Is this classed as Undertaking?

Is this classed as Undertaking?

Author
Discussion

32Ford29

Original Poster:

64 posts

92 months

Tuesday 14th August 2018
quotequote all
I have looked at the many threads but cannot see my answer....
So if I am driving in L1 of Mway at a steady 65-70 along with other cars and L2 & L3 are busy with cars that are doing about same speed if I keep my speed steady and keep going is this classed as Undertaking?
Or am I meant to hang my speed back to match the car in L2 so I stay behind?
I always though undertaking was if you deliberately switched lanes to Undertake say L3 to L2 and then back to L3 etc.....

Pericoloso

44,044 posts

163 months

Tuesday 14th August 2018
quotequote all
No.

Pica-Pica

13,764 posts

84 months

Tuesday 14th August 2018
quotequote all
It is not undertaking in my book. Just be aware those in lane 2 may wake up and move to lane 1

vonhosen

40,233 posts

217 months

Tuesday 14th August 2018
quotequote all
32Ford29 said:
I have looked at the many threads but cannot see my answer....
So if I am driving in L1 of Mway at a steady 65-70 along with other cars and L2 & L3 are busy with cars that are doing about same speed if I keep my speed steady and keep going is this classed as Undertaking?
Or am I meant to hang my speed back to match the car in L2 so I stay behind?
I always though undertaking was if you deliberately switched lanes to Undertake say L3 to L2 and then back to L3 etc.....
It has nothing to do with lane changing. Passing on the nearside is undertaking. The highway code says you shouldn't do it, but it then describes limited circumstances where it would be OK, but if you do it when it's OK that doesn't mean it isn't undertaking it just means you've done it in circumstances it was described as OK in the highway code.

PorkRind

3,053 posts

205 months

Tuesday 14th August 2018
quotequote all
Pericoloso said:
No.
Ditto

32Ford29

Original Poster:

64 posts

92 months

Tuesday 14th August 2018
quotequote all
Good as I was having a chat with somebody, who basically told me I must have undertook people for years, I like to think I have good lane discipline etc..Always return to the left lane, never sit in middle lane unnecessarily etc...but now it made me think maybe I was wrong

Douglas Quaid

2,282 posts

85 months

Tuesday 14th August 2018
quotequote all
If you’re in the middle lane you should be able to pull back over to the left lane without indicating at any point. If someone is undertaking and blocking that manoeuvre they’re in the wrong.

InitialDave

11,887 posts

119 months

Tuesday 14th August 2018
quotequote all
PorkRind said:
Ditto
Nor by me.

32Ford29

Original Poster:

64 posts

92 months

Tuesday 14th August 2018
quotequote all
Douglas Quaid said:
If you’re in the middle lane you should be able to pull back over to the left lane without indicating at any point. If someone is undertaking and blocking that manoeuvre they’re in the wrong.
So this is what I mean, so everytime I reach a car in L2 i need to move from L1 to L3 to pass and then back because the wk in L2 cannot pull back in when he should!

MrGTI6

3,160 posts

130 months

Tuesday 14th August 2018
quotequote all
Definitely not undertaking in my opinion. The fault lies with the other driver(s) for lane-hogging.

vonhosen

40,233 posts

217 months

Tuesday 14th August 2018
quotequote all
32Ford29 said:
Douglas Quaid said:
If you’re in the middle lane you should be able to pull back over to the left lane without indicating at any point. If someone is undertaking and blocking that manoeuvre they’re in the wrong.
So this is what I mean, so everytime I reach a car in L2 i need to move from L1 to L3 to pass and then back because the wk in L2 cannot pull back in when he should!
Not every time, it's all in the highway code.
It's quite clearly explained.

HC said:
Rule 268
Do not overtake on the left or move to a lane on your left to overtake. In congested conditions, where adjacent lanes of traffic are moving at similar speeds, traffic in left-hand lanes may sometimes be moving faster than traffic to the right. In these conditions you may keep up with the traffic in your lane even if this means passing traffic in the lane to your right. Do not weave in and out of lanes to overtake.
Edited by vonhosen on Tuesday 14th August 22:06

Wooda80

1,743 posts

75 months

Tuesday 14th August 2018
quotequote all
Douglas Quaid said:
If you’re in the middle lane you should be able to pull back over to the left lane without indicating at any point. If someone is undertaking and blocking that manoeuvre they’re in the wrong.
Can't find that in the Highway Code anywhere... Can you link to the appropriate paragraph?

Or is it from The Road Captain's Handbook?

Pericoloso

44,044 posts

163 months

Tuesday 14th August 2018
quotequote all
Douglas Quaid said:
If you’re in the middle lane you should be able to pull back over to the left lane without indicating at any point. If someone is undertaking and blocking that manoeuvre they’re in the wrong.
Not indicating ,good luck with that.

32Ford29

Original Poster:

64 posts

92 months

Tuesday 14th August 2018
quotequote all
Douglas Quaid said:
If you’re in the middle lane you should be able to pull back over to the left lane without indicating at any point. If someone is undertaking and blocking that manoeuvre they’re in the wrong.
Why would you not indicate?

pingu393

7,784 posts

205 months

Tuesday 14th August 2018
quotequote all
I read on another thread a post from a BiB. He said that an overtake starts with a lane change.

An undertake isn't explained, but the start of the explanation could be reasonably be assumed to be the same as an overtake.

I always watch the front wheels of any car that I undertake. I am ready to react if the wheels start to steer towards me. I do this during overtakes as well, but I am particularly aware when undertaking as the MLM is just that, a Middle Lane Moron and they might do anything.

Mafffew

2,149 posts

111 months

Tuesday 14th August 2018
quotequote all
Douglas Quaid said:
If you’re in the middle lane you should be able to pull back over to the left lane without indicating at any point. If someone is undertaking and blocking that manoeuvre they’re in the wrong.
Absolutely bks.

Drive Blind

5,094 posts

177 months

Tuesday 14th August 2018
quotequote all
Douglas Quaid said:
If you’re in the middle lane you should be able to pull back over to the left lane without indicating at any point. If someone is undertaking and blocking that manoeuvre they’re in the wrong.
you've just made that up

Valgar

850 posts

135 months

Tuesday 14th August 2018
quotequote all
Technically yes, however because the standard of driving is so poor in the UK we're frequently in the position you describe.

I always like to practice defensive driving, if you're undertaking/passing someone on the left you are putting yourself at risk by being where you really shouldn't be. This risk is massively increased with HGVs. Ask yourself, do you trust the guy on the right? I don't.

Additionally if someone were to happen you maybe share responsibility by again, being where you shouldn't be.

Personally I always overtake on the right, I spend 8-10 hours on the road a day and I see how shocking many people can be.

I've recently come back from Europe, driving on the motorways in France and Italy was absolute bliss, to us it seems aggressive but if a car comes up behind you then you get the fk out the way, if you hold that car up, you're the one bring rude, not the car behind flashing the lights, and you know, it works! Just don't drive in an Italian city.

Edited by Valgar on Tuesday 14th August 22:16

vonhosen

40,233 posts

217 months

Tuesday 14th August 2018
quotequote all
pingu393 said:
I read on another thread a post from a BiB. He said that an overtake starts with a lane change.

An undertake isn't explained, but the start of the explanation could be reasonably be assumed to be the same as an overtake.
That's censored

Look at rule 268 I've copied above & look at the 'OR' in the first sentence.

pingu393

7,784 posts

205 months

Tuesday 14th August 2018
quotequote all
vonhosen said:
pingu393 said:
I read on another thread a post from a BiB. He said that an overtake starts with a lane change.

An undertake isn't explained, but the start of the explanation could be reasonably be assumed to be the same as an overtake.
That's censored

Look at rule 268 I've copied above & look at the 'OR' in the first sentence.
Rule 268
Do not overtake on the left or move to a lane on your left to overtake. - Pretty clear, until I read the caveats...

In congested conditions, - define "congested"
where adjacent lanes of traffic are moving at similar speeds - define "similar",
traffic in left-hand lanes may sometimes be moving faster than traffic to the right. In these conditions you may keep up with the traffic in your lane even if this means passing traffic in the lane to your right. - so I can "undertake"
Do not weave in and out of lanes to overtake. - the "undertaker" in this example hasn't changed lanes.


I'm glad that this is so clear.