequote all
Efbe said:
fabia vrs from 2003-7

130bhp from a 1.9tdi
What about the up gti then that is slower I assume

HustleRussell

24,690 posts

160 months

Friday 16th March 2018
quotequote all
Aston Martin

Cygnet

captain_cynic

11,986 posts

95 months

Friday 16th March 2018
quotequote all
Nickbrapp said:
Doesn’t the a180 have the Diesel engine out of a Renault with 107bhp or something? Not surprised the connect beat it.

Bmw put a 101bhp in the 1 Series m sport which will be just as slow.
At least BMW makes it easy to differentiate between a badged M-sport and a M car. An M car has the M before the model designation (I.E. M4 or M240i) and the performance you'd expect. "M Sport" cars have it after the model designation (I.E. 116d M-Sport).

Its a £3000-ish quid option for badge snobs and has zero effect on performance, it's a body kit and interior upgrade.

V10 SPM

564 posts

251 months

Friday 16th March 2018
quotequote all

nbetts

1,455 posts

229 months

Friday 16th March 2018
quotequote all
Howard- said:
Mk4 Golf GTI
Yep. The 2.0 litre petrol version was appallingly slow.

The 1.8 turbo with 5-valves per cylinder was actually OK'ish, designated by the red little letter i on the GTi badge.

I had one of these , bought it from new and it really was a bit of a pudding. Build quality was good as were the Leather Recaro's but it was a bit of a pudding all round to be fair.

FN2TypeR

7,091 posts

93 months

Friday 16th March 2018
quotequote all
ExPat2B said:
culpz said:
Correct. The car in question is not a "performance" brand car.

Better examples would be something like the Fiesta ST150 or the Focus ST170. Not really new examples though, but they still did not live up to their proper ST performance badges today or even at the time of their release.
I agree, its not a proper AMG. I think what is most confusing is that it actually looks "sportier" than the A45 which has about 3 times the power, do you not think trim leveling a car in this will result in major brand dilution ?
Major brand dilution but massive profits.

Jdjd1

179 posts

75 months

Friday 16th March 2018
quotequote all
Buzypea said:
I never understood cars like this, all show and no go. Horses for courses though.

I much prefer it the other way around, no sporting pretensions but with plenty of poke under the bonnet.

Fancy being beaten off the line by a Transit connect in an AMG Line Merc. Ha Ha.
Shame my A class would of spat a huge flame out and scorched his bumper

bungz

1,960 posts

120 months

Friday 16th March 2018
quotequote all
Mk5 Escort GTi.

Same engines that were in all the boggo 1.8 Zetecs in the range.

culpz

4,882 posts

112 months

Friday 16th March 2018
quotequote all
ExPat2B said:
culpz said:
Correct. The car in question is not a "performance" brand car.

Better examples would be something like the Fiesta ST150 or the Focus ST170. Not really new examples though, but they still did not live up to their proper ST performance badges today or even at the time of their release.
I agree, its not a proper AMG. I think what is most confusing is that it actually looks "sportier" than the A45 which has about 3 times the power, do you not think trim leveling a car in this will result in major brand dilution ?
Absolutely not. Most brands are doing it now. That's actually what most people want these days, something that looks nice and "sporty" with big alloys, the works, but usually with either a diesel or a low-powered petrol motor, so that it's also frugal and cheap to run.

Us petrol heads are the minority and the realistic truth is that the cars that we want, don't sell by the buckets loads, whereas these models do.

ArnageWRC

2,065 posts

159 months

Friday 16th March 2018
quotequote all
Efbe said:
fabia vrs from 2003-7

130bhp from a 1.9tdi
But didn't it have decent torque? Something like 230 ib/ft @ 1700 revs....

culpz

4,882 posts

112 months

Friday 16th March 2018
quotequote all
ArnageWRC said:
Efbe said:
fabia vrs from 2003-7

130bhp from a 1.9tdi
But didn't it have decent torque? Something like 230 ib/ft @ 1700 revs....
Yeah, but it was more of a rival to the Mini Cooper rather than the Cooper S, which was the proper performance version and probably should have translated to Skoda's VRS badge.

With that being said, i think the diesel version was actually preferred to the unreliable twin-charged petrol car that replaced it and gained more of a cult following, despite the on-paper stats.