RE: Showpiece of the Week: Lexus LFA

RE: Showpiece of the Week: Lexus LFA

Monday 23rd April 2018

Showpiece of the Week: Lexus LFA

Toyota's mystical supercar has become one of the rarest for-sale sightings. So when one does emerge...



No introductions necessary here. The LFA - which definitely never stood for Lexus Fuji Apex, but ought to have done - was, of course, Toyota's dizzying, Akio Toyoda-sponsored assault on the two-seat supercar segment. Broadly speaking (and by that I mean speaking in the language used by the bean counters in Aichi) the model was probably considered a failure; the limited-edition production run almost certainly being sold at a loss even accounting for the massive per unit cost. 

But grading the LFA on the basis of profit though is like grading the Apollo 11 spaceflight on its speed from A to B; it rather misses the point. Toyota didn't build a supercar because it thought the world desperately needed another one; it did it to show that it could - and applied itself to the task in a characteristic fashion. At a corporate level, it was eventually justified as a brand-building exercise for Lexus, but really it was Toyoda - newly appointed in 2009, and race-mad - who ensured that the right bureaucratic levers were pulled. 


Reaching production had taken almost the entire decade. As a concept the LFA - or LF-A then - was born in 2000. Instigated as a study but hugely expensive from the outset, the project suffered from repeat near-death experiences as it veered drastically away from the manufacturer's volume-based instincts. The engineers didn't make things easy for themselves either: for five years, the car was made of aluminium alloy, a material they understood very well - then, suddenly, it wasn't. Carbon fibre reinforced polymer, they surmised, would be better (i.e. lighter), so they returned to the drawing board. 

If that about face weren't insane enough, the team were instructed to bring production of the CFRP - which was to make up 65 per cent of the car - in-house. Not only did this process require yet more investment to perfect (the manufacturer being, by its own admission, no expert in making the stuff at the time) it ultimately ensured that the body-in-white alone would take Toyota four days to build - and for a company accustomed to producing a hatchback every 66 seconds, that's effectively like following good money with a lit creosote rag. 


Then there was the engine. This, at least, was co-developed with Yamaha, who would be responsible for assembling it. Nevertheless, the 4.8-litre V10 was about as far from a stock item as it's possible to imagine. The selection of ten cylinders only made sense if it could be made to be as light as a V8, with as much power (and better response) than could be had from a V12. Toyota pursued both objectives fanatically: the result was a 72-degree symphony of spare-no-expense aluminium, titanium and magnesium that could rev to 9,500rpm. At 8,700rpm, it produced 560hp, and 90 per cent of its peak torque from 3,700rpm. 

Still more famously it could be coaxed - via resonance frequency - to shatter a champagne glass, and could not be measured by an analogue rev counter because the 0.6 seconds it took to get from idle to redline was deemed too savage for 20th century technology. Naturally such silliness was custom-made grist for the publicity mill at the time, but it also helped cement the LFA's legend after the model went out of production after only two years. The scarcity afforded by a 500-example run has done its reputation (and ascending values) no harm - even in the treasure trove that is the classifieds, the car is an ultra-rare prospect - although, like the Ford GT40, it's the supercar's sheer improbability that helps underscores its appeal. 


This, after all, was the same Toyota responsible for the Corolla, Camry and Avensis. The awe-inspiring scale of its production capacity had made it comfortably the biggest manufacturer in the world - but mass production had given it the kind of unsentimental reputation that not even a long-running Formula 1 campaign could budge. The LFA though showed that it was still capable of extraordinary things; things that made no sense on a budget sheet or bottom line or to anyone that didn't believe the end justified the means. It showed - and the GT86 doubled down on the notion a life cycle later - that with the right handful of dreamers in the right positions (not least the very top), Toyota could do anything, and do it brilliantly well. 

See the full advert here.

 

 

Author
Discussion

paulyv

Original Poster:

1,020 posts

123 months

Monday 23rd April 2018
quotequote all
https://www.pistonheads.com/gassing/topic.asp?t=17...

An epic thread likely familiar with most who inhabit the forums.

Krikkit

26,514 posts

181 months

Monday 23rd April 2018
quotequote all
Absolutely love the LFA.

Not sure about this bit of the article though...
PH said:
But grading the LFA on the basis of profit though is like grading the Apollo 11 spaceflight on its speed from A to B
Apollo 11 travelled 953,054 miles in its 8 days, averaging 5000mph for more than a week is fairly respectable I think...

cptsideways

13,544 posts

252 months

Monday 23rd April 2018
quotequote all
One of the most most epic sounding cars I have ever driven. Drove Toyota GB's blue one up the hill at Carfest & was involved on it's original launch, a very raw thing to drive indeed & on my lottery win list.

sr.guiri

478 posts

89 months

Monday 23rd April 2018
quotequote all
Lovely.......... reminds me of the Nissan 300ZX, albeit with a few more horses.....


jonosterman

76 posts

92 months

Monday 23rd April 2018
quotequote all
"and could not be measured by an analogue rev counter because the 0.6 seconds it took to get from idle to redline was deemed too savage for 20th century technology"

Was this ever actually true? It just sounds ridiculous and like a press release got mangled in translation on its way to a Top Gear episode.

Surely making a needle sweep round a dial faster than an engine can gain revs is, and has been for some time, a trivial piece of engineering?

sidesauce

2,472 posts

218 months

Monday 23rd April 2018
quotequote all
Ooof. This car still gets me all tingly; the engine note at full chat is only match by the shriek of Porsche's Carerra GT...

Snubs

1,172 posts

139 months

Monday 23rd April 2018
quotequote all
jonosterman said:
Surely making a needle sweep round a dial faster than an engine can gain revs is, and has been for some time, a trivial piece of engineering?
I've often wondered the same. Perhaps they put one in that they knew was unlikely to cope, broke it, and rather than upping the spec instead let loose a now very well known legend.

Baddie

613 posts

217 months

Monday 23rd April 2018
quotequote all
jonosterman said:
"and could not be measured by an analogue rev counter because the 0.6 seconds it took to get from idle to redline was deemed too savage for 20th century technology"

Was this ever actually true? It just sounds ridiculous and like a press release got mangled in translation on its way to a Top Gear episode.

Surely making a needle sweep round a dial faster than an engine can gain revs is, and has been for some time, a trivial piece of engineering?
Don’t know about expensive kit, but the cheapo dials in my RAW Striker were rubbish. At the rev limiter in second the speedo was 10-15 mph behind and the revs 500 rpm behind! They’d catch up eventually, but couldn’t keep up with the car’s acceleration. Still, one would have thought it possible to make a needle flip round a dial in 0.6 sec.

Aside from those sorts of stories, I’d love an LFA. Just bought a used copy of the EVO issue in which it beats a 599GTO

culpz

4,882 posts

112 months

Monday 23rd April 2018
quotequote all
Lexus did a great job with the LFA. If i was in the market for a used supercar, this would be a top contender. I don't care about the badge when it looks fantastic, goes pretty damn well too and sounds like nothing else out there.

BarbaricAvatar

1,416 posts

148 months

Monday 23rd April 2018
quotequote all
I wonder what the former owner has now to deem this car surplus to requirements. Can only be a Chiron.

Terminator X

15,041 posts

204 months

Monday 23rd April 2018
quotequote all
Great article, epic car!

TX.

pppppppppppppppp

169 posts

122 months

Monday 23rd April 2018
quotequote all
BarbaricAvatar said:
I wonder what the former owner has now to deem this car surplus to requirements. Can only be a Chiron.
Could be a tax bill. Or a divorce settlement. Or something else cynical.

Love these cars though.

suffolk009

5,373 posts

165 months

Monday 23rd April 2018
quotequote all
Yup. When I win the Euromillions and go full Jay Leno, an LFA is on my list.

Vtec_Luke

62 posts

87 months

Monday 23rd April 2018
quotequote all
Literally the best car I’ve ever seen,for some reason I see this as the pinicall of cars and NA engineering too....
I’d take an Nsx type r if there wasn’t any LFA’s availablehehe

unsprung

5,467 posts

124 months

Monday 23rd April 2018
quotequote all
suffolk009 said:
Yup. When I win the Euromillions and go full Jay Leno, an LFA is on my list.
And, when you do, just imagine how much you'll save on clothing! wink

cramorra

1,665 posts

235 months

Monday 23rd April 2018
quotequote all
Magical
And times up for N/A beauties like this sadly
Like to hear one and drive one...

samoht

5,700 posts

146 months

Monday 23rd April 2018
quotequote all

One of the few cars I really lust after. Not too big or heavy, FR but a true sports car, and _that_ motor.

A really nice set of photos in the ad, too - conventional beauty isn't really one of the LFA's attributes, but it looks good.


Vyse

1,224 posts

124 months

Monday 23rd April 2018
quotequote all
Is the motor based on a previous platform or is it brand spanking new?

Amirhussain

11,487 posts

163 months

Monday 23rd April 2018
quotequote all
Defo a car to buy if I ever won it big. The noise alone...

F1GTRUeno

6,353 posts

218 months

Monday 23rd April 2018
quotequote all
They're utterly perfect.