Are labour antisemitic?

Author
Discussion

irocfan

Original Poster:

40,389 posts

190 months

Monday 30th July 2018
quotequote all
Another day, another problem for a Jewish labour mp.

This really is getting quite worrying - I know we can laugh at the loony left, but when they stand a good chance of forming the next government with compo as the figurehead it is surely something that should concern us all?

A labour councillor recently made some comments about Jews drinking human blood.
2 Jewish MPs facing "show trials" in a comparative nano-second (look at how long it took to deliberate the Livingston issue).
Arbeit macht frei posted by another councillor on twitter.
A call for a final solution from yet another....

loafer123

15,429 posts

215 months

Monday 30th July 2018
quotequote all

Yes.

Gecko1978

9,684 posts

157 months

Monday 30th July 2018
quotequote all
loafer123 said:
Yes.
Had you askes me pre corbyn I would jave said no. Today answer seems to be yes

Countdown

39,824 posts

196 months

Monday 30th July 2018
quotequote all
irocfan said:
Another day, another problem for a Jewish labour mp.

This really is getting quite worrying - I know we can laugh at the loony left, but when they stand a good chance of forming the next government with compo as the figurehead it is surely something that should concern us all?

A labour councillor recently made some comments about Jews drinking human blood.
2 Jewish MPs facing "show trials" in a comparative nano-second (look at how long it took to deliberate the Livingston issue).
Arbeit macht frei posted by another councillor on twitter.
A call for a final solution from yet another....
Would a fair comparison be to question "Are UKIP racist?"

FWIW I don't think they are. I know quite a few Labour Councillors and Labour members and none have ever said anything or done anything to suggest they're anti-semitic. However that's only anecdotal evidence. Quite a few have made remarks about Israel and especially their policies, something which sometimes gets translated as anti-semitism by those who are pro-Israeli and pro-Settler.

2gins

2,839 posts

162 months

Monday 30th July 2018
quotequote all
The fundamental leftist ideology "We must protect the oppressed minorities" seems to break own when confronted with a minority whose members, for want of a better word, are in the main quite successful, wealthy and/or influential. They don't know what to do and there is an element of comedy value in watching the saga unfold.

abzmike

8,344 posts

106 months

Monday 30th July 2018
quotequote all
I can't work out if Labour are antisemitic or not... there have been so many meetings, reviews, accusations, tweets, articles, splitting infinities etc it is just a blur. However I wouldn't expect in the event of a Labour government being elected there was any greater threat to any religious or racial group than exists now. I am much more concerned that the worst government anyone can remember are driving the country off a cliff (and not just related to Brexit) without any coherent opposition to call them to account, because they are mired in internal issues. They need to stop the navel gazing and start doing what they were elected to do.

williamp

19,248 posts

273 months

Monday 30th July 2018
quotequote all
How can they be? They paid for a fully indipendant review by a fuly indiepndnat labour party member, out of their own party funds, who found that no,they are not anti semetic. And they only gave the author a peerage to the house of lords for it.

As john mcdonnal said: we are anti racist and anti semetic


Johnnytheboy

24,498 posts

186 months

Monday 30th July 2018
quotequote all
Do bears st in the woods?

ScotHill

3,129 posts

109 months

Monday 30th July 2018
quotequote all
Is there really enough Jewish people outside of London to make it worthwhile being anti-Semitic? I've lived in the midlands, northwest and Scotland and while I've come across a fair few Jewish people there's nothing particular about them that would make me think they were a homogenous group to be anti-anythinged. Is this just all about the ones in black hats with the dangly hair?

Johnnytheboy

24,498 posts

186 months

Monday 30th July 2018
quotequote all
ScotHill said:
Is there really enough Jewish people outside of London to make it worthwhile being anti-Semitic? I've lived in the midlands, northwest and Scotland and while I've come across a fair few Jewish people there's nothing particular about them that would make me think they were a homogenous group to be anti-anythinged. Is this just all about the ones in black hats with the dangly hair?
It's about appealing to people that are anti-semitic.

Mothersruin

8,573 posts

99 months

Monday 30th July 2018
quotequote all
It's not just who they're 'anti', it's who they're 'pro', who they apologise for and why.

The Surveyor

7,576 posts

237 months

Monday 30th July 2018
quotequote all
abzmike said:
I can't work out if Labour are antisemitic or not... there have been so many meetings, reviews, accusations, tweets, articles, splitting infinities etc it is just a blur. However I wouldn't expect in the event of a Labour government being elected there was any greater threat to any religious or racial group than exists now. I am much more concerned that the worst government anyone can remember are driving the country off a cliff (and not just related to Brexit) without any coherent opposition to call them to account, because they are mired in internal issues. They need to stop the navel gazing and start doing what they were elected to do.
Good point, Labour need to stop prating about trying (but failing) to defend their underlying hatred of anybody who has done well in life, and start to behave like an effective opposition. That the Conservatives are in a total mess over Brexit, and yet Labour are unable to make hay in the opinion polls shows Labour have lost their momentum.

avinalarf

6,438 posts

142 months

Monday 30th July 2018
quotequote all
Momentum and the far left conflate their opposition to the actions of an Israeli government and jeopardises the State of Israel and its right to exist as a Jewish state, especially when they hold court and are empathetic with the likes of Hammas whose aim is to see an end to the State of Israel by violent actions.
There is an antipathy towards Israel that is voiced in strident terms that are anti semitic and repeat old tropes that are anti semitic.
By legitimising these tropes and anti Semitic views it allows those on the extreme left and right to give full rein to their hatred.
It is accepted that one can criticise an Israeli government and many Jews, in Israel and the diaspora do, so that argument of theirs is a red herring.
It is only 80 years ago that 6 million Jews, men, women and children were slaughtered in concentration camps so is it any wonder that for the present generation the spectre of that unspeakable horror still resonates on their psyche.
Israel to them represents a safe haven if such an atrocity should ever become apparent again so it is within that context that the State of Israel provides them with a sense of security.
The Israel/ Palestinian conflict is very complex and I feel no need to extrapolate on it in this post.
The great majority of Jews would embrace a peaceful solution to that problem that gives both the Palestinians and Israelis peace and security.




TooMany2cvs

29,008 posts

126 months

Monday 30th July 2018
quotequote all
It all comes down to very fine definitions... The IHRA definition has been adopted by the Labour party - but not in full.

The sticking point is whether questioning the legitimacy of the very existence of the Israeli state is anti-semitic or not.

Question the actions of the Israeli government, as you would the actions of any other state? No problem at all within the IHRA definition.

Biker 1

7,724 posts

119 months

Monday 30th July 2018
quotequote all
TooMany2cvs said:
It all comes down to very fine definitions... The IHRA definition has been adopted by the Labour party - but not in full.
This is the bit I don't understand. The definition was presumably thrashed out in a way that is acceptable to all involved, so why can't the labour party sign up like anybody else? The Jewish population in the UK is tiny, so losing their vote will not make much difference in terms of MPs, but why carry on down this path?

avinalarf

6,438 posts

142 months

Monday 30th July 2018
quotequote all
In Syria circa 350,000 people have been killed in the present conflict.
Libya and Iraq are failed states, many killed or displaced, due to the wars fought by the USA and the West, which has abandoned them to their sorry state.
Egypt is in a politically perilous condition, Saudi Arabia is conducting a vicious war with Yemen, Afghanisthan has terrible problems with the Taliban and a resurgence of ISIS.
However the most, if not all, condemnation and vitriol by Momentum and the far left in that region is directed towards Israel.

Edited by avinalarf on Monday 30th July 14:39

loafer123

15,429 posts

215 months

Monday 30th July 2018
quotequote all
Biker 1 said:
TooMany2cvs said:
It all comes down to very fine definitions... The IHRA definition has been adopted by the Labour party - but not in full.
This is the bit I don't understand. The definition was presumably thrashed out in a way that is acceptable to all involved, so why can't the labour party sign up like anybody else? The Jewish population in the UK is tiny, so losing their vote will not make much difference in terms of MPs, but why carry on down this path?
They can't sign up to the unedited version as many senior Labour people have previously made statements which have breached that version.

Mothersruin

8,573 posts

99 months

Monday 30th July 2018
quotequote all
Biker 1 said:
TooMany2cvs said:
It all comes down to very fine definitions... The IHRA definition has been adopted by the Labour party - but not in full.
This is the bit I don't understand. The definition was presumably thrashed out in a way that is acceptable to all involved, so why can't the labour party sign up like anybody else? The Jewish population in the UK is tiny, so losing their vote will not make much difference in terms of MPs, but why carry on down this path?
Because other key support areas love it.

Guybrush

4,342 posts

206 months

Monday 30th July 2018
quotequote all
Yes. The further to the left Labour are going, the more National Socialist they are becoming. We don't ever want such people in power.

AnotherClarkey

3,593 posts

189 months

Monday 30th July 2018
quotequote all
Johnnytheboy said:
It's about appealing to people that are anti-semitic.
Sad to say but I think this is spot on. I suspect that Corbyn has done the sums and thinks he comes out ahead with anti Semitic voters on balance.