The "Sh*t Driving Caught On Cam" Thread (Vol 4)

The "Sh*t Driving Caught On Cam" Thread (Vol 4)

TOPIC CLOSED
TOPIC CLOSED
Author
Discussion

trackdemon

12,149 posts

260 months

Thursday 24th January 2019
quotequote all
jamei303 said:
Fermit and Sexy Sarah said:
Something none C-Max now.

A st attempt at an undertake.

https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/8260299/toyota-rams-...
It says the Fiesta "was pulling out to overtake another car when the vehicle suddenly appeared behind him".

That's one way of putting it. It looks like he chucked the Fiesta into lane 2 either without checking his mirrors or in an attempt to block the Celica.
A lot of idiots on that. The DCW is idling along in lane 2 for no reason, making the undertake possible. Fiesta pulls out as the Celica is virtually on top of him: 'didn't see it' is synonymous with 'I didn't look' or 'I'm lying, I wanted to block them'. Celica driver clearly a tt

Rawwr

22,722 posts

233 months

Thursday 24th January 2019
quotequote all
trackdemon said:
A lot of idiots on that. The DCW is idling along in lane 2 for no reason, making the undertake possible. Fiesta pulls out as the Celica is virtually on top of him: 'didn't see it' is synonymous with 'I didn't look' or 'I'm lying, I wanted to block them'. Celica driver clearly a tt
Yeah, three bellends for the price of one there.

FWIW

3,042 posts

96 months

Thursday 24th January 2019
quotequote all
Rawwr said:
trackdemon said:
A lot of idiots on that. The DCW is idling along in lane 2 for no reason, making the undertake possible. Fiesta pulls out as the Celica is virtually on top of him: 'didn't see it' is synonymous with 'I didn't look' or 'I'm lying, I wanted to block them'. Celica driver clearly a tt
Yeah, three bellends for the price of one there.
Wow, something we all agree on?! hehe

trackdemon

12,149 posts

260 months

Thursday 24th January 2019
quotequote all
FWIW said:
Rawwr said:
trackdemon said:
A lot of idiots on that. The DCW is idling along in lane 2 for no reason, making the undertake possible. Fiesta pulls out as the Celica is virtually on top of him: 'didn't see it' is synonymous with 'I didn't look' or 'I'm lying, I wanted to block them'. Celica driver clearly a tt
Yeah, three bellends for the price of one there.
Wow, something we all agree on?! hehe
Eject eject, somethings wrong! yikes

anonymous-user

53 months

Thursday 24th January 2019
quotequote all
saaby93 said:
janesmith1950 said:
More often than not accidents between vehicles are a coincidence of at least 2 bits of bad driving.

DCWs sometimes appear to encourage a scenario in order to 'justify' displays of riteous indignation. I really don't think they appreciate how their own footage could hoist them, in the event of an accident.
Most of those honking with indignation clips could be replace by a quick flash or wave to let someone out of a turning or into the DCW lane
Except according to jagnet and his band of merry dolts we're not allowed to do that!

Ken Figenus

5,678 posts

116 months

Thursday 24th January 2019
quotequote all
Legendary cool! Didnt lift or counter steer! https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/av/world-us-canada-4698...

Dromedary66

1,924 posts

137 months

Thursday 24th January 2019
quotequote all
Absolute third world.

Frimley111R

15,537 posts

233 months

Thursday 24th January 2019
quotequote all
trackdemon said:
jamei303 said:
Fermit and Sexy Sarah said:
Something none C-Max now.

A st attempt at an undertake.

https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/8260299/toyota-rams-...
It says the Fiesta "was pulling out to overtake another car when the vehicle suddenly appeared behind him".

That's one way of putting it. It looks like he chucked the Fiesta into lane 2 either without checking his mirrors or in an attempt to block the Celica.
A lot of idiots on that. The DCW is idling along in lane 2 for no reason, making the undertake possible. Fiesta pulls out as the Celica is virtually on top of him: 'didn't see it' is synonymous with 'I didn't look' or 'I'm lying, I wanted to block them'. Celica driver clearly a tt
Yep, agree on the DCW blocking lane 2. I don't think the Fiesta guy did it deliberately but I suspect he didn't really look but also didn't expect something to be on top of him. Bear in mind that seconds before that the DCW was the nearest thing to him. If you're tanking down the motorway like that you have to expect the many people won't be expecting to see anyone going so quickly.

lost in espace

6,136 posts

206 months

Friday 25th January 2019
quotequote all
Peugeot goes down hill, "brakes fail" and avoids car waiting at junction by driving onto the pavement. No MOT but insured. This sort of thing only happens when it is snowing on the hill.

https://youtu.be/vJ2zaER3PQ0




Dromedary66

1,924 posts

137 months

Friday 25th January 2019
quotequote all
Frimley111R said:
trackdemon said:
jamei303 said:
Fermit and Sexy Sarah said:
Something none C-Max now.

A st attempt at an undertake.

https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/8260299/toyota-rams-...
It says the Fiesta "was pulling out to overtake another car when the vehicle suddenly appeared behind him".

That's one way of putting it. It looks like he chucked the Fiesta into lane 2 either without checking his mirrors or in an attempt to block the Celica.
A lot of idiots on that. The DCW is idling along in lane 2 for no reason, making the undertake possible. Fiesta pulls out as the Celica is virtually on top of him: 'didn't see it' is synonymous with 'I didn't look' or 'I'm lying, I wanted to block them'. Celica driver clearly a tt
Yep, agree on the DCW blocking lane 2. I don't think the Fiesta guy did it deliberately but I suspect he didn't really look but also didn't expect something to be on top of him. Bear in mind that seconds before that the DCW was the nearest thing to him. If you're tanking down the motorway like that you have to expect the many people won't be expecting to see anyone going so quickly.
I counted about 5 seconds that the Celica would have been visible in the Fiesta's rear viewer mirrors had he looked before pulling out into L2.

WCZ

10,492 posts

193 months

Friday 25th January 2019
quotequote all
Ken Figenus said:
Legendary cool! Didnt lift or counter steer! https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/av/world-us-canada-4698...
watch the officer, he instinctively goes for his gun lol

The Moose

22,821 posts

208 months

Friday 25th January 2019
quotequote all
WCZ said:
Ken Figenus said:
Legendary cool! Didnt lift or counter steer! https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/av/world-us-canada-4698...
watch the officer, he instinctively goes for his gun lol
Probably an instinctive response as he thinks he may be under attack.

Frimley111R

15,537 posts

233 months

Friday 25th January 2019
quotequote all
The Moose said:
WCZ said:
Ken Figenus said:
Legendary cool! Didnt lift or counter steer! https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/av/world-us-canada-4698...
watch the officer, he instinctively goes for his gun lol
Probably an instinctive response as he thinks he may be under attack.
It was his radio, the gun is on the other side.

FWIW

3,042 posts

96 months

Friday 25th January 2019
quotequote all
Frimley111R said:
It was his radio, the gun is on the other side.
Can’t see his radio being any more help than his gun in that situation...

80sMatchbox

3,891 posts

175 months

Friday 25th January 2019
quotequote all
Here's yet another one that would go 50/50 with insurers....

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WRjyVY2Pjew


..according to one or two on here.
winkbiggrin

mac96

3,715 posts

142 months

Friday 25th January 2019
quotequote all
80sMatchbox said:
Here's yet another one that would go 50/50 with insurers....

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WRjyVY2Pjew


..according to one or two on here.
winkbiggrin
Absolutely. No way the dashcammer should have stopped, should have forced the oncoming car off the road. Fiat woman totally innocent.

anonymous-user

53 months

Friday 25th January 2019
quotequote all
mac96 said:
80sMatchbox said:
Here's yet another one that would go 50/50 with insurers....

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WRjyVY2Pjew


..according to one or two on here.
winkbiggrin
Absolutely. No way the dashcammer should have stopped, should have forced the oncoming car off the road. Fiat woman totally innocent.
Are you jagnet in disguise? wink

mac96

3,715 posts

142 months

Friday 25th January 2019
quotequote all
cb1965 said:
mac96 said:
80sMatchbox said:
Here's yet another one that would go 50/50 with insurers....

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WRjyVY2Pjew


..according to one or two on here.
winkbiggrin
Absolutely. No way the dashcammer should have stopped, should have forced the oncoming car off the road. Fiat woman totally innocent.
Are you jagnet in disguise? wink
Damn, you've seen right through me!

Vipers

32,799 posts

227 months

Friday 25th January 2019
quotequote all
mac96 said:
80sMatchbox said:
Here's yet another one that would go 50/50 with insurers....

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WRjyVY2Pjew


..according to one or two on here.
winkbiggrin
Absolutely. No way the dashcammer should have stopped, should have forced the oncoming car off the road. Fiat woman totally innocent.
Dog/kid run out, Fiat too close to stop, me thinks Fiat at fault.
TOPIC CLOSED
TOPIC CLOSED