JLR on 3 day week

Author
Discussion

Olivera

7,131 posts

239 months

Tuesday 29th January 2019
quotequote all
craigjm said:
Olivera said:
craigjm said:
The F-type is far too heavy to really compete for 911 customers
The new 992 Carrera 2S PDK unladen (EU) weight is 1590kg. The F-Type R Dynamic P380 auto book figure is 1594kg.
Compare an SVR to a 991 Turbo S and the difference is 170kg. That’s like carrying two average weight grown men around permanently.
1705 kg for the SVR here: https://www.jaguar.co.uk/Images/Jaguar-F-TYPE-Broc...

1640kg for the 992 Carrera 4S here (Turbo I'd expect to be heavier still): https://www.porsche.com/uk/models/911/911-carrera-...

So again, two figure differences.

havoc

30,052 posts

235 months

Tuesday 29th January 2019
quotequote all
Olivera said:
craigjm said:
Olivera said:
craigjm said:
The F-type is far too heavy to really compete for 911 customers
The new 992 Carrera 2S PDK unladen (EU) weight is 1590kg. The F-Type R Dynamic P380 auto book figure is 1594kg.
Compare an SVR to a 991 Turbo S and the difference is 170kg. That’s like carrying two average weight grown men around permanently.
1705 kg for the SVR here: https://www.jaguar.co.uk/Images/Jaguar-F-TYPE-Broc...

1640kg for the 992 Carrera 4S here (Turbo I'd expect to be heavier still): https://www.porsche.com/uk/models/911/911-carrera-...

So again, two figure differences.
JLR's "book" figures have been proven time and time again to be complete bobbins.

If you want the most accurate data, go to the website of one of the big US auto-magazines - they actually weigh the cars, not just parrot manufacturers figures as a lot of the (lazier) UK journos do.

Some quick googling gives the 992 C2S quoted as 1,515kg in a few different places, US websites included, vs a consistent 1,674kg for the P380 (google even has this as the first result), so there's 160kg difference between two direct-competitor cars, and the heavier one is the 2-seat car with the smaller boot...


I've said it before and I'll say it again, JLR make the heaviest 'lightweight architecture' cars around. Not sure where they're getting their aluminium from...

Olivera

7,131 posts

239 months

Tuesday 29th January 2019
quotequote all
havoc said:
JLR's "book" figures have been proven time and time again to be complete bobbins.
You've made a bobbins of your research. A 1515kg figure for the C2S *exactly* corresponds to the 1590kg on the Porsche UK website minus 75kg for the driver. It's a 1590kg car at EU unladen weight.

The 1674kg f type weight is for the AWD model, if you'd actually read the spec.

Autocar have a tested weight of 1614kg for the 2019 f type p380:

https://www.autocar.co.uk/car-review/jaguar/f-type...

Burwood

18,709 posts

246 months

Tuesday 29th January 2019
quotequote all
Olivera said:
havoc said:
JLR's "book" figures have been proven time and time again to be complete bobbins.
You've made a bobbins of your research. A 1515kg figure for the C2S *exactly* corresponds to the 1590kg on the Porsche UK website minus 75kg for the driver. It's a 1590kg car at EU unladen weight.

The 1674kg f type weight is for the AWD model, if you'd actually read the spec.

Autocar have a tested weight of 1614kg for the 2019 f type p380:

https://www.autocar.co.uk/car-review/jaguar/f-type...
But but. Anyone who buys a p380 over a c2s, money aside is a bit mad smile

havoc

30,052 posts

235 months

Tuesday 29th January 2019
quotequote all
Olivera said:
havoc said:
JLR's "book" figures have been proven time and time again to be complete bobbins.
You've made a bobbins of your research. A 1515kg figure for the C2S *exactly* corresponds to the 1590kg on the Porsche UK website minus 75kg for the driver. It's a 1590kg car at EU unladen weight.

The 1674kg f type weight is for the AWD model, if you'd actually read the spec.

Autocar have a tested weight of 1614kg for the 2019 f type p380:

https://www.autocar.co.uk/car-review/jaguar/f-type...
OK, so your reducing the difference to ONLY 100kg's invalidates the argument, does it?

The less-practical F-Type, like-for-like, is 100kg heavier than a 911. It's also of comparable weight to a (more powerful, more practical) M4 with the heavier DCT, despite being built off a bespoke platform* not a mainstream saloon platform.

None of this would be the end of the world if JLR's marketing department didn't regularly promote their cars as 'light weight' in some form or another...




* Except it's not, as JLR were lazy and used a cut-down X150 platform to save on development costs.

craigjm

17,949 posts

200 months

Tuesday 29th January 2019
quotequote all
Wow one comment about weight and all of a sudden it’s become like some strange slimming world kind of argument. Anyone buying an F type over a 911 or even a Cayman /Boxster would have to be a patriotic nutter IMO regardless of having to carry round one fully grown adult man minimum in extra weight for the prize of less practicality. How Jaguar makes its alluminium cars so heavy is beyond me.

Olivera

7,131 posts

239 months

Tuesday 29th January 2019
quotequote all
havoc said:
OK, so your reducing the difference to ONLY 100kg's invalidates the argument, does it?
It's heavier than quoted and a little heavier than perhaps what it should be.

However let's put it in context to other modern high performance cars.

Evo not so long ago put all the hot saloons (M3, Alfa Quad, C63, RS4 etc) on a weigh bridge. They all were over 1700kg, some over 1800kg. I think the M3 dipped just under the 1700kg mark.

The recent Aston Vantage has been weighed over 1700kg, the Lexus RCF and LC are over 1700kg and 1800kg respectively. The 992 911 is looking like it's going to be a real world 1600kg+.

anonymous-user

54 months

Tuesday 29th January 2019
quotequote all
craigjm said:
Wow one comment about weight and all of a sudden it’s become like some strange slimming world kind of argument. Anyone buying an F type over a 911 or even a Cayman /Boxster would have to be a patriotic nutter IMO regardless of having to carry round one fully grown adult man minimum in extra weight for the prize of less practicality. How Jaguar makes its alluminium cars so heavy is beyond me.
I wonder that, and to make it even stranger their first aluminium car was actually quite light; I drove my 2004 XJ8 onto a weighbridge at a clients site out of curiosity. With 1/4 tank of fuel and me in it the weight was 1678KG so not far off the 1650KG book figure.

Digga

40,316 posts

283 months

Wednesday 30th January 2019
quotequote all
Seanseansean said:
I think they definitely need a bmw 240I/Golf R/Tyre R equivalent to get some younger buyers.
I know most people my age (26) that really like the JLR brand but don’t want a SUV or saloon.
^This. The Project 8 was bonkers, an uber-example of this, but nonetheless pretty successful and a good direction to head toward for a cheaper iteration.

The XE is IMHO a really nice saloon. One of these with the new straight six engine would be superb. Just was the brand needs to lift it's image and bathe the lesser cars in the light of it's halo.

The test driver

1,171 posts

159 months

Wednesday 30th January 2019
quotequote all
Olivera said:
havoc said:
JLR's "book" figures have been proven time and time again to be complete bobbins.
You've made a bobbins of your research. A 1515kg figure for the C2S *exactly* corresponds to the 1590kg on the Porsche UK website minus 75kg for the driver. It's a 1590kg car at EU unladen weight.

The 1674kg f type weight is for the AWD model, if you'd actually read the spec.

Autocar have a tested weight of 1614kg for the 2019 f type p380:

https://www.autocar.co.uk/car-review/jaguar/f-type...
I might have been paid to remove weight from a press car before it went to be weighted once at JLR.

I maybe burning bridges but the part of that company I worked in was god awful anyway.

craigjm

17,949 posts

200 months

Wednesday 30th January 2019
quotequote all
Digga said:
The XE is IMHO a really nice saloon. One of these with the new straight six engine would be superb. Just was the brand needs to lift it's image and bathe the lesser cars in the light of it's halo.
Yup agreed but the interior of the XE is crap. The interior of the XE has current XF is a step back in quality and style from the original XF and current XJ. It doesn’t feel as nice to sit in as the German lot which is a shame.

NickGibbs

1,258 posts

231 months

Wednesday 30th January 2019
quotequote all
The test driver said:
I might have been paid to remove weight from a press car before it went to be weighted once at JLR.

I maybe burning bridges but the part of that company I worked in was god awful anyway.
Which bit of the car did you remove to make it lighter?

The test driver

1,171 posts

159 months

Wednesday 30th January 2019
quotequote all
NickGibbs said:
Which bit of the car did you remove to make it lighter?
NVH ballast weights, sound deadening, spare tyres, tool kits anything that wouldn't be overly noticed and wasn't important to the overall operation especially if it was under a trim or cover it was fair game.

NickGibbs

1,258 posts

231 months

Wednesday 30th January 2019
quotequote all
The test driver said:
NVH ballast weights, sound deadening, spare tyres, tool kits anything that wouldn't be overly noticed and wasn't important to the overall operation especially if it was under a trim or cover it was fair game.
Interesting. Was this specifically so it would weigh less when it was weighed, or to make it more light on its feet on a track test? And what was the car?

The test driver

1,171 posts

159 months

Wednesday 30th January 2019
quotequote all
NickGibbs said:
Interesting. Was this specifically so it would weigh less when it was weighed, or to make it more light on its feet on a track test? And what was the car?
Having just read your occupation I'll stop there thanks.laughlaugh

You'll have to wait for my book, its due when i retire in about 30 years.

WonkeyDonkey

2,338 posts

103 months

Thursday 31st January 2019
quotequote all
The test driver said:
Having just read your occupation I'll stop there thanks.laughlaugh

You'll have to wait for my book, its due when i retire in about 30 years.
You've just ruined Autocars headline for next month!

craigjm

17,949 posts

200 months

Thursday 31st January 2019
quotequote all
Well quality control is still as rubbish as ever

https://www.carscoops.com/2019/01/jaguar-e-pace-su...

Actually delivered to customers and then because there is “no fix” they are offering $600 compensation! Outrageous. I would be driving it straight back and getting my money back.

When are they finally going to learn how to build a car properly. To make it worse these are the cars contracted out in Austria.

anonymous-user

54 months

Thursday 31st January 2019
quotequote all
craigjm said:
Well quality control is still as rubbish as ever

https://www.carscoops.com/2019/01/jaguar-e-pace-su...

Actually delivered to customers and then because there is “no fix” they are offering $600 compensation! Outrageous. I would be driving it straight back and getting my money back.

When are they finally going to learn how to build a car properly. To make it worse these are the cars contracted out in Austria.
Wierd as you'd think it'd be an easy software fix.

Maybe a licensing issue meaning the tech couldn't and cant be used in that territory? As in l, someone at JLR didn't get the licence to use whatever tech it was in the US in time for early deliveries.

craigjm

17,949 posts

200 months

Thursday 31st January 2019
quotequote all
janesmith1950 said:
craigjm said:
Well quality control is still as rubbish as ever

https://www.carscoops.com/2019/01/jaguar-e-pace-su...

Actually delivered to customers and then because there is “no fix” they are offering $600 compensation! Outrageous. I would be driving it straight back and getting my money back.

When are they finally going to learn how to build a car properly. To make it worse these are the cars contracted out in Austria.
Wierd as you'd think it'd be an easy software fix.

Maybe a licensing issue meaning the tech couldn't and cant be used in that territory? As in l, someone at JLR didn't get the licence to use whatever tech it was in the US in time for early deliveries.
It can’t be that because it must have been in the spec that people were expecting. My bet is on something physical missing like a wiring loom meaning that it would be too costly to put right.

Regardless it shouldn’t happen total shambles and knocks the confidence of consumers in their quality

No ideas for a name

2,186 posts

86 months

Thursday 31st January 2019
quotequote all
craigjm said:
It can’t be that because it must have been in the spec that people were expecting. My bet is on something physical missing like a wiring loom meaning that it would be too costly to put right.

Regardless it shouldn’t happen total shambles and knocks the confidence of consumers in their quality
I have something similar in my XF-S. Sold as having a TV tuner, listed on the build spec. as having a TV tuner - it just isn't there. Apparently it can't be retrofitted.