RE: Shed of the Week: Rover Metro

RE: Shed of the Week: Rover Metro

Author
Discussion

Barchettaman

6,308 posts

132 months

Friday 27th April 2018
quotequote all
'Timewarp Deathtrap of the Week'.

No redeeming features.

rallycross

12,790 posts

237 months

Friday 27th April 2018
quotequote all
Low mileage 1 owner metro's always used to turn up, they were never worth anything even when they were like new (although they always seems to have rust in the front wings).
I could be tempted by a nice GTa if one turns up as I have the complete running gear from a Rover 600 ti turbo here, I think a Metro with 200 bhp could surprise a few people!

Valgar

850 posts

135 months

Friday 27th April 2018
quotequote all
The only remotely interesting thing about this is that it's in very good condition for it's age.

I just bought an MG ZT 190+ for £500, to think if I had only saved up a bit more I could've had this!



Narcisus

8,074 posts

280 months

Friday 27th April 2018
quotequote all
My Mrs had a very similar on an L plate. Never missed a beat. Nothing went wrong with it either apart from the rust in the rear arches.

gzylo

35 posts

182 months

Friday 27th April 2018
quotequote all
Why slagging of Chriss Harris smile?

Escort3500

11,902 posts

145 months

Friday 27th April 2018
quotequote all
Valgar said:
The only remotely interesting thing about this is that it's in very good condition for it's age.

I just bought an MG ZT 190+ for £500, to think if I had only saved up a bit more I could've had this!
And had more street cred smile

Greg 172

233 posts

201 months

Friday 27th April 2018
quotequote all
"The price of this car seems challenging verging on cheeky, but we doubt there'll be many cleaner ones out there, and who knows, it might erode a bit after a few weeks on the shelf."

Wait, what's eroding? The price or the car?

mooseracer

1,886 posts

170 months

Friday 27th April 2018
quotequote all
"so even if yours only had the same carburetted 59hp engine as our Shed's"

Surely it would have been fuel injection on a car of this age?

Cambs_Stuart

2,868 posts

84 months

Friday 27th April 2018
quotequote all
Frankly Shed, I'm disappointed. I think you've let yourself down.

Mr2Mike

20,143 posts

255 months

Friday 27th April 2018
quotequote all
Excellent shed, unless you are the kind of cry baby that puts crash performance at the top of your shed purchase requirements. These are getting extremely scarce so a low mileage tidy one has to be worth that. VVC conversions are fun, though it would be shame to mess that around.

jakesmith

9,461 posts

171 months

Friday 27th April 2018
quotequote all
They rebadged it you fool!

seriousrikk

61 posts

129 months

Friday 27th April 2018
quotequote all
Brings back memories of never wanting to go out in the car with my Nan.

Also memories of the two lads who were lucky to survive after then thought their 1.1 metro would be capable of overtaking a bus going up a hill, then protecing them when they realised the error of their ways shortly before being t-boned by my mums Passat on the brow of said hill. The passenger suffered life altering injuries because the car basically crumpled round that heavy five cylinder block of iron at the front of the passat.

Dispised them before I saw what happened to them in a crash. Now I feel strangely drawn to the idea of putting a silly engine (and lots of bracing) in one.

Stop it.

RM

592 posts

97 months

Friday 27th April 2018
quotequote all
r11co said:
Dave Hedgehog said:
just dont crash it biggrin
Or any car designed in the '70's/early '80's, or any pre NCAP car for that matter. In fact ANY car at all as crashing isn't a good idea.

rolleyes

(I didn't think this would make it past half a dozen posts without that old canard getting mentioned).
Yes, but the metro was in the unfortunate position of having been in production for 17 odd years, and still in production, by the time NCAP arrived. Most other 70s designed cars were out of production by 97. Plus the metro had it roots in an early 70s design.

Don't look if you intend to drive a metro into a wall

My wife's had a low-speed rear impact. The other car sustained light damage, and hers was written off due to a rippled boot floor, amongst other things.

KPB1973

918 posts

99 months

Friday 27th April 2018
quotequote all
Nice curio shed. That would make a good long terms investment for someone.

But the memory of once bumping into a 5 door at very low speed still makes me shudder. Busy dual carriageway, two screaming toddlers in the back and a terrified mum just frozen in the driver's seat giggling at me. Bl--dy rear doors had crumped enough to be stuck fast, and the front door handle came off in my hand when I tried to get to her.

Thankfully, a police motorcyclist arrived on scene...took a few notes and then promptly rode off without helping!

AC43

11,486 posts

208 months

Friday 27th April 2018
quotequote all
In the 80's I drove a 1.3 to Skye and back.

I'd normally do that drive in a Alfa but I was doing some mates on bikes a favour. Once I got used to the bus-angle steering wheel it was surprisingly good fun. You could really lean on it in "high speed" corners and make all four skinny tyres squeal for the entire bend.

Dale487

1,334 posts

123 months

Friday 27th April 2018
quotequote all
Hateful little car!

My dad had an Austin Metro City X (lord know how basic the City was, as the City X was a barren as the Employee Quarter), the worse car he has ever owned. And he’s had bog basic Escorts mk5&6, an auto Xsara, 900cc Fiestas. The Metro was cramped, noisy, uncomfortable, got beached on speed bumps, rushed to hell - it made my 106 seem like an S-Class by comparison.


DailyHack

3,174 posts

111 months

Friday 27th April 2018
quotequote all
Tebbers said:
Lynn, I’m not driving a Mini Metro.
Exactly this! This made me laugh!

Trophy Husband

3,924 posts

107 months

Friday 27th April 2018
quotequote all
I had one as my second car. Metro City 1.0l in cream/beige with brown and cream dogtooth nylon/polyester seats. B939 ARN. Real good fun down the lanes. Next was an MG Metro in red. What a hoot that was!!




Wildcat45

8,073 posts

189 months

Friday 27th April 2018
quotequote all
I have soft spot for Metros. Cars don't have to be good for you to like them.

Billed as BL's make or break car in 1980, people raved about them at the time. A classic example of BL hitting on something good and then not developing it. E.g. 10 years before the Range Rover got 4 doors. The Mini in production largely undeveloped for decades.

All the bks about it being dangerous is just that. Clearly next to a modern carr it would be hopeless in a crash, but so would a 1980s Volvo, Jag, Escort. Or anything else from that time. It's probably a horrible car to drive around in as a sole means of transport, but as a classic runaround or a curiosity to have for giggles, then why not?

As for the comment about the rusty bonnet catch. Really?

We never had Metros. My mate had a 1982/3 Turbo in 1989 and it was great fun. Maybe rose tinted glasses are obscuring the view but I like that the 5 MGF and TFs I've had over the past 11 years are related to the Mini Metro.

Now if you hate Metros, you'll hate this. Crazy price but I love the idea of Mum's shopping car filled with posh interior fittings. It's bonkers! I think it's gorgeous and clearly the person who bought it at auction this month agrees.

https://angliacarauctions.co.uk/classic/results/re...


over_the_hill

3,188 posts

246 months

Friday 27th April 2018
quotequote all
I had a slightly later 114 Gta - looked very similar to the older Metro style wise but was a much improved car.
At under 900kg it was pretty nippy, cornered on rails, great in town as you could shoe-horn it into any parking space, boxy shape and tailgate meant that load carrying was impressive - unlike many modern "hatchbacks" and was easy to maintain.

Just a pity that a mini-cab decided to use the rear end as a brake.