RE: New rally Porsche Cayman R-GT set for WRC debut
Discussion
re33 said:
Anyone know what the rules for GT class are? As in how close to standard it is meant to be? Even with going on major diet and significant suspension and gearbox changes I can't see it getting near current WRC cars. Looks and sounds great though.
Fill yer boots: https://www.fia.com/regulation/category/119re33 said:
Anyone know what the rules for GT class are? As in how close to standard it is meant to be? Even with going on major diet and significant suspension and gearbox changes I can't see it getting near current WRC cars. Looks and sounds great though.
Of course they'll never be near the WRC cars, because of 4WD and massive budgets to begin with. But that's not the point of these R-GT cars. On the contrary, being slower, less efficient and more spectacular makes them so right :-)"All cars must be fitted with a restrictor whose diameter is determined by the FIA in order to achieve a weight/power ratio of 3.4 kg/hp"
So a 911 GT3 must weight 1700kg or be restricted. There's something wrong in racing rules when cars have to be castrated in order to be authorized to compete.
Racing cars should be both lighter and more powerful than production versions. It's what's made them special and interesting to watch.
It's so obvious that the FIA don't want them to compete with WRC cars.
So a 911 GT3 must weight 1700kg or be restricted. There's something wrong in racing rules when cars have to be castrated in order to be authorized to compete.
Racing cars should be both lighter and more powerful than production versions. It's what's made them special and interesting to watch.
It's so obvious that the FIA don't want them to compete with WRC cars.
Some more footage of the Cayman.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=atidLxhMlVs
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3hfk-Gqds
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=atidLxhMlVs
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3hfk-Gqds
It's been done before, but with a proper car and and driver (that's not to say Dumas isn't a proper driver) but I'd question whether the GT4 is "proper". The engine certainly isn't, nor is the gearbox from my perspective ....
Fill ya boots and enjoy and genius at work in THE seminal GT3 :
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=grlqdthGIJE
Fill ya boots and enjoy and genius at work in THE seminal GT3 :
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=grlqdthGIJE
pardonmyenglish said:
"All cars must be fitted with a restrictor whose diameter is determined by the FIA in order to achieve a weight/power ratio of 3.4 kg/hp"
So a 911 GT3 must weight 1700kg or be restricted. There's something wrong in racing rules when cars have to be castrated in order to be authorized to compete.
Racing cars should be both lighter and more powerful than production versions. It's what's made them special and interesting to watch.
It's so obvious that the FIA don't want them to compete with WRC cars.
Yes. 1700kg is just a joke. This I find ridiculous. Hardly any encouragement for prospective entrants. Hello, FiA, wake up. Porsche are showing interest in another of your series - sort this rule/reg out, sharpish. Why you want to enter if you can't really be competitive. Nobody really expects them to beat WRCars - but they should be able to get near an R5 on Tarmac (if they were allowed). So a 911 GT3 must weight 1700kg or be restricted. There's something wrong in racing rules when cars have to be castrated in order to be authorized to compete.
Racing cars should be both lighter and more powerful than production versions. It's what's made them special and interesting to watch.
It's so obvious that the FIA don't want them to compete with WRC cars.
Anything that brings more interest to the WRC has got to be good.
998420 said:
2 questions for the cognoscenti..
Foam in the doors.. Is this side impact protection?
The extra front light binnacle/carbuncle?
Standard mandated kit, hence ugly as ****?
Why so, in a world of tiny LED's?
Yes, I suspect the foam is side impact protection. WRC cars run it too.Foam in the doors.. Is this side impact protection?
The extra front light binnacle/carbuncle?
Standard mandated kit, hence ugly as ****?
Why so, in a world of tiny LED's?
As for the lamps, a traditional style lamp can still perform better than LEDs in certain circumstances. Having spoken to a couple of people, a combination of both works well, as spots are apparently still better at providing a focused light for further down the road.
Gassing Station | General Gassing | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff